Texas law preempts most local firearm regulation. Tex. Local Gov't Code § 229.001 prohibits municipalities from adopting ordinances regulating...
Reviewed by Will Luker, Founder of CCW Hub. USCCA Training Counselor, USCCA Certified Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, Law Enforcement.
Texas law preempts most local firearm regulation. Tex. Local Gov't Code § 229.001 prohibits municipalities from adopting ordinances regulating ownership, possession, transfer, transportation, licensing, registration, or sale of firearms, ammunition, firearm components, or firearm supplies. Counties are separately preempted under Tex. Local Gov't Code § 236.002. Tex. Gov't Code § 411.209 prohibits political subdivisions from restricting LTC holders' ability to carry on government property absent specific statutory authorization. The Texas Attorney General has explicit enforcement authority for preemption violations.
For an LTC holder, the practical takeaway is short. Your Texas License to Carry is good in every city, every county, and on every piece of state-owned or local-government property in Texas, except for the locations the legislature itself has put off-limits in Tex. Penal Code § 46.03 (and a handful of related statutes). No municipality and no county can layer a local permit, a local registration scheme, a local "no firearms in the park" rule, an assault-weapon ban, or a local insurance requirement on top of state law. If a city posts a § 30.06 or § 30.07 sign on government property without statutory authority, that posting is unlawful and exposes the city to civil penalties under § 411.209. If you read about a Texas ordinance that purports to regulate ownership, possession, transfer, transportation, licensing, registration, or commerce in firearms or ammunition, it is almost certainly preempted, and the Attorney General has standing to sue and recover fees.
Section 229.001(a) is the Texas municipal preemption rule. It reads:
"Notwithstanding any other law, including Section 43.002 of this code and Chapter 251, Agriculture Code, a municipality may not adopt or enforce regulations that:
(1) relate to:
(A) the transfer, possession, wearing, carrying, ownership, storage, transportation, licensing, or registration of firearms, air guns, knives, ammunition, or firearm or air gun supplies or accessories;
(B) commerce in firearms, air guns, knives, ammunition, or firearm or air gun supplies or accessories; or
(C) the discharge of a firearm or air gun at a sport shooting range; or
(2) require an owner of a firearm to obtain liability insurance coverage for damages resulting from negligent or wilful acts involving the use of the firearm."
Three things to notice in that text.
Counties are governed by a separate but parallel statute. Tex. Local Gov't Code § 236.002(a) tracks § 229.001(a) almost word-for-word:
"Notwithstanding any other law, including Chapter 251, Agriculture Code, a county may not adopt or enforce regulations that:
(1) relate to:
(A) the transfer, possession, wearing, carrying, ownership, storage, transportation, licensing, or registration of firearms, air guns, knives, ammunition, or firearm or air gun supplies or accessories;
(B) commerce in firearms, air guns, knives, ammunition, or firearm or air gun supplies or accessories; or
(C) the discharge of a firearm or air gun at a sport shooting range; or
(2) require an owner of a firearm to obtain liability insurance coverage for damages resulting from negligent or wilful acts involving the use of the firearm."
Subsection (b) declares any county "ordinance, rule, resolution, or policy" - and any "official action, including in any legislative, police power, or proprietary capacity, taken by an employee or agent of a county" - adopted in violation of the section void. Subsection (d) further provides that any county order designed or enforced to "effectively restrict or prohibit the manufacture, sale, purchase, transfer, or display of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition that is otherwise lawful in this state is void." The anti-circumvention rule mirrors the municipal version in § 229.001(b-1) and forecloses the most common workaround: dressing up a firearm regulation as a generic land-use rule.
For instructors and license-holders, the practical effect is that no county commissioner's court - including the largest urban counties - can adopt a local rule on storage, transport, registration, sale, or carry. Sheriff's-office policies and county-employee rules in the course of duty are addressed separately under § 236.002(c)(5) and Subchapter G, Chapter 52, Labor Code.
Section 229.001(b) lists nine narrow categories of municipal authority that survive preemption. They are exceptions to the general rule, not loopholes. Read them strictly.
The county-level exceptions in § 236.002(c) are narrower and shorter, but they track the same architecture: mandatory armament, discharge regulation under § 235.022, LTC carry under § 411.209, generally applicable land-use and business regulation (subject to anti-circumvention in § 236.002(d)), and employee-conduct rules.
Section 229.001(d) adds one more universal limit. Nothing in the section authorizes the seizure or confiscation of any firearm, air gun, knife, ammunition, or firearm or air-gun supplies or accessories from "an individual who is lawfully carrying or possessing" them. Even when a city or county is acting within an exception - say, regulating long-gun carry at a public park - the city cannot seize the firearm of a lawful carrier.
Texas preemption reaches local governments. It does not reach private actors or the federal government. The following are outside its scope.
Section 411.209 is the enforcement teeth for LTC holders facing improperly posted government property. Subsection (a) provides:
"Except as provided by Subsection (i), a state agency or a political subdivision of the state may not take any action, including an action consisting of the provision of notice by a communication described by Section 30.06 or 30.07, Penal Code, that states or implies that a license holder who is carrying a handgun under the authority of this subchapter is prohibited from entering or remaining on a premises or other place owned or leased by the governmental entity unless license holders are prohibited from carrying a handgun on the premises or other place by Section 46.03, Penal Code, or other law."
In plain English: a state agency or political subdivision cannot post a § 30.06 sign, a § 30.07 sign, or any equivalent communication on government property unless a state law (typically § 46.03) actually prohibits LTC carry there. A city cannot post the city park, the city hall lobby, the public library, the convention center, or any other government-owned or government-leased premises unless the legislature has placed that location on the list of prohibited places.
Subsection (b) provides civil penalties: not less than $1,000 and not more than $1,500 for the first violation, and not less than $10,000 and not more than $10,500 for the second or subsequent violation. Each day of a continuing violation is a separate violation.
Subsection (d) creates the complaint process. A Texas resident or any LTC holder may file a complaint with the Attorney General after providing the agency or subdivision a written notice describing the location and the general facts of the violation. The agency or subdivision has three business days to cure. If it does not, the complaint goes to the AG.
Subsections (f) and (g) describe AG enforcement. Before bringing suit, the AG must investigate, give the chief administrative officer 15 days to cure, and then sue for the civil penalty if the cure does not occur. The AG can also seek a writ of mandamus or other equitable relief and can recover reasonable expenses, attorney's fees, investigative costs, witness fees, and deposition costs. Subsection (h) waives sovereign immunity to the extent of the liability the section creates.
For an LTC holder, the practical workflow for an improperly posted city or county building is straightforward. Send a written notice describing the location and the unauthorized posting. If the agency does not remove the sign within three business days, file a complaint with the Texas Attorney General. The AG's office maintains a dedicated portal for § 411.209 complaints and has used the statute to compel multiple Texas cities and counties to remove improperly posted signs.
Texas preemption is not enforced solely through private litigation. Both § 229.001(f) and § 236.002(f) authorize the Attorney General to bring a state-on-behalf action seeking a temporary or permanent injunction against a city or county that adopts a regulation in violation of the preemption rules. The AG can recover reasonable expenses, court costs, attorney's fees, investigative costs, witness fees, and deposition costs.
This is meaningfully broader than the private-litigant model that governs preemption challenges in many other states. In Texas, the AG can act on a single complaint, without waiting for a license-holder to be charged or arrested under the preempted ordinance. That changes the litigation posture. A Texas city that adopts a preempted ordinance is not facing a hypothetical future plaintiff; it is facing the AG with statutory standing and a fee-shifting provision.
The current shape of Texas preemption is the product of two waves of legislation. HB 1500 (2017) strengthened § 229.001 in three ways. It added the express AG enforcement authority in subsection (f), making clear that the state itself can sue a noncompliant city. It tightened the zoning and land-use exception by adding subsection (b-1)'s anti-circumvention language. And it expanded the operative list in subsection (a)(1) to cover firearm and air-gun supplies and accessories - a response to local-government attempts to regulate gun stores indirectly through ordinances on accessories or components.
HB 2363 (2021) added the parallel county preemption statute that became Tex. Local Gov't Code § 236.002. Before 2021, the principal county preemption authority had been read into § 229.001 by analogy and through other Local Government Code provisions. The new chapter put county preemption on the same footing as municipal preemption, with the same anti-circumvention rule, the same exceptions, the same AG enforcement authority, and the same fee-shifting.
The 2017 and 2021 changes reflect a consistent legislative posture: Texas preemption is broad, the exceptions are narrow, and the AG carries the enforcement load.
The Texas Attorney General has used § 411.209 and the AG enforcement authority in § 229.001(f) repeatedly. Several Texas cities - including Austin and San Antonio - have been the subject of AG correspondence, complaints, or litigation over local firearm-storage ordinances, gun-show regulations, and posted notices on city-owned property. The pattern is consistent. A city adopts an ordinance or posts a sign. A complaint is filed. The AG investigates, gives the city the statutory cure period, and then sues if the city does not remove the ordinance or sign. In several cases, the cities removed the offending action during the cure period rather than face a final judgment with fee-shifting.
For instructors who teach in Texas, the operating rule is the same in every city, every county, and on every piece of government property: state law controls. If you encounter a local firearm rule that goes beyond § 229.001's enumerated exceptions or a § 30.06/§ 30.07 sign on government property without a corresponding § 46.03 listing, document the location, send the statutory notice, and file with the AG.
This page covers one part of our Texas concealed carry guide.
Read the complete Texas guideBrowse local instructors offering state-approved training in your area. Book online, complete your training, and get one step closer to your concealed carry permit.