Reviewed by Will Luker, Founder of CCW Hub. USCCA Training Counselor, USCCA Certified Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, Law Enforcement.
This section is a catch-all for Massachusetts firearm rules that do not fit cleanly into the other sections of this guide: private sales and transfer reporting, juveniles and firearms, domestic violence prohibitors, ammunition rules, the federal Gun Control Act overlay, hunting overlays, gun shows, tribal-land considerations, and several smaller topics.
If a question does not belong in OVERVIEW, PERMIT_BASICS, CONSTITUTIONAL_CARRY, CONCEALED_CARRY, OPEN_CARRY, TRAINING_REQUIREMENTS, APPLICATION_PROCESS, FEES_COSTS, RENEWAL_PROCESS, PROHIBITED_PLACES, VEHICLE_CARRY, TRANSPORT, STORAGE, USE_OF_FORCE, CASTLE_DOCTRINE, DUTY_TO_INFORM, UNDER_INFLUENCE, RESTRICTIONS, NFA_ITEMS, RED_FLAG, PREEMPTION, RECIPROCITY, RESOURCES, or FAQ, the short answer is here.
Massachusetts is a heavily regulated firearms state. Most of what shows up in this catch-all is regulated at the state level, often more strictly than the federal floor.
Massachusetts requires that all firearm transfers be reported to the State Police Firearms Records Bureau (FRB). Under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 128A, a private transfer between two Massachusetts LTC holders or FID holders must be conducted using the FRB's online portal:
Transfers across state lines must go through an FFL per 18 U.S.C. 922(a)(3) and Section 922(b)(3). A Massachusetts resident receiving a firearm from out-of-state must take delivery through a Massachusetts FFL.
Possession of a firearm by a person under 18 is generally prohibited in Massachusetts, with narrow exceptions:
The juvenile possession framework is in M.G.L. c. 140, Section 129B (FID-Restricted variant) and overlays the c. 269, Section 10 framework for unlicensed possession.
Federal law generally prohibits possession of a handgun (or handgun ammunition) by a person under 18, with enumerated exceptions for ranch work, employment, hunting, target practice, defense in the home, and transport to lawful purposes. The federal rule applies in parallel to the state framework.
M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10G is the storage-causing-child-injury offense, addressed in detail in the STORAGE section. A storage violation under c. 140, Section 131L that results in a person under 18 obtaining the firearm and causing death or injury triggers c. 269, Section 10G felony exposure.
Massachusetts layers state and federal prohibitors on domestic violence convictions and protection orders.
The state and federal prohibitors apply in parallel; either alone is sufficient to disqualify possession.
Possession of ammunition in Massachusetts requires an LTC or FID. M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(h) criminalizes unlicensed ammunition possession on the same basis as unlicensed firearm possession. A person without an LTC or FID may not lawfully purchase or possess ammunition for any firearm.
Ammunition may be purchased only from a licensed dealer or transferred through the FRB MIRCS portal. Mail-order purchase of ammunition is permitted when shipped to a licensed person; the federal 18 U.S.C. 922(d) prohibition on sale to a prohibited person applies in parallel.
Massachusetts does not impose a separate ammunition-storage statute equivalent to c. 140, Section 131L. Best practice is to store ammunition separately from firearms, particularly in households with children.
Massachusetts gun shows operate under M.G.L. c. 140 with the underlying transfer rules:
The MassWildlife regulations under M.G.L. c. 131 layer on top of c. 140 for hunters:
The MassWildlife Hunting and Trapping regulations are updated annually; consult the current edition at mass.gov for current rules.
Massachusetts has two federally recognized tribes: the Mashpee Wampanoag and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah). Tribal sovereignty means tribal nations may regulate firearms within their reservation boundaries. State firearms law generally applies to non-Indian persons on fee-patent land within a reservation; tribal law governs tribal members and certain on-reservation conduct.
The interplay is fact-specific. LTC holders visiting a Massachusetts tribal area should:
The federal 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(16) defines an antique firearm as one manufactured in or before 1898, plus certain muzzleloaders and replicas. Antiques are largely exempt from the federal Gun Control Act framework.
Massachusetts state law treats most antique firearms outside the regulated "firearm" category in M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121. The practical effect:
Massachusetts does not prohibit civilian possession of soft body armor. Federal 18 U.S.C. 931 prohibits possession of body armor by a person previously convicted of a violent felony.
A Massachusetts firearms dealer may apply to become a federal Class 3 Special Occupational Taxpayer (SOT) to deal in NFA-regulated items. The Class 3 SOT process is federal (ATF). Massachusetts state law in M.G.L. c. 140 governs the underlying dealer license; the federal Class 3 status authorizes the dealer to handle NFA inventory subject to ATF audit. The practical NFA market in Massachusetts is limited by the state-law restrictions on civilian NFA possession discussed in NFA_ITEMS.
Massachusetts has limited civil immunity for justified force; see USE_OF_FORCE for the framework. A person who uses lawful self-defense force may still be sued civilly, though the criminal disposition has preclusive effect on certain elements.
Federal firearms law sets a floor that no state can fall below; Massachusetts has consistently legislated above that floor (LTC requirement, magazine cap, assault-style firearm definition, sensitive-place expansion, training requirement). When state and federal rules conflict, federal law generally controls only where the state rule is preempted (e.g., federal supremacy on dealer licensing). On substantive carry, possession, and transfer rules, Massachusetts's stricter framework governs in-state conduct.
Two federal statutes commonly come up:
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Firearm definitions |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 128A | Private transfer through FRB MIRCS |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 129B | FID |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L | Safe storage |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Carry offenses |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10G | Storage causing child injury |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12F | Armor-piercing ammunition |
| M.G.L. c. 209A, Section 3B | DV order firearm surrender |
| 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(16) | Antique firearm definition |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(a)(3) | Federal interstate transfer rule |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(d) | Federal sale to prohibited person |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) | Federal DV protection order |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(9) | Federal misdemeanor DV |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(x) | Federal handgun-to-juvenile rule |
| 18 U.S.C. 926A | FOPA |
| 18 U.S.C. 931 | Body armor prohibition |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | 2024 reform act |
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Firearm Laws - Other Topics
Massachusetts is one of the most heavily regulated firearms jurisdictions in the United States. The state's firearms framework lives primarily in M.G.L. c. 140 (the licensing statute) and M.G.L. c. 269 (the criminal penalty statute), and was substantially overhauled by Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 ("An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws"), signed by Governor Healey on July 25, 2024.
Massachusetts uses two separate firearm licenses, both administered through the local police chief or, for non-residents, the Colonel of the State Police:
Carrying a handgun without an LTC is prosecuted under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(a) and historically carried a mandatory minimum sentence; Chapter 135 of 2024 reworked the penalty structure. Possession of a firearm at home or work without proper licensing is a separate offense under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(h).
Pre-Bruen, Massachusetts was the leading example of a strict may-issue state, with licensing authorities requiring applicants to show "good reason to fear injury" before issuing an unrestricted LTC. After New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), Massachusetts could no longer condition issuance on a need-based showing.
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 amended M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 to remove "good reason" and replace it with a suitability standard. The statute now bars issuance only to applicants the licensing authority finds "unsuitable" based on enumerated criteria - including a reliable risk of harm to self or others, prior conduct evidencing carelessness with firearms, or other disqualifying factors. Denials are appealable de novo to the District Court under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131(f).
The suitability standard is a constraint on what would otherwise be shall-issue treatment, and licensing-authority discretion remains a significant feature of Massachusetts practice. Applicants in some jurisdictions still encounter delays, restrictions, or denials based on prior contacts with police that did not result in convictions.
Massachusetts does not have permitless concealed carry. Every person carrying a handgun in public must hold a valid LTC issued under c. 140, Section 131 (residents) or Section 131F (non-residents).
Massachusetts also does not recognize any other state's concealed carry permit. A non-resident must obtain a Massachusetts Non-Resident LTC (90-day or 1-year) before lawfully carrying a handgun in the Commonwealth. Federal 18 U.S.C. 926A (FOPA) still protects interstate transport of an unloaded firearm in a locked container between two states where possession is lawful, but does not authorize carry on the person while in Massachusetts.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Firearm-related definitions (firearm, large capacity, assault-style firearm) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 129B | Firearm Identification Card (FID) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | License to Carry (LTC) - residents |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F | Non-resident LTC |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L | Safe storage requirements |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131P | Basic firearms safety course |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Unlawful possession / carry penalties |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10H | Carrying under the influence |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12D | Carry on school grounds |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12E | Discharge near a dwelling |
| M.G.L. c. 278, Section 8A | Castle doctrine (no duty to retreat in dwelling) |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | Comprehensive 2024 firearm reform act |
This guide walks through Massachusetts firearm law as it applies to a person seeking or holding an LTC: who qualifies, how to apply, what training is required, what restrictions apply to where and how the firearm may be carried, what storage and transport rules apply, what to do in encounters with law enforcement, and what the use-of-force framework looks like under c. 278, Section 8A and the common-law self-defense doctrine.
Statutes are cited inline. The "Resources" section at the end of this guide links the canonical sources at malegislature.gov and mass.gov, the licensing application portal, and the firearms records bureau. Massachusetts law is dynamic - Chapter 135 of 2024 changed dozens of provisions, with phased effective dates running into 2026 - so verify any time-sensitive provision against the current statutory text before relying on it.
Massachusetts uses two distinct licenses for civilian firearm possession and carry. Both are issued by the local police chief or, for non-residents, the Colonel of the Massachusetts State Police, and both are governed by M.G.L. c. 140.
The LTC is the broad firearms license. A valid LTC authorizes the holder to:
The LTC is the only Massachusetts permit that authorizes carry of a handgun. It is valid for six years unless revoked or suspended.
Pre-2024 Massachusetts issued two LTC subtypes (Class A and Class B); Chapter 135 of 2024 collapsed these into a single LTC and amended M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 accordingly.
The FID is a narrower license. A valid FID authorizes the holder to:
The FID does not authorize possession of a handgun and does not authorize concealed carry of any firearm. An FID holder who carries a handgun is exposed to prosecution under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(a) or 10(h) just as an unlicensed person would be.
The FID is also valid for six years.
Under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131, an LTC applicant must:
Under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 129B, an FID applicant must:
The FID does not impose a separate "suitability" finding, but the licensing authority may deny an FID for several enumerated statutory reasons (recent restraining-order history, certain juvenile dispositions, etc.).
Under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131, the licensing authority may issue an LTC subject to written restrictions based on what the authority finds reasonable. Common restriction types include:
A restricted LTC who carries outside the restriction can face revocation and prosecution. Restrictions are subject to the same de novo District Court appeal as outright denials under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131(f).
See the Renewal Process section for the full mechanical sequence.
Under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131(d), the licensing authority shall not issue an LTC to a person who:
The federal Gun Control Act (18 U.S.C. 922(g)) overlays the same and additional prohibitions; both apply in parallel.
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts License to Carry (LTC) - The Basics
Concealed carry of a handgun in Massachusetts requires a valid License to Carry (LTC) issued under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 (residents) or M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F (non-residents). The LTC is the only Massachusetts license that authorizes carry of a handgun, whether concealed or openly. The Firearm Identification Card (FID) under c. 140, Section 129B covers long guns and ammunition only and does NOT authorize handgun carry.
The LTC authorizes the holder to carry a loaded handgun on the person or under direct control in a vehicle, subject to the place-restrictions in M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 and Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024, the storage requirements in M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L, the impairment prohibition in M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10H, and any restrictions written on the face of the LTC itself.
Pre-Bruen Massachusetts was the leading example of a may-issue concealed carry state. M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 conditioned issuance on the applicant's showing of "good reason to fear injury" - a need-based test that licensing authorities applied with broad discretion, often denying unrestricted LTCs to applicants who could not articulate a specific threat.
After New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), the "good reason" test became constitutionally untenable. Massachusetts responded by enacting Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 ("An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws"), which:
The post-2024 framework continues to give the local chief of police meaningful authority but reduces the variability across municipalities that characterized the pre-Bruen practice.
Under c. 140, Section 131, the licensing authority may issue an LTC subject to written restrictions. Common restrictions:
Carry outside a restriction can lead to revocation and prosecution. Restrictions are appealable de novo to the District Court under c. 140, Section 131(f).
The carry-related offenses are codified in M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10, with subsections covering specific scenarios:
| Offense | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Possession of firearm/rifle/shotgun without license outside home or business | M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(a) | The core unlicensed carry offense |
| Possession of loaded firearm without license outside home or business | M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(n) | Enhanced penalty for loaded firearm |
| Possession of firearm/rifle/shotgun at home or business without proper licensing | M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(h) | Separate offense from carry outside |
| Possession of ammunition without proper licensing | M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(h) | Ammunition possession requires FID or LTC |
| Failure to surrender revoked/suspended LTC, FID card, or firearms | M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(i) | Applies upon revocation or suspension |
| Defacing a firearm serial number | M.G.L. c. 269, Section 11C | Serial number alteration |
| Possession of a firearm with defaced serial during felony | M.G.L. c. 269, Section 11B | Enhanced |
Massachusetts Criminal Model Jury Instructions for these offenses were revised in July 2023, and certain dangerous-weapons instructions under c. 269, Section 10(b) were further revised in February 2026. Practitioners and trial courts work from the current model instructions in active prosecutions.
It is unlawful for an LTC holder to carry a loaded firearm on the person or under control in a vehicle while:
Penalty: fine up to $5,000, imprisonment in the house of correction for up to 2.5 years, or both. Conviction is near-automatic grounds for LTC revocation under c. 140, Section 131. See UNDER_INFLUENCE section for the full framework.
Every firearm not under the LTC holder's immediate control must be in a locked container or have a tamper-resistant mechanical lock attached. The c. 140, Section 131L rule applies at home, in a vehicle, and in any other context where the firearm is left unattended. Violation penalties scale with the firearm type and outcome - civil for long guns, misdemeanor for handguns, felony for large-capacity firearms or where injury to a child results (M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10G). See STORAGE section.
It is unlawful to discharge a firearm within 500 feet of a building used for residential or business purposes, with limited exceptions for self-defense and lawful sport at a permitted range. Many municipalities impose additional local restrictions on discharge on town-owned property under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12E and local ordinance authority.
Certain dangerous weapons are categorically prohibited regardless of license. The list includes switchblade knives, blackjacks, slungshots, brass knuckles, sword canes, and others. The c. 269, Section 10(b) Criminal Model Jury Instructions were revised in February 2026, reflecting ongoing judicial attention to the dangerous-weapons category.
Suitability under c. 140, Section 131 is a continuous standard. The licensing authority may suspend or revoke an LTC at any time if subsequent conduct supports a finding that the holder is no longer suitable. Common bases for post-issuance revocation:
A revocation is appealable de novo to the District Court under c. 140, Section 131(f) on the same standard as an initial denial.
The LTC authorizes both concealed and open carry of a handgun. In practice:
Most Massachusetts firearms instructors recommend concealed carry to minimize incident potential. See the OPEN_CARRY section for the open-carry-specific analysis.
Under c. 140, Section 131 read with c. 140, Section 131C, an LTC holder may carry a loaded handgun on the person OR under direct control in a vehicle. "Direct control" means the firearm is within the holder's reach. The vehicle carry authority does NOT extend to the FID holder for long guns or to any unlicensed person. See the VEHICLE_CARRY section.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Firearm definitions |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | License to Carry (resident) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131C | Vehicle transport |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F | Non-resident LTC |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L | Safe storage |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131P | Basic Firearms Safety Course |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Unlicensed carry penalties |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10G | Storage causing child injury |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10H | Carry while intoxicated |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 11B | Firearm with defaced serial during felony |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 11C | Defacing serial number |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12D | Carry on school grounds |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12E | Discharge near dwelling |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | 2024 reform act |
| 18 U.S.C. 922 | Federal Gun Control Act |
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Concealed Carry Laws
Massachusetts has no statute that specifically prohibits open carry of a handgun by a person holding a valid License to Carry (LTC) under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131. As a strict statutory matter, an unrestricted LTC authorizes both concealed and open carry of a handgun.
In practice, open carry in Massachusetts is rare, legally risky, and operationally unwise. The combination of strict licensing requirements, the licensing authority's continuous suitability discretion, the c. 269, Section 14 disturbing-the-peace exposure, and the post-Chapter-135 expanded sensitive-place list makes open carry a poor practical choice for nearly all LTC holders. Most Massachusetts firearms instructors recommend concealed carry as the default.
M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 authorizes the LTC holder to "carry firearms" subject to the conditions imposed on the license. The statute does not distinguish between concealed and open methods of carry. Whatever the LTC authorizes, it authorizes in either form.
The restrictions written on the face of a particular LTC may limit the manner of carry. A "target & hunting only" restriction limits both concealed and open carry to those activities. An "unrestricted" LTC authorizes general public carry in either form.
A visibly armed person walking through a public space in Massachusetts is a statistical rarity. Civilian observers may file a complaint or call 911 reporting a "man with a gun." The responding police investigation may lead to:
The Section 14 risk is not theoretical. Massachusetts case law has sustained disturbing-the-peace prosecutions where conduct caused alarm even where the underlying conduct (open carry by an LTC holder) was otherwise lawful.
Suitability under c. 140, Section 131 is a continuous standard. A licensing authority may suspend or revoke an LTC if the holder's conduct gives the chief reason to find the holder no longer suitable. Open carry that produces civilian alarm, police responses, or licensee-authority reports may be cited in a suitability review.
A visibly armed person produces a tactically charged police encounter even when the carry is lawful. Officers approach with weapons drawn or pre-deployed; the LTC holder must produce identification while remaining still; misunderstandings can escalate to tragedy. The risk-reward analysis for an LTC holder strongly favors concealed carry.
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 substantially expanded the list of sensitive places where firearm carry is prohibited (schools, courthouses, government buildings, polling places, hospitals, public transit, parades, parks, alcohol-serving establishments, houses of worship). An open carrier walking through a public area is more likely to inadvertently enter a sensitive place than a concealed carrier whose firearm is not visible to others, and the open carrier becomes the visible test case for enforcement of the sensitive-place rule.
The most common LTC restrictions written by Massachusetts licensing authorities effectively rule out open carry:
Only an unrestricted LTC authorizes general open carry. A restricted LTC holder open-carrying outside the restriction is exposed to revocation and prosecution under c. 269, Section 10 for carry outside license authority.
Even with an unrestricted LTC, certain carry contexts are categorically prohibited - and open carry in those contexts compounds the violation:
A Massachusetts LTC holder hunting with a long gun in a Wildlife Management Area or on private land with permission is openly displaying the firearm in the ordinary course of the activity. The MassWildlife regulations under M.G.L. c. 131 govern hunting firearm carry; the c. 140, Section 131 open-carry analysis applies on top.
Similarly, at a permitted firing range, openly displaying the firearm is normal range conduct. The c. 140, Section 131 framework permits this.
The open-carry analysis described above applies to public carry in non-recreational, non-range contexts.
Massachusetts case law has not produced a bright-line definition of "concealed." The practical standard:
LTC holders who carry concealed should pay attention to clothing fit and printing. Brief, accidental exposure of a holstered firearm during normal activity (reaching up, bending over) is not generally a basis for prosecution but may produce a citizen-complaint response.
The same analysis applies to long guns: an LTC holder may openly carry a rifle or shotgun in public subject to license restrictions and the c. 269, Section 14 / suitability risk. Open carry of a long gun in a non-hunting, non-recreational context will produce a police response.
Massachusetts's posture differs from many other states:
Massachusetts sits in the third category functionally even though no specific statute prohibits open carry. The combination of licensing, suitability, and incidental-offense exposure produces a de facto prohibition for most LTC holders.
For nearly every LTC holder in Massachusetts, the practical recommendation is:
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Firearm definitions |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC (authorizes carry without specifying method) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F | Non-Resident LTC |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Carry offenses |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(j) | Firearms at school |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12D | School grounds carry |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 14 | Disturbing the peace |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(q) | Gun Free School Zones Act |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | 2024 reform act |
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Open Carry Laws
Massachusetts does not have constitutional carry (permitless concealed carry). Every person who carries a handgun in Massachusetts must hold a valid License to Carry (LTC) issued under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 (residents) or M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F (non-residents). Unlicensed carry is prosecuted under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(a) and carries substantial penalties.
Constitutional carry, also known as permitless carry or Vermont carry, refers to the policy of allowing eligible adults to carry a concealed firearm without a state-issued license. As of early 2026, 29 states have enacted some form of constitutional carry. Massachusetts is not one of them and shows no near-term sign of moving to the constitutional carry framework.
Massachusetts is among the most heavily regulated firearms jurisdictions in the United States. The state's firearm-licensing framework has been in place for decades and was substantially expanded by Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 ("An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws"). Chapter 135's direction was toward more comprehensive licensing, training, and sensitive-place restrictions - the opposite of the constitutional carry direction.
The political composition of the Massachusetts General Court (the state legislature) does not support constitutional carry legislation. No serious constitutional carry bill has been filed in recent sessions, and no bill of that type has advanced through committee.
To lawfully carry a handgun in Massachusetts:
| Person | License Required |
|---|---|
| Massachusetts resident | LTC issued under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 |
| Non-resident visiting Massachusetts | Massachusetts Non-Resident LTC issued under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F |
| Active or retired law enforcement officer (qualified) | Carry under federal LEOSA (18 U.S.C. 926B and 926C); no Massachusetts license required |
There is no "in your home" or "in your vehicle" exception that allows unlicensed handgun possession. M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(h) separately criminalizes unlicensed firearm possession at home or business; the LTC or FID is required for possession in either location.
The c. 269, Section 10 offenses applicable to unlicensed carry are substantial:
A conviction under any of these subsections is a serious criminal record and triggers federal firearm-disability under 18 U.S.C. 922(g) (felony or qualifying misdemeanor) on top of the state consequences.
For an eligible Massachusetts resident, the LTC is the permitless-carry alternative. Once issued, the LTC authorizes carry of a handgun without the holder having to seek further authorization for each carry instance. The friction is at the front-end licensing stage, not at the per-instance level.
The LTC qualifying steps:
This is more friction than a constitutional carry state, but is the only lawful path in Massachusetts.
If Massachusetts were to enact constitutional carry, the change would:
No such change is pending or likely in Massachusetts as of early 2026.
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to carry a handgun in public for self-defense. The decision invalidated New York's may-issue framework that conditioned licensure on a need-based showing, and the same logic applied to Massachusetts's pre-Chapter-135 "good reason" requirement.
Bruen did NOT hold that all permit requirements are unconstitutional. The decision left intact:
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 was Massachusetts's substantive response to Bruen. It replaced "good reason" with "suitability" - retaining a discretionary element but framing it within enumerated criteria and de novo District Court appeal. Whether Chapter 135's various provisions survive ongoing federal litigation in Granata v. Healey and related cases remains to be determined.
Even if Chapter 135 were largely invalidated, the result would likely be a Massachusetts shift to shall-issue licensing, NOT a shift to constitutional carry. The Second Amendment doctrine post-Bruen does not require states to forgo licensing entirely.
Massachusetts's lack of constitutional carry combines with its zero-reciprocity posture (see RECIPROCITY section) to make the state uniquely unfriendly to non-resident carriers:
Federal law does not require states to recognize constitutional carry from sister states. 18 U.S.C. 926A (FOPA) provides interstate transport protection for an unloaded firearm in a locked container with ammunition separately stored. FOPA does not authorize carry while in Massachusetts; only Massachusetts state law governs carry.
For any person, resident or non-resident, intending to carry a handgun in Massachusetts:
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Firearm definitions |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC (resident) - the required license |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F | Non-Resident LTC |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131P | Basic Firearms Safety Course |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(a) | Unlicensed carry penalty |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(h) | Unlicensed possession at home/business |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(n) | Unlicensed loaded carry |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(g) | Federal firearm disabilities |
| 18 U.S.C. 926A | FOPA interstate transport |
| 18 U.S.C. 926B | LEOSA active LE |
| 18 U.S.C. 926C | LEOSA retired LE |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | 2024 reform act (preserved LTC requirement) |
| Item | Massachusetts Status |
|---|---|
| Constitutional carry | Not permitted |
| Permit required for handgun carry | Yes - LTC |
| Issuing authority | Local chief of police / Colonel of State Police |
| Issue type (post-Chapter-135 of 2024) | Suitability-based (post-Bruen equivalent of shall-issue with discretion) |
| Open carry by LTC holder | Technically legal but practically inadvisable |
| Recognition of other states' permits | None - zero reciprocity |
| Key statute | M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131; M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 |
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Constitutional Carry
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 significantly expanded Massachusetts's list of "sensitive places" where firearm carry by an LTC holder is prohibited. The expansion was the state's substantive response to New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), and is being tested in federal litigation. Operators should treat the sensitive-place rule as the law until a court enjoins or strikes a specific provision.
This section sets out the categories that are prohibited under the post-Chapter-135 framework. A few categories remain in litigation; verify current enforcement before relying on any specific category.
It is a felony to carry a firearm on the grounds of:
The school-grounds prohibition is one of the longest-standing sensitive-place rules in Massachusetts and predates Bruen. M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12D specifically addresses firearms on school grounds; penalties include imprisonment for up to 5 years in state prison.
The federal Gun Free School Zones Act, 18 U.S.C. 922(q), overlays the state rule and applies a 1,000-foot zone around K-12 schools, with an exception for state-licensed concealed carry. The Massachusetts LTC qualifies for that federal exception, but Massachusetts state law restricts the carry on the grounds themselves.
Firearm possession in any state, federal, or municipal courthouse, court building, or building principally occupied by a court is prohibited. Courthouse weapons screening is universal in Massachusetts; an LTC holder attempting to enter with a firearm will be turned away or arrested.
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 added a prohibition on firearm carry in:
The "government building" category is broad and includes buildings where the public conducts business with state or local agencies. Some buildings provide lockboxes for LTC holders entering for limited purposes; many do not.
Carry is prohibited at:
The polling-place provision was reinforced by Chapter 135 of 2024.
Firearm carry is prohibited at:
Some private healthcare networks (Mass General Brigham, Beth Israel Lahey, etc.) post additional firearm restrictions on their property regardless of the statutory rule.
Massachusetts state law and federal aviation rules combine to prohibit firearm carry past the secure screening area at any commercial airport (Logan, Worcester, Hanscom, etc.). LTC holders may transport a firearm through the airport public area to check-in counter under TSA's air-travel-firearm rules; carry inside the sterile area is barred.
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 expanded the prohibition on firearms on:
The MBTA Transit Police enforces the rule.
In addition to K-12 schools (above), Chapter 135 added:
Massachusetts has long prohibited carry by an LTC holder at premises licensed to sell alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption (bars, restaurants with liquor licenses), unless the licensee is the LTC holder operating their own establishment. The on-premises licensee distinction matters: an off-premises beer-and-wine store generally is not posted as off-limits.
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 added prohibitions on firearm carry at:
Several of these provisions are being litigated in federal court under Bruen. The State Police and local enforcement continue to enforce the prohibitions until enjoined.
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 added houses of worship to the sensitive-place list, subject to a permission opt-out - the owner or operator of the house of worship may consent in writing to LTC holders carrying on the premises. Absent such consent, carry is prohibited.
Private property owners may prohibit firearm carry on their premises. Posting requirements include conspicuous signage at points of public entry. Refusing to leave when asked by the property owner is a trespass offense; the carry itself does not become a separate firearm offense unless the property is otherwise designated as a sensitive place.
Federal law prohibits firearm possession at:
The federal sensitive-place rules apply to LTC holders the same as to unlicensed persons.
Massachusetts has no statute requiring a private employer to allow firearm carry on company property or in employee vehicles parked on company lots. Employers may, and many do, prohibit firearm possession on company property as a condition of employment. Violation is a contractual matter, not a criminal one, unless the property is also a sensitive place under state or federal law.
The sensitive-place rule generally applies to carry at the location, not to transit through the surrounding area. An LTC holder driving past a school does not commit an offense. The Gun Free School Zones Act federal 1,000-foot rule has an exception for state-licensed concealed carry, which Massachusetts LTC holders satisfy.
When a sensitive-place location is one a person must visit (a courthouse for jury duty, a hospital for emergency care), the conservative practice is to leave the firearm secured per c. 140, Section 131L in the vehicle before approaching the location.
As of early 2026, several Chapter 135 sensitive-place categories are being challenged in federal court under Bruen - particularly the houses-of-worship default rule, the public park and beach restrictions, and certain elements of the establishments-serving-alcohol rule. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has not yet issued a definitive ruling on the post-Chapter-135 sensitive-place expansion as of this writing.
Treat the rules as enforceable until enjoined. Track current litigation through the Granata v. Healey docket and related cases.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(j) | Firearms at school |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12D | Carry on school grounds |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC scope including restrictions |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | Expanded sensitive-place list |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(q) | Gun Free School Zones Act |
| 18 U.S.C. 930 | Federal buildings prohibition |
| 39 C.F.R. 232.1(l) | Postal property rule |
| 36 C.F.R. 2.4 | National park firearm rule |
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Prohibited Places for Firearm Carry
Massachusetts has two distinct vehicle-firearm rules depending on what license the carrier holds and what firearm is in the vehicle:
The interplay of these rules is the most commonly misunderstood feature of Massachusetts firearms law for new LTC holders.
Under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 and Section 131C, an LTC holder may carry a loaded handgun on the person or under direct control in a vehicle. "Direct control" means the firearm is within the holder's reach - on the person, in a holster, in a center console, in a glove box, or in a similar location accessible from the driver's or passenger's seat.
Practical points:
A restricted LTC (target & hunting only, sporting, employment) limits where the holder may carry the firearm; vehicle transport under that restriction is allowed only for purposes consistent with the restriction.
The same direct-control authority applies to long guns being transported by an LTC holder, provided the LTC also authorizes possession of the specific firearm category (large-capacity, etc.). For loaded long-gun transport in a vehicle, the LTC must authorize the firearm category and the holder must be the operator or passenger.
A loaded long gun in a vehicle, even by an LTC holder, can implicate hunting-overlay rules under M.G.L. c. 131 if the transport is in connection with hunting; consult the MassWildlife regulations for those scenarios.
The FID does not authorize carry of a loaded firearm in a vehicle. Under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131C(b), an FID holder transporting a long gun in a vehicle must keep the firearm:
A glove box is not a "secure container" for this purpose; a soft case is not "locked"; the passenger compartment of the vehicle is not the "trunk." A locked rigid case in the back of an SUV (no trunk) satisfies the rule.
The general public is not authorized to carry a firearm in Massachusetts. Narrow exceptions (transporting between a place of purchase and place of residence within Massachusetts, between two places where the person is lawfully entitled to possess the firearm, etc.) require the firearm to be:
These exceptions are heavily restrictive and intended for narrow one-time situations (e.g., a person taking inheritance possession of a long gun being transported to a licensed dealer for transfer). Any general civilian carry of a handgun in a vehicle without an LTC is prosecuted under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(a).
A non-resident traveling through Massachusetts may rely on the federal Firearm Owners Protection Act (FOPA), 18 U.S.C. 926A, to protect interstate transport of an unloaded firearm in a locked container, with ammunition stored separately, between two states where possession is lawful at origin and destination. FOPA is a federal-law affirmative defense:
FOPA does not authorize the non-resident to stop in Massachusetts for non-journey purposes, to spend a night in a Massachusetts hotel without the firearm secured per FOPA, or to remove the firearm from the locked container while in Massachusetts.
M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 defines "loaded" for firearm purposes. A firearm is loaded if:
A magazine carried separately from the firearm does not make the firearm "loaded." A round in the chamber of a revolver makes the revolver loaded.
M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12E and overlapping hunting-regulation provisions in M.G.L. c. 131 prohibit discharging a firearm from a motor vehicle or from a public way. Hunting from a vehicle is also prohibited under MassWildlife rules. The discharge prohibitions apply regardless of license type.
If you are stopped by police with a firearm in the vehicle and you hold an LTC:
The voluntary disclosure step is not statutorily required under M.G.L. c. 140 or c. 269 (see DUTY_TO_INFORM section), but is universally recommended by Massachusetts firearms instructors.
When the LTC holder leaves the vehicle and the firearm stays behind, M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L applies and the firearm must be secured:
Leaving a loaded handgun in plain view on the seat is a storage violation. A theft from the vehicle that proceeds from such a storage failure can result in a separate criminal charge against the licensee.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Definitions (loaded, large capacity) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC scope including vehicle authority |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131C | Improper transportation / unloaded-locked rule |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L | Safe storage including in vehicles |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(a) | Unlicensed carry penalty |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12E | Discharge from vehicle / public way |
| 18 U.S.C. 926A | FOPA interstate transport defense |
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Carrying in Vehicles
Massachusetts does not recognize any other state's concealed carry permit. A non-resident must obtain a Massachusetts Non-Resident License to Carry under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F before lawfully carrying a handgun in the Commonwealth. This is the most restrictive reciprocity posture in the United States as of early 2026.
The Massachusetts LTC framework in M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 and Section 131F authorizes concealed carry only for the holder of a Massachusetts-issued license:
A valid concealed carry permit from any other state - Texas LTC, Florida Concealed Weapon Permit, Pennsylvania License to Carry Firearms, etc. - does not authorize the holder to carry a handgun in Massachusetts. A traveler arriving at Logan or driving through Massachusetts with another state's permit, but without a Massachusetts LTC, is subject to prosecution under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(a) for unlicensed carry.
A non-resident who wants to lawfully carry in Massachusetts has two options under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F:
Both non-resident LTC types authorize carry in Massachusetts to the same extent as the resident LTC, subject to the same sensitive-place restrictions, storage requirements, and other state-law overlays.
A Massachusetts LTC is recognized by some other states' concealed carry permit programs. Recognition varies state-by-state and changes from time to time:
Massachusetts does not maintain a list of "states that recognize the Massachusetts LTC" because Massachusetts does not engage in formal reciprocity agreements. Recognition by other states is each receiving state's unilateral decision.
The federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA), 18 U.S.C. 926B and 18 U.S.C. 926C, authorizes qualified active and retired law enforcement officers to carry concealed nationwide, regardless of state reciprocity arrangements. LEOSA preempts most state location restrictions but does not override certain federal sensitive-place rules (federal buildings, courthouses) or certain state sensitive-place rules (Massachusetts courthouses, schools).
A qualified LEOSA carrier in Massachusetts:
LEOSA is the practical exception to Massachusetts's non-recognition of other state permits.
The federal Firearm Owners Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. 926A, provides a partial preemption that protects a person transporting an unloaded firearm in a locked container, with ammunition stored separately, between two states where possession is lawful at origin and destination. FOPA applies to interstate journeys and does not authorize:
A non-resident driving through Massachusetts en route to Maine or New Hampshire with a firearm secured per FOPA is lawfully transiting; the same non-resident stopping at a Massachusetts hotel as the destination loses FOPA protection and must comply with Massachusetts law.
A non-resident concealed carry permit holder flying to Logan Airport from Texas, Florida, or another state must either:
There is no "land at Logan, get a permit, carry today" path. The Non-Resident LTC requires advance application processing.
A non-resident driving on I-90, I-95, or another interstate through Massachusetts with a firearm secured per FOPA (unloaded, locked container, ammunition separate) is lawfully transiting if the journey is incidental to travel between two states where possession is lawful. The driver must not stop in Massachusetts as the destination and must not remove the firearm from FOPA-compliant storage.
A non-resident who regularly visits Massachusetts (family, business, vacation home) should obtain a Massachusetts Non-Resident LTC. The one-year version at $100 is the appropriate vehicle for repeated visits. The 90-day version is for one-time short-term trips.
A Massachusetts LTC holder traveling to another state should verify whether the destination state recognizes the Massachusetts permit. If recognition exists, carry per the destination state's rules; if not, leave the firearm at home or transport per FOPA.
This is a directional summary; verify against current state-by-state data before travel.
| Massachusetts recognizes | Massachusetts LTC recognized by (representative) |
|---|---|
| No other state's permit | Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Utah (with limits), various others; not New York, NJ, CT, MD, IL, CA, HI |
A non-resident applicant for the Massachusetts Non-Resident LTC must:
The Colonel of State Police makes the issuance decision. Denials are appealable to the District Court for the judicial district where the FRB office is located under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131(f).
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | Resident LTC |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F | Non-Resident LTC |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131P | Basic Firearms Safety Course |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Unlicensed carry penalty |
| 18 U.S.C. 926A | FOPA interstate transport |
| 18 U.S.C. 926B | LEOSA active law enforcement |
| 18 U.S.C. 926C | LEOSA qualified retired law enforcement |
Massachusetts has the strictest reciprocity posture in the United States - it recognizes no other state's concealed carry permit. Visitors who need to carry in Massachusetts must obtain a Massachusetts Non-Resident LTC in advance. FOPA protects interstate transit but not carry while in Massachusetts. LEOSA is the only federal exception for qualified active or retired law enforcement officers.
View this topic on its own page: Reciprocity
Massachusetts law governs the use of force - including deadly force - through a combination of statutory provisions and extensive case law. Massachusetts is a duty-to-retreat state, meaning individuals must use all reasonable means to avoid physical combat before resorting to deadly force, with an exception under the Castle Doctrine for occupants of a dwelling facing an unlawful intruder.
Key Principle: A person is not guilty of any crime if they acted in proper self-defense. The burden is on the Commonwealth to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in proper self-defense.
All of the following must be satisfied:
Actual Belief of Imminent Danger - The person must have actually believed they were in immediate danger of death or serious bodily harm from which they could save themselves only by using deadly force. (Commonwealth v. Wallace, 460 Mass. 118, 124-125 (2011))
Reasonable Belief - A reasonable person in the same circumstances would also have believed they were in immediate danger of death or serious bodily harm requiring deadly force. (Commonwealth v. Santos, 454 Mass. 770, 773)
Duty to Retreat / Avoidance - The person must have used or attempted to use all proper and reasonable means to avoid physical combat before resorting to deadly force. (Commonwealth v. Mercado, 456 Mass. 198, 209 (2010))
Proportional Force - The person must not have used more force than was reasonably necessary under all the circumstances. (Commonwealth v. Glacken, 451 Mass. 163, 167 (2008))
Not the Initial Aggressor - The person must not have been the first to use or threaten deadly force, unless they withdrew in good faith and clearly communicated their intent to end the confrontation. (Commonwealth v. Chambers, 465 Mass. 520, 528 (2013))
Deadly force is defined as force that is intended or likely to cause death or serious bodily harm. (Commonwealth v. Noble, 429 Mass. 44, 46 (1999))
See Commonwealth v. Walker, 443 Mass. 213, 218 (2005); Commonwealth v. King, 460 Mass. 80, 83 (2011)
A person may use deadly force even if their belief that they were in immediate danger was mistaken, provided the mistaken belief was reasonable based on all circumstances. (Commonwealth v. Pike, 428 Mass. 393, 396-397 (1998))
Non-deadly force is force that is not intended or likely to cause death or serious bodily harm (e.g., using one's fists). (Commonwealth v. Cataldo, 423 Mass. 318, 325 (1996); Commonwealth v. Lopes, 440 Mass. 731, 739 (2004))
Non-deadly force in self-defense is justified at a lower threshold than deadly force. The person must show:
Commonwealth v. King, 460 Mass. 80, 83 (2011); Commonwealth v. Franchino, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 367, 368-369 (2004)
Massachusetts requires retreat before using deadly force, with important qualifications:
Commonwealth v. Benoit, 452 Mass. 212, 226-227 (2008); Commonwealth v. Pike, 428 Mass. 393, 398-399 (1998)
Massachusetts recognizes a Castle Doctrine exception to the duty to retreat:
A person lawfully residing in their dwelling has no duty to retreat before using reasonable force against an unlawful intruder, if they reasonably believe:
- The intruder is about to kill or seriously injure the occupant or another person lawfully in the dwelling, and
- Such force is necessary to protect themselves or another person lawfully in the dwelling.
Massachusetts law permits the use of force - including deadly force - in defense of another person. The Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in proper defense of another.
The Commonwealth satisfies this burden by proving any one of the following:
Key distinction: The focus is on the defendant's perspective and what was known to the defendant - not on whether the third party was actually entitled to use self-defense. (Commonwealth v. Young, 461 Mass. 198, 208-209 (2012))
Non-deadly force in defense of another follows the same proportionality standard as self-defense. (Commonwealth v. King, 460 Mass. 80, 83 (2011))
Massachusetts recognizes defense of property as a legal justification for the use of force. Model jury instructions (Instruction 9.265, revised October 2024) address this topic, though the full text of the instruction is not reproduced in the sources reviewed here. Consult the text of Instruction 9.265 or a qualified attorney for the precise legal standards governing force in defense of property.
A person who was the first to use or threaten deadly force loses the right to claim self-defense. (Commonwealth v. Chambers, 465 Mass. 520, 528 (2013))
G.L. c. 268, § 32B - Resisting Arrest:
It is a crime to knowingly prevent or attempt to prevent a police officer from effecting an arrest by:
Self-defense exception: It is not a defense that the arrest was unlawful, unless the officer was resorting to unreasonable or excessive force - in which case the right of self-defense may arise.
Penalty: Up to 2.5 years in jail and/or a fine of up to $500.
In criminal cases involving use of force where self-defense, defense of another, duress, or accidental harm is asserted, a defendant may introduce:
This evidence is relevant to:
See also Commonwealth v. Anestal, 463 Mass. 655, 676 (2012)
G.L. c. 140, § 122D governs self-defense spray (chemical mace, pepper spray, and similar products):
Massachusetts law does not permit the use of force for retaliation or revenge. The right of self-defense arises from the necessity of the moment and ends when the necessity ends. An individual may only use sufficient force to prevent the occurrence or reoccurrence of the attack. (Commonwealth v. Pike, 428 Mass. 393, 398 (1998); Commonwealth v. Kendrick, 351 Mass. 203, 212 (1966))
| Statute / Source | Subject |
|---|---|
| G.L. c. 278, § 8A | Castle Doctrine (no duty to retreat in dwelling) |
| G.L. c. 233, § 23F | Admissibility of abuse evidence in self-defense cases |
| G.L. c. 268, § 32B | Resisting arrest |
| G.L. c. 140, § 122D | Self-defense spray permits |
| Model Jury Instruction 9.260 | Introduction to self-defense - revised Oct. 2024 |
| Model Jury Instructions 9.260A-9.263 | Self-defense (non-deadly and deadly force, full set) - revised Feb. 2026 |
| Model Jury Instruction 9.264 | Defense of another - revised Oct. 2024 |
| Model Jury Instruction 9.265 | Defense of property - revised Oct. 2024 |
| Model Jury Instructions on Homicide, Part III | Self-defense and defense of another in homicide cases |
This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Massachusetts use-of-force law is heavily shaped by case law and fact-specific analysis. Consult a qualified attorney for guidance on specific situations.
Sources: Massachusetts General Laws; Massachusetts Model Jury Instructions (District Court and Homicide, revised through February 2026); Mass.gov official publications.
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Use of Force Laws
Massachusetts codifies a Castle Doctrine that eliminates the duty to retreat only within one's dwelling (M.G.L. c. 278, § 8A). Because the statute's no-retreat provision is expressly limited to dwellings, and Massachusetts evidentiary law references a defendant's obligation to have "availed himself of all available means to avoid physical combat" (M.G.L. c. 233, § 23F), the state does not extend a no-retreat right to public spaces.
Massachusetts codifies its Castle Doctrine in General Laws Part IV, Title II, Chapter 278, Section 8A. The statute provides a legal defense for an occupant of a dwelling who kills or injures a person unlawfully present in that dwelling, provided:
No Duty to Retreat in the Home: Section 8A explicitly states that "there shall be no duty on said occupant to retreat from such person unlawfully in said dwelling."
Key Limitation: The protection applies only to occupants against persons unlawfully in the dwelling. It does not apply to disputes between lawful occupants.
Section 8A's no-retreat provision is explicitly limited to dwellings. Outside the home, Massachusetts evidentiary law (M.G.L. c. 233, § 23F) frames self-defense reasonableness in terms of whether the defendant "had availed himself of all available means to avoid physical combat," indicating that avoidance of confrontation is expected where possible. A person claiming self-defense outside the dwelling must generally show:
Acts of 2024, Chapter 135 ("An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws") includes provisions reinforcing that certain firearm discharge restrictions near dwellings do not apply to "the lawful defense of life and property" (Chapter 269, § 12E(b)(i)). Similarly, the offense of recklessly striking a dwelling with a firearm (§ 12G) does not apply to "persons acting in the lawful defense of life or property."
In criminal cases where self-defense is asserted, Massachusetts law permits defendants to introduce:
This evidence may be used to establish the reasonableness of:
| Situation | Duty to Retreat | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Inside your dwelling (against unlawful intruder) | No | c. 278, § 8A |
| Outside your dwelling | Avoidance of combat expected where possible | c. 233, § 23F (evidentiary standard) |
Acts of 2024, Chapter 135 - "An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws" amended multiple Massachusetts firearms statutes, including updated definitions, penalties, and new provisions such as § 12E (firearm discharge near dwellings) and § 12G (recklessly striking a dwelling). The law explicitly preserved "lawful defense of life and property" exceptions in these firearm discharge provisions.
View this topic on its own page: Castle Doctrine
Massachusetts does not impose a general statutory duty to inform a law enforcement officer that you are carrying a concealed firearm. No provision of M.G.L. c. 140 or M.G.L. c. 269 requires an LTC holder to volunteer to a police officer, during a traffic stop or other contact, that the holder is armed.
This puts Massachusetts in the same category as most New England states (no proactive duty to inform), and unlike states such as Texas, Michigan, or North Carolina, which have specific statutes requiring disclosure on contact.
The two operative statutes governing LTC holders are:
There is no Massachusetts statute that makes failure to inform a law enforcement officer of concealed-carry status, by itself, a criminal or licensing offense.
Even without a proactive duty to inform, an LTC holder has these obligations during a contact with law enforcement:
M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 requires the LTC holder to carry the license on the person at all times while carrying or possessing a firearm. The license must be produced on demand of any law enforcement officer.
This means: if an officer asks for identification and you are carrying a firearm, you must produce the LTC. The duty to produce on demand is the closest functional equivalent in Massachusetts to a duty to inform - it is triggered by the officer's request, not by your initiative.
Massachusetts law does not require volunteering information, but it does prohibit lying to a police officer in the conduct of an investigation. If an officer directly asks "do you have any weapons on you?" - the truthful answer is required.
False statements to a police officer can support charges under M.G.L. c. 268, Section 13B (witness intimidation, where applicable) or general obstruction principles. Plead the Fifth or stay silent if you must, but do not affirmatively lie.
If the officer directs you to keep your hands visible, exit the vehicle, place hands on the steering wheel, or step away from the firearm, comply. Officer-safety compliance is independent of any disclosure duty and protects both parties.
Most Massachusetts firearms instructors, range safety officers, and police practitioners recommend that LTC holders voluntarily inform an officer of concealed-carry status at the start of any sustained contact, even though no statute requires it. The case for proactive disclosure:
Suggested phrasing: "Officer, before we go any further, I want to let you know that I am a Massachusetts LTC holder and I have a firearm [on my person / in the glove box / in the center console]. How would you like me to proceed?"
The vehicle-carry rules in M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131C and the storage rules in M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L (cross-referenced in the VEHICLE_CARRY and STORAGE sections) govern how a firearm should be stored in a vehicle by an LTC holder. The duty-to-inform analysis above is independent of those rules but interacts with them:
If you do not volunteer the information and the officer later discovers the firearm (during a search incident to arrest, a Terry frisk based on independent reasonable suspicion, or a consent search), the non-disclosure itself is not a separate offense in Massachusetts. But:
In short: there is no charge, but the silence is not consequence-free in the licensing dimension.
When dealing with federal officers (FBI, ATF, U.S. Marshals, etc.), no federal statute imposes a duty to inform of state-licensed concealed carry. Federal officers generally follow the same officer-safety protocols described above. If the encounter is on federal property (a courthouse, a post office, a federal building), the federal sensitive-place rule may make the carry itself unlawful regardless of disclosure.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC issuance, suitability, production on demand |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131C | Vehicle carry by LTC holders |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L | Safe storage |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Carry offenses (no notification element) |
Massachusetts has no proactive duty to inform, but the LTC must be produced on demand, the holder must not lie to an officer, and suitability considerations make volunteering the prudent practice for any sustained contact. Carry the physical LTC card, keep hands visible, and treat any officer interaction as an event that can be reported to your licensing authority.
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Duty to Inform Law Enforcement
Massachusetts requires all first-time applicants for a License to Carry (LTC) or Firearm Identification Card (FID) to obtain a Basic Firearms Safety Certificate before their application can be accepted or processed by the licensing authority.
Primary Statute: MGL c. 140, § 131P (as amended by Acts of 2024, Chapter 135 - "An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws")
Regulations: 515 CMR 3.00 - Firearms Course and Instructor Certifications and Firearms Surrender Programs
Under MGL c. 140, § 131P(b)(ii), the certified course curriculum must include:
To receive a Basic Firearms Safety Certificate, an applicant must demonstrate:
No certificate may be issued to any person who fails to meet any of these minimum requirements.
The Acts of 2024, Chapter 135, added a mandatory live firearms training component to the Basic Firearms Safety Course.
The following individuals are exempt from the safety course requirement (MGL c. 140, § 131P(a)):
Provided that such person is authorized by a competent authority to carry or possess the firearm and is acting within the scope of their duties.
Active military personnel are not required to complete a safety course; however, they should review local laws including safe storage requirements.
A certificate issued under MGL c. 131, § 14 evidencing satisfactory completion of a Basic Hunter Education Course is a valid substitute for the Basic Firearms Safety Certificate when applying for a Firearm Identification Card (FID) under section 129B. Hunter Education courses are administered by the Division of Fisheries & Wildlife.
Under MGL c. 140, § 131P(g), the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, in collaboration with the Department of Public Health, developed educational materials that must be discussed and distributed during every firearms safety course, covering:
| Municipality | Resident Cost | Non-Resident Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Worcester | $20 | $35 |
| Other municipalities | Varies | Varies |
Fees are generally non-refundable.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| MGL c. 140, § 131P | Basic firearms safety certificate requirements, instructor certification, live fire training |
| MGL c. 140, § 131 | License to Carry (LTC) issuance |
| MGL c. 140, § 129B | Firearm Identification Card (FID) issuance |
| MGL c. 140, § 131F | Non-resident LTC |
| MGL c. 131, § 14 | Hunter education course (FID substitute) |
| 515 CMR 3.00 | Firearms course and instructor certifications |
| Acts of 2024, c. 135 | An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws (comprehensive reform) |
View this topic on its own page: Training Requirements for Massachusetts Concealed Carry
Massachusetts requires a License to Carry (LTC) for concealed carry of firearms. The application process is governed by M.G.L. Chapter 140, Sections 121F and 131, as substantially amended by the Acts of 2024, Chapter 135 ("An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws"). Applications are submitted to and processed by the local police department (licensing authority) in the applicant's city or town of residence.
While specific requirements may vary slightly by municipality, the following are generally required:
Critical Note on Criminal History Disclosure: Applicants must disclose every appearance as a defendant in court for any criminal offense, regardless of disposition - including dismissed cases, continuances without a finding, not guilty verdicts, sealed cases, and juvenile appearances. Motor vehicle citations (speeding, red lights) are not criminal offenses, but operating without a license, after suspension, or uninsured are criminal offenses that must be disclosed. Failure to answer truthfully constitutes perjury under M.G.L. c. 140, §§ 129 and 131, and will result in denial and potential criminal prosecution.
Obtain the firearms licensing application from your local police department. Many departments now accept applications by mail or email (e.g., Cambridge). Complete the application thoroughly and accurately.
Applications are processed by appointment only in most municipalities. Contact your local police department's licensing unit or use their online scheduling system. Due to high volume, appointments may be booked several months out in larger cities.
At your scheduled appointment:
Upon receiving the completed application, the licensing authority must provide the applicant a receipt including (§ 121F(b)):
The licensing authority conducts a comprehensive background investigation:
State Police Review (§ 121F(c)-(d)): Within 7 days, the licensing authority forwards one copy of the application and fingerprints to the Colonel of State Police, who has 30 days to:
Additional Inquiries (§ 121F(e)): The licensing authority also makes inquiries to:
The licensing authority must, within 40 days from receipt of a completed application, either:
(§ 121F(a))
Note: No license shall be issued unless the Colonel of State Police has certified that issuing it does not violate state or federal law.
Once approved, the actual license card is produced by the Department of Criminal Justice Information Services (DCJIS) and sent to the local police department, which will contact the applicant for pickup.
| License Type | Fee |
|---|---|
| License to Carry (LTC) - New or Renewal | $100.00 (non-refundable) |
| Firearm Identification Card (FID) - Adult | $100.00 (non-refundable) |
| FID - Minors (ages 15-17) | $25.00 |
| LTC Renewal - Age 70+ | Fee waived (some municipalities) |
| Firearms Safety Course | ~$20-$35 (varies by provider) |
Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), restrictions previously placed on LTC licenses - such as limiting carry to hunting, target shooting, or employment - are no longer enforceable in Massachusetts. Existing license holders do not need to update their current license. Future renewals will be issued without restrictions.
Any applicant aggrieved by a denial, revocation, or suspension may (§ 121F(v)):
All non-resident permits are issued through the Firearms Records Bureau at the state level, not through local police departments.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, § 121 | Definitions (as amended by 2024 Ch. 135) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, § 121F | Unified application, processing, denial, and appeal procedures |
| M.G.L. c. 140, § 129B | Firearm Identification Card (FID) requirements |
| M.G.L. c. 140, § 131 | License to Carry (LTC) conditions and restrictions |
| M.G.L. c. 140, § 131P | Firearms safety training requirements |
| M.G.L. c. 140, § 128A | Private sales and transfers |
| M.G.L. c. 140, § 121B | Electronic firearms registration system |
| M.G.L. c. 140, § 121C | Serialization requirements |
| Acts of 2024, Chapter 135 | "An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws" - comprehensive reform |
Acts of 2024, Chapter 135 ("An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws") made sweeping changes to Massachusetts firearms law, including:
Note: Some provisions of Chapter 135 have phased implementation dates. Applicants should verify current requirements with their local licensing authority or the DCJIS.
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Concealed Carry Application Process
Massachusetts License to Carry (LTC) holders must renew their license periodically through their local licensing authority (municipal police department) for residents, or the Firearms Records Bureau for non-residents. The renewal process was updated by the Act Modernizing Firearm Laws (2024 Mass. Acts, Chapter 135).
M.G.L. c. 140, § 131(e), as amended by Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024
The Commissioner of the Department of Criminal Justice Information Services (DCJIS) is required to send a notice of expiration not less than 90 days before the license expires, either electronically or by first-class mail. The notice must include:
M.G.L. c. 140, § 121F(r), as amended by 2024 Acts c. 135, § 32
Applicants can apply online via the MIRCS Unified Gun Portal at mircsportal.chs.state.ma.us. If applying online, contact your licensing authority to arrange payment.
Completed application packages, including the fee, may be mailed to your local licensing authority (municipal police department).
Completed application packages must be mailed to:
Department of Criminal Justice Information Services
Firearms Records Bureau
200 Arlington Street, Suite 2200
Chelsea, MA 02150
Applications may be submitted in person at the local police department during business hours. Contact your local licensing authority for specific submission options, as procedures vary by department.
Based on municipal requirements (which may vary by jurisdiction):
Note: A personal interview is required for initial applications but is not specifically required for renewals under the statute.
Fingerprints are not required for renewal if the applicant's fingerprints are already on file with the Department of State Police.
M.G.L. c. 140, § 121F(c), as amended by 2024 Acts c. 135, § 32
| Applicant Type | Fee |
|---|---|
| Standard renewal | $100 |
| Persons over age 70 | Exempt (no fee) |
| Law enforcement officers (through employing agency) | Exempt (no fee) |
| Active/retired law enforcement officials | $25 |
The $100 fee is allocated as follows:
Fees are non-refundable and are not prorated in case of revocation or denial.
M.G.L. c. 140, § 121F(o)-(p), as amended by 2024 Acts c. 135, § 32
M.G.L. c. 140, § 121F(a), (c)-(d), as amended by 2024 Acts c. 135, § 32
An expired LTC remains valid for all lawful purposes under the following circumstances:
M.G.L. c. 140, § 121F(s), as amended by 2024 Acts c. 135, § 32
A person in possession of a firearm with an expired license (beyond the 90-day grace period), who is not otherwise disqualified from renewal, is subject to a fine of $100 to $5,000. The criminal possession penalties under M.G.L. c. 269, § 10 do not apply in this limited circumstance.
This penalty exemption does not apply if the license:
Law enforcement officers who discover a person with an expired license shall confiscate the firearm and the expired license. The firearm shall be returned if proof of license reinstatement is provided within 1 year of confiscation.
M.G.L. c. 140, § 121F(t), as amended by 2024 Acts c. 135, § 32
Licensees must report any change of address via the electronic firearm registration system administered by DCJIS within 30 days of the change. Failure to notify in a timely manner is cause for revocation or suspension of the license.
M.G.L. c. 140, § 131(g), as amended by Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024
A licensing authority shall deny renewal to any person determined to be a prohibited person (felony conviction, domestic violence conviction, active protection orders, etc.) or determined to be unsuitable based on reliable, articulable, and credible information. Denial must be provided in writing with specific reasons.
Applicants aggrieved by a denial may file a petition for judicial review in the district court within 90 days of receiving notice of the denial.
M.G.L. c. 140, § 121F(j)-(k), (m), (v), as amended by 2024 Acts c. 135, § 32
The Act Modernizing Firearm Laws (2024 Mass. Acts, Chapter 135), signed into law in 2024, made significant changes to the licensing process including:
View this topic on its own page: Renewal Process - Massachusetts License to Carry (LTC)
Massachusetts state-level licensing fees are set by M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 (LTC) and M.G.L. c. 140, Section 129B (FID). The state fee is collected by the local licensing authority and remitted to the Commonwealth.
| License | Statutory Fee | Validity |
|---|---|---|
| License to Carry (LTC), initial | $100 | 6 years |
| License to Carry (LTC), renewal | $100 | 6 years |
| Firearm Identification Card (FID), initial | $100 | 6 years |
| Firearm Identification Card (FID), renewal | $100 | 6 years |
| FID-Restricted (mace/pepper spray, ages 15-17) | $25 | 6 years |
| Non-Resident LTC, 1-year | $100 | 1 year |
| Non-Resident LTC, 90-day (temporary) | $25 | 90 days |
| Resident Alien Permit to Possess Rifle/Shotgun | $100 | 1 year |
| Machine Gun License | $100 | 6 years |
| Gunsmith License | $100 | 6 years |
| Class 1, 2, 3 Firearm Dealer License | varies by class | 1 year |
State fee waivers apply for active and retired law enforcement officers, active military, and certain other categories enumerated in c. 140, Section 131 and Section 129B.
The statute caps the state portion at $100. Some municipalities collect additional non-statutory fees for fingerprinting, photo capture, or appointment processing. These vary by department and are typically modest ($20-$50). Confirm the total at the time of application with the issuing department.
The required Basic Firearms Safety Course under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131P is not free. Prices vary widely by instructor and region:
| Cost item | Typical range |
|---|---|
| Basic Firearms Safety Course (state-mandated curriculum) | $100 - $250 |
| Optional advanced / unrestricted course | $150 - $400 |
| Live-fire range fee (often included) | $25 - $75 |
| Ammunition for live-fire (typically supplied by student) | $30 - $80 |
Some police departments run their own low-cost courses; some municipalities subsidize courses for residents. Massachusetts has no state subsidy program for basic firearms training as of the 2024 reform.
A live-fire cost-study provision in Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 directed the Secretary of Public Safety and Security to study and report on the implementation of the new mandatory live-fire component added to the Basic Firearms Safety Course, with explicit attention to whether the requirement is becoming cost-prohibitive and whether facilities are reasonably available in all regions of the Commonwealth. The directive acknowledges that the live-fire requirement, mandatory for applicants with no LTC or FID issued before August 1, 2024, adds a recurring cost that some applicants in range-poor regions cannot absorb without a long drive.
The renewal fee is the same $100 state portion. Holders who let the license expire and apply for reissuance pay the initial fee structure and may, depending on department practice, need to redo certain steps (fingerprinting, course renewal).
A denial, restriction, or revocation may be appealed de novo to the District Court for the judicial district of the issuing authority under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131(f). There is no statutory appeal fee for the filing itself, but counsel fees and any court costs apply. Many denied applicants represent themselves; experienced firearms counsel fees in Massachusetts typically range from $1,500 to $5,000 for a District Court appeal.
| Action | Typical fee |
|---|---|
| Replacement card (lost/stolen/damaged) | $25 |
| Change of address notification | no fee (statutory duty under c. 140, Section 129B / Section 131) |
A change of address must be reported to the Firearms Records Bureau and to the licensing authority of the new municipality within 30 days of the move.
A realistic first-time LTC applicant in Massachusetts should plan for:
| Item | Low | High |
|---|---|---|
| State license fee | $100 | $100 |
| Local processing fee | $0 | $50 |
| Basic Firearms Safety Course | $100 | $250 |
| Live-fire range / ammo | $25 | $100 |
| Fingerprinting | $25 | $50 |
| Total out-of-pocket | $250 | $550 |
That estimate excludes the firearm itself, holster, secure storage device (required under c. 140, Section 131L), ammunition for ongoing practice, and any optional advanced training.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC fees and waivers |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 129B | FID fees and waivers |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F | Non-resident LTC fees |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131P | Basic firearms safety course costs |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | Live-fire cost study provision |
| 26 U.S.C. 5811 | Federal NFA transfer tax |
Massachusetts does not have a low-income fee waiver program for non-public-safety applicants; the suitability appeal process is the only statutory cost-relief mechanism for an applicant who cannot afford the licensing pipeline.
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts LTC and FID Fees and Costs
Massachusetts maintains one of the most extensive lists of weapon-type restrictions in the United States. The restrictions are layered: some pre-date the 1998 firearms reform, some date from the 1994 federal assault weapons ban (which Massachusetts adopted independently), and many were added or rewritten by Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 ("An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws"). This section covers the firearm-type, magazine, and feature restrictions; for what places carry is prohibited, see PROHIBITED_PLACES; for the LTC scope, see PERMIT_BASICS.
Massachusetts originally adopted a copy of the now-expired federal Assault Weapons Ban definition. That feature-based test enumerated specific firearms (Colt AR-15, Avtomat Kalashnikov clones, Uzi, etc.) and additional firearms meeting two-feature tests (semi-automatic centerfire rifle with a detachable magazine and at least two of: folding/telescoping stock, pistol grip, bayonet mount, flash suppressor or threaded barrel, grenade launcher).
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 added M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121's definition of "assault-style firearm" and tightened the feature-based test. Under the post-2024 framework:
The full enumerated list and feature test are in M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 and Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024. Owners of firearms that became newly prohibited under Chapter 135 had a grandfathering window for firearms lawfully possessed before August 1, 2024.
Firearms lawfully possessed in Massachusetts before the relevant prohibition (1994 federal ban predecessor or August 1, 2024 effective date under Chapter 135) remain lawful to possess subject to registration, transfer, and storage restrictions. Specifics depend on the firearm category and the date.
M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 defines a "large-capacity feeding device" as a fixed or detachable magazine, box, drum, feed strip, or similar device capable of accepting, or that can be readily converted to accept, more than:
For handguns, the post-Chapter-135 rule reduced the capacity threshold; the operative number is in c. 140, Section 121 as amended. Pre-Chapter-135, the handgun magazine limit was effectively 10 rounds; the 2024 amendment imposed a stricter limit for non-grandfathered handgun magazines.
A large-capacity feeding device lawfully possessed in Massachusetts before September 13, 1994 is grandfathered and remains lawful to possess and transfer within Massachusetts. The transferor must be able to prove pre-1994 status. Chapter 135 of 2024 left the pre-1994 grandfathering in place but added documentation requirements for transfer.
Unlawful possession or transfer of a large-capacity feeding device is a violation under c. 269, Section 10 and related provisions, with penalty escalation depending on the firearm context. Acquisition of a non-grandfathered large-capacity feeding device after the effective date is a substantive criminal offense.
A "machine gun" under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 is any weapon that shoots, is designed to shoot, or can readily be restored to shoot automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. The federal Hughes Amendment of 1986 generally prohibits civilian transfer of machine guns manufactured after May 19, 1986; civilian possession of pre-1986 transferable machine guns is permitted under federal law subject to the NFA registration requirements.
Massachusetts requires a separate Machine Gun License under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131(o) for civilian possession, in addition to the federal NFA paperwork. The Machine Gun License is rarely issued to private citizens. Without both the federal NFA approval and the state Machine Gun License, civilian machine gun possession in Massachusetts is unlawful.
Suppressors are NFA Title II items federally regulated under 26 U.S.C. 5841 et seq. and 18 U.S.C. 922(o). Civilian possession of a federally registered suppressor requires ATF Form 4 approval and the $200 federal transfer tax stamp.
Massachusetts law on civilian suppressor possession is restrictive. M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10A prohibits possession of certain devices designed to silence a firearm; the statute's interplay with federally registered suppressors has been the subject of litigation and policy debate. As a practical matter, civilian suppressor possession in Massachusetts is rare and is conducted under narrow exceptions; verify current State Police FRB guidance before any acquisition.
A short-barreled rifle is a rifle with a barrel length under 16 inches or overall length under 26 inches; a short-barreled shotgun is a shotgun with a barrel length under 18 inches or overall length under 26 inches. Both are NFA items federally requiring Form 4 approval and the $200 tax stamp.
Massachusetts adds further restrictions on SBRs and SBSs under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(c) and related provisions. Some configurations are categorically prohibited even with federal NFA approval.
The general "sawed-off" shotgun (any shotgun with a barrel length under 18 inches that has been altered from its original form) is treated as a short-barreled shotgun for both NFA and Massachusetts purposes. Adding a stock to a pistol to create a short-barreled rifle is the same offense.
A destructive device under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 includes explosives, bombs, grenades, mines, and similar devices, along with any firearm with a barrel diameter over 0.5 inches with certain exceptions. Civilian possession of destructive devices is prohibited absent extremely narrow federal licensing.
AOWs are a federal NFA category capturing concealable weapons not falling within the other Title II categories (cane guns, pen guns, certain disguised firearms). Federal AOW possession requires Form 4 approval and a $5 transfer tax. Massachusetts does not provide a separate AOW license; the federal NFA approval plus the underlying state firearm rules govern.
Massachusetts does not prohibit civilian possession of soft body armor. Federal law (18 U.S.C. 931) prohibits possession of body armor by a person previously convicted of a violent felony.
Massachusetts knife law is governed primarily by M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(b) (carrying certain dangerous weapons) and includes restrictions on automatic-opening (switchblade) knives, double-edged daggers, dirks, stilettos, sword canes, and certain other knife types. Knife law is largely outside the scope of this firearms-focused guide; consult a Massachusetts knife-law-specific resource for the current rules.
Possession of self-defense spray (oleoresin capsicum, mace) requires a Firearm Identification Card (FID) for ages 18+, and an FID-Restricted card (with parental consent) for ages 15-17. The FID-Restricted form is the only Massachusetts license that exists solely for self-defense sprays.
Possession of ammunition by a person without an LTC or FID is itself an offense under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(h). Ammunition can be purchased only by a licensed person from a licensed dealer; private transfer of ammunition follows similar restrictions.
Special-purpose ammunition (armor-piercing handgun ammunition, certain incendiary or explosive rounds) is restricted under federal law and Massachusetts statute. M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12F covers possession of certain armor-piercing rounds.
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 added or tightened restrictions on:
These categories are treated as machine guns or as separate substantive offenses under the post-2024 framework. Possession penalties are severe.
Several Chapter 135 of 2024 firearm-type restrictions are being challenged in federal court under Bruen in cases including Granata v. Healey. As of early 2026, no Chapter 135 firearm-type restriction has been enjoined by the First Circuit. Verify current status before relying on a specific provision.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Definitions (firearm, large capacity, assault-style firearm, machine gun, destructive device) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC scope including Machine Gun License |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131M | Restrictions on assault-style firearms |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Unlawful possession (various subsections) |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10A | Silencer / suppressor possession |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 11B | Possession of firearm with defaced serial number during felony |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 11C | Defacing serial number |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12F | Armor-piercing ammunition |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(o) | Machine gun prohibition |
| 18 U.S.C. 931 | Body armor prohibition |
| 26 U.S.C. 5811 | NFA transfer tax |
| 26 U.S.C. 5845 | NFA definitions |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | 2024 reform act |
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Weapon Restrictions
M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10H is the controlling provision on firearm carry while impaired in Massachusetts. The statute makes it unlawful for any person holding a valid LTC under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 or Section 131F to carry a loaded firearm on the person or have one under control in a vehicle while:
The statute applies to LTC holders. An unlicensed person carrying a firearm is already in violation of M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(a) and does not need an additional impairment offense for the carry itself; the impairment is a sentencing factor.
c. 269, Section 10H is violated on either of two grounds:
A blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or greater while carrying a loaded firearm or having one under control in a vehicle is per se a violation, regardless of observable impairment. The 0.08 threshold mirrors the Operating Under the Influence (OUI) threshold under M.G.L. c. 90, Section 24.
A breathalyzer or blood test result above 0.08 is sufficient evidence for conviction.
The "under the influence" prong does not require a specific BAC measurement. It requires evidence that the carrier's mental or physical faculties were impaired by a controlled substance, alcohol, or toxic vapor substance to the degree that the carrier could not handle the firearm safely.
The "under the influence" prong covers:
Violation of c. 269, Section 10H is punishable by:
In addition to the criminal penalty, a c. 269, Section 10H conviction is almost always grounds for revocation of the LTC under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131. The licensing authority will treat the conviction as evidence of unsuitability.
The c. 269, Section 10H prohibition applies only to a loaded firearm. M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 defines a firearm as loaded when a live round is in the chamber or a loaded magazine is inserted. An unloaded firearm in a locked case, even while the carrier is impaired, does not violate c. 269, Section 10H - but it may violate the c. 140, Section 131L safe-storage rule and may give rise to other liability.
The "under the control" prong of c. 269, Section 10H reaches the loaded firearm in the center console, glove box, or other location accessible to the impaired LTC holder while in a vehicle. The vehicle context expands the offense beyond on-person carry.
Massachusetts legalized recreational marijuana under Question 4 of 2016 (codified at M.G.L. c. 94G). Legal personal use of marijuana does not change the c. 269, Section 10H prohibition. An LTC holder who consumes marijuana and then carries a loaded firearm violates c. 269, Section 10H if observable impairment is shown, even though the marijuana consumption itself was legal.
Federal law has a parallel issue: 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) bars firearm possession by "an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance." ATF Form 4473 still classifies marijuana use as a federal disqualifier despite state legalization. The federal rule is independent of the state c. 269, Section 10H impairment offense.
Most prescription medications are not "controlled substances" within the c. 94C, Section 1 reference, but Schedule II-V prescription drugs (opioids, certain stimulants, certain sedatives) are. An LTC holder on a Schedule II-V prescription is not categorically barred from carry, but the c. 269, Section 10H impairment offense applies if the medication produces observable impairment.
A c. 269, Section 10H investigation typically begins with a traffic stop, a domestic incident response, or another police contact that gives officers reason to suspect impairment. The officer may:
Evidence of impairment combined with evidence of a loaded firearm on the person or under control in a vehicle establishes the offense.
A defense to c. 269, Section 10H typically argues one or more of:
Massachusetts criminal practice on c. 269, Section 10H cases mirrors OUI defense practice in many respects, with the additional firearm-specific evidence layer.
A c. 269, Section 10H prosecution may run alongside:
For LTC holders, the practical rule is straightforward:
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10H | Carrying loaded firearm while intoxicated (operative statute) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Definition of "loaded firearm" |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC scope including revocation grounds |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F | Non-resident LTC |
| M.G.L. c. 90, Section 24 | OUI (driving under influence) - same 0.08 BAC |
| M.G.L. c. 94C, Section 1 | Controlled substances definitions |
| M.G.L. c. 270, Section 18 | Toxic vapor substances |
| M.G.L. c. 94G | Recreational marijuana statute |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) | Federal unlawful-user prohibition |
c. 269, Section 10H makes Massachusetts one of the stricter states on impaired carry. The 0.08 BAC per se rule and the broad "under the influence" alternate, combined with the severe penalty and near-automatic LTC revocation, leave no meaningful margin for an LTC holder to consume any impairing substance while carrying.
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Carry Under the Influence
M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L is the central safe-storage provision in Massachusetts firearm law. It applies to all firearm owners, regardless of license type, and creates an affirmative duty to secure firearms not under immediate control.
The statute reflects a policy choice consistent with the Supreme Judicial Court's decision in Commonwealth v. Runyan, 456 Mass. 230 (2010), which upheld the statute against a Second Amendment challenge brought after District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008). Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 left the c. 140, Section 131L core requirement intact and added some peripheral provisions.
Under c. 140, Section 131L(a), a firearm not under the owner's immediate control or possession must be:
Either method satisfies the statute. The owner does not need both.
The statute does not enumerate brand-specific products, but Massachusetts courts and the State Police interpret "locked container" to require:
A locked gun safe, a locked rigid handgun case, a locked rifle case, or a locked glove box (with a real lock mechanism, not just an interior light "lockout") all satisfy. The vehicle itself does not satisfy: a locked vehicle door does not make the firearm "in a locked container."
A trigger lock, a cable lock, or a chamber lock that prevents the firearm from being fired or loaded is the typical compliance device. The lock must be specifically designed to disable the firearm and resist tampering. A bicycle cable looped through the trigger guard generally does not qualify; a purpose-built trigger lock does.
The duty to store activates the moment the firearm is not under the owner's immediate control or possession. Immediate control means the owner is within reaching distance and can physically access the firearm before another person could.
Examples:
Under c. 140, Section 131L(b)-(d), violation penalties scale with circumstances:
The penalty escalation reflects the legislature's view that loaded, large-capacity firearms left unsecured pose the greatest risk and warrant the highest sanction.
M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10G creates a separate offense when a firearm storage violation results in a person under 18 obtaining the firearm and causing death or injury to any person, including themselves. The offense is a felony with substantial penalties. Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 updated this section.
The c. 269, Section 10G charge is brought in addition to (not instead of) the underlying c. 140, Section 131L civil or misdemeanor charge.
The statute does not certify specific brands, and there is no Massachusetts state "approved" trigger-lock list. The practical compliance standard:
Many firearm purchases include a free trigger lock; many police departments distribute trigger locks at safety events. The Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security has run firearm-surrender and storage-education campaigns under 515 CMR 3.00 and related programs.
The same c. 140, Section 131L rule applies inside a vehicle when the owner is not present. A handgun left in plain view on the seat of an unattended vehicle is a storage violation. Compliance options inside a vehicle:
Vehicle thefts in Massachusetts are a recurring source of stolen firearms. A theft from an unsecured vehicle that proceeds from a storage failure exposes the owner to the c. 140, Section 131L charge plus potential aiding-an-offense exposure under c. 269.
The home rule under c. 140, Section 131L is identical to the vehicle rule - the firearm must be in a locked container or have a tamper-resistant lock attached whenever not under the owner's immediate control. This is the rule the SJC upheld in Runyan.
Multi-person households trigger the rule more easily because "immediate control" is reduced when other occupants are present. Owners with children in the home should apply the rule strictly and use either a locked safe or a trigger lock for every firearm not under direct supervision.
Massachusetts does not impose a separate ammunition-storage requirement equivalent to c. 140, Section 131L, but the federal Gun Control Act does prohibit sale or disposal of ammunition to a prohibited person (18 U.S.C. 922(d)). Best practice for households with children is to store ammunition separately from firearms in a locked container.
A workplace firearm storage situation (e.g., armed security at a private employer) is governed by the same c. 140, Section 131L rule. The employer may impose additional storage requirements as a condition of employment.
When a Massachusetts resident inherits a firearm and the resident does not hold a license, the resident must lawfully transfer the firearm to an FFL or to a licensed Massachusetts resident within a reasonable time. While in possession, the firearm must be stored per c. 140, Section 131L. The State Police FRB provides guidance on the inheritance-transfer process.
For every firearm not under your immediate control right now, ask:
If the answer to neither is "yes," you are out of compliance with M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L. Fix the storage immediately.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L | Safe storage (the operative provision) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131M | Restrictions on assault-style firearms |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10G | Storage causing child injury |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Carry offenses (overlap with storage in vehicle scenarios) |
| 515 CMR 3.00 | Firearms course / surrender programs |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(d) | Federal prohibition on transfer to prohibited person |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | 2024 reform act updates |
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Safe Storage Requirements
This section covers the general transportation rules outside the day-to-day vehicle-carry scenarios addressed in VEHICLE_CARRY. The focus here is interstate transport, transport in connection with travel and storage in non-vehicle contexts, and transport on common carriers.
Under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131C, the in-state transport rule depends on the carrier's license:
See VEHICLE_CARRY for the vehicle-specific application.
The federal Firearm Owners Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. 926A, provides a partial preemption that protects a person transporting a firearm across state lines, provided the journey passes through a state where possession would not be lawful. The rule:
FOPA is an affirmative defense, not pretrial immunity. Massachusetts has, in practice, charged FOPA travelers under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 and required them to assert FOPA as a defense at trial. A widely cited incident pattern is the out-of-state visitor who flies into Logan with a firearm, fails to fly out within hours, and remains in Massachusetts overnight - at which point FOPA's "transporting" element is no longer satisfied.
Firearms checked through air travel must comply with TSA's airline-firearm rule (49 C.F.R. 1540.111 and airline policy):
For a Massachusetts resident departing from Logan or Worcester: the LTC holder may transport the firearm to the airport under the in-state vehicle-carry rules described above, then transition to TSA's regime at check-in.
For a non-resident arriving at Logan or another Massachusetts airport: the moment the firearm leaves the airline's possession at baggage claim, Massachusetts law applies. The non-resident without a Massachusetts LTC or FOPA-qualifying transit plan may not lawfully carry the firearm beyond what FOPA covers.
Massachusetts has no statute specifically prohibiting common-carrier transport of firearms by an LTC holder. UPS, FedEx, and U.S. Postal Service each maintain their own firearm-shipping policies (long guns and handguns are handled differently). USPS allows shipping of unloaded long guns between FFLs; handguns through USPS retail mail are restricted. UPS and FedEx accept both with declaration and adult signature, generally to an FFL.
The MassWildlife regulations under M.G.L. c. 131 layer on top of c. 140 for hunters:
The c. 140, Section 131C transport rules apply to motor vehicles. The MassWildlife regulations cover use of firearms from boats in connection with hunting (generally prohibited). For boat transport of a firearm that is not in connection with hunting, the LTC holder may carry under the general LTC authority; the FID holder must keep long guns unloaded and locked.
The MBTA (subway, bus, commuter rail) is governed by 220 CMR and by MBTA regulations. The MBTA's firearm policy generally allows LTC-authorized concealed carry on MBTA vehicles; openly displayed firearms or improperly stored firearms can result in MBTA Transit Police intervention. Sensitive-place rules under Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 may also apply to specific MBTA stations or property; verify the current rule for the specific facility.
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 expanded the list of sensitive places where firearm possession by an LTC holder is prohibited. Transport through a sensitive place is a separate question from possession at the sensitive place; see PROHIBITED_PLACES for the current sensitive-place list and the carry-through rules. Where a sensitive-place restriction applies, the LTC holder must usually either store the firearm in a permitted lockbox (where one is provided), return to a vehicle and secure the firearm under c. 140, Section 131L, or avoid the location entirely.
The instant the LTC holder steps away from the vehicle with the firearm left behind, M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L applies. The firearm must be:
A handgun on the seat of an unattended vehicle is a storage violation under c. 140, Section 131L. The penalty for unsecured storage that results in a child injury under c. 269, Section 10G is escalated.
A traveler with an LTC who needs to leave the firearm at a hotel room during the day must apply c. 140, Section 131L: a locked container, or a tamper-resistant mechanical lock attached to the firearm. Many hotel safes satisfy the locked-container requirement; some do not. The traveler is responsible for confirming the storage is c. 140, Section 131L-compliant. The hotel room door lock alone is not sufficient.
The federal Gun Control Act (18 U.S.C. 922(a)(5)) generally prohibits transfer of a firearm to a non-licensee in a different state except through an FFL. Within Massachusetts, an LTC-to-LTC private firearm transfer must be processed through the State Police FRB online portal under c. 140, Section 128A and reported with the seller's and buyer's information. Possession during transport for transfer follows the same rules as other transport.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Definitions |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC authority including transport |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131C | Improper transportation rule |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L | Storage requirements |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10G | Storage causing child injury |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(a)(5) | Federal interstate private transfer rule |
| 18 U.S.C. 926A | FOPA interstate transport defense |
| 49 C.F.R. 1540.111 | TSA firearm air-travel rule |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | 2024 reform act (sensitive-place transit) |
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Firearm Transportation Laws
Massachusetts does not have a comprehensive firearm preemption statute. The state firearms code in M.G.L. c. 140 and c. 269 sets baseline rules, but cities and towns retain meaningful authority to enact additional local firearm regulations within constitutional limits. This is unusual compared to most states, which either fully preempt local firearm regulation (e.g., Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania) or have a hybrid system with explicit carve-outs.
Massachusetts municipalities have used this authority to enact local ordinances on assault-weapon bans (some pre-dating the state statute), magazine limits, storage requirements, sensitive-place designations, and similar topics.
Massachusetts municipalities derive their lawmaking authority from:
The threshold question for any local firearm ordinance is whether the state firearm statutes occupy the field or whether room remains for additional local regulation. Massachusetts courts have generally held that c. 140 and c. 269 set a floor that municipalities may regulate above, not a ceiling that excludes local rule.
Municipalities may designate additional locations as sensitive places where firearm carry is prohibited. After Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 added substantial sensitive-place categories at the state level, local authority to designate additional categories continues - municipal property, certain public events, certain transit facilities.
The state floor for safe storage is M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L. Some municipalities have enacted additional storage requirements that exceed the state minimum, including specific safe-product certification standards, lock-box availability mandates, and similar measures. Boston, Cambridge, and several other cities have enacted such ordinances.
The state baseline on firearm discharge near a dwelling is M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12E. Municipalities have enacted additional discharge regulations on town-owned property, in parks, and near specified facilities. These local discharge regulations are common.
The state framework for firearm dealer licensing is in M.G.L. c. 140, Sections 122-124. Some municipalities (notably Boston) have imposed additional zoning and licensing conditions on firearm dealers operating in the municipality. These have been upheld as proper exercise of local zoning authority.
The state sets the maximum LTC and FID fee at $100 (M.G.L. c. 140, Sections 129B and 131). Municipalities may not exceed the state-set fee for the license itself, but may charge separate non-licensing fees (fingerprinting, photo capture) that are not preempted.
Local zoning and noise regulations apply to firearm range operations. The state does not preempt local zoning authority over range siting.
The eligibility criteria, suitability standard, and procedural requirements for an LTC or FID under c. 140, Section 129B and Section 131 are state law. A municipality may not impose substantively different licensing standards. Local licensing authorities apply the state framework, but cannot create new categorical disqualifications beyond what state law authorizes.
The criminal offenses for unlawful carry, possession, and transfer in M.G.L. c. 269 are state law. A municipality may not create local criminal penalties for firearm possession that duplicate or alter the c. 269 framework.
Massachusetts state law in c. 140 and Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 defines categorically restricted firearm types (assault-style firearms, large-capacity feeding devices, machine guns, NFA-restricted items). Municipalities may not weaken these state restrictions but, historically, have enacted parallel local prohibitions that match or exceed the state floor.
The state-administered background check through the State Police Firearms Records Bureau and the federal NICS query are uniform statewide. Municipalities do not run separate background checks.
Several Massachusetts cities have firearm-related ordinances that operate alongside state law:
Specific ordinances vary in scope and enforcement; consult the municipal code for the specific city or town.
Massachusetts municipalities have been sued by gun-rights organizations seeking to invalidate local firearm ordinances. Massachusetts courts have generally upheld local ordinances that:
A local ordinance that creates a categorical local prohibition on a firearm type (e.g., a local assault-weapon ban predating the state law) has been upheld; a local ordinance that purports to impose a different licensing standard than c. 140, Section 131 would be vulnerable.
The federal Gun Control Act and the National Firearms Act preempt certain state and local regulation in their respective fields:
For an LTC holder or firearm-business operator in Massachusetts:
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| Mass. Const. Art. LXXXIX | Home Rule Amendment |
| M.G.L. c. 43B | Home Rule Procedures Act |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Firearm definitions (state baseline) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 129B | FID licensing |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC licensing |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L | Safe storage state floor |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Unlawful possession (state) |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12E | Discharge near dwelling (state) |
| 18 U.S.C. 926A | Federal preemption of interstate transport |
| 18 U.S.C. 926B | Federal preemption of LEOSA carry |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | 2024 reform act (state baseline expansion) |
Massachusetts does not preempt local firearm regulation. The state floor in c. 140 and c. 269 is supplemented by municipal ordinances in many cities and towns. An LTC holder traveling within Massachusetts should be aware of local rules that exceed the state baseline, particularly in storage, discharge, and sensitive-place areas. The conservative approach is to research the specific municipality's firearm code before relying on the state framework alone.
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts State Preemption of Firearm Laws
Massachusetts enacted an Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) statute in 2018, codified at M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131R and the operative procedure in M.G.L. c. 140, Sections 131R-131Z. The statute is commonly known as the red flag law and authorizes a court to order temporary firearm surrender by a person deemed an imminent threat to themselves or others.
Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 expanded the categories of persons authorized to petition for an ERPO and tightened certain procedural elements.
Under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131R, an ERPO petition may be filed by:
Chapter 135 of 2024 expanded the petitioner categories to include certain healthcare providers and to allow employers under specified conditions. Confirm the current list against the active text of c. 140, Section 131R.
Massachusetts ERPOs come in two forms:
A petitioner may seek an emergency ERPO without prior notice to the respondent when the petitioner alleges the respondent poses an immediate and present danger of harming themselves or others. The court may issue the emergency ERPO based on the petition alone, without an evidentiary hearing.
A standard ERPO follows a noticed evidentiary hearing where the respondent has the opportunity to appear, cross-examine, and present evidence. The standard ERPO requires the petitioner to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent poses a risk of personal injury to self or others.
A respondent subject to an ERPO must:
Failure to comply with the surrender order is a separate criminal offense under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131T.
The Massachusetts ERPO statute incorporates due process protections:
When an ERPO expires (or is terminated), the respondent may petition for return of the surrendered firearms. The return process under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131W requires:
A respondent whose LTC or FID was suspended or revoked in connection with the ERPO must complete the reapplication process to recover the license.
Massachusetts has several other order types that affect firearm possession:
A single incident may give rise to multiple orders (c. 209A plus ERPO, for example). Each order operates independently.
The federal Gun Control Act prohibits firearm possession by:
The U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), upheld 922(g)(8) against a Second Amendment challenge in the post-Bruen framework. Massachusetts ERPOs typically qualify under the federal protection-order provision when the underlying order was entered with notice and hearing; emergency ex parte ERPOs generally do not trigger federal 922(g)(8) until the noticed-hearing order issues.
M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131S provides penalties for a person who knowingly files a false ERPO petition. The petition system relies on truthful sworn statements; misuse for harassment or retaliation is a substantive criminal offense.
Massachusetts ERPO usage has grown since 2018. The State Police FRB maintains aggregate statistics on petitions filed, orders issued, and firearms surrendered. Enforcement rates and reissuance patterns are tracked by the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security.
For an LTC or FID holder:
For a petitioner:
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131R | ERPO definitions and overview |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131S | False petition penalty |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131T | Failure to surrender firearms |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131U | Termination of ERPO |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131W | Return of surrendered firearms |
| M.G.L. c. 209A, Section 3B | Domestic violence order firearm surrender |
| M.G.L. c. 258E | Harassment prevention order |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) | Federal protection order prohibition |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(9) | Federal misdemeanor domestic violence prohibition |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | 2024 reform act updates |
The Massachusetts ERPO is a powerful temporary order that triggers immediate firearm surrender. The statute provides due process protections - notice, hearing, right to counsel, right to seek termination - but the preponderance standard makes the orders relatively easy for a petitioner to obtain when there is a genuine concern. Compliance is non-optional; non-compliance is a separate offense. Any respondent should retain counsel without delay.
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Extreme Risk Protection Order (Red Flag Law)
The National Firearms Act of 1934, codified in Title 26 (Internal Revenue Code) at 26 U.S.C. 5841 et seq., and Title 18 of the U.S. Code at 18 U.S.C. 922, regulates a specific category of firearms and devices known as NFA items or Title II firearms. NFA items include:
Each NFA item category is defined in 26 U.S.C. 5845 (NFA definitions) and overlapping 18 U.S.C. 921 (Gun Control Act definitions).
To lawfully acquire an NFA item federally, a civilian must:
A trust (Gun Trust) may hold an NFA item; all "responsible persons" of the trust must complete the same fingerprint and photo requirements.
Federal NFA approval is necessary but not sufficient in Massachusetts. Each NFA category interacts with state law as follows.
Massachusetts requires a separate Machine Gun License under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131(o) for civilian possession of a machine gun. The Machine Gun License:
Without the Machine Gun License and the federal NFA approval, civilian machine gun possession is unlawful in Massachusetts. As a practical matter, civilian machine gun ownership in Massachusetts is virtually nonexistent.
M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10A prohibits possession of certain devices designed to silence a firearm. The statute's interplay with federally registered suppressors has been subject to litigation; the State Police FRB's current guidance is that civilian suppressor possession is generally unlawful in Massachusetts even with federal NFA approval, with narrow exceptions for certain law-enforcement or research uses.
A Massachusetts LTC holder cannot acquire a suppressor through a Massachusetts FFL without additional state authorization. ATF will process the federal Form 4 application regardless of state law, but possession in Massachusetts may still be unlawful after federal approval. The legal landscape on this point continues to develop; verify current FRB guidance before any acquisition.
Massachusetts law layers additional restrictions on SBRs and SBSs under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(c) and overlapping provisions. Civilian SBR and SBS possession in Massachusetts is restricted; certain configurations are categorically prohibited even with federal NFA approval. Pre-existing lawful possession may be grandfathered subject to documentation.
Civilian possession of destructive devices in Massachusetts is categorically prohibited under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(c) and overlapping provisions. The federal NFA path for destructive devices does not lead to civilian Massachusetts possession.
The Any Other Weapons category is concealable firearm-like devices; Massachusetts treatment of AOWs depends on the specific device. Cane guns and pen guns fall within multiple state weapons-prohibition statutes (M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10(b)) and are categorically prohibited regardless of federal NFA registration. Some AOW configurations may be lawful but the path is narrow.
The federal Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 (FOPA) closed the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record to new civilian machine gun additions as of May 19, 1986. Civilian-transferable machine guns are limited to the registry of approximately 175,000 firearms registered by that date. Prices for transferable machine guns range from $15,000 (subgun, low-end) to $300,000+ (M16, M249, etc.).
Pre-1986 machine guns lawfully held by a Massachusetts resident with both the federal Form 4 and the state Machine Gun License remain lawful. New civilian acquisitions of machine guns are effectively impossible in Massachusetts.
Some civilians use the federal Form 1 (Application to Make and Register a Firearm) to lawfully manufacture an SBR or suppressor for personal use, paying the $200 making tax. In Massachusetts, Form 1 manufacture of a suppressor faces the same state-law constraints as Form 4 acquisition - the state-law overlay is the same regardless of federal acquisition method. Form 1 manufacture of an SBR is subject to the same state restrictions as Form 4 acquisition.
A Massachusetts resident interested in NFA items faces a narrow lawful path:
A Massachusetts resident wanting NFA items may:
Some residents establish Gun Trusts to hold NFA items lawfully owned in other states; the trust's possession in Massachusetts faces the same state-law constraints as individual possession.
A Massachusetts resident who inherits an NFA item from an out-of-state decedent must comply with both:
If the resident cannot lawfully possess the item in Massachusetts, the resident must transfer it to a lawful out-of-state party or surrender it. The State Police FRB administers surrender procedures.
Unlawful possession of an NFA item in Massachusetts is prosecuted under multiple statutes:
A combined state-federal prosecution exposure for unlawful NFA possession is substantial.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Definitions (machine gun, destructive device, large capacity) |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC scope and Machine Gun License |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Unlawful possession (subsections cover NFA categories) |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10A | Silencer / suppressor possession |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(o) | Federal machine gun prohibition (post-1986) |
| 26 U.S.C. 5811 | NFA transfer tax ($200) |
| 26 U.S.C. 5845 | NFA item definitions |
| 26 U.S.C. 5871 | NFA violation penalty |
| 27 C.F.R. 479.11 | NFA regulatory definitions |
The interplay of federal NFA approval and Massachusetts state law makes NFA items practically unavailable to most Massachusetts civilians. Suppressors, machine guns, and destructive devices are essentially off-limits; SBRs and SBSs are heavily restricted; AOWs depend on the specific device. Anyone considering an NFA acquisition in Massachusetts should consult a Massachusetts firearms attorney before initiating the federal application process.
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts NFA Items (Title II Firearms)
The Code of Massachusetts Regulations is published at mass.gov/cmr.
The State Police FRB (Firearms Records Bureau) is the central administrative authority for firearm licensing in Massachusetts. Resources:
Cornell Law's Legal Information Institute is a free, current source for federal statute text: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18 and law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26.
A firearm safety topic that the State Police 515 CMR 3.00 program emphasizes:
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 | Firearm definitions |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 129B | FID licensing |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131 | LTC licensing |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131C | Vehicle transport |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131F | Non-Resident LTC |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131L | Safe storage |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131P | Basic Firearms Safety Course |
| M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131R | ERPO definitions |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10 | Unlawful possession |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10H | Carry while intoxicated |
| M.G.L. c. 269, Section 12D | School grounds carry |
| M.G.L. c. 278, Section 8A | Castle Doctrine |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | Comprehensive 2024 firearm reform |
| 515 CMR 3.00 | Safety course / instructor regulations |
| 18 U.S.C. 922 | Federal Gun Control Act |
| 18 U.S.C. 926A | FOPA |
| 18 U.S.C. 926B | LEOSA active LE |
| 18 U.S.C. 926C | LEOSA retired LE |
Massachusetts firearm law is dynamic. Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 changed dozens of provisions, and federal Second Amendment litigation continues to reshape what state and local restrictions are enforceable. Always verify a specific provision against the current statutory text at malegislature.gov before relying on it for a legal decision. Consult a licensed Massachusetts firearms attorney for any case-specific question.
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Firearms Law - Resources
Q: What license do I need to carry a handgun in Massachusetts? A: A License to Carry (LTC) issued under M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131. The LTC is the only Massachusetts license that authorizes carry of a handgun. The Firearm Identification Card (FID) under c. 140, Section 129B covers long guns and ammunition only.
Q: How old do I have to be to get an LTC? A: 21 years old for the LTC. The FID is available at 18 (or 15-17 with parental consent for the FID-Restricted variant).
Q: Where do I apply? A: To the chief of police (or police commissioner) of the city or town where you reside. Non-residents apply to the Colonel of the Massachusetts State Police through the Firearms Records Bureau (FRB) under c. 140, Section 131F.
Q: How long does the LTC last? A: Six years from the date of issuance.
Q: How much does it cost? A: The state fee is $100. Local municipalities may charge additional fingerprinting or processing fees ($25-$50 typical). The Basic Firearms Safety Course runs $100-$250 separately.
Q: Do I need training to get an LTC? A: Yes. M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131P requires completion of a Basic Firearms Safety Course from a state-certified instructor. Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 added a mandatory live-fire component for first-time applicants.
Q: Am I exempt from training if I have military or law enforcement background? A: Yes, in certain categories. Active duty law enforcement officers, active duty military, and certain other categories are exempt from the safety course requirement under c. 140, Section 131P(a).
Q: Is a hunter education course a substitute? A: A Basic Hunter Education Course under M.G.L. c. 131, Section 14 is a valid substitute for an FID application but not for an LTC application.
Q: What is "suitability"? A: After Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024, the licensing authority may deny an LTC only on finding the applicant unsuitable based on enumerated criteria (risk of harm to self or others, prior conduct evidencing carelessness with firearms, etc.). Post-Bruen, the prior "good reason" need-based test was removed from c. 140, Section 131.
Q: Can I appeal a denial or restriction? A: Yes. M.G.L. c. 140, Section 131(f) authorizes a de novo appeal to the District Court for the judicial district of the issuing authority. The appeal is heard by a judge, with the licensing authority defending its decision.
Q: What is a "restricted LTC"? A: A restricted LTC is one issued with written limitations on where or for what purpose the holder may carry. Common restrictions are "target & hunting only," "employment," and "sporting." Carry outside the restriction can lead to revocation and prosecution.
Q: Can I carry concealed in Massachusetts with an LTC from another state? A: No. Massachusetts does not recognize any other state's concealed carry permit. You must obtain a Massachusetts Non-Resident LTC under c. 140, Section 131F before lawfully carrying.
Q: Is open carry legal? A: An LTC authorizes both concealed and open carry of a handgun. In practice, open carry is rare in Massachusetts and may prompt police response or disturbing-the-peace charges under M.G.L. c. 269, Section 14. Most LTC holders carry concealed.
Q: Where am I prohibited from carrying? A: Many places. K-12 schools (c. 269, Section 10(j) and Section 12D), colleges, courthouses, government buildings, polling places, hospitals, airports past security, public transit, parades and demonstrations, public parks and beaches (post-Chapter-135 of 2024), establishments serving alcohol for on-premises consumption, and houses of worship absent owner consent. See the PROHIBITED_PLACES section for the full list.
Q: Do I have to tell a police officer I'm carrying? A: No statutory duty to volunteer the information, but you must produce the LTC on demand and you must not lie. Best practice is to volunteer at the start of any sustained contact. See the DUTY_TO_INFORM section.
Q: Can I carry in a vehicle? A: An LTC holder may carry a loaded handgun on the person or under direct control in a vehicle (center console, glove box). An FID holder must keep long guns unloaded and in a locked case or trunk under c. 140, Section 131C. See the VEHICLE_CARRY section.
Q: Does Massachusetts have a Castle Doctrine? A: Yes, but narrowly. M.G.L. c. 278, Section 8A eliminates the duty to retreat from an intruder only within the occupant's dwelling. Outside the dwelling, M.G.L. c. 233, Section 23F's evidentiary framework expects the defender to have availed themselves of all available means to avoid combat.
Q: Does Massachusetts have a Stand Your Ground law? A: No. Massachusetts is a duty-to-retreat state outside the home. The defender must show no reasonable alternative existed before resorting to force.
Q: Can I use deadly force in self-defense? A: Only when faced with imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury, and only with reasonable proportionate force. The duty to retreat outside the home applies. See the USE_OF_FORCE section.
Q: How do I have to store my firearm at home? A: Under c. 140, Section 131L, every firearm not under your immediate control must be in a locked container or have a tamper-resistant mechanical lock (e.g., trigger lock) attached. The home rule is the same as the vehicle storage rule.
Q: Can I leave a handgun in my car while I shop? A: Only if it is secured per c. 140, Section 131L - in a locked container affixed to the vehicle (locked glove box, trunk, or lock box) or with a tamper-resistant mechanical lock attached.
Q: Can I fly with my firearm from Logan? A: Yes, checked in a locked, hard-sided container with ammunition packed per airline policy, in compliance with TSA's air-travel-firearm rule (49 C.F.R. 1540.111). Declared at check-in.
Q: How do I renew my LTC? A: File a renewal application with the licensing authority before expiration. Most departments require the renewal at least 30-60 days in advance. The renewal fee is $100. See the RENEWAL_PROCESS section.
Q: What happens if my LTC expires? A: An expired LTC is not valid. The holder must surrender any firearms held under the license until reissuance. A late-renewal grace period may apply in limited circumstances; the safe practice is to renew on time.
Q: Do I have to notify someone if I move? A: Yes. Under c. 140, Sections 129B and 131, the holder must notify the Firearms Records Bureau and the licensing authority of the new municipality within 30 days of a change of address.
Q: How does Massachusetts law interact with federal law? A: Federal law (Gun Control Act, NFA) sets a floor; Massachusetts law generally regulates above the floor. Federal prohibitions on possession by certain categories (18 U.S.C. 922(g)) overlay state prohibitions and apply in parallel.
Q: Is my LTC valid for the Brady Permit-Holder NICS exemption? A: ATF maintains a chart of permits that satisfy the federal NICS check at the point of firearm purchase. The Massachusetts LTC's status on the chart may change; verify current status with the ATF Brady Permit Chart.
Q: Can I own a suppressor in Massachusetts? A: Effectively no. M.G.L. c. 269, Section 10A restricts suppressor possession; civilian suppressor ownership in Massachusetts is rare and requires special authorization beyond the federal NFA Form 4 approval.
Q: Can I own a machine gun? A: Effectively no for new acquisitions. Civilian machine gun possession requires both the federal NFA approval (which is limited to pre-1986 transferable units) and a Massachusetts Machine Gun License under c. 140, Section 131(o), which is rarely issued to private citizens.
Q: What about AR-15 or similar rifles? A: Many AR-15 platform rifles are restricted as "assault-style firearms" under c. 140, Section 121 as amended by Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024. Pre-effective-date possession may be grandfathered. New acquisitions of post-2024-prohibited configurations are unlawful.
Q: What about magazine capacity? A: M.G.L. c. 140, Section 121 defines "large-capacity feeding devices" - generally limited to 10 rounds for rifles and 5 shells for shotguns, with handgun limits tightened by Chapter 135 of 2024. Pre-September-13-1994 lawfully possessed large-capacity magazines are grandfathered.
Q: How do I buy a firearm in Massachusetts? A: From a licensed dealer with your LTC (or FID for non-large-capacity long guns). The dealer runs the NICS check and the Massachusetts state-level check.
Q: Can I buy from a private party? A: A private firearm transfer between two LTC holders must be processed through the State Police Firearms Records Bureau online portal under c. 140, Section 128A. Both parties must hold valid licenses.
Q: Can I buy out-of-state and bring the firearm to Massachusetts? A: Federal law (18 U.S.C. 922(a)(3) and Section 922(b)(3)) generally requires interstate firearm transfers to go through an FFL in the buyer's state of residence. A Massachusetts resident must have the firearm shipped to a Massachusetts FFL for transfer.
| Resource | Source |
|---|---|
| Massachusetts General Laws | malegislature.gov |
| Mass. Firearms Records Bureau | mass.gov/orgs/firearms-records-bureau |
| Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 | malegislature.gov/Laws/SessionLaws/Acts/2024/Chapter135 |
| Federal Gun Control Act | 18 U.S.C. 921 et seq. |
| Federal NFA | 26 U.S.C. 5841 et seq. |
View this topic on its own page: Massachusetts Concealed Carry FAQ
Browse local instructors offering state-approved training in your area. Book online, complete your training, and get one step closer to your concealed carry permit.