Reviewed by Will Luker, Founder of CCW Hub. USCCA Training Counselor, USCCA Certified Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, Law Enforcement.
Starting August 1, 2026, you cannot buy a "specified semiautomatic firearm" in Colorado until you have done two things in order: gotten a firearms safety course eligibility card from your county sheriff, then passed a Colorado Parks and Wildlife certified firearms safety course. This is C.R.S. 18-12-116, added by Senate Bill 25-003 (2025 Regular Session, ch. 68), which Governor Polis signed on April 10, 2025.
Two things this law does not do. It does not touch firearms you already own. And it is not a concealed carry rule. Your Colorado concealed handgun permit does nothing for you here, and the background check and training you did for your permit do not carry over. CPW is explicit: "All background checks and courses taken for a concealed carry weapon (CCW) are not reciprocal for the Firearms Safety Program."
The card is good for 5 years. The course completion is good for 5 years. The CPW record fee is $52, your sheriff can add a processing fee of their own, and your instructor can charge for the class.
C.R.S. 18-12-116(1)(d)(I) defines a specified semiautomatic firearm (the state and the industry both abbreviate it SSF) as either:
"Detachable magazine" under 18-12-116(1)(b) means a feeding device that is not permanently attached and can be removed without rendering the firearm incapable of accepting any magazine. An attached tubular magazine under the barrel is not a detachable magazine.
"Gas-operated semiautomatic handgun" under 18-12-116(1)(c) means a semiautomatic handgun that traps or harnesses part of the high-pressure gas from a fired cartridge to cycle the action, through a long-stroke piston system, a short-stroke piston system, a direct impingement system that strikes the bolt, bolt carrier, or slide assembly, a hybrid of those, or a blowback-operated system that uses the expanding propellant gasses acting on the cartridge case to drive the breechblock or breech bolt rearward.
C.R.S. 18-12-116(1)(d)(II) carves seven categories out of the definition:
Do not guess from the statutory text. SB25-003 directed the Colorado Department of Revenue division that issues state firearms dealer permits to publish model-specific guidance, and the Firearms Dealer Division (FDD) does that. The FDD published its Specified Semiautomatic Firearms Guidance dated July 1, 2026 at sbg.colorado.gov. In its July 1, 2026 letter to industry, the FDD said it collected feedback for six weeks, reviewed 183 responses, and removed 32 firearms from its initial draft list.
The FDD warns that the list "is not all-inclusive of firearms currently available, or that will be available in the future" and that it is reviewed on an ongoing basis as new firearms are manufactured. If your firearm is not on the list and you need an answer, you can petition the Firearms Dealer Division for a statement of position.
C.R.S. 18-12-116(2) reaches five verbs: manufacture, distribute, transfer, sell, and purchase. Possession is not one of them. There is no registration requirement, no surrender requirement, and no grandfather paperwork for an SSF you already own. CPW puts it plainly: "This law only affects those who will purchase and/or transfer SSFs on or after August 1, 2026."
Carry, transport, and storage rules are unchanged by SB25-003. Those still come from C.R.S. 18-12-105, 18-12-105.6, 18-12-114, and 18-12-114.5.
CPW runs this through an online Firearms Safety System (FSS) at coloradofss.com. The five steps, per CPW's published customer journey:
You can take the course anywhere in Colorado from any verified Firearms Safety Program instructor. You are not limited to your own county for the class, only for the card.
Statutory authority is C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(b). Every sheriff shall issue these cards. Key rules:
Both tiers are set by C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(a). You must already hold a valid eligibility card to enroll, and the instructor has to verify that in the state record system before letting you attend.
| Basic course | Extended course | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum length | 4 hours | 12 hours, spread over at least 2 different days |
| Who it is for | People who have completed a CPW-certified hunter education course (C.R.S. 33-6-107(8)) | People who have not completed hunter education or a CPW firearms safety course |
| Format | In person only | In person only |
| Exam | At least 90% | At least 90% per CPW guidance |
| Good for | 5 years from completion | 5 years from completion |
Three statutory qualifying pathways sit in C.R.S. 18-12-116(3)(e)(I). You may buy an SSF if you:
Hunter education by itself does not qualify you to buy. CPW is direct about this: "Completion of a hunter education course certified by CPW will not qualify you for purchasing a SSF." You still need the Basic course on top of it. If your hunter education came from another state, it has to be CPW-certified, and you must bring your hunter education card or record to a CPW office to get it verified in CPW's records system.
No other firearms safety course counts. Not an NRA course, not a state concealed carry class, not a hunter safety course from a private provider.
When the 5 years runs out, you start over at Step 1.
C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(a)(IV) requires both tiers to satisfy CPW's adopted course requirements and to include, at minimum, instruction on:
C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(a)(V) requires the instructor to give an exam at the end of the course that tests knowledge of the subjects taught and requires the student to demonstrate the ability to safely handle firearms and a mastery of gun safety. The statute sets the passing score for the basic course at at least ninety percent. CPW's published guidance applies the same 90% minimum to the extended course and describes the requirement as passing both a written exam and a hands-on practical at 90% or better.
The instructor has 3 business days after completion to report the result into the state record system created by C.R.S. 33-9-115.
You need two credentials, in this order.
First, sheriff verification under C.R.S. 18-12-202.7. This is the same verified-firearms-instructor status Colorado created for concealed handgun training in HB 24-1174 (effective August 7, 2024). To get it you must:
You apply to the sheriff of the county that is your principal place to conduct firearms training. Verification runs 10 years and can be renewed any time before it expires. The sheriff issues evidence of verification showing the expiration date, keeps a record of verified instructors, and must post the list on the sheriff's website with expiration dates. The sheriff may charge a fee covering actual direct and indirect costs. A sheriff shall revoke your verification if you stop meeting the requirements, and may revoke or suspend it if you teach a concealed handgun class or refresher that fails the Part 2 requirements and a training certificate still gets issued. After a suspension you can apply for reinstatement no earlier than 30 days out. Denials, suspensions, and revocations come with written notice and judicial review under C.R.S. 18-12-207.
Second, CPW's Firearms Safety Program Train the Trainer. CPW's training covers the curriculum, teaching and testing guidelines, and protocols, and walks you through the Firearms Safety System so you can create an account, register students, and enter course completion. The trainings are free, run virtually or in person, and are capped at 50 attendees per class, first come first served. CPW asks you to register for only one session. Sessions CPW has posted run 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. and are virtual: August 21, September 1, October 6, November 17, and December 2, 2026.
Once verified and trained, you appear on CPW's list of verified Firearms Safety Program instructors, and students statewide can take your class. Before class you must check the record system to confirm each student holds a valid eligibility card, and you must confirm which tier they qualify for.
| Date | What happens |
|---|---|
| April 10, 2025 | Governor signs SB25-003. Session Laws of Colorado 2025, ch. 68. Most of the act, including C.R.S. 18-12-116 itself, takes effect on this date. |
| July 1, 2026 | Firearms Dealer Division publishes its Specified Semiautomatic Firearms Guidance list. |
| July 20, 2026 | FSS application portal at coloradofss.com opens at 9:00 a.m. MST. |
| August 1, 2026 | The purchase and transfer prohibition in C.R.S. 18-12-116(2) begins to apply. |
The gap between April 10, 2025 and August 1, 2026 is deliberate. The definitions, the card scheme, the course rules, and the record system all had to exist before the prohibition could bite.
Two practical warnings for the opening weeks. CPW says some counties will not review applications until August 1, 2026, and others are not accepting applications at all, so call your sheriff's office before you submit. And do not read the July 20 portal opening as a head start on the card: the card only matters once you get to a class, and the class only matters once you get to the counter.
C.R.S. 18-12-116(3) exempts these from the purchase and transfer ban:
| Conduct | Grade |
|---|---|
| Unlawful manufacture, distribution, transfer, sale, or purchase of a specified semiautomatic firearm, first offense | Class 2 misdemeanor |
| Second or subsequent offense | Class 6 felony |
| Unlawful sale, transfer, or possession of a large-capacity magazine (C.R.S. 18-12-302(1)(a), as amended by SB25-003) | Class 1 misdemeanor |
| False statement or deliberate material omission on an eligibility card application | Perjury in the second degree, C.R.S. 18-8-503 |
Three collateral consequences ride along, per the SB25-003 bill summary:
SB25-003 also reworked the dangerous weapon list. It defines "rapid-fire device" and classifies rapid-fire devices as dangerous weapons, and it repealed the definition of "machine gun conversion device" and removed those devices from the dangerous weapon list.
SB25-003 is being challenged in federal court, and it has not been enjoined. Treat it as fully enforceable on August 1, 2026 unless and until a court says otherwise.
The case is Del Toro v. Polis, No. 1:25-cv-02725 (D. Colo.), filed September 2, 2025. Plaintiffs are Israel Del Toro, Kathleen Clayton, Luke Sorensen, Nathanael Skiver, Garrett Flicker, Jason Reeves, and the Colorado State Shooting Association, the NRA's Colorado affiliate. Defendants are Governor Jared Polis, Attorney General Philip Weiser, District Attorney Michael J. Allen, and Laura Clellan. The claim is brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and is docketed as a civil rights action. Judge William J. Martinez presides, with Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Mountain States Legal Foundation represents the plaintiffs and argues the permit-to-purchase structure is an unconstitutional prior restraint on the Second Amendment.
Where the case stands, on the public docket as last retrieved February 27, 2026:
Nothing on that docket stops August 1, 2026 from arriving. If you are an instructor, do not tell students the law might not take effect. If you are a buyer, do not plan around an injunction that does not exist. Check the docket or CPW's page before you rely on a change.
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Statute | C.R.S. 18-12-116 |
| Bill | SB25-003, 2025 Regular Session, ch. 68 |
| Signed | April 10, 2025 |
| Prohibition effective | August 1, 2026 |
| Eligibility card issuer | County sheriff |
| Card validity | 5 years |
| CPW record fee | $52 (non-refundable, charged whether or not approved) |
| Sheriff processing fee | Varies by county |
| Basic course | 4 hours minimum, requires CPW-certified hunter education |
| Extended course | 12 hours minimum, across at least 2 different days |
| Passing score | 90% minimum |
| Course completion validity | 5 years |
| Instructor prerequisite | Sheriff verification under C.R.S. 18-12-202.7, then CPW Train the Trainer |
| First offense | Class 2 misdemeanor |
| Repeat offense | Class 6 felony |
| Litigation | Del Toro v. Polis, No. 1:25-cv-02725 (D. Colo.), no injunction |
View this topic on its own page: Other
Colorado is a shall-issue state for concealed handgun permits (CHP), with permits issued at the county level by the local sheriff. Both the U.S. Constitution (Second Amendment) and the Colorado Constitution (Article II, § 13) protect the right to keep and bear arms, while federal, state, and local governments may regulate firearms consistent with constitutional protections.
Colorado operates under a shall-issue concealed carry permit system. County sheriffs are required to issue permits to applicants who meet all statutory criteria under C.R.S. § 18-12-203. A concealed handgun permit authorizes the permittee to carry a concealed handgun throughout the state, except in places prohibited by state or local law (C.R.S. § 18-12-214).
To obtain a concealed handgun permit, an applicant must (C.R.S. § 18-12-203(1)):
Applicants may demonstrate competence through:
HB24-1174, signed by the Governor on June 4, 2024, significantly updated training requirements:
Initial Training Class Requirements (effective July 1, 2025):
Renewal Training Requirements (effective July 1, 2025):
Instructor Verification:
Additional Disqualification (effective August 7, 2024):
A sheriff may deny, revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew a permit if the sheriff has a reasonable belief that the applicant or permittee does not meet the criteria for a permit, or that documented previous behavior by the applicant makes it likely the applicant will present a danger to self or others (C.R.S. § 18-12-203(2) and (3)).
Signed by the Governor on April 10, 2025, SB25-003 prohibits the manufacture, distribution, transfer, sale, and purchase of "specified semiautomatic firearms" (semiautomatic rifles or shotguns with detachable magazines, or gas-operated semiautomatic handguns with detachable magazines) beginning August 1, 2026. Exceptions exist for persons who complete required firearms safety courses, law enforcement, military, and other specified categories. Violations are a class 2 misdemeanor (class 6 felony for second or subsequent offenses).
Colorado's concealed carry permit is recognized by some other states. Permit holders should verify current reciprocity agreements before traveling. The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA) permits nationwide concealed carry by qualified current and retired law enforcement officers.
| Topic | Statute |
|---|---|
| Concealed carry permit requirements | C.R.S. § 18-12-203 |
| Concealed carry permit authority | C.R.S. § 18-12-214 |
| Unlawful carrying of concealed weapon | C.R.S. § 18-12-105 |
| Permit fees | C.R.S. §§ 18-12-205(2)(b), 18-12-211(1) |
| Permit renewal | C.R.S. § 18-12-211 |
| Schools prohibition | C.R.S. § 18-12-105.5 |
| Government buildings prohibition | C.R.S. § 18-12-105.3 |
| Vehicle carry | C.R.S. §§ 18-12-105(2), 18-12-105.6 |
| Local government authority | C.R.S. §§ 29-11.7-103, 29-11.7-104 |
| Background checks | C.R.S. §§ 18-12-112, 18-12-112.5 |
| Large-capacity magazines | C.R.S. § 18-12-301 et seq. |
| Safe storage | C.R.S. §§ 18-12-114, 18-12-114.5 |
| Extreme risk protection orders | Title 13, Article 14.5, C.R.S. |
| Ghost guns | C.R.S. § 18-12-111.5 |
| Specified semiautomatic firearms | C.R.S. § 18-12-116 |
| Training class standards (HB24-1174) | Session Laws Ch. 388 (2024) |
Note: This overview is based on Colorado law as of early 2025, including HB24-1174 (signed June 4, 2024, with portions effective August 7, 2024 and July 1, 2025) and SB25-003 (signed April 10, 2025, with key provisions effective August 1, 2026). Colorado firearms law is subject to ongoing legislative changes and local government regulations. Consult the full Colorado Revised Statutes and your local sheriff's office for the most current requirements.
Concealed Handgun Permits (CHP) are issued by the Sheriff of the county in which the applicant resides. [C.R.S. 18-12-203]
Colorado issues a statewide concealed handgun permit. The law enabling statewide permits took effect May 18, 2003.
Applicants must be 21 years of age at the time of application.
Applicants must demonstrate competence with a handgun through one of the following:
Completion of an initial concealed handgun training class within 1 year before submitting the application. The class must:
Honorable discharge from a branch of the U.S. Armed Forces within 3 years preceding the application
Honorable discharge from a branch of the U.S. Armed Forces with pistol qualifications obtained within 10 years preceding the application
Current certification as a peace officer (pursuant to Article 2.5 of Title 16)
Evidence of being a verified instructor at the time of application
Evidence of experience with a firearm through participation in organized shooting competitions or current military service
Certificate showing retirement from a Colorado Law Enforcement Agency with pistol qualifications within 10 years preceding the application
Beginning July 1, 2025, renewal applicants must also demonstrate competence with a handgun through one of the following:
Completion of a concealed handgun refresher class within 6 months before submitting the renewal application. The refresher class must:
Participation in organized shooting competitions
Current military service
Current certification as a peace officer
Being a verified instructor for firearms safety courses
Honorable discharge from a branch of the U.S. Armed Forces with pistol qualifications within 10 years prior to submitting the renewal
Retirement from a Colorado law enforcement agency with pistol qualifications within 10 years prior to submitting the renewal
County sheriffs must verify training instructors whose principal place of business for firearms training is in the sheriff's county. To be verified, a person must:
| Fee Type | Amount |
|---|---|
| New permit application | $152.50 (non-refundable) |
| Renewal permit application | $63 (non-refundable) |
| Late renewal fee (expired permit) | $15 |
| Replacement permit | $15 |
Note: Fees may vary by county. Consult your local Sheriff's Department for specific fee schedules. The Colorado Department of Public Safety directs applicants to the CBI website for current CHP fees.
By law, the sheriff has 90 days from receipt of the application to perform a background check and either approve or deny the request for a concealed handgun permit.
View this topic on its own page: Colorado Concealed Carry Permit Basics
Colorado is a shall-issue state for concealed handgun permits (CHPs). A permit is required to carry a concealed handgun on one's person in public. The concealed carry permit system is governed primarily by C.R.S. Title 18, Article 12, Part 2 (sections 18-12-201 through 18-12-214).
Carrying a concealed firearm without a valid permit is a criminal offense under C.R.S. 18-12-105. As amended by recent legislation, unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon is a class 1 misdemeanor.
Under C.R.S. 18-12-105(2), it is not an offense to carry a concealed weapon if the person is:
Key Note: A permit is not required and a handgun is not considered concealed when a person is in a private automobile or other private transportation. [C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)]
Concealed handgun permits are issued by the Sheriff of the county in which the applicant:
[C.R.S. 18-12-203]
Applicants must meet the requirements specified in C.R.S. 18-12-203(1). The application form requires disclosure of the following disqualifying factors:
House Bill 24-1174 established new standardized training requirements for concealed handgun permits. Key provisions:
Training must demonstrate competence with a handgun as specified in C.R.S. 18-12-203(1)(h).
Fees vary by county. Example from Morgan County:
The Colorado Department of Public Safety directs applicants to the CBI website for current statewide CHP fee schedules.
Under C.R.S. 18-12-214, a concealed handgun permit does not authorize carrying in the following locations:
Colorado law allows a person to carry a firearm in a vehicle if its use is for lawful protection of such person's or another's person or property. [C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)]
Open carry of firearms is regulated by local county and municipal authorities. There is no statewide preemption for open carry. Individuals should check local municipal codes for specific restrictions.
When carrying concealed with a permit:
The federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act permits nationwide carrying of concealed handguns by qualified current and retired law enforcement officers, exempting them from state and local concealed carry prohibitions. Colorado has specific application processes for retired/separated law enforcement officers.
An applicant who knowingly and intentionally makes a false or misleading statement on a permit application or deliberately omits material information commits perjury under C.R.S. 18-8-503. Upon conviction:
House Bill 13-1224 prohibits the sale, transfer, and possession of "large-capacity ammunition magazines" in Colorado. This applies to concealed carry permit holders as well.
Colorado has reciprocity agreements with certain states. Ohio's Attorney General office lists a Colorado Concealed Carry Reciprocity Agreement. Pennsylvania's reciprocity summary indicates that Colorado does not allow Pennsylvania residents to apply for a Colorado CHP (residents-only state). Permit holders should verify current reciprocity status with specific states before traveling.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| C.R.S. 18-12-105 | Unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon |
| C.R.S. 18-12-105.1 | Former permit system (repealed) |
| C.R.S. 18-12-105.3 | Government building restrictions |
| C.R.S. 18-12-105.5 | Child care center/college restrictions |
| C.R.S. 18-12-105.6 | Preemption of local laws on vehicle carry |
| C.R.S. 18-12-203 | Permit application requirements |
| C.R.S. 18-12-214 | Authority granted by permit; carrying restrictions |
| C.R.S. 18-8-503 | Perjury |
| C.R.S. 1-13-724 | Firearms at polling locations |
| C.R.S. 29-11.7-102 | Prohibition on gun registration |
N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen (2022). Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), eliminated "proper cause" / "good cause" discretionary CCW frameworks and required states to apply objective issuance criteria. The decision converted formerly may-issue states to shall-issue. States that were already shall-issue or permitless before Bruen experience the case primarily through its broader historical-tradition test for evaluating subsequent Second Amendment claims.
View this topic on its own page: Colorado Concealed Carry Laws
Colorado is generally an open carry state at the state level. There is no state statute that broadly prohibits the open carrying of firearms. To lawfully possess a firearm in Colorado, a person must be at least 18 years old and must not have any state or federal prohibitions [C.R.S. 18-12-108.5; see also Colorado Department of Public Safety firearms FAQ].
However, open carry is significantly regulated by local authorities and restricted in certain sensitive locations by state law.
According to the Colorado Department of Public Safety:
"The actual open carrying of firearms is regulated by local county and municipal authorities. Confirmation of open carry municipal code restrictions would have to be done with those local authorities."
This means that individual cities and counties may enact their own restrictions or prohibitions on open carry. Most city municipal codes are posted online for public review. Persons wishing to open carry should verify the specific rules of the municipality or county they are in.
Notable local restrictions include:
Local governments that prohibit open carry of firearms in a building or specific area must post signs at public entrances informing persons that open carry is prohibited [C.R.S. 29-11.7-104(1)].
Colorado's preemption framework for firearms regulation is nuanced:
Local-government authority over open carry is set by C.R.S. 29-11.7-104 and the preemption provisions above. Because the sensitive-space rules were amended by SB 24-131 (2024) and the polling-place statute (C.R.S. 1-13-724) was further amended in 2026 by HB 1113, verify the current text of any local ordinance and the state statute before relying on a specific restriction.
Effective July 1, 2024, SB24-131 ("Prohibiting Carrying Firearms in Sensitive Spaces," Session Laws Ch. 301) significantly expanded the locations where carrying firearms is prohibited. For government buildings and educational facilities, the act prohibits carrying firearms both openly and concealed, and violations are a class 1 misdemeanor. The act also amended the existing polling location restrictions under C.R.S. 1-13-724, though those restrictions remain limited to open carry (see below).
Exceptions for government buildings include:
Note: Separate from SB24-131, C.R.S. 18-12-105.5 also addresses unlawful carrying and possession of weapons on school, college, or university grounds.
Exceptions for educational facilities include:
Important: The prohibition at polling locations and election facilities under C.R.S. 1-13-724 (originally enacted by HB22-1086, the "Vote Without Fear Act") applies specifically to openly carrying a firearm. Unlike the government buildings and educational facilities provisions above, this section was not expanded to cover concealed carry. SB24-131's amendments to C.R.S. 1-13-724 added security personnel described in C.R.S. 24-33.5-216.7(5) to the list of exceptions and updated legislative declaration language, but retained the "openly carry" scope of the prohibition in subsections (3)(a) and (3)(b).
Penalties for violations at polling locations (per HB22-1086 as amended):
Exceptions at polling locations include:
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. The Court held that firearms regulations must be consistent with the historical tradition of firearm regulation in America.
Significantly, the Court noted a historical consensus that States could not altogether prohibit the public carry of arms. The Court observed that antebellum courts consistently held that concealed-carry prohibitions were constitutional only if they did not similarly prohibit open carry. As the Court stated: "[T]hese antebellum state-court decisions evince a consensus view that States could not altogether prohibit the public carry of 'arms' protected by the Second Amendment." This historical analysis supports the view that open carry enjoys strong constitutional protection, even as concealed carry may be regulated.
Colorado law allows a person to carry a firearm in a vehicle if its use is for lawful protection of such person or another's person or property [C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)]. A handgun is not considered concealed when a person is in a private automobile or other private transportation [C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)].
Under Title 33 (wildlife laws), it is unlawful to possess any firearm other than a pistol or revolver in or on a motor vehicle unless the chamber is unloaded [C.R.S. 33-6-125].
Open carry is permitted in Colorado National Forests, subject to both state laws and federal regulations. A firearm may not be discharged in the following areas:
Some forests or districts have additional restrictions on discharging a firearm. Check with local forest authorities before visiting.
Per 16 USC 1a-7b, a person may possess a firearm in any national park if such possession complies with the laws of the state in which the park is located. Colorado's state laws therefore apply in Colorado national parks.
However, firearms are prohibited in federal facilities - defined as buildings or parts thereof owned or leased by the Federal Government where federal employees are regularly present for official duties. In national parks, such facilities may include visitor centers, administrative offices, and maintenance buildings, and will be clearly marked with signs at all public entrances [18 USC 930].
Colorado prohibits gun registration [C.R.S. 29-11.7-102].
Several additional Colorado statutes may affect persons who open carry:
SB25-003 ("Semiautomatic Firearms & Rapid-Fire Devices"), signed by the Governor on April 10, 2025, prohibits the manufacture, distribution, transfer, sale, and purchase of specified semiautomatic firearms on or after August 1, 2026, with certain exceptions including completion of required firearms safety courses. This law does not directly change open carry rules but affects the types of firearms that may be lawfully acquired going forward.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| C.R.S. 18-12-105 | Unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon; vehicle exceptions |
| C.R.S. 18-12-105.5 | Weapons on school, college, or university grounds |
| C.R.S. 18-12-105.6 | Preemption of local travel restrictions; reciprocity |
| C.R.S. 18-12-106 | Prohibited use of weapons |
| C.R.S. 18-12-108 | Possession of weapons by previous offenders |
| C.R.S. 18-12-108.5 | Possession of weapons by juveniles |
| C.R.S. 18-12-113 | Failure to report lost or stolen firearm |
| C.R.S. 18-12-114 | Secure firearm storage required |
| C.R.S. 18-12-115 | Waiting period for firearm sales |
| C.R.S. 18-12-203 | Concealed handgun permit requirements |
| C.R.S. 29-11.7-102 | Prohibition on gun registration |
| C.R.S. 29-11.7-103 | Prohibition on local regulation of firearm types |
| C.R.S. 29-11.7-104 | Local government authority to regulate open carry; posting requirements |
| C.R.S. 33-6-125 | Wildlife laws - firearms in vehicles |
| C.R.S. 1-13-724 | Vote Without Fear Act - firearms at polling locations (HB22-1086) |
| SB24-131 (Session Laws Ch. 301) | Sensitive spaces firearms prohibition (effective July 1, 2024) |
| SB25-003 (Session Laws Ch. 68) | Semiautomatic firearms restrictions (signed April 10, 2025) |
| HB 13-1224 | Large-capacity ammunition magazine prohibition |
View this topic on its own page: Open Carry
Colorado does not have constitutional carry (also known as permitless carry). A concealed carry permit is required to legally carry a concealed handgun in the state. Under C.R.S. § 18-12-105, carrying a concealed firearm on or about one's person without a valid permit is a Class 1 misdemeanor (reclassified from Class 2 by SB 24-131, eff. July 1, 2024).
Under C.R.S. § 18-12-105(1)(b), a person commits a Class 1 misdemeanor (reclassified from Class 2 by SB 24-131, eff. July 1, 2024) if they knowingly and unlawfully carry a firearm concealed on or about their person.
Exceptions to the concealed carry prohibition (where it is not an offense) include:
Multiple attempts have been made in the Colorado General Assembly to pass constitutional carry legislation. All have failed:
View this topic on its own page: Constitutional Carry
Colorado law designates several categories of locations where carrying firearms (including concealed carry with a permit) is prohibited. The following information reflects current law as of July 1, 2024, when SB24-131 took effect.
A person shall not knowingly carry a firearm, whether loaded or not, in the following government buildings including their adjacent parking areas:
State Legislative Buildings:
Local Government Buildings (unless the local government enacts a law permitting carry):
Courthouses:
Penalty: Unlawful carrying of a firearm in a government building is a class 1 misdemeanor.
Exceptions to the government buildings prohibition:
A person shall not knowingly carry a firearm, either openly or concealed, in or on the real estate and all improvements erected thereon of:
Penalty: Violation is a class 1 misdemeanor.
Exceptions:
It is unlawful for any person to carry a firearm in any manner (openly or concealed) at:
The designated election official shall visibly place a sign notifying persons of the 100-foot no-carry zone.
Penalty: Misdemeanor, punishable by a maximum $250 fine and up to 120 days' imprisonment in county jail; a second or subsequent offense is punishable by a maximum $1,000 fine and up to 364 days' imprisonment.
Exceptions:
Local governments have additional authority to restrict firearms:
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| § 18-12-105.3, C.R.S. | Unlawful carrying in government buildings |
| § 18-12-105.5, C.R.S. | Unlawful carrying on school, college, university, and child care center grounds |
| § 1-13-724, C.R.S. | Unlawful carrying at polling locations and drop boxes |
| § 18-12-105, C.R.S. | Concealed carry without a permit |
| § 18-12-214, C.R.S. | Authority of permit; local government restrictions |
| § 29-11.7-104, C.R.S. | Local government authority to regulate open carry |
| § 18-12-203, C.R.S. | Concealed carry permit criteria |
View this topic on its own page: Prohibited Places
Colorado law permits carrying firearms in vehicles under the following provisions:
Lawful Protection Exception: Colorado allows a person to carry a firearm in a vehicle if its use is for lawful protection of such person or another person's person or property. [C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)]
Possession in an Automobile: Colorado law allows a person to possess a handgun in a dwelling, place of business, or automobile. However, when you carry the weapon into your home, business, hotel room, etc., it must be in plain view. [C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)]
No Concealed Carry Permit Required in a Vehicle: A permit is not required and a handgun is not considered concealed when a person is in a private automobile or other private transportation. [C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)]
Local Preemption: Local jurisdictions may not enact laws that restrict a person's ability to travel with a weapon. [C.R.S. 18-12-105.6]
Long Guns Must Have Unloaded Chambers: In accordance with Colorado wildlife laws, including C.R.S. 33-6-125, you may carry a weapon in your vehicle. However, it is unlawful for any person, except a person authorized by law or by the division (Colorado Parks and Wildlife), to possess or have under his control any firearm, other than a pistol or revolver, in or on any motor vehicle unless the chamber of such firearm is unloaded.
Muzzle-Loaders: A muzzle-loader shall be considered unloaded if it is not primed. For this purpose, "primed" means having a percussion cap on the nipple or flint in the striker and powder in the flash pan.
| Firearm Type | Vehicle Carry Rule |
|---|---|
| Handguns (pistols/revolvers) | May be carried in a vehicle (loaded, concealed or not) without a concealed carry permit for lawful protection [C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)] |
| Long guns (rifles/shotguns) | May be carried in a vehicle but the chamber must be unloaded per wildlife law [C.R.S. 33-6-125] |
| Muzzle-loaders | Must be unprimed (no percussion cap on nipple, no flint in striker, no powder in flash pan) [C.R.S. 33-6-125] |
National Parks: In accordance with 16 USC 1a-7b, in any national park in Colorado, a person may possess a firearm if such possession is in compliance with Colorado state law. However, firearms are prohibited in "Federal facilities" (visitor centers, administrative offices, maintenance buildings) per 18 USC 930. Such facilities will be clearly marked with signs at all public entrances.
National Forests: You may carry a weapon while visiting National Forests in Colorado. However, you must comply with federal regulations pertaining to the use of a firearm on National Forest System lands. Discharge restrictions apply per 36 CFR 261.10(d):
View this topic on its own page: Vehicle Carry
Colorado honors concealed carry permits from 34 states, but only when the permit was issued to a resident of that state. This is the single rule that catches the most travelers, and it catches Colorado residents too. If you hold a non-resident permit from Utah, Florida, Arizona, or anywhere else, that permit is worthless in Colorado. It does not matter that the issuing state is on Colorado's reciprocity list. What matters is that the state on your permit matches the state on your driver's license.
The rule comes from C.R.S. 18-12-213, which was amended in 2007 to add the residency-match requirement. The statute says a permit issued by another state is valid in Colorado only if it was issued to a person who is "[a] resident of the state that issued the permit, as demonstrated by the address stated on a valid picture identification that is issued by the state that issued the permit and is carried by the permit holder." The Colorado Bureau of Investigation, which distributes the reciprocity determination to Colorado law enforcement through the CCIC system, puts it plainly: "The State of Colorado does not recognize the validity of a concealed carry permit issued by any state, to a nonresident of that state (see C.R.S 18-12-213, as amended in 2007). Specifically, state law requires the state of residency of the person and the state of issue of a permit to match as proven by a valid driver's license or identification card issued by that same state."
CBI restates C.R.S. 18-12-213 as a checklist. Colorado recognizes an out-of-state permit only if all of the following are true:
Two details about the ID. First, C.R.S. 18-12-213(2) defines "valid picture identification" narrowly: it "means a driver's license or a state identification issued in lieu of a driver's license." A passport, a military ID, or a concealed carry card that happens to have your photo on it does not satisfy this element. Second, the ID has to be on you. The statute requires that it "is carried by the permit holder." A Wyoming permit plus a Wyoming driver's license left in the hotel room is not a compliant carry.
Note what is not on the list. Colorado imposes no permit-class qualifier. Neither the statute nor CBI's reciprocity page distinguishes between "enhanced" and "standard" permits, between North Dakota Class 1 and Class 2, or between resident-issued permit tiers within a recognized state. The only conditions are the five above.
This is the part most guides get wrong. CBI states it directly:
"In addition to out of state visitors from reciprocal states, this state law also applies to Colorado residents. A Colorado resident may only carry concealed in the state using a Colorado Concealed Handgun Permit (CHP). A Colorado resident cannot legally carry concealed in-state using a nonresident permit issued by any other state."
The mechanism is the same residency-match test. If you live in Colorado and carry a Colorado driver's license, then no other state's permit can satisfy C.R.S. 18-12-213(1)(b)(I), because the address on your picture ID will never match the issuing state. The non-resident Utah or Florida permit that a Colorado resident buys to widen their travel options does nothing for them at home. It is not a shortcut around the Colorado application, the county sheriff, or the training requirement.
The practical consequence is a criminal charge, not a warning. Carrying a concealed firearm in Colorado is a class 1 misdemeanor under C.R.S. 18-12-105(1)(b) unless an exception in subsection (2) applies. The permit exception at C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)(c) covers a person who "held a valid permit to carry a concealed handgun or a temporary emergency permit issued pursuant to part 2 of this article." A reciprocal out-of-state permit reaches that exception only because C.R.S. 18-12-213 declares it "valid in this state in all respects as a permit issued pursuant to this part 2." Fail any of the five conditions and the permit is not valid in Colorado, the exception does not attach, and you are carrying concealed without a permit.
Per the CBI Concealed Handgun Permit (CHP) Reciprocity page, "[c]oncealed carry reciprocity has been established with the following states" (34 states):
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The archived handgunlaw.us Colorado summary, last updated June 7, 2026, lists the identical 34 states, which corroborates the CBI page as current.
This is the half that produces arrests, so know it cold. Per the same CBI page, reciprocity "has not been established with the following states" (15 states plus the District of Columbia):
California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, and Washington.
A resident-issued permit from any of these jurisdictions is not honored in Colorado. A Nevada resident with a Nevada CCW permit and a Nevada driver's license, all valid, still cannot carry concealed in Colorado. Two of Colorado's own neighbors are on this list, Nevada is a short drive from the western slope, and Washington and Oregon feed a lot of I-70 and I-25 traffic.
Together the two lists cover 49 states plus the District of Columbia, with Colorado itself as the fiftieth state. CBI's page does not address permits issued by Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or other U.S. territories, and the statute does not mention territories either. Treat territorial permits as unrecognized until CBI says otherwise.
Tribal land is a second silence of the same kind. Neither C.R.S. 18-12-213 nor the CBI reciprocity page says anything about the Southern Ute Indian Reservation or the Ute Mountain Ute Reservation in southwestern Colorado, so nothing in this corpus tells you what carry rules apply there. Treat tribal land as its own jurisdiction and check tribal law directly before carrying on a reservation.
Failing the C.R.S. 18-12-213 test does not strip you of every lawful option. It ends concealed carry on a permit. Four things in the Colorado and federal texts still work, and they are narrower than most travelers assume.
Your own dwelling, business, or property. C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)(a) says the concealed-carry offense does not reach "[a] person in his or her own dwelling or place of business or on property owned or under his or her control at the time of the act of carrying." Whether a hotel room or a short-term rental is "owned or under his or her control" is not answered by any source in this corpus. Do not treat a vacation rental as settled ground.
A private vehicle while traveling. C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)(b) exempts "[a] person in a private automobile or other private means of conveyance who carries a weapon for lawful protection of such person's or another's person or property while traveling." C.R.S. 18-12-204(3)(a) says the same thing from the permit side. A person who may lawfully possess a handgun may carry it "without obtaining a permit and the handgun shall not be considered concealed" when "[t]he handgun is in the possession of a person who is in a private automobile or in some other private means of conveyance and who carries the handgun for a legal use, including self-defense."
Lawful hunting. C.R.S. 18-12-204(3)(a)(II) gives the same not-considered-concealed treatment to a handgun in the possession of "a person who is legally engaged in hunting activities within the state." Subsection (3)(b) caps both branches: nothing in subsection (3) "shall be construed to authorize the carrying of a handgun in violation of the provisions of section 18-12-105 or 18-12-105.5."
Federal safe passage if you are only passing through. 18 U.S.C. 926A, as scraped from Cornell's U.S. Code archive, entitles a person not otherwise prohibited "to transport a firearm for any lawful purpose from any place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm to any other place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm," on stated conditions: "the firearm is unloaded, and neither the firearm nor any ammunition being transported is readily accessible or is directly accessible from the passenger compartment of such transporting vehicle," and "in the case of a vehicle without a compartment separate from the driver's compartment the firearm or ammunition shall be contained in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console." That is a transport protection, not a carry protection. It covers the driver crossing Colorado on I-70 or I-25 whose firearm is legal at both ends of the trip. It does not permit loaded, accessible carry, and by its own terms it does nothing for a trip that begins or ends in a place where you may not lawfully possess and carry.
The hinge on all of this is the car door. Both vehicle provisions are about being in a private conveyance. Step out into a parking lot with a handgun concealed on you and no recognized permit, and you are carrying a concealed weapon under C.R.S. 18-12-105(1)(b) with no exception to point at. Whether you could instead carry openly outside the vehicle is a different question under different rules, including local ordinances, and this section does not answer it. See the Open Carry section. Nothing here is permission to carry openly.
"No recognized permit means no concealed carry" has one federal exception that has nothing to do with C.R.S. 18-12-213.
18 U.S.C. 926B, from the Cornell U.S. Code archive in this corpus, provides that "[n]otwithstanding any other provision of the law of any State or any political subdivision thereof, an individual who is a qualified law enforcement officer and who is carrying the identification required by subsection (d) may carry a concealed firearm that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, subject to subsection (b)." 18 U.S.C. 926C does the same for a "qualified retired law enforcement officer." Both are federal grants that run directly against state law, so an officer relying on one of them is not asking Colorado to honor a state permit, and the residency-match rule in 18-12-213 is beside the point.
Two limits matter as much as the grant:
The statutory definitions of "qualified law enforcement officer" and "qualified retired law enforcement officer" in 926B(c) and 926C(c) are detailed, and they do the real work of deciding who is covered. Read them before relying on either section.
Colorado's recognition is automatic by statute, not the product of a signed memorandum. CBI explains the design: "Colorado state law passes the authority to grant a reciprocal status to the other states, once our Colorado permit is honored, reciprocity may be established."
Read C.R.S. 18-12-213(1) and you can see why. The statute conditions Colorado's recognition on the issuing state's behavior: a permit "issued by a state that recognizes the validity of permits issued pursuant to this part 2 shall be valid in this state." There is no separate step where Colorado decides to reciprocate, no formal agreement to sign, and no termination clause to invoke. When another state starts honoring Colorado CHPs, Colorado's recognition follows from the statute. When another state stops, Colorado's recognition drops out the same way. That is why the CBI list can change without any legislative action in Colorado.
C.R.S. 18-12-213(1)(b)(II) gives new residents a short bridge. Instead of proving residency in the issuing state, you can qualify as "[a] resident of Colorado for no more than ninety days, as determined by the date of issuance on a valid picture identification issued by Colorado and carried by the permit holder."
Read the clock carefully, because it is not measured from the day you moved:
One tension worth naming. On the face of the statute, subsection (1)(b)(II) does not require the prior permit to have been resident-issued, which would suggest a brand-new Colorado resident could ride out ninety days on a non-resident Utah card. CBI does not read it that way. CBI's page states the non-resident bar absolutely, with no ninety-day carve-out, and then applies it to Colorado residents by name. CBI is the agency that pushes this determination to Colorado law enforcement through CCIC, so the practical answer is that a non-resident permit will not be honored by an officer on the roadside regardless of how long you have lived here. Do not plan around the textual argument.
C.R.S. 18-12-213 makes a recognized permit valid "in all respects as a permit issued pursuant to this part 2." That cuts both ways. You get the same authority a Colorado permittee gets, and you inherit the same limits. Under C.R.S. 18-12-214, a part 2 permit authorizes carry "in all areas of the state, except as specifically limited in this section," and those limits apply to you as a visitor:
Two more points from the same statute. A peace officer may temporarily disarm you incident to a lawful stop and must return the handgun before releasing you from the scene, per subsection (1)(b). And carrying a concealed handgun in violation of C.R.S. 18-12-214 strips the permit exception in C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)(c), which converts a location violation back into a class 1 misdemeanor concealed-carry charge.
See the Prohibited Places section for the full list. Colorado has been an active jurisdiction for new location restrictions, and a visitor relying on a two-year-old list will be behind.
The "in all respects as a permit issued pursuant to this part 2" language in C.R.S. 18-12-213 hands a visitor duties along with authority. C.R.S. 18-12-204(2)(a) applies to you exactly as it applies to a Colorado permittee:
"The permittee shall carry the permit, together with valid photo identification, at all times during which the permittee is in actual possession of a concealed handgun and shall produce both documents upon demand by a law enforcement officer. Failure to produce a permit upon demand by a law enforcement officer raises a rebuttable presumption that the person does not have a permit. Failure to carry and produce a permit and valid photo identification upon demand as required in this subsection (2) is a petty offense."
The same subsection supplies a cure for the paperwork offense. The charge "shall be dismissed by the court if, at or before the permittee's scheduled court appearance, the permittee exhibits to the court a valid permit and valid photo identification, both of which were issued to the permittee prior to the date on which the permittee was charged with failure to carry and produce a permit and valid photo identification upon demand."
Now notice how the two requirements overlap. For a visitor, the "valid photo identification" that 18-12-204(2)(a) demands and the matching home-state "valid picture identification" that 18-12-213(1)(b)(I) demands are the same card. One forgotten wallet defeats both at once, and the two failures are not equally survivable:
See the Duty to Inform section for what you have to say, and when, during the encounter that produces this demand.
A permit, honored or Colorado-issued, is permission to carry concealed. It is not permission to possess something Colorado bans, and it is not a key to places closed to everyone. Three items catch visitors.
Magazines. C.R.S. 18-12-302(1)(a) makes it a class 1 misdemeanor to sell, transfer, or possess a large-capacity magazine, "[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section," and (1)(c) raises it to a class 6 felony where the possession occurs during a felony or a crime of violence. The grandfather in subsection (2)(a) is narrow. A person may possess a large-capacity magazine only if he or she "[o]wns the large-capacity magazine on July 1, 2013" and "[m]aintains continuous possession of the large-capacity magazine." A magazine bought lawfully in another state in 2020 satisfies neither prong. Nothing in 18-12-213, 18-12-204, or 18-12-214 creates a permit exception to 18-12-302. Subsection (2)(b) does place the burden of refuting a claimed grandfather on the prosecution, which is a trial rule, not a travel plan.
Specified semiautomatic firearms. Senate Bill 25-003, per the General Assembly's own bill summary, "prohibits knowingly manufacturing, distributing, transferring, selling, or purchasing a specified semiautomatic firearm on or after August 1, 2026," and channels lawful purchases through a hunter education or firearms safety course path plus a sheriff-issued firearms course eligibility card. That regime attaches to acquisition in Colorado, not to a carry permit. A visiting permit holder who buys a covered firearm in Colorado is inside the SB25-003 rules no matter what permit is in the wallet. See the Restrictions section.
Denver International Airport. The archived handgunlaw.us Colorado summary, a secondary source last updated 2026-06-07, reports "Airport Carry: Denver International Off Limits per Denver General Rule 30.19-1," and quotes the rule as making it unlawful "to possess or present any contraband or loaded firearm, as defined in Parts 10.17 and 10.29, on or about their person or property whether concealed or not, in the Airport Terminal, sterile, secured, or controlled areas, or while seeking to enter the sterile, secured, or controlled areas at DEN." That is a municipal rule reported by a secondary source, not a statute archived in this corpus. Confirm the current rule with Denver or the airport before relying on the details, and treat the terminal as closed to carry.
The Prohibited Places and Restrictions sections are the operative treatment for all three. This paragraph exists only so a reader who came here for reciprocity does not assume an honored permit answers a possession question.
The Gun-Free School Zones Act is one place where an honored out-of-state permit and a Colorado-issued permit may not be equal, and no Colorado source in this corpus addresses it.
18 U.S.C. 922(q)(2)(A), from the Cornell U.S. Code archive, makes it unlawful "for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm that has moved in or that otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone." The license exception at 922(q)(2)(B)(ii) is written narrowly:
"if the individual possessing the firearm is licensed to do so by the State in which the school zone is located or a political subdivision of the State, and the law of the State or political subdivision requires that, before an individual obtains such a license, the law enforcement authorities of the State or political subdivision verify that the individual is qualified under law to receive the license"
A Colorado CHP fits that description. Colorado issued it, and C.R.S. 18-12-205(4)(c) requires the sheriff to verify the applicant against the C.R.S. 18-12-203(1) criteria through a national and state background check before the permit issues.
An out-of-state permit that Colorado merely honors is a harder question. C.R.S. 18-12-213 makes it "valid in this state in all respects as a permit issued pursuant to this part 2," which is a statement of Colorado law about Colorado's own permit scheme. It does not make Colorado the state that issued the license, and 922(q)(2)(B)(ii) asks who licensed the individual, not whose law treats the license as valid. On that reading, a Wyoming permit holder standing in a Colorado school zone has no (B)(ii) exception even though Colorado honors the permit for state-law purposes.
This is a genuine unsettled risk, not settled law. No Colorado statute, CBI page, or case in this corpus resolves it, and the argument runs both ways. The "in all respects" language is broad, and a court could read Colorado's adoption of the permit as satisfying the federal condition. Four points do not depend on how it comes out:
If you carry on an honored out-of-state permit, the conservative course near a school is to unload and lock, which satisfies (B)(iii) without needing (B)(ii) to be resolved in your favor.
There is no Colorado non-resident permit to apply for. C.R.S. 18-12-203(1)(a) requires that an applicant "[i]s a legal resident of the state of Colorado." The statute carves out one group: a member of the armed forces stationed in Colorado on permanent duty station orders, and members of that person's immediate family living in Colorado, "shall be deemed to be a legal resident of the state of Colorado" for purposes of part 2.
The residents-only rule has been litigated and upheld. Per the annotation to C.R.S. 18-12-203, "[l]imiting issuance of concealed handgun permits to only state residents does not violate the second amendment or the privileges and immunities clause of article IV of the U.S. constitution." Peterson v. Martinez, 707 F.3d 1197 (10th Cir. 2013).
The military carve-out creates a question the sources do not answer. Because C.R.S. 18-12-203(1)(a) deems a stationed service member a Colorado legal resident "[f]or purposes of this part 2," and C.R.S. 18-12-213 sits inside part 2, it is arguable that a service member stationed in Colorado is treated as a Colorado resident for the reciprocity test even while holding a home-state driver's license and permit. Neither the statute nor CBI addresses this directly. The clean answer for a service member stationed in Colorado is to apply for a Colorado CHP, which the deeming clause expressly permits.
The application machinery accommodates that service member, which is what makes the clean answer practical rather than theoretical. The archived handgunlaw.us Colorado summary reproduces C.R.S. 18-12-205(1)(a)(IV), which limits what the standardized application may ask to, among other items, "[w]hether the applicant is a resident of this state as of the date of application and whether the applicant has a valid driver's license or other state-issued photo identification or military order proving residence." A military order sits in that list alongside a driver's license, so a service member who kept a home-state license is not stopped at the residency question. The same source reproduces C.R.S. 18-12-205(4)(a) on identity: "[t]o verify the applicant's identity, the applicant shall present to the sheriff the applicant's valid Colorado driver's license or valid Colorado or military photo identification."
Note the asymmetry, because it is easy to get backwards. A military photo ID is expressly sufficient to prove identity when applying for a Colorado permit under 18-12-205(4)(a). It is expressly not sufficient to make an out-of-state permit valid in Colorado, because C.R.S. 18-12-213(2) limits "valid picture identification" to "a driver's license or a state identification issued in lieu of a driver's license." Military ID gets you a Colorado permit. It does not get you reciprocity.
Both 18-12-205 quotes come from a secondary source that reproduces the statute rather than from a scrape of 18-12-205 itself. Confirm the current wording with the sheriff of your county before building a plan on the exact language.
Colorado publishes no outbound list. CBI's page is an inbound determination: which permits Colorado honors. But because C.R.S. 18-12-213(1) conditions Colorado's recognition on the issuing state recognizing Colorado permits, each of the 34 states on CBI's list has been determined to honor the Colorado CHP. That is the inference the statute supports, and it is the closest thing Colorado offers to an outbound list.
It is not a travel plan. CBI's own instruction is to verify: "When traveling with a Colorado permit, it is advisable to contact the state you are visiting to confirm reciprocity and to review that state's firearms laws." Three reasons that matters:
A destination state can attach a condition to your Colorado permit that has no counterpart anywhere in Colorado law, and no Colorado source will warn you about it. Minnesota is the archived example.
The handgunlaw.us Colorado summary, a secondary source in this corpus last updated 2026-06-07, carries this note directly under its reciprocity map: "MN only Honors CO Permits issued or renewed on or after 8/1/24." The same document's changelog dates the change, "5/4/2025 - Minnesota Now Honors Colorado Permits Only Issued on or after 8/1/2024. Map Updated and Note Added Under Map," and records a separate later entry running the other direction, "2/1/2026 - Colorado Now Honors The Minnesota Resident Permit Only."
Read what that first note does to a Colorado permit holder. A Colorado CHP is valid for five years under C.R.S. 18-12-204(1)(b). A permit issued in 2022 and not renewed since is fully valid in Colorado, and Minnesota appears on CBI's recognized list, so both halves of the usual check come back clean. Per this source the permit is still not honored in Minnesota, because it was issued before 2024-08-01 and has not been renewed since. Nothing on the CBI page hints at that, and nothing about it is a Colorado defect. CBI publishes an inbound determination, which says which permits Colorado honors and is silent on the terms other states set.
Attribution, and what to do about it. That Minnesota condition is reported by handgunlaw.us, a secondary source. It is not stated by any Colorado or Minnesota government page archived in this corpus, and this section does not treat it as the operative rule. Treat it as a warning to verify. Before carrying a Colorado CHP in Minnesota, confirm the current position with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, which is the state authority for Minnesota permit-to-carry reciprocity. Then do the same thing for every other destination: find the destination state's own official list, and read the conditions printed on it rather than the state names. The condition that stops you will live in the destination state's law, and Colorado will never publish it.
| Belief | Reality |
|---|---|
| "My non-resident Utah permit covers Colorado since Utah is on the list." | No. C.R.S. 18-12-213(1)(b)(I) requires the permit to be issued to a resident of the issuing state, proven by a matching state photo ID. Utah's presence on the list is irrelevant to a non-resident card. |
| "I live in Colorado, so my non-resident Arizona permit is my backup while my CHP is pending." | No. CBI: "A Colorado resident cannot legally carry concealed in-state using a nonresident permit issued by any other state." |
| "Colorado only honors enhanced permits from some states." | No. Neither C.R.S. 18-12-213 nor CBI imposes any permit-class or tier qualifier. |
| "Colorado signed reciprocity agreements, so there is an agreement I can look up." | No. Recognition is statutory and automatic. CBI: Colorado law "passes the authority to grant a reciprocal status to the other states." |
| "My 90 days as a new resident start when I move in." | No. C.R.S. 18-12-213(1)(b)(II) measures the ninety days from the issuance date on your Colorado driver's license or state ID, and you must be carrying that card. |
| "Reciprocity means I follow my home state's rules while in Colorado." | No. C.R.S. 18-12-213 makes your permit valid "as a permit issued pursuant to this part 2," which means C.R.S. 18-12-214's Colorado limits bind you. |
| "A permit from any state beats no permit at all." | No. An unrecognized or non-resident permit is legally the same as no permit, and carrying concealed is a class 1 misdemeanor under C.R.S. 18-12-105(1)(b). |
| "Colorado honors Minnesota, so Minnesota honors my Colorado permit on the same terms." | Not necessarily. The archived handgunlaw.us summary reports that Minnesota honors Colorado permits only if issued or renewed on or after 2024-08-01. Colorado imposes no such issue-date condition and does not publish anyone else's. Confirm with the Minnesota BCA. |
| "Colorado does not honor my permit, so the gun has to stay home." | Not quite. C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)(a) and (2)(b), C.R.S. 18-12-204(3), and 18 U.S.C. 926A leave real options for property, private-vehicle carry, hunting, and through-travel. All of them end when you step out of the vehicle carrying concealed. |
| "My permit gets me past the magazine ban." | No. C.R.S. 18-12-302 is a possession offense with a July 1, 2013 continuous-possession grandfather and no permit exception. Recognition under 18-12-213 does not reach it. |
C.R.S. 18-12-213(1) speaks of "[a] permit to carry a concealed handgun or a concealed weapon" issued by another state, which is broader than handguns. But the authority a part 2 permit confers under C.R.S. 18-12-214 is handgun-specific, and the criminal exception at C.R.S. 18-12-105(2)(c) reaches an out-of-state permit only "if the weapon involved was a handgun." Nothing in CBI's guidance resolves the gap. The safe reading, and the one the rest of part 2 supports, is that Colorado reciprocity covers concealed handguns. Do not assume a broad out-of-state "concealed weapon" permit authorizes carrying a concealed knife or other weapon in Colorado.
| Citation | What it does |
|---|---|
| C.R.S. 18-12-213 | Reciprocity. Recognizes out-of-state permits subject to age 21, issuing-state residency proven by matching state photo ID, or Colorado residency of no more than ninety days. Amended 2007 to add the residency-match requirement. |
| C.R.S. 18-12-203(1)(a) | Colorado applicants must be legal residents. Deems military stationed in Colorado, and immediate family living in Colorado, legal residents for part 2 purposes. No non-resident permit exists. |
| C.R.S. 18-12-214 | Authority granted by a permit and its limits. Applies to recognized out-of-state permits through 18-12-213's "in all respects" language. Also applies to temporary emergency permits under 18-12-209, per subsection (6). |
| C.R.S. 18-12-105 | Unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon. Class 1 misdemeanor at subsection (1)(b); the permit exception at (2)(c) is what a recognized out-of-state permit satisfies. Subsections (2)(a) and (2)(b) are the dwelling, business, property, and private-conveyance exceptions available without any permit. |
| C.R.S. 18-12-204 | Permit term of five years at (1)(b). Carry-and-produce duty and petty offense at (2)(a), which reaches visitors through 18-12-213. Private-conveyance and lawful-hunting carry not considered concealed at (3)(a), capped by (3)(b). |
| C.R.S. 18-12-205 | Application procedure. (1)(a)(IV) lets a military order prove residence; (4)(a) accepts a military photo ID for identity; (4)(c) is the sheriff's pre-issuance verification, which matters to the federal school-zone question. |
| C.R.S. 18-12-302 | Large-capacity magazines. Class 1 misdemeanor at (1)(a), class 6 felony at (1)(c), and a narrow grandfather at (2)(a) requiring ownership on July 1, 2013 plus continuous possession. No permit exception. |
| SB 25-003 (2025) | Specified semiautomatic firearms. Prohibits purchase and transfer on or after August 1, 2026 outside a hunter education or firearms safety course path plus a sheriff-issued firearms course eligibility card. Applies regardless of permit. |
| 18 U.S.C. 926A | Federal safe passage for through-travel. Unloaded, not readily accessible, locked container other than glove compartment or console where the vehicle has no separate compartment. |
| 18 U.S.C. 926B, 926C | LEOSA. Federal concealed carry authority for qualified active and qualified retired officers, independent of 18-12-213, requiring the subsection (d) identification and subject to the (b) private-property and government-property carve-outs. |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(q) | Gun-Free School Zones Act. The (2)(B)(ii) license exception requires a license issued by the state where the school zone sits, which leaves an unresolved question for an out-of-state permit Colorado merely honors. |
| Peterson v. Martinez, 707 F.3d 1197 (10th Cir. 2013) | Upheld Colorado's residents-only permit rule against Second Amendment and privileges-and-immunities challenges. |
View this topic on its own page: Reciprocity
Colorado law authorizes the use of physical force in self-defense under the following framework:
A person is justified in using physical force upon another person to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by that other person. The person may use a degree of force which he reasonably believes to be necessary for that purpose.
Deadly physical force may be used only if a person reasonably believes a lesser degree of force is inadequate AND one of the following conditions exists:
A person is not justified in using physical force if:
Colorado follows the "no duty to retreat" doctrine. Under established case law and statutory interpretation:
Colorado's "Make My Day" law provides strong protections for occupants of dwellings:
A person in possession or control of any building, realty, or other premises, or a person licensed or privileged to be thereon, is justified in using reasonable and appropriate physical force upon another person when and to the extent reasonably necessary to prevent or terminate what he reasonably believes to be an unlawful trespass.
A person is justified in using reasonable and appropriate physical force upon another person when and to the extent reasonably necessary to prevent what he reasonably believes to be an attempt by the other person to commit theft, criminal mischief, or criminal tampering involving property.
A private person acting on his own account is justified in using reasonable and appropriate physical force upon another person when and to the extent he reasonably believes it necessary to:
However, a private person is justified in using deadly physical force only when he reasonably believes it necessary to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of deadly physical force.
SB 20-217 (Enhance Law Enforcement Integrity), effective September 1, 2020, established enhanced use of force standards for peace officers:
Effective July 1, 2025, all Colorado law enforcement agencies must adopt written policies and procedures concerning use of the prone position and prone restraint, including:
Training on these policies must be implemented by July 1, 2026.
N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen (2022) and United States v. Rahimi (2024). Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), established the historical-tradition test for Second Amendment claims. Rahimi, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), then applied Bruen to uphold the federal domestic-violence-restraining-order firearm prohibition at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), confirming that not every firearm disability fails Bruen's test. Practitioners advising on use of force or firearm-disability questions should be familiar with both cases.
View this topic on its own page: Use Of Force
Colorado follows a "no duty to retreat" doctrine. Under Colorado law, a person who is not the initial aggressor has no obligation to retreat before using physical force, including deadly force, in self-defense.
Key Statute: C.R.S. § 18-1-704 - Use of Physical Force in Defense of a Person
A person is justified in using physical force upon another person to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by that other person, and may use a degree of force which he reasonably believes to be necessary for that purpose.
Deadly physical force may be used only if a person reasonably believes a lesser degree of force is inadequate and:
A person is not justified in using physical force if:
Important: Only an "initial aggressor" has a duty to retreat before using physical force in self-defense. All other persons (non-aggressors) have no duty to retreat, even if they could safely do so. This principle was affirmed by the Colorado Supreme Court in People v. Toler (2000) and Idrogo v. People, 818 P.2d 752 (Colo. 1991).
Colorado's Castle Doctrine, commonly known as the "Make My Day" law, provides strong protections for occupants of dwellings.
Legislative Intent: The General Assembly recognizes that the citizens of Colorado have a right to expect absolute safety within their own homes.
Justified Use of Force: Any occupant of a dwelling is justified in using any degree of physical force, including deadly physical force, against another person when:
Criminal Immunity: Any occupant using physical force (including deadly force) in accordance with this statute shall be immune from criminal prosecution for the use of such force.
Civil Immunity: Any occupant using physical force (including deadly force) in accordance with this statute shall be immune from any civil liability for injuries or death resulting from the use of such force.
A person in possession or control of any building, realty, or other premises, or a person who is licensed or privileged to be thereon, is justified in using reasonable and appropriate physical force upon another person when and to the extent that it is reasonably necessary to prevent or terminate what he reasonably believes to be the commission or attempted commission of an unlawful trespass by the other person.
People v. Toler (2000), No. 98SC858 - The Colorado Supreme Court held that a person does not have to "retreat to the wall" before using deadly force in self-defense, unless the person was the "initial aggressor" in the encounter. The Court confirmed that neither C.R.S. § 18-1-704 nor Colorado caselaw deprives a person of the right to use physical force in self-defense based upon where that person is located at the time of the encounter.
Idrogo v. People, 818 P.2d 752 (Colo. 1991) - The Court rejected the argument that a duty to retreat arises before a defendant may use deadly force in self-defense, confirming that § 18-1-704(2) "contains no language reflecting any intention by the General Assembly to revive the doctrine of retreat."
Boykin v. People, 22 Colo. 496 (1896) - Colorado adopted the "no duty to retreat" rule as part of its common law.
| Scenario | Legal Standard |
|---|---|
| In your dwelling (unlawful entry) | May use any degree of force, including deadly force, under the "Make My Day" law (§ 18-1-704.5); immune from criminal prosecution and civil liability |
| Outside your dwelling (non-aggressor) | No duty to retreat; may use deadly force if you reasonably believe lesser force is inadequate and you face imminent danger of death or great bodily injury (§ 18-1-704) |
| If you are the initial aggressor | Must withdraw and effectively communicate intent to withdraw before using force in self-defense (§ 18-1-704(3)(b)) |
| Defense of premises against trespass | May use reasonable force; deadly force only in self-defense situations or to prevent first degree arson (§ 18-1-705) |
View this topic on its own page: Castle Doctrine
Colorado has no statutory duty to inform. Nothing in C.R.S. 18-12-105 (unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon) or in Part 2 of Article 12 (permits to carry concealed handguns) requires you to volunteer that you are armed when a law enforcement officer walks up to your car window or stops you on the street.
Colorado also has no statutory duty to answer. There is no provision in the scraped statutes that obligates you to say yes when an officer asks "are you armed."
What Colorado does have is a duty to carry and produce. Under C.R.S. 18-12-204(2)(a), a permittee "shall carry the permit, together with valid photo identification, at all times during which the permittee is in actual possession of a concealed handgun and shall produce both documents upon demand by a law enforcement officer." That is the whole obligation at a stop. It is triggered by the officer's demand, not by the start of the encounter, and it is satisfied by handing over two pieces of paper, not by making a statement.
Colorado does impose reporting duties, but they run to the sheriff who issued your permit, not to the officer in front of you. C.R.S. 18-12-210 sets those deadlines and they are covered below. And there is exactly one statute in this archive that compels you to let an officer physically inspect a firearm, C.R.S. 33-6-125, which reaches the chamber of a rifle or shotgun in a motor vehicle and no handgun at all.
Treat those as separate rules. Confusing the carry-and-produce duty with a duty to inform is the most common mistake students make about Colorado.
The statute sets out one requirement, one evidentiary consequence, one penalty, and one escape hatch:
By C.R.S. 18-12-204(2)(b), all of this applies equally to a temporary emergency permit issued under C.R.S. 18-12-209.
The same statute that creates the carry-and-produce duty also describes two situations in which a person carries a handgun with no permit at all. C.R.S. 18-12-204(3)(a) says a person who may lawfully possess a handgun may carry one "without obtaining a permit and the handgun shall not be considered concealed" when:
C.R.S. 18-12-204(3)(b) limits both: the subsection "shall not be construed to authorize the carrying of a handgun in violation of the provisions of section 18-12-105 or 18-12-105.5." So (3) is not a license to carry into a school, a college, or a child care center covered by 18-12-105.5, and it does not authorize anything 18-12-105 forbids.
The consequence for this section is direct. A person carrying under 18-12-204(3) has no permit, so the produce-on-demand duty in 18-12-204(2)(a) does not attach. That duty runs to "the permittee," and what it commands is that the permittee carry and produce "the permit." Someone who was never issued a permit has no document the subsection (2) duty can reach and cannot commit the petty offense it creates. Note that 18-12-105(2)(b) reaches the same private-conveyance ground from the other direction, by making it not an offense under 18-12-105 to carry a weapon in a private automobile or other private means of conveyance for lawful protection while traveling.
One question the statute leaves open: a person who does hold a permit and who is carrying in a private automobile is, by the terms of (3)(a), carrying a handgun that "shall not be considered concealed." Whether that person is still "in actual possession of a concealed handgun" for purposes of the (2)(a) duty is not addressed in the scraped text. The safe practice is to carry the permit and photo ID anyway.
C.R.S. 18-12-210 is titled "Maintenance of permit - address change - invalidity of permit," and it creates two reporting duties. Neither one is owed to the officer at a stop. Both are owed to the sheriff who issued the permit.
| Trigger | Deadline | Who to notify |
|---|---|---|
| A change to the address specified on your permit | Within thirty days | The issuing sheriff |
| Your permit is lost, stolen, or destroyed | Within three business days | The issuing sheriff |
The penalty is stated in the same subsection: "Failure to notify the sheriff pursuant to this subsection (1) is a civil infraction."
Then the part that matters more than the deadline. Under C.R.S. 18-12-210(2), "If a permit is lost, stolen, or destroyed, the permit is automatically invalid." Invalidity is automatic. It does not wait for a sheriff's determination, a hearing, or the end of the three-business-day reporting window. The replacement route is in the next sentence: "The person to whom the permit was issued may obtain a duplicate or substitute therefor upon payment of fifteen dollars to the issuing sheriff and upon submission of a notarized statement to the issuing sheriff that the permit has been lost, stolen, or destroyed."
Read 18-12-210(2) next to 18-12-204(2)(a) and the practical problem is obvious. The 204(2)(a) duty is to carry and produce a valid permit on demand. Once a permit is lost, stolen, or destroyed it is automatically invalid, so there is nothing valid to produce until the fifteen-dollar duplicate issues. In that gap an officer's demand meets no permit, and 18-12-204(2)(a) says: "Failure to produce a permit upon demand by a law enforcement officer raises a rebuttable presumption that the person does not have a permit."
The scraped text does not say whether a duplicate issued under 18-12-210(2) satisfies the 18-12-204(2)(a) dismissal condition, which requires the permittee to exhibit to the court "a valid permit and valid photo identification, both of which were issued to the permittee prior to the date on which the permittee was charged." A duplicate issued after the charge date replaces an original that predates it. Whether a court treats the duplicate's issue date or the original's as controlling is not resolved in the statutes in this archive. Do not plan on the answer. Report the loss inside three business days and pay for the duplicate.
C.R.S. 18-12-210(3) extends the entire section to temporary emergency permits issued under C.R.S. 18-12-209.
Two things 18-12-210 is not. It is not the lost or stolen firearm reporting statute, which is C.R.S. 18-12-113 with a five-day deadline, covered below. And it is not a general change-of-residence rule: the trigger the statute states is a change to "the address specified on his or her permit," which the statute does not further define.
The history line for 18-12-210 records the part added by L. 2003 effective May 17 of that year, and subsection (1) amended by SB 21-271, ch. 462, section 350, effective March 1, 2022.
C.R.S. 18-12-214(1)(b) is the other statute that matters at a traffic stop: "A peace officer may temporarily disarm a permittee, incident to a lawful stop of the permittee. The peace officer shall return the handgun to the permittee prior to discharging the permittee from the scene."
Two things follow. The officer does not need your consent to take the handgun for the duration of a lawful stop. And the officer is required to give it back before you leave. If a stop ends without your handgun being returned, that is not what the statute contemplates.
Exactly one statute in this archive compels affirmative cooperation with an officer, and it is not in the criminal code's firearms article. It is in the wildlife title. C.R.S. 33-6-125, "Possession of a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle," does two things:
Read the second duty narrowly. It is a duty to allow inspection of the chamber of a rifle or shotgun in a motor vehicle. It is not a duty to inform, it is not a duty to answer questions, and it does not reach a handgun. The officer it names is a peace officer empowered under C.R.S. 33-6-101 to enforce articles 1 through 6 of title 33, which is a wildlife-enforcement authority rather than every law enforcement officer in the state.
The penalty is fixed in the statute: "Any person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of one hundred dollars and an assessment of fifteen license suspension points."
The statute also supplies its own loaded-or-not rule for muzzle-loaders. A "muzzle-loader" is unloaded "if it is not primed," and "primed" means "having a percussion cap on the nipple or flint in the striker and powder in the flash pan."
C.R.S. 33-6-125 was amended by HB 19-1026, effective July 1, 2019.
The statutory duties reduce to a short sequence:
Volunteering that you are armed is a personal choice. It is not a Colorado legal requirement, and this section does not treat it as one.
Being clear about the gaps matters as much as the rules:
C.R.S. 18-12-213(1) makes an out-of-state permit "valid in this state in all respects as a permit issued pursuant to this part 2" when the permit was issued to a person who is 21 or older and who is either a resident of the issuing state, "as demonstrated by the address stated on a valid picture identification that is issued by the state that issued the permit and is carried by the permit holder," or a resident of Colorado for no more than ninety days as shown by a Colorado picture ID carried by the holder. Reciprocity runs only to states that recognize Colorado permits.
Because the out-of-state permit is valid "in all respects" as a Colorado permit, the carry-and-produce duty in 18-12-204(2)(a) travels with it. C.R.S. 18-12-213(2) also defines what counts: "valid picture identification" means a driver's license or a state identification issued in lieu of a driver's license.
Note that 18-12-210 speaks to "the issuing sheriff," which no out-of-state permit has. The scraped text does not say how the 18-12-210 reporting duties apply, if at all, to a recognized out-of-state permit. Report a loss to the issuing authority in your home state under that state's rules.
C.R.S. 18-12-105(2) lists every circumstance in which carrying a concealed weapon is not an offense under that section. As scraped, the list is:
| C.R.S. 18-12-105(2) | Who or what it covers |
|---|---|
| (2)(a) | A person in his or her own dwelling or place of business, or on property owned or under his or her control at the time of the act of carrying |
| (2)(b) | A person in a private automobile or other private means of conveyance who carries a weapon for lawful protection of such person's or another's person or property while traveling |
| (2)(b.5) | Carrying a concealed firearm at a specific location in violation of section 1-13-724, 18-12-105.3, or 18-12-105.5 |
| (2)(c) | A holder of a valid permit to carry a concealed handgun or a temporary emergency permit issued under part 2, or a valid written permit issued under former section 18-12-105.1. This exemption does not apply, and it is an offense under 18-12-105, if the person was carrying a concealed handgun in violation of section 18-12-214 |
| (2)(d) | A peace officer as described in section 16-2.5-101 carrying in conformance with the policy of the employing agency under section 16-2.5-101(2) |
| (2)(e) | Deleted by amendment in 2003 |
| (2)(f) | A United States probation officer or United States pretrial services officer while on duty and serving in Colorado under rules promulgated by the judicial conference of the United States |
There is no military, veteran, or retired peace officer exemption in 18-12-105(2). A previous version of this page claimed one. The statute does not contain it. Subsection (2)(d) reaches a peace officer only "when carrying a weapon in conformance with the policy of the employing agency," which is a duty-status and employment condition, not a status conferred by past service. Anyone relying on military service, an honorable discharge, or a retired credential as a substitute for a Colorado permit under this statute is relying on something the statute does not say.
That correction stands. It is also narrower than it looks, and the next subsection says why.
Note also that 18-12-105(1) grades unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon as a class 1 misdemeanor. SB24-131 amended the introductory portions of subsections (1) and (2) and added (2)(b.5), effective July 1, 2024.
The 18-12-105(2) list is one statute. Two other bodies of law give status-based authority that 18-12-105(2) does not, and collapsing them into the permit question is what produced the original fabrication.
C.R.S. 18-12-105.3(2), the government-buildings offense. The SB24-131 offense created by 18-12-105.3(1) does not apply to:
| 18-12-105.3(2) | Who it covers |
|---|---|
| (2)(a) | A peace officer carrying a firearm pursuant to the authority granted in section 16-2.5-101(2) |
| (2)(b) | A member of the United States armed forces or Colorado National Guard when engaged in the lawful discharge of the member's official duties |
| (2)(c) | Security personnel employed or retained by an entity that controls or operates a place described in the section, and security personnel described in section 24-33.5-216.7(5), while engaged in the security personnel's official duties |
| (2)(d) | Law enforcement personnel, defense counsel personnel, and court personnel carrying or possessing a firearm in the performance of their official duties as part of the lawful and common practices of a legal proceeding |
| (2)(e) | A person holding a valid permit or a temporary emergency permit under part 2 who is carrying a concealed handgun in the adjacent parking area of a location listed in subsection (1) |
So an on-duty Colorado National Guard member is outside the government-buildings offense. Be precise about what that is. It is an exemption from one place-based offense, conditioned on the lawful discharge of official duties. It is not a substitute for a permit under 18-12-105, and (2)(b) does not reach a veteran or a Guard member who is off duty.
LEOSA, 18 U.S.C. 926B and 926C. Federal law gives qualified active and qualified retired law enforcement officers concealed carry authority that does not run through Colorado's permit scheme at all. Both sections open the same way: "Notwithstanding any other provision of the law of any State or any political subdivision thereof, an individual who is a qualified law enforcement officer" (926C: "qualified retired law enforcement officer") "and who is carrying the identification required by subsection (d) may carry a concealed firearm that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, subject to subsection (b)."
Two features of that sentence matter to this section.
The archive's copy of both federal sections is the Cornell LII mirror, which is tagged in _sources/ as a secondary-tier source rather than a primary government one. Confirm the operative text against the U.S. Code before relying on it in class.
None of this rescues the original claim. There is still no 18-12-105(2) exemption for a veteran or for a retired peace officer as such. What exists is a place-based exemption in 18-12-105.3(2) tied to official duties, and a separate federal authority in 926B and 926C that requires a qualifying agency credential in hand.
Subsections (2)(b.5) and (2)(c) of 18-12-105 pull in opposite directions and the statute does not reconcile them.
Subsection (2)(b.5) says it is not an offense under 18-12-105 if the defendant was "carrying a concealed firearm at a specific location in violation of section 1-13-724, 18-12-105.3, or 18-12-105.5." Read plainly, that channels place-based violations into the place-based statute instead of stacking a concealed-carry charge on top.
Subsection (2)(c) says the permit exemption does not apply, and it is an offense under 18-12-105, if the person was "carrying a concealed handgun in violation of the provisions of section 18-12-214." But 18-12-214(3.5) defines carrying in violation of 214 partly by reference to 18-12-105.5, 18-12-105.3, and 1-13-724, the same three statutes (2)(b.5) carves out.
The scraped text does not resolve which subsection controls for a permit holder who carries into one of those locations. Do not teach a confident answer here. Treat carrying into a prohibited location as exposing you to charges under the place-based statute and possibly under 18-12-105 as well.
The permit is not a statewide pass. C.R.S. 18-12-214(1)(a) grants authority to carry concealed "in all areas of the state, except as specifically limited in this section." The limits, as scraped:
By 18-12-214(6), these provisions also apply to temporary emergency permits issued under 18-12-209.
SB24-131 was approved by the Governor on May 31, 2024 and took effect July 1, 2024. It created C.R.S. 18-12-105.3, which prohibits knowingly carrying a firearm, loaded or unloaded, in state legislative buildings, local government governing-body buildings, and courthouses or other buildings used for court proceedings, including their adjacent parking areas. Violation is a class 1 misdemeanor under 18-12-105.3(3).
Two carve-outs matter to permit holders. C.R.S. 18-12-105.3(2)(e) lets a permit holder carry a concealed handgun in the adjacent parking area of a listed location, not inside the building. C.R.S. 18-12-105.3(5) preserves securely storing a firearm in a vehicle as required by state law at such a location. A local government may permit carry at its own governing-body buildings under 18-12-105.3(4)(b).
SB24-131 also converted the election-location rule from an open-carry prohibition into a prohibition on carrying "in any manner," and exempted members of the general assembly from the state legislative building prohibition until January 5, 2025. For the full location list, see the Prohibited Places section.
Do not confuse this with a lost or stolen permit. That is C.R.S. 18-12-210, three business days to the issuing sheriff, and the permit goes automatically invalid. What follows is the rule for a lost or stolen firearm.
A previous version of this page cited C.R.S. 18-12-114 for lost and stolen firearm reporting. That is the wrong statute. C.R.S. 18-12-114 is "Secure firearm storage required." The reporting statute is C.R.S. 18-12-113, "Failure to report a lost or stolen firearm," known and citable as the Isabella Joy Thallas Act under 18-12-113(6).
What 18-12-113 requires:
Penalties under 18-12-113(2):
| Offense | Grade | Fine |
|---|---|---|
| First | Civil infraction | Twenty-five dollars |
| Second or subsequent | Unclassified misdemeanor | Up to five hundred dollars |
Three more details from the statute. Licensed gun dealers, as defined in C.R.S. 18-12-506, are excluded by 18-12-113(3). The receiving agency must enter available descriptive information into the Colorado Bureau of Investigation crime information center database within five days, under 18-12-113(4). And under 18-12-113(5), a person who reports a lost or stolen firearm is immune from criminal prosecution for a storage offense in part 1 and from the civil infraction of unlawful storage of a firearm in a vehicle described in C.R.S. 18-12-114.5.
C.R.S. 18-12-113 was added by SB 21-078 effective September 7, 2021. Subsection (5) was amended by HB 24-1348 effective January 1, 2025.
SB23-169 raised the legal age to purchase a firearm in Colorado to twenty-one. It was approved by the Governor on April 28, 2023 and took effect August 7, 2023. Unlawful purchase by a person under 21 is a class 2 misdemeanor, and it is unlawful for a licensed or unlicensed gun dealer to facilitate such a sale. The bill summary lists exceptions for active members of the United States armed forces and for peace officers or persons certified by the P.O.S.T. board.
This is a purchase rule. It creates no disclosure duty, and it does not change the concealed handgun permit age, which was already twenty-one. The scraped archive contains no source on the litigation history of SB23-169, so this section makes no claim about its current enforcement status. Verify before relying on it.
| Question | Colorado answer | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Must you volunteer that you are armed? | No | No such provision in 18-12-105 or part 2 |
| Must you answer "are you armed"? | No statutory duty | No such provision in 18-12-105 or part 2 |
| Must you carry the permit while carrying concealed? | Yes, plus valid photo ID | 18-12-204(2)(a) |
| Must you hand them over when asked? | Yes, both, upon demand by a law enforcement officer | 18-12-204(2)(a) |
| Penalty for not carrying or producing? | Petty offense | 18-12-204(2)(a) |
| Can the charge be dismissed? | Yes, if you show the court a permit and photo ID that both predate the charge | 18-12-204(2)(a) |
| Does this apply to a temporary emergency permit? | Yes | 18-12-204(2)(b), 18-12-210(3), 18-12-214(6) |
| Does it apply to out-of-state permit holders? | Yes, a recognized permit is valid "in all respects" as a Colorado permit | 18-12-213(1) |
| Do you need a permit to carry a handgun in your own private vehicle? | No, and the handgun "shall not be considered concealed" | 18-12-204(3)(a)(I) |
| Do you need a permit while lawfully hunting? | No, and the handgun "shall not be considered concealed" | 18-12-204(3)(a)(II) |
| Does the produce-on-demand duty apply to someone carrying under (3)? | No, that person is not a permittee and holds no permit | 18-12-204(2)(a), 18-12-204(3)(a) |
| Does (3) let you carry into a school or a college? | No | 18-12-204(3)(b) |
| Must you tell the sheriff when the address on your permit changes? | Yes, within thirty days | 18-12-210(1) |
| Must you tell the sheriff if your permit is lost, stolen, or destroyed? | Yes, within three business days | 18-12-210(1) |
| Penalty for not notifying the sheriff? | Civil infraction | 18-12-210(1) |
| Is a lost, stolen, or destroyed permit still valid? | No, it is automatically invalid; a duplicate costs fifteen dollars plus a notarized statement | 18-12-210(2) |
| Can an officer take your handgun during a stop? | Yes, temporarily, and it must be returned before you are released | 18-12-214(1)(b) |
| Must you ever let an officer inspect a firearm? | Only the chamber of a rifle or shotgun in a motor vehicle, for a peace officer enforcing articles 1 to 6 of title 33 | 33-6-125 |
| Penalty for refusing that inspection or for a loaded chamber? | Misdemeanor, one hundred dollar fine, fifteen license suspension points | 33-6-125 |
| Is there a military, veteran, or retired officer exemption from the Colorado permit requirement? | No | 18-12-105(2)(a) through (2)(f) |
| Is an on-duty armed forces or Colorado National Guard member exempt from the government-buildings offense? | Yes, when engaged in the lawful discharge of official duties | 18-12-105.3(2)(b) |
| Does LEOSA require carrying a credential? | Yes, the agency photographic identification described in subsection (d) | 18 U.S.C. 926B(a), (d); 926C(a), (d) |
| Does LEOSA override Colorado government-property or private-property restrictions? | No | 18 U.S.C. 926B(b), 926C(b) |
| Deadline to report a lost or stolen firearm? | Five days after discovery | 18-12-113(1)(a)(I) |
| Citation | Subject |
|---|---|
| C.R.S. 18-12-105 | Unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon, and the complete exemption list |
| C.R.S. 18-12-105.3 | Unlawful carrying of a firearm in government buildings, and its exemptions (SB24-131) |
| C.R.S. 18-12-113 | Failure to report a lost or stolen firearm (Isabella Joy Thallas Act) |
| C.R.S. 18-12-114 | Secure firearm storage required (not the reporting statute) |
| C.R.S. 18-12-204 | Permit contents, validity, carrying requirements, and permitless carry in a conveyance or while hunting |
| C.R.S. 18-12-210 | Maintenance of permit, address change, invalidity of a lost or stolen permit |
| C.R.S. 18-12-213 | Reciprocity |
| C.R.S. 18-12-214 | Authority granted by permit, carrying restrictions, local authority |
| C.R.S. 33-6-125 | Possession of a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle, and the chamber inspection duty |
| 18 U.S.C. 926B | LEOSA, qualified active law enforcement officers |
| 18 U.S.C. 926C | LEOSA, qualified retired law enforcement officers |
View this topic on its own page: Colorado Duty to Inform Law Enforcement
Colorado now has two separate firearms training systems, and completing one does not satisfy the other:
Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) states this directly: all background checks and courses taken for a concealed carry permit are not reciprocal for the Firearms Safety Program. Your CHP class does not qualify you to buy an SSF, and an FSP course does not qualify you for a CHP.
| CHP Training | FSP Training (SSF purchase) | |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Concealed handgun permit | Buying specified semiautomatic firearms |
| Length | 8 hours (new) / 2-hour refresher (renewal) | Basic 4 hours or Extended 12 hours |
| Exam | Written exam 80%, live fire 70% | Final exam and hands-on practical, 90% |
| Who teaches | Sheriff-verified instructor (C.R.S. 18-12-202.7) | Sheriff-verified instructor who also completed CPW's FSP Train the Trainer |
| Prerequisite card | None | Firearms course eligibility card from your sheriff |
| Governing law | C.R.S. 18-12-202.5 (HB24-1174) | C.R.S. 18-12-116 (SB25-003) |
Effective July 1, 2025, Colorado House Bill 24-1174 (HB24-1174) significantly changed the training requirements for concealed handgun permits (CHP). All training must now be conducted by a verified firearms instructor - an instructor verified by a Colorado county sheriff's office. Training certificates submitted for a CHP must be completed through a verified instructor.
Governing Statutes: C.R.S. 18-12-201 through 18-12-215; C.R.S. 18-12-202.5 (training class requirements); C.R.S. 18-12-202.7 (instructor verification)
C.R.S. 18-12-202.5(1) defines the class itself. A concealed handgun training class is either:
The open-to-the-general-public element matters if you teach. A course offered only to a closed group, to one employer's staff, or to a private membership does not fit the second category on its face. If you run CHP classes as a business, keep enrollment open to the public.
The class must be held in person with the instructor at the same location as the students. No part of the class may be conducted via the internet. The eight hours of instruction do not need to be consecutive.
Online courses and Hunter Education certificates are NOT accepted.
The 8-hour training class must include the following elements:
The refresher class must be held in person with the instructor at the same location as the students. No part of the class may be conducted via the internet.
In lieu of the standard training class, the following may satisfy the training requirement:
Per C.R.S. 18-12-202.7, each sheriff shall verify as a firearms instructor a person whose principal place to conduct firearms training is in the sheriff's county.
Two requirements come straight from the statute:
Revocation is mandatory when eligibility lapses. Under C.R.S. 18-12-202.7(4)(a) a sheriff shall revoke a verification if the verified instructor ceases to meet the requirements for verification. Suspension for teaching a class that fails the statutory requirements is the separate, discretionary track under (4)(b).
The statute leaves the paperwork and the fee to each sheriff. Boulder County publishes its process in full, and it is a useful model for what to expect elsewhere. Confirm the details with your own county before you rely on them.
Two class-level rules from the same county guidance are worth building into your operation:
It is a deceptive trade practice to claim to be a verified instructor for a firearms safety course that satisfies CHP training requirements unless the person is actually verified by a sheriff pursuant to C.R.S. 18-12-202.7.
Per C.R.S. 18-12-207(4)(a), if a sheriff denies a person's application for verification as a firearms instructor, or suspends or revokes a person's firearms instructor verification, the person may seek judicial review of the sheriff's decision. The sheriff must first notify the person in writing, stating the grounds and informing the person of the right to seek judicial review (C.R.S. 18-12-202.7(4)(c)).
Under C.R.S. 18-12-207(4)(b), the sheriff has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the person does not meet the requirements to be verified as a firearms instructor, or that the person satisfies the criteria for suspension or revocation of a verification. The procedure and timelines follow rule 106(a)(4) and (b) of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure (C.R.S. 18-12-207(2), (4)(a)).
Where you apply: the permit application is submitted in person to the sheriff of the county or city and county where you reside, or to the sheriff of the county or city and county where you maintain a secondary residence or own or lease real property used by you in a business (C.R.S. 18-12-205(2)(a)). Residency in the county is not itself an eligibility criterion; the statutory requirement is legal residency in Colorado.
| Fee Type | Amount (Examples) |
|---|---|
| New Application | $105 (San Miguel County); $152.50 (Elbert County) |
| Renewal Application | $63 (multiple counties) |
| New application fees typically include | CBI fingerprints, InstaCheck, FBI processing, plus local processing |
| Training Course (if offered by sheriff's office) | $150 new / $75 renewal (Clear Creek County example) |
Note: Fees vary by county. Some counties (e.g., Elbert County) offer free training classes for county residents.
Since August 1, 2026, you cannot buy a "specified semiautomatic firearm" in Colorado unless you have completed the state's Firearms Safety Program pathway (C.R.S. 18-12-116, enacted as SB25-003 and signed April 10, 2025). The statute is captioned as enforcement of the large-capacity magazine ban, and the definition tracks that purpose: a specified semiautomatic firearm (SSF) means a semiautomatic rifle or semiautomatic shotgun with a detachable magazine, or a gas-operated semiautomatic handgun with a detachable magazine, with certain firearm types and specific models excluded. Rimfire firearms, manually operated actions, firearms with a permanently fixed magazine that cannot accept more than fifteen rounds, recoil-operated semiautomatic handguns, a list of named models as configured on April 10, 2025, permanently inoperable firearms, and antiques and curios and relics all fall outside the definition.
Simply owning an SSF you already had does not require you to take training. What triggers the requirement is a transfer, sale, or purchase on or after August 1, 2026, and some of those transactions involve firearms you already own. See the pawn and consignment note below.
This training requirement is administered by Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW), not by CHP instructors as such, and it uses its own application system, its own eligibility card, and its own courses.
C.R.S. 18-12-116(2) makes it unlawful for any person to knowingly manufacture, distribute, transfer, sell, or purchase an SSF on or after August 1, 2026. This is not a dealer-only rule, and the section is not limited to retail sales.
The Firearms Dealer Division addressed this directly in Bulletin 26-02, issued July 24, 2026. Transfers by dealers, including pawn brokers, are governed by C.R.S. 18-12-112.5, under which "transfer" carries the meaning set out in C.R.S. 24-33.5-424(1)(d). That definition expressly includes redemption of a pawned firearm by any person who is not a federally licensed dealer. The Division also treats the return of a consigned firearm to the consignor as a transfer, because the return is a delivery of the firearm from the dealer to the consignor.
The consequence is concrete: if you redeem a pawned SSF, or take back an SSF you left on consignment, on or after August 1, 2026, the training requirements of C.R.S. 18-12-116(3)(e) apply to you, regardless of when the firearm was originally pawned or consigned. The Division encourages pawn brokers and consignment dealers to raise this with customers before writing the agreement. Questions go to the Firearms Dealer Division at dor_fdd@state.co.us.
Under C.R.S. 18-12-116(3)(e)(I), a transfer, sale, or purchase of an SSF is lawful when the person receiving or purchasing it:
Per CPW: a hunter education course alone does not qualify you. Out-of-state hunter education must be verified in CPW's records; bring your hunter education card or record to a CPW office. Completion of any other firearm safety course (including CHP/CCW training) does not satisfy the SSF purchase requirement.
Separately, Colorado raised the minimum age to purchase a firearm to 21 under SB23-169, with limited exceptions. That age floor applies on top of the SSF training pathway.
This is an open question and worth raising with your local office before you file. C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(b) says only that "each sheriff shall issue firearms safety course eligibility cards" and that the applicant submits the application "to the sheriff." Unlike the CHP statute, which spells out residence and business-property options in C.R.S. 18-12-205(2)(a), the Firearms Safety Program statute names no venue rule.
CPW's guidance fills the gap in practice rather than in law: the FSS routes a submitted application to your county sheriff's queue, and CPW tells applicants to contact their county sheriff's office for the name-based background check and document submission. CPW also warns that some counties did not begin reviewing applications until August 1, 2026 and that others are not accepting applications at all. Call your sheriff's office before you pay anything, because the fee is not refundable if the application is denied.
Under C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(b)(II), the application form is created by CPW and requires your full name and date of birth plus three attestations:
Under C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(b)(III) you must also submit:
The attestations have teeth. Under C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(b)(IV), knowingly making a false or misleading statement on the application, or deliberately omitting material information the application asks for, is perjury in the second degree under C.R.S. 18-8-503. On top of any criminal penalty, if you are convicted of perjury on that application the sheriff shall revoke a card issued before the conviction.
A sheriff shall deny an application if you cannot lawfully possess a firearm under state or federal law, or if the sheriff cannot positively identify you. A sheriff may deny or revoke based on a reasonable belief that documented previous behavior makes it likely you would present a danger to yourself or others. Either way the sheriff must notify you in writing, state the grounds, and tell you about the right to seek judicial review.
C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(b)(X) sets out that review:
Colorado does not regulate what an instructor may charge for a basic or extended firearms safety course. CPW says only that "a cost may be associated with this step" and confirms that the $52 firearms training and safety course record fee is separate from any fee assessed by the sheriff and from any fee charged by a private firearms instructor for conducting the class. No source in this corpus states a dollar amount for the course itself, so treat course pricing as an open market question and ask the instructor directly.
CPW states the courses cover safe handling of semiautomatic firearms and ammunition magazines, child safety and safe storage of firearms, firearm deaths associated with mental illness, extreme risk protection orders, and victim awareness and empathy, along with other firearms safety topics. CPW establishes the course requirements for both the basic and extended courses under the act.
The statute and the agency guidance do not line up exactly here. C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(a)(V) requires the instructor to administer an exam at the conclusion of a basic or extended course, testing knowledge of the subjects taught and requiring the student to demonstrate safe handling and mastery of gun safety. But the statute states the 90% threshold expressly only for the basic course: to complete a basic firearms safety course, a student must achieve a score of at least ninety percent on the exam. The statute sets no numeric score for the extended course.
CPW's guidance applies 90% to both. It lists "students must pass the course with a minimum score of 90% on their final exam" as a general course requirement, and repeats the same 90% figure in its description of the extended course. Plan on 90% for either course, because that is the threshold the instructor will apply and enter into the CPW system. The gap here is between statute and agency guidance, not a conflict about what happens in the classroom.
To teach Firearms Safety Program courses you must first be a sheriff-verified firearms instructor under C.R.S. 18-12-202.7 (the same verification used for CHP training), and then complete CPW's FSP Train the Trainer program, which covers the curriculum, teaching and testing guidelines, and the Firearms Safety System (student registration and score entry). CPW offers these trainings free of charge, virtually and in person, with a 50-attendee cap per class, first come first served. This is a distinct business line from CHP classes: FSP course completions must be entered in CPW's system, and instructors verify each student's eligibility card through the FSS before enrollment. Statute puts that verification on the instructor. Under C.R.S. 18-12-116(5)(a)(II), before allowing a student to attend, the instructor shall verify that the student holds a valid eligibility card by requesting information from the firearms training and safety course record system created in C.R.S. 33-9-115.
Once you are through Train the Trainer, CPW lists you on its public roster of verified FSP instructors, which is how students find you. To reach the program directly, CPW publishes a Firearms Safety Program phone line at 303-291-7143 and an email address at dnr_cpw_firearmsafety@state.co.us.
This is the most commonly overstated part of the statute. Read C.R.S. 18-12-116(3)(a)(II) and (3)(b) closely:
Neither provision exempts a personal purchase. An officer or a service member buying an SSF for personal use, outside the official-capacity and official-duties limits, stands in the same position as any other Colorado buyer and needs the eligibility card and the course. The exemption attaches to the official role and the agency's requirements, not to the person's occupation.
SB25-003 is being challenged in federal court. Del Toro v. Polis, No. 1:25-cv-02725 (D. Colo.), was filed September 2, 2025 by six individual plaintiffs and the Colorado State Shooting Association against state and local officials including Governor Jared Polis, raising civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint on December 22, 2025, which superseded the original complaint and mooted the first round of dismissal briefing; further dismissal briefing was underway as of early 2026.
No injunction has issued. The law took effect August 1, 2026 as scheduled and is enforceable now. Plan around the statute as written. If the case later produces an injunction or a ruling on the merits, that would change the picture, but nothing in the docket to date has paused any part of the Firearms Safety Program.
The Firearms Dealer Division publishes a Specified Semiautomatic Firearms Guidance document listing specific models the law applies to. The list is not all-inclusive and is reviewed on an ongoing basis, and new firearms are added after research and industry and public feedback. If you need to determine whether a specific firearm is an SSF, you may petition the Firearms Dealer Division for a statement of position.
Timing note from CPW: the FSS application link opened July 20, 2026, some counties did not begin reviewing applications until August 1, 2026, and others are not accepting applications at all. Check with your local sheriff's office first. See "Which Sheriff Do You Apply To?" above.
Colorado Concealed Handgun Permits (CHP) are governed by Colorado Revised Statutes Title 18, Article 12, Part 2 (C.R.S. 18-12-201 through 18-12-216), as amended by Colorado House Bill 24-1174. Applications must be submitted to the County Sheriff's Office where the applicant resides, owns property, or owns a business.
Effective Date of New Requirements: July 1, 2025
Applicants who cannot complete the online process due to disability or special circumstances may contact their County Sheriff's Office for assistance.
General Requirements:
Required Course Elements per C.R.S. 18-12-202.5:
Applicants may demonstrate competence through:
IMPORTANT: All renewal applications received on or after July 1, 2025 are subject to new training requirements with no exceptions or grace period.
General Requirements:
Required Course Elements:
Permittees may demonstrate competence through:
Per state law, permit holders must notify the issuing agency of address changes within 30 days of moving.
Colorado Concealed Handgun Permits are governed by:
County-Specific Variations: While state law governs CHPs, individual counties may have variations in procedures, fees, and issuance methods (e.g., mailing vs. in-person pickup). Always verify with your specific county Sheriff's Office.
Verified Instructors: Lists of verified instructors are maintained by each county Sheriff's Office and available on their websites.
No Exceptions: The July 1, 2025 training requirements apply to ALL applicants with no exceptions or grace periods for renewals.
Certificate Validity: Training certificates for new applications are valid for one year; refresher certificates for renewals are valid for six months.
Original Certificates Required: Copies of training certificates will not be accepted under any circumstances.
Background Checks: All applicants undergo fingerprint-based criminal background checks through the Colorado Bureau of Investigation per C.R.S. 18-12-205.
For assistance with the application process, contact the Sheriff's Office in your county of residence. Applications and inquiries must be directed to the county where you reside, own property, or own a business.
Fact-Checked Information:
View this topic on its own page: Application Process for Colorado Concealed Handgun Permits
Colorado concealed handgun permits are valid for five (5) years from the date of issuance. Renewal is handled by the county sheriff's office in the county where the permit holder currently resides, even if the original permit was issued by a different Colorado county. Out-of-state permits are not eligible for renewal in Colorado; holders must apply as new applicants.
House Bill 24-1174, signed into law in 2024 and effective July 1, 2025, significantly changed renewal training requirements. All renewal applications received on or after July 1, 2025, must comply with the new requirements - there is no grace period for the training mandate.
A renewal applicant must demonstrate competence with a handgun by submitting one of the following:
Refresher Course Certificate - A training certificate from a minimum 2-hour concealed handgun refresher class conducted by a verified instructor (verified by a Colorado Sheriff's Office), obtained within six (6) months prior to submitting the renewal application. The refresher class must include:
Organized Shooting Competitions / Active Military / Peace Officer - Evidence of experience with a firearm through participation in organized shooting competitions (within one year), current military service, or current certification as a peace officer pursuant to Article 2.5 of Title 16.
Verified Instructor Status - Evidence that, at the time of application, the applicant is a verified instructor.
Honorable Military Discharge - Proof of honorable discharge from a branch of the United States Armed Forces that reflects pistol qualifications obtained within the ten (10) years preceding submittal of the renewal form.
Retired Colorado Law Enforcement - A certificate showing retirement from a Colorado law enforcement agency that reflects pistol qualifications obtained within the ten (10) years preceding submittal of the renewal form.
Important notes on training:
As of July 1, 2025, concealed handgun training classes (both initial and refresher) must be conducted by a certified firearms instructor who has been "verified" by a Colorado Sheriff's Office. Key points:
| Fee Component | Amount |
|---|---|
| Standard renewal fee | $63 (state-set amount; some counties may have slight variations in total due to processing) |
| Late renewal fee (expired up to 6 months) | $63 + $15 late fee = $78 (per C.R.S. § 18-12-211) |
| Replacement card (lost/stolen/damaged) | $15 |
Note: Some counties charge additional credit/debit card processing fees (e.g., 2.39%). Payment methods vary by county (cash, check, money order, credit/debit card).
Fee breakdown may vary slightly by county. For example, Park County lists $50 for the permit + $13 for the background investigation = $63 total.
Additional documentation may be required, including proof of address (lease, utility bill), proof of name change (court documents, marriage certificate), etc.
If you have moved to a different Colorado county since your permit was issued:
If a renewal applicant has undergone a name change (marriage, divorce, or otherwise) since first acquiring the permit:
Processing times vary by county:
Permit holders must notify the issuing sheriff's office of a change of address within 30 days of moving. Lost or stolen permits must be reported within 30 days (some counties specify 3 business days for lost/stolen reporting).
View this topic on its own page: Renewal Process
Under Colorado law, sheriffs are required to establish and collect fees for issuing and renewing concealed handgun permits that reflect the actual direct and indirect costs of processing permit applications.
These statutory maximums are in addition to the cost of the required background check. The Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) sets the background check fee amount separately.
The background check component typically includes:
These fees total approximately $52.50 for the background investigation portion.
Total fees vary by county because each sheriff sets local processing fees within the statutory maximum. Common totals reported by Colorado counties include:
| Fee Type | Typical Total | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| New Permit | $152.50 | $100 permit fee + $52.50 background check |
| Renewal Permit | $63.00 | $50 permit fee + $13 InstaCheck |
| Late Renewal | $78.00 | $63 renewal + $15 statutory late fee |
| Replacement Permit (Lost/Stolen/Damaged) | $15.00 | Per state law |
| Address Change | No charge | Required within 30 days of moving |
Accepted payment methods vary by county but generally include:
Training course fees are separate from the permit application fees and are paid directly to the training provider. Per HB24-1174 (effective July 1, 2025), new applicants must complete an 8-hour concealed handgun training class, and renewal applicants must complete a 2-hour refresher class, both from a verified instructor.
Example training costs (vary by provider and county):
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| § 18-12-203, C.R.S. | Permit criteria and application requirements |
| § 18-12-205(2)(b), C.R.S. | Maximum new permit fee ($100) |
| § 18-12-211, C.R.S. | Permit validity, renewal, maximum renewal fee ($50), late fee |
| § 18-12-214, C.R.S. | Authority of permit; where permits are valid |
| HB24-1174 | New training requirements effective July 1, 2025 |
View this topic on its own page: Colorado Concealed Handgun Permit (CHP) - Fees and Costs
Under Colorado law, certain weapons are classified as illegal or restricted:
C.R.S. 18-12-302(2) creates a possession exception for pre-ban magazines. You may lawfully possess a large-capacity magazine if you:
Both conditions must hold. There is no registration, permit, or paperwork attached to the exception.
The burden is on the prosecution. Under C.R.S. 18-12-302(2)(b), once a person charged under subsection (1) asserts that the grandfather exception applies, the prosecution has the burden of proof to refute the assertion. The defendant does not have to prove ownership on July 1, 2013.
Signed by Governor: April 10, 2025 Effective Date: April 10, 2025 (with prohibition on manufacture/sale/purchase effective August 1, 2026)
Statute: C.R.S. 18-12-116. For the full purchase process, course tiers, instructor requirements, penalties, and pending litigation, see the SB25-003 section of this guide.
A person commits a class 2 misdemeanor if they:
Signed by Governor: May 15, 2024 Effective Date: January 1, 2025
The following persons are prohibited from possessing firearms under Colorado law:
The following persons are prohibited from shipping, transporting, receiving, or possessing firearms or ammunition:
Lautenberg Amendment - 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9). A misdemeanor crime of domestic violence (MCDV) - any misdemeanor that has, as an element, the use or attempted use of physical force or the threatened use of a deadly weapon, committed against a current or former spouse, parent, guardian, person with a child in common, cohabitant, or similarly situated person - triggers a federal LIFETIME firearm-possession bar that is independent of state law. The Lautenberg disability applies even when the state-court conviction did not involve a firearm and even when no firearm-related penalty was imposed at sentencing. United States v. Rahimi (2024) confirmed the constitutionality of related federal § 922(g)(8) DV-restraining-order disabilities under the Bruen historical-tradition test.
View this topic on its own page: Restrictions
Under C.R.S. § 18-12-106(1)(d), a person commits a class 2 misdemeanor if:
"The person has in his or her possession a firearm while the person is under the influence of intoxicating liquor or of a controlled substance, as defined in section 18-18-102(5)."
Possession of a concealed carry permit issued pursuant to Part 2 of Article 12 (or a temporary emergency permit) is not a defense to a violation of this subsection. The statute explicitly states:
"Possession of a permit issued under section 18-12-105.1, as it existed prior to its repeal, or possession of a permit or a temporary emergency permit issued pursuant to part 2 of this article is no defense to a violation of this subsection (1)."
Colorado courts have held that possession of a firearm while intoxicated is a strict liability offense. In People v. Wilson, 972 P.2d 701 (Colo. App. 1998), the court ruled that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury that "knowingly" was an element of the offense.
The common sense definition of "possession" as used in C.R.S. § 18-12-106(1)(d) is the actual or physical control of a firearm. (People v. Garcia, 197 Colo. 550, 595 P.2d 228 (1979))
The statute does not specifically define "under the influence of intoxicating liquor" for purposes of this section. However, in People v. Beckett, 782 P.2d 812 (Colo. App. 1989), aff'd, 800 P.2d 74 (Colo. 1990), the court found that the failure to define "under the influence of intoxicating liquor" was harmless error where the defendant testified he was too drunk to drive.
Additionally, in People v. Koper, 2018 COA 137, the court held that the trial court did not err in rejecting defendant's jury instructions and expert testimony regarding blood alcohol content inferences and presumptions, as those are not incorporated under the prohibited possession of a firearm statute (i.e., the DUI BAC presumptions do not automatically apply to this firearms offense).
Self-defense is not a valid defense to the crime of prohibited use of weapons under this statute. (People v. Beckett, 782 P.2d 812 (Colo. App. 1989), aff'd, 800 P.2d 74 (Colo. 1990))
The prohibition applies to being under the influence of:
The Colorado Supreme Court has upheld this statute, finding that:
Violation of C.R.S. § 18-12-106(1)(d) is a class 2 misdemeanor.
View this topic on its own page: Under Influence
Colorado law requires that firearms be responsibly and securely stored when not in use to prevent access by unsupervised juveniles and other unauthorized users.
It is unlawful to fail to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that a person owns or controls when:
Penalty: Failure to comply is a class 2 misdemeanor.
Colorado law prohibits knowingly leaving a firearm in an unattended vehicle unless specific storage requirements are met:
Handguns:
Non-Handgun Firearms (long guns, etc.):
Penalty: Unsafe storage of a firearm in a vehicle is a civil infraction.
A person who owns a firearm that has been lost or stolen must report the loss or theft to a law enforcement agency within five days after discovering the loss or theft.
Penalties:
These storage requirements apply to all firearm owners in Colorado, including concealed carry permit holders. Permit holders should be particularly aware of the vehicle storage requirements, as carrying a concealed handgun in a vehicle is common practice. When a concealed handgun is not being carried on the person and is left in an unattended vehicle, it must comply with the locked hard-sided container requirements outlined in § 18-12-114.5, C.R.S.
| Requirement | Statute | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Safe storage on premises (juvenile/prohibited person access) | § 18-12-114, C.R.S. | Class 2 misdemeanor |
| Safe storage in unattended vehicles | § 18-12-114.5, C.R.S. | Civil infraction |
| Reporting lost or stolen firearms | § 18-12-113, C.R.S. | Civil infraction ($25 fine) / Misdemeanor (up to $500 fine) |
View this topic on its own page: Storage
Colorado law allows a person to carry a firearm in a vehicle if its use is for lawful protection of such person or another person's person or property. [C.R.S. §18-12-105(2)]
Colorado law also allows a person to possess a handgun in a dwelling, place of business, or automobile. However, when you carry the weapon into your home, business, hotel room, etc., it must be in plain view. [C.R.S. §18-12-105(2)]
A concealed handgun permit (CHP) is not required when a person is in a private automobile or other private transportation - a handgun is not considered concealed in that context. [C.R.S. §18-12-105(2)]
However, if a person does hold a CHP, the permit and a valid photo identification must be carried with the handgun at all times.
Local jurisdictions may not enact laws that restrict a person's ability to travel with a weapon. [C.R.S. §18-12-105.6]
Under Colorado's wildlife statutes, you may carry a weapon in your vehicle. However, it is unlawful to have any firearm, other than a pistol or revolver, in or on any motor vehicle unless the chamber is unloaded. This means:
Effective January 1, 2025, Colorado enacted new requirements for storing firearms in unattended vehicles:
In accordance with 16 USC §1a-7b, in any national park, a person may possess a firearm if such possession is in compliance with the laws of the state in which the national park is located. Therefore, Colorado's laws apply in national parks within the state.
However, under 18 USC §930, firearms are prohibited within "Federal facilities" (buildings or parts thereof owned or leased by the Federal Government where Federal employees are regularly present for official duties). In national parks, such facilities may include visitor centers, administrative offices, and maintenance buildings. These facilities will be clearly marked with signs at all public entrances.
While visiting National Forests in Colorado, you may carry a weapon. However, in addition to state laws, you must comply with Federal Regulations pertaining to the use of a firearm on National Forest System lands.
A firearm may not be discharged in the following National Forest areas per 36 CFR §261.10(d):
While not directly a transportation law, SB25-003 prohibits the manufacture, distribution, transfer, sale, and purchase of specified semiautomatic firearms (effective August 1, 2026) with certain exceptions including completion of approved firearms safety courses. This may affect what firearms can be legally acquired and subsequently transported in Colorado. Persons who already lawfully possess such firearms are not prohibited from continued possession or transportation under existing law.
View this topic on its own page: Transport
Colorado historically had a state preemption statute (C.R.S. § 29-11.7-103) that generally prohibited local governments from enacting firearms regulations that were inconsistent with or more restrictive than state law. This preemption framework was significantly altered in 2021.
On June 19, 2021, Governor Jared Polis signed SB21-256 into law, fundamentally changing Colorado's preemption landscape for firearms regulation.
Declares that the regulation of firearms is a matter of both state and local concern, effectively removing the prior blanket state preemption.
Permits local governments to enact ordinances, regulations, or other laws governing or prohibiting the sale, purchase, transfer, or possession of a firearm, ammunition, or firearm component or accessory.
Floor, not ceiling: Local ordinances, regulations, or laws may not be less restrictive than state law - meaning local governments can impose stricter regulations but cannot loosen state-level requirements.
Criminal penalty limitations: A local law may only impose a criminal penalty for a violation upon a person who knew or reasonably should have known that the person's conduct was prohibited.
Local governments (including special districts) and governing boards of institutions of higher education are permitted to enact ordinances, resolutions, rules, or other regulations that prohibit a concealed handgun permit holder from carrying a concealed handgun in a building or specific area within the local government's or governing board's jurisdiction.
For special districts, the prohibition applies to buildings or specific areas under the direct control or management of the district.
Violations of local concealed carry restrictions may only result in a civil penalty (not criminal).
The maximum fine for a first offense is $50.
As a result of SB21-256, concealed carry permit holders in Colorado must be aware that:
Firearms regulations may vary by locality. Different cities, counties, and special districts may have enacted their own firearms ordinances that are more restrictive than state law.
Local governments can designate specific buildings and areas as off-limits for concealed carry, even for valid permit holders.
Institutions of higher education may independently restrict concealed carry on their campuses.
Several Colorado municipalities have enacted local firearms ordinances following the passage of SB21-256:
City of Boulder: Has enacted gun violence prevention ordinances, including an assault weapons ban and restrictions on concealed carry in certain city properties and areas.
City of Lafayette: The Lafayette City Council has approved firearm safety ordinances under the authority granted by SB21-256.
Other municipalities across Colorado have similarly adopted or considered local firearms regulations.
| Statute/Law | Description |
|---|---|
| SB21-256 (2021 Regular Session) | Permits local regulation of firearms; declares firearms regulation a matter of state and local concern |
| C.R.S. § 29-11.7-103 | Prior state preemption statute (modified by SB21-256) |
| C.R.S. § 18-12-105.6 | Concealed handgun permit provisions |
View this topic on its own page: Preemption
Primary Statute: Article 14.5 of Title 13, C.R.S. (§ 13-14.5-101 et seq.)
Colorado's "Red Flag" law, formally known as the Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) statute, was enacted in 2019 (HB 19-1177) and expanded in 2023 (SB 23-170). An ERPO is a civil court order that prohibits a person who poses a significant risk of causing personal injury to self or others in the near future from:
A person subject to an ERPO (the "respondent") must surrender all firearms in their possession or control. ERPOs also require the respondent to surrender any concealed carry permits.
The following individuals or entities may file a petition requesting an ERPO (expanded by SB 23-170 in 2023 and further expanded by SB 4 in 2026):
Concealed carry permit holders subject to an ERPO must:
Colorado law includes additional firearm prohibition provisions that may interact with ERPOs:
| Feature | ERPO | Domestic Violence Protection Order |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Civil restraining order | Civil or criminal protection order |
| Trigger | Significant risk to self or others | Domestic violence involving physical force |
| Duration | 364 days (renewable once) | See §§ 13-14-105.5, 18-1-1001 |
| Attorney appointed | Yes, at court's expense | Not addressed in firearm relinquishment statutes |
| Firearm surrender | Mandatory | Mandatory (if DV with physical force) |
| CCP surrender | Required | Not specifically addressed (statutes require firearm and ammunition surrender) |
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| § 13-14.5-101 et seq., C.R.S. | Extreme Risk Protection Orders (primary ERPO statute) |
| § 13-14.5-103, C.R.S. | ERPO petition and hearing procedures |
| § 13-14-105.5, C.R.S. | Civil protection orders - firearm provisions |
| § 18-1-1001, C.R.S. | Criminal protection orders - firearm relinquishment |
| § 18-6-803.5, C.R.S. | Violation of protection orders |
| § 24-4.1-302, C.R.S. | Victim Rights Act - covered crimes |
United States v. Rahimi (2024). In United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federal firearm prohibition at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) for persons subject to a qualifying domestic-violence restraining order, holding the federal disability survives the historical-tradition test of N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). Rahimi is the controlling SCOTUS authority on the constitutionality of federal firearm disabilities tied to domestic-violence findings; it bears on any state-level red-flag / ERPO analysis to the extent those frameworks borrow federal § 922(g)(8) prohibitor mechanics.
View this topic on its own page: Red Flag
The National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA; 26 U.S.C. §§5801 et seq.) regulates certain categories of firearms through registration and taxation requirements. These items are commonly referred to as "NFA items" or "NFA firearms."
Per 26 U.S.C. §5845, the NFA covers the following weapons:
Colorado does not have state-level prohibitions on NFA items that are lawfully possessed under federal law. NFA items including short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, suppressors/silencers, and destructive devices may be possessed in Colorado provided they are properly registered and transferred in compliance with federal NFA requirements.
Note: Machine guns manufactured after May 19, 1986, are prohibited from transfer to civilians under the Firearms Owners' Protection Act of 1986 (18 U.S.C. §922(o)). Only machine guns lawfully possessed before that date may be transferred to private individuals.
P.L. 119-21 (the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act") sets a $0 tax rate for the making or transfer of all NFA firearms that are not machine guns or destructive devices. This means:
Important: P.L. 119-21 does not repeal the NFA or its implementing regulations. The following requirements remain in place:
To acquire an NFA firearm in Colorado, individuals must:
Certain NFA firearm transfers are tax-exempt under 26 U.S.C. §§5852-5853, including:
Tax-exempt transfers use ATF Form 5 (Application for Tax Exempt Transfer and Registration of Firearm).
The same categories of prohibited persons under 18 U.S.C. §922(g) apply to NFA firearms. Prohibited persons include those who:
If the NFA firearm is a machine gun, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or destructive device, the registrant may be required by 18 U.S.C. §922(a)(4) to obtain permission from ATF prior to any transportation in interstate or foreign commerce.
Any person who violates or fails to comply with any NFA requirement shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both. Any firearm involved in a violation is subject to seizure and forfeiture.
H.R. 2395 (SHORT Act) - Introduced March 27, 2025, in the 119th Congress. This bill would remove short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and "any other weapons" from the NFA definition of "firearm" entirely, leaving only machine guns, silencers, and destructive devices regulated under the NFA. The bill would also preempt state and local taxes and registration requirements on short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and require destruction of related NFRTR records within 365 days. Status: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on the Judiciary.
NFA Constitutional Challenges - Following enactment of P.L. 119-21, lawsuits have been filed challenging the constitutionality of NFA registration requirements for untaxed firearms, arguing that without the tax, the NFA's registration provisions lack constitutional authority under the Taxing Clause and violate the Second Amendment. These cases are in early stages as of September 2025.
To deal in NFA firearms, an individual must hold both a Federal Firearms License (FFL) under the Gun Control Act and pay a Special Occupational Tax under the NFA:
Bump stocks - Garland v. Cargill (2024). In Garland v. Cargill, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the federal regulation classifying bump stocks as machineguns under the National Firearms Act. As a matter of FEDERAL law, bump stocks are no longer NFA-regulated. State law may still independently restrict bump stocks; consult your state's RESTRICTIONS section for any state-level bump-stock prohibition.
P.L. 119-21 NFA tax (2026). Effective January 1, 2026, P.L. 119-21 (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed July 4, 2025) reduced the federal NFA making and transfer tax to $0 for silencers, SBRs, SBSs, and AOWs. Machine guns and destructive devices retain the $200 tax. The federal registration requirements (Form 1 / Form 4, fingerprints, photographs, CLEO notice) remain unchanged.
View this topic on its own page: Nfa Items
When a mandatory protection order is issued in a domestic violence case involving the threat, use, or attempted use of physical force, the court must order the defendant to:
Relinquishment options (per § 18-1-1001(9)(d)):
Key enforcement provisions:
Note: Colorado has seen multiple constitutional carry proposals in recent legislative sessions. None have been enacted as of April 2026.
Effective July 1, 2023, this legislation requires:
Concealed Handgun Permits are issued by the sheriff of the county in which the applicant resides. Below are select county contacts:
View this topic on its own page: Resources
How long does the permit application process take? By law, the Sheriff has ninety (90) days from receipt of your application to perform a background check and either approve or deny your request for a concealed handgun permit. It could take up to 90 days to complete the background check and notify you that your permit is ready to pick up. Note: Some counties (e.g., Adams County) report high citizen demand, with waits of 120 days or more just for an open application appointment, followed by the 90-day processing period.
Who is eligible to apply for a CHP? Applicants must be at least 21 years old, a legal resident of Colorado, and not prohibited by law from possessing a firearm.
Do I need a concealed handgun permit? Only if you plan to carry a handgun on your person, hidden from the view of others when out of your car, home, or business.
How long is my permit valid? Your permit is good for five (5) years.
Will the Sheriff's Office notify me when it is time to renew my permit? No. Like your driver's license, it is your responsibility to maintain your permit. You may renew your permit within 120 days before it expires and up to 6 months (180 days) after it expires. If you renew within 180 days after expiration, there is a $15 late fee per C.R.S. 18-12-211. No permit shall be renewed six months or more after the expiration date; the permit is then deemed permanently expired.
If I moved out of the county, do I need to renew my permit in the county I move to? Yes. Within 120 days prior to the expiration of the permit, you may obtain a renewal form from the Sheriff of the county or city and county in which you reside (or maintain a secondary residence, or own or lease real property used by you in a business).
What handgun training is required? As of July 1, 2025, all applications are subject to new training requirements per HB24-1174. There is no grace period. For new permits, applicants must have completed a certified concealed handgun training class from a verified instructor within one (1) year preceding submittal of the application. The original training certificate with the printed name and original signature of the verified instructor is required. Online classes are not acceptable.
For renewals, a 2-hour refresher concealed handgun training class from a verified instructor obtained within six (6) months preceding submittal of the application is required. Alternatively, an 8-hour concealed handgun training class obtained within 6 months is also acceptable.
Alternative training qualifications include:
Is my class instructor verified? How do I check? Your instructor's name must be listed on one of the Colorado county sheriff's websites. Ask your instructor which county sheriff verified them and go to that county sheriff's website to verify their name is listed.
| Fee Type | Amount |
|---|---|
| New Permit | $152.50 (non-refundable) |
| Renewal Permit | $63.00 (non-refundable) |
| Late Renewal Fee | $15.00 (for expired permits within 6 months) |
| Replacement Permit (lost/stolen/damaged) | $15.00 |
| Military Discount (Adams County) | $50 off new permit fee |
Payment methods generally accepted: cash, check, money order, credit/debit card (American Express may not be accepted at all locations).
Do I need to inform the Sheriff's Office if I move? Yes. You must notify the county Sheriff's Office that issued your Concealed Handgun Permit within thirty (30) days of your move by submitting an Address Change Form. This requirement aligns with C.R.S. 42-2-119.
I have a CHP issued from another county and moved into a new county. Who do I notify? Notify the Colorado county that issued your Concealed Handgun Permit within 30 days of your move by checking that county's website and submitting an Address Change Form.
My permit was lost or stolen. What do I do? Initiate a report with the local law enforcement agency where the permit was lost or stolen. Bring a valid driver's license and the report documents to the Sheriff's Office that issued your permit. You will fill out a Permit Lost or Destroyed Form. The replacement fee is $15.
My permit is faded and unreadable. What do I do? Bring your permit and valid ID to the Sheriff's Office that issued your permit for replacement. The fee is $15.
Can I transfer my out-of-state concealed handgun permit to a Colorado permit? No. You must apply for a Colorado concealed handgun permit through the standard application process.
Does Colorado recognize out-of-state permits? Pursuant to C.R.S. 18-12-213, Colorado will recognize a valid permit issued in another state IF:
When traveling with a Colorado permit, contact the destination state to confirm reciprocity and review that state's firearms laws. For current reciprocity information, visit the CBI Concealed Handgun Permit Reciprocity page.
If I'm a current Colorado resident, is my out-of-state permit valid here? No. Colorado no longer recognizes the validity of any permit issued by any state to a nonresident of that state (see C.R.S. 18-12-213, amended 2007). Specifically, the permit holder must be a resident of the state that issued the concealed handgun permit and must be in possession of a valid driver's license or identification card issued by that same state.
New Permit Applications:
Renewal Applications:
HB24-1174 (Effective July 1, 2025): All new and renewal CHP applications submitted on or after July 1, 2025 are subject to new training requirements. There is no grace period. This includes enhanced instructor verification requirements and specific training certificate standards.
Senate Bill 25-003 (Signed April 10, 2025; purchase prohibition effective August 1, 2026): Beginning August 1, 2026, C.R.S. 18-12-116(2) makes it unlawful to knowingly manufacture, distribute, transfer, sell, or purchase a "specified semiautomatic firearm," which the statute defines as a semiautomatic rifle or shotgun with a detachable magazine, or a gas-operated semiautomatic handgun with a detachable magazine. Several categories are excluded, including rimfire-only .22 firearms without a separate upper and lower receiver, manually operated actions, recoil-operated semiautomatic handguns, permanently fixed magazines that cannot accept more than 15 rounds, and 35 named models.
To buy one on or after August 1, 2026 you must do two things in order:
Three things Colorado permit holders get wrong about this law:
Penalties: a first violation is a class 2 misdemeanor; a second or subsequent violation is a class 6 felony (C.R.S. 18-12-116(4)(b)).
For the full process, the exemption list, instructor requirements, and the litigation status, see the SB25-003 section of this guide.
Lautenberg Amendment - 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9). A misdemeanor crime of domestic violence (MCDV) - any misdemeanor that has, as an element, the use or attempted use of physical force or the threatened use of a deadly weapon, committed against a current or former spouse, parent, guardian, person with a child in common, cohabitant, or similarly situated person - triggers a federal lifetime firearm-possession bar that is independent of state law. The federal bar applies even when the state-court conviction did not involve a firearm and even when no firearm-related penalty was imposed at sentencing. The 2024 U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Rahimi reaffirmed that federal firearm disabilities tied to domestic-violence findings remain constitutional under the Second Amendment.
View this topic on its own page: Faq
Browse local instructors offering state-approved training in your area. Book online, complete your training, and get one step closer to your concealed carry permit.