Reviewed by Will Luker, Founder of CCW Hub. USCCA Training Counselor, USCCA Certified Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, Law Enforcement.
Washington is a licensed carry state, and the license is shall-issue. Outside your own home or your fixed place of business, you cannot carry a pistol concealed on your person without a Concealed Pistol License (CPL) unless one of the statutory exceptions applies. RCW 9.41.050(1)(a) sets that rule, and RCW 9.41.070 gives the issuing agency no room to say no to a qualified applicant: the chief of police of a municipality or the sheriff of a county "shall within thirty days after the filing of an application of any person, issue a license to such person to carry a pistol concealed on his or her person within this state for five years from date of issue." The statute then adds: "The applicant's constitutional right to bear arms shall not be denied, unless" one of seven listed disqualifiers applies.
Two things surprise people coming from other states. First, no training of any kind is a condition of the Washington license. RCW 9.41.070(1) frames its list as exclusive, saying the right "shall not be denied, unless" one of the listed grounds applies, and training is not among them. Second, training is a condition of buying a gun. Those are different rules in different statutes.
Under RCW 9.41.070(13) you apply to the municipality or the county where you live, to your county if you live in an unincorporated area, or anywhere in the state if you are a nonresident. The Attorney General's Office says you must apply in person at a local law enforcement office. There is no statewide permit office, and under RCW 9.41.070(1) the issuing authority "shall not refuse to accept completed applications for concealed pistol licenses during regular business hours."
The thirty-day clock stretches to sixty days if you do not hold a valid permanent Washington driver's license or state identification card, or if you have not been a Washington resident for the previous consecutive ninety days.
The statutory fees sit in RCW 9.41.070(5) through (7) and (9). The original, renewal, and replacement fees are all nonrefundable.
RCW 9.41.070(2) sends you through the national instant criminal background check system, the Washington State Patrol electronic database, and the Health Care Authority electronic database. A first-time license also requires a fingerprint-based national FBI check.
The seven disqualifiers in RCW 9.41.070(1) are ineligibility to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040 or 9.41.045 or under federal law, a CPL in revoked status, being under twenty-one, being subject to a firearms-related court order or injunction from the statutes it lists, being free on bond or personal recognizance pending trial, appeal, or sentencing for a felony, an outstanding felony or misdemeanor warrant, and a firearm forfeiture ordered under RCW 9.41.098(1)(e) within the year before you apply.
RCW 9.41.075 requires immediate revocation on several triggers, including a conviction that makes you ineligible under RCW 9.41.040, and a third conviction under chapter 9.41 RCW within five calendar years.
The CPL is a pistol license. RCW 9.41.010 defines a pistol as "any firearm with a barrel less than 16 inches in length, or is designed to be held and fired by the use of a single hand," and the Attorney General's Office states that Washington licenses are only issued for the concealed carry of pistols.
Practical rules from RCW 9.41.050:
Where chapter 9.41 RCW does not name a grade for an offense, RCW 9.41.810 supplies one: any violation of the chapter is a misdemeanor "except as otherwise provided."
RCW 9.41.060 lists ten categories that RCW 9.41.050 does not apply to at all. They include law enforcement and correctional personnel meeting its subsection (1) conditions, armed forces and national guard members on duty, anyone carrying a pistol "unloaded and in a closed opaque case or secure wrapper," target-shooting and firearm-collecting club members at or traveling to and from their activities, and people engaged in a lawful outdoor recreational activity such as hunting, fishing, camping, or hiking.
The Attorney General's Office puts it this way: "No Washington statute directly prohibits openly carrying a firearm." Three statutes limit it.
RCW 9.41.270(1) makes it unlawful to carry, exhibit, display, or draw a firearm or other weapon capable of producing bodily harm "in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons." That is a gross misdemeanor, and a conviction costs you your CPL. The statute does not reach acts in your abode or fixed place of business, or acts protecting yourself or another against presently threatened unlawful force.
RCW 9.41.300(2) makes it unlawful to knowingly open carry a firearm or other weapon while knowingly at a permitted demonstration, whether on your person or in a vehicle. It also reaches open carry within 250 feet of the perimeter of one, but only after a law enforcement officer advises you of the demonstration and directs you to leave until you no longer possess or control the firearm, and not on private property you own or lease. That subsection expressly does not apply to lawful concealed carry by a valid CPL holder, and law enforcement and military personnel are exempt from it.
RCW 9.41.305 bars knowingly open carrying on the west state capitol campus grounds, in the capitol buildings it lists, at state legislative offices and public legislative hearings, and in municipal buildings used for governing-body meetings, unless you fall within its own exemptions. A first violation is a misdemeanor and second and subsequent violations are a gross misdemeanor.
RCW 9.41.300(1) lists restricted areas of jails and law enforcement facilities, court areas, restricted areas of certain mental health facilities, the portion of an establishment the state liquor and cannabis board classifies as off-limits to persons under 21, restricted areas of commercial service airports, libraries, accredited zoos and aquariums, and transit stations and facilities. A violation of subsection (1) or (2) is a gross misdemeanor. A CPL matters here: RCW 9.41.300(14) exempts a licensee from the library, zoo, and transit restrictions, and RCW 9.41.300(9) lets a licensee into the restricted access areas of a jail or law enforcement facility after directly and promptly obtaining written permission from the administrator or checking the firearm.
RCW 9.41.280 makes it a misdemeanor to knowingly carry a firearm onto public or private elementary or secondary school premises, school transportation, or facility areas in exclusive school use. A second violation is a gross misdemeanor, and a firearm conviction costs a licensee three years of CPL revocation plus three years of ineligibility to reapply. Licensees get narrow exceptions, including picking up or dropping off a student. The child care premises and voting facility restrictions sit in RCW 9.41.282 and RCW 9.41.284, each with its own exception for licensees.
A CPL does not exempt you from Washington's purchase and transfer rules.
There is no permit to purchase in Washington today. The background check fee that the Washington State Patrol charges through dealers under RCW 43.43.580(4) is set by the agency at an amount "reasonably calculated to cover the direct and indirect costs," not by a figure in the statute.
These are enacted and dated, and none of them is in force now. Do not plan around them as current requirements.
2025 c 370 (E2SHB 1163) takes effect May 1, 2027 except for its section 6, which is Washington State Patrol rulemaking authority effective July 27, 2025. On that date RCW 9.41.121 creates a permit to purchase issued by the State Patrol, and RCW 9.41.070 gains a new disqualifier at subsection (1)(h), which will read "Has failed to produce a certificate of completion from a certified concealed carry firearms safety training program within the last five years," backed by a new subsection (5) requiring a program certified under RCW 43.43.575 that includes "live-fire shooting exercises on a firing range" and "a minimum of 50 rounds of ammunition firing training at a firing range under the supervision of an instructor." RCW 43.43.575 is itself not yet law either. Until then, the license has no training condition.
RCW 9.41.040 defines unlawful possession of a firearm. First degree, which includes possession after a conviction or insanity acquittal for a serious offense, is a class B felony. Second degree is a class C felony. Restoration runs through RCW 9.41.041, which permanently bars petitioning after a felony sex offense, a class A felony, or a felony carrying a maximum sentence of at least twenty years, and otherwise requires a set number of consecutive conviction-free years in the community before you may petition a superior court.
RCW 9.41.290 is broad. Washington "fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation within the boundaries of the state," and local ordinances that are "inconsistent with, more restrictive than, or exceed the requirements of state law" are preempted and repealed regardless of home rule status. Cities, towns, and counties may enact only what state law specifically authorizes. RCW 9.41.300(3) is that authorization: they may restrict discharge where people, animals, or property are reasonably likely to be jeopardized, and may restrict possession in a municipally operated stadium or convention center, except that those restrictions cannot reach a pistol carried by a CPL holder or someone exempt under RCW 9.41.060. RCW 9.41.300(4) separately lets them zone firearms businesses.
Washington recognizes another state's license only on the conditions in RCW 9.41.073, and only while the holder is not a Washington resident. The Attorney General publishes the qualifying list under RCW 9.41.073(2); the current publication is dated 07/10/2026. Once you become a Washington resident you need a Washington CPL. The reciprocity page covers the list and the conditions.
Washington's use of force rules are statutory. RCW 9A.16.020(3) makes force lawful when used by a party about to be injured, or by another lawfully aiding that party, in preventing or attempting to prevent an offense against the person, "in case the force is not more than is necessary." RCW 9A.16.050(1) makes homicide justifiable in lawful defense of yourself or the people it lists when there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design by the person slain to commit a felony or do some great personal injury, and imminent danger of that design being accomplished. RCW 9A.16.110 directs the state to reimburse defense costs for the crimes it lists when a defendant is found not guilty by reason of self-defense and the trier of fact finds the claim sustained by a preponderance of the evidence.
RCW 9.41.070(4) requires the license and the application to carry a warning substantially as follows: "Although state and local laws do not differ, federal law and state law on the possession of firearms differ. If you are prohibited by federal law from possessing a firearm, you may be prosecuted in federal court. A state license is not a defense to a federal prosecution." RCW 9.41.090(3)(b) requires a dealer to give a firearm purchaser a parallel caution, that state permission to purchase a firearm is not a defense to a federal prosecution. A Washington CPL does not change your status under 18 U.S.C. 922(g).
This is general information, not legal advice. Check the current text of any RCW section at app.leg.wa.gov before you rely on it, watching the effective-date heading above the text you are reading, and take specific questions to a Washington attorney.
Washington licenses concealed carry, and the document is the concealed pistol license, or CPL. RCW 9.41.050(1)(a) states the rule the license answers: except in the person's place of abode or fixed place of business, a person shall not carry a pistol concealed on his or her person without a license to carry a concealed pistol. RCW 9.41.060 lists the people and situations that fall outside RCW 9.41.050 entirely, so a license is not the only lawful route. See Concealed Carry. RCW 9.41.070 is the issuing statute, and it reaches pistols. RCW 9.41.010 defines a pistol as any firearm with a barrel less than 16 inches in length, or that is designed to be held and fired by the use of a single hand.
Washington's RCW prints a superseding version of several chapter 9.41 statutes alongside the version in force. Every current-law statement here comes from the version in force today, which for RCW 9.41.070 is the half headed as effective until May 1, 2027. The superseding version is already enacted, is covered separately below, and is not law today.
Under RCW 9.41.070(1), the chief of police of a municipality or the sheriff of a county shall, within thirty days after the filing of an application, issue a license to carry a pistol concealed on the person within this state. The deadline stretches to sixty days for an applicant who does not have a valid permanent Washington driver's license or Washington state identification card, or who has not been a resident of the state for the previous consecutive ninety days. The same subsection bars the issuing authority from refusing to accept completed applications during regular business hours.
RCW 9.41.070(13) sets where you file. A resident of a municipality applies to that municipality or to the county, a resident of an unincorporated area applies to the county, and a nonresident may apply anywhere in the state. That last route is a real nonresident path to the same license.
RCW 9.41.070(11) keeps local practice inside the statute: a political subdivision may not modify the requirements of the section or the chapter, and may not ask an applicant to voluntarily submit information the section does not require. RCW 9.41.070(10) allows the chief of police of the municipality or the sheriff of the county of the applicant's residence to issue a temporary emergency license for good cause while review under subsection (1) is pending. It does not exempt the holder from any records check requirement, and it must be easily distinguishable from a regular license.
The application calls for a full set of fingerprints, identifying information, and a signed waiver of confidentiality covering mental health and health care records, with added requirements under RCW 9.41.173 for a noncitizen applicant. See Application Process. RCW 9.41.070 also fixes the fee schedule and bars any other state or local branch or unit of government from adding charges for issuance. See Fees and Costs.
RCW 9.41.070(1) issues the license for five years from date of issue, for the purposes of protection or while engaged in business, sport, or while traveling. Renewal timing, the department of licensing renewal notice, and the military renewal extensions are covered under Renewal Process.
RCW 9.41.070(1) is written as a duty with a closed list of exceptions: the applicant's constitutional right to bear arms shall not be denied, unless the applicant
Read the qualifiers closely. The bond and recognizance ground runs only to a felony. The warrant ground runs to a felony or a misdemeanor. The forfeiture ground is limited to RCW 9.41.098(1)(e), which covers a firearm possessed by a person who is in any place in which a concealed pistol license is required and who is under the influence of any drug or of intoxicating liquor as defined in chapter 46.61 RCW, and it lapses one year after the order. Twenty-one is the age floor, stated without a younger tier.
Two further rules sit alongside that list. RCW 9.41.070(1) provides that no person convicted of a felony may have the right to possess firearms restored or the privilege to carry a concealed pistol restored unless the attorney general has granted relief from disabilities under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 925(c), or RCW 9.41.040(3) or (4) applies. RCW 9.41.070(2)(b) then directs the issuing authority to deny a permit to anyone found to be prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal or state law, which backstops the enumerated grounds.
RCW 9.41.070(2)(a) runs the eligibility check through the national instant criminal background check system, the Washington state patrol electronic database, the health care authority electronic database, and other agencies or resources as appropriate. RCW 9.41.070(2)(c) applies that check, and the denial rule in (2)(b), whether the applicant is applying for a new license or renewing one. RCW 9.41.070(2)(d) adds a further step for an original license only: the background check must be conducted through the Washington state patrol criminal identification section and must include a national check from the federal bureau of investigation through the submission of fingerprints.
The license removes concealed carry of a pistol from the prohibition in RCW 9.41.050(1)(a), and it unlocks the loaded vehicle rule. Under RCW 9.41.050(2)(a) a person shall not carry or place a loaded pistol in any vehicle unless the person has a license to carry a concealed pistol and one of three conditions holds: the pistol is on the licensee's person, the licensee is within the vehicle at all times that the pistol is there, or the licensee is away from the vehicle and the pistol is locked within the vehicle and concealed from view from outside the vehicle.
RCW 9.41.050(3)(a) is not a licensee rule and applies whether or not you hold a CPL. A person at least eighteen years of age in possession of an unloaded pistol may not leave it in a vehicle unless it is locked within the vehicle and concealed from view from outside. RCW 9.41.050(4) adds that nothing in the section permits possession of firearms illegal to possess under state or federal law.
RCW 9.41.050(1)(b) requires a licensee to keep the license in immediate possession whenever the section requires one, and to display it on demand to any police officer or to any other person when and if required by law.
RCW 9.41.098(1)(a) adds a collateral benefit. Where a firearm is found concealed on a person not authorized under RCW 9.41.060 or RCW 9.41.070 to carry a concealed pistol, it is an absolute defense to forfeiture that the person possessed a valid Washington concealed pistol license within the preceding two years and has not become ineligible in the interim. Past due and current renewal fees must be paid before the firearm is returned.
The license does not open every location. See Prohibited Places.
| Conduct | Grading |
|---|---|
| Carrying a pistol concealed on the person without a CPL, outside your abode or fixed place of business, RCW 9.41.050(1)(a) | Misdemeanor. RCW 9.41.810 grades any violation of chapter 9.41 RCW as a misdemeanor except as otherwise provided |
| Failing to keep the license in immediate possession or to display it when required, RCW 9.41.050(1)(b) | Class 1 civil infraction under chapter 7.80 RCW. RCW 7.80.120(1)(a) sets the maximum and default at $250, not counting statutory assessments |
| Carrying or placing a loaded pistol in a vehicle without a CPL, or outside the three conditions, RCW 9.41.050(2)(a) | Misdemeanor under RCW 9.41.050(2)(b) |
| Leaving an unloaded pistol in a vehicle unlocked or in view, by a person at least eighteen, RCW 9.41.050(3)(a) | Misdemeanor under RCW 9.41.050(3)(b) |
| Knowingly false statement about citizenship or identity on a CPL application, RCW 9.41.070(12) | False swearing under RCW 9A.72.040, a gross misdemeanor. RCW 9A.20.021(2) allows up to three hundred sixty-four days in county jail, a fine up to five thousand dollars, or both. The license is revoked and the person is permanently ineligible |
Chapter 9.41 RCW attaches no jail term or fine figure to its own misdemeanors. RCW 9.92.030 supplies the default where no punishment is prescribed by statute: up to ninety days in county jail, a fine of up to one thousand dollars, or both.
Nothing in the current RCW 9.41.070 conditions issuance on a course, a range qualification, or a certificate. Subsection (1) frames refusal as an exception to a duty to issue and then enumerates the grounds, and training is not among them.
Training does have a role on the purchase side rather than the carry side. See below.
A superseding version of RCW 9.41.070 takes effect May 1, 2027. The training condition in it comes from 2025 c 370 s 9, and the version as printed also carries 2026 c 36 s 11. That version adds a disqualifier for an applicant who has failed to produce a certificate of completion from a certified concealed carry firearms safety training program within the last five years, or proof of exemption, and a subsection (5)(a) requiring that the program include "live-fire shooting exercises on a firing range that include a demonstration by the applicant of the safe handling of, and shooting proficiency with, firearms, including a minimum of 50 rounds of ammunition firing training at a firing range under the supervision of an instructor." RCW 43.43.575, which directs the Washington state patrol to certify those programs, takes effect the same day.
2025 c 370 also creates a permit to purchase at RCW 9.41.121, effective the same day. Washington has no permit to purchase requirement today.
A training rule does exist on the purchase side, serving a different transaction. RCW 9.41.1132 requires a person applying for the purchase or transfer of a firearm to show proof of completion of a recognized firearms safety training program within the last five years covering eight enumerated topics. Its exemptions at subsection (4) reach certain peace officers and certain military members, each on the terms the subsection sets out, and holding a CPL is not among them. See Training Requirements.
The CPL is a carry credential. Current RCW 9.41.090(1) bars a dealer from delivering a firearm until three things are true: the purchaser shows proof of completion of a recognized firearm safety training program within the last five years complying with RCW 9.41.1132, or proof of exemption; the Washington state patrol firearms background check program notifies the dealer that the purchaser is eligible under state and federal law; and RCW 9.41.092 is satisfied. RCW 9.41.092 requires that the results of all required background checks are known, that the purchaser is not prohibited and has no voluntary waiver of firearm rights currently in effect, and that ten business days have elapsed from the date the licensed dealer requested the background check.
Neither section carves out a licensee. A CPL holder faces the same dealer background check and the same ten business days.
RCW 9.41.075(1) requires a law enforcement agency to revoke the license immediately upon any of the following: discovery that the licensee was ineligible under RCW 9.41.070 when applying for the license or a renewal; conviction, a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity, or commitment for mental health treatment, on grounds that make a person ineligible under RCW 9.41.040 to possess a firearm; conviction for a third violation of chapter 9.41 RCW within five calendar years; an order that the licensee forfeit a firearm under RCW 9.41.098(1)(d); or receipt of an order to surrender and prohibit weapons or an extreme risk protection order against the licensee, other than an ex parte temporary protection order.
Forfeiture revocations escalate. Under RCW 9.41.075(3) a first forfeiture under RCW 9.41.098(1)(d) revokes for one year, a second for two years, and a third or subsequent for five years, and the person may not reapply until the revocation period ends.
RCW 9.41.075(2) adds a disposal duty. Unless the person may lawfully possess a pistol without a license, an ineligible person to whom a CPL was issued must lawfully transfer ownership of any pistol acquired while licensed within 14 days of revocation, and where the agency finds the person bought a pistol while licensed, the agency requires satisfactory evidence of that transfer within 15 days of the revocation. Under RCW 9.41.075(4) the agency notifies the department of licensing in writing and the department records the revocation. A revoked license is itself a ground for refusing a new application.
RCW 9.41.0975(2) allows an application to a court of competent jurisdiction for a writ of mandamus directing an issuing agency to issue a concealed pistol license wrongfully refused, or directing that erroneous information behind the refusal be corrected. File in the county where the license application was made or in Thurston county. The court must provide an expedited hearing, and a person granted the writ is awarded reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. RCW 9.41.0975(1) gives the state, local governmental entities, public and private agencies, and their employees, all acting in good faith, immunity for failing to issue a license to an eligible person, so the writ is the remedy rather than damages.
RCW 9.41.073(1) recognizes another state's license only if that state gives effect to a Washington CPL, does not issue concealed pistol licenses to persons under twenty-one, and requires mandatory fingerprint-based background checks of criminal and mental health history for all applicants. It applies only while the holder is not a Washington resident. See Reciprocity.
View this topic on its own page: Washington Concealed Pistol License: Permit Basics
Washington requires a license to carry a pistol concealed. RCW 9.41.050(1)(a) states the prohibition: "Except in the person's place of abode or fixed place of business, a person shall not carry a pistol concealed on his or her person without a license to carry a concealed pistol." That license is the concealed pistol license (CPL), issued under RCW 9.41.070.
RCW 9.41.050 states no grade for that offense. RCW 9.41.810 supplies one for the chapter: "Any violation of any provision of this chapter, except as otherwise provided, shall be a misdemeanor and punishable accordingly." A CPL covers pistols and nothing else. RCW 9.41.010(37) defines "pistol" as any firearm with a barrel under 16 inches, or one designed to be held and fired by the use of a single hand.
RCW 9.41.070(1) directs the chief of police of a municipality or the sheriff of a county to issue, within 30 days of the filing of an application, a license to carry a pistol concealed anywhere in the state for five years, "for the purposes of protection or while engaged in business, sport, or while traveling." The authority gets up to 60 days if you lack a valid permanent Washington driver's license or state ID card, or have not been a resident for the previous 90 consecutive days.
Issuance is not discretionary. The statute says the applicant's constitutional right to bear arms "shall not be denied, unless" one of seven things is true: ineligibility under RCW 9.41.040 or RCW 9.41.045 or federal law, a CPL already in revoked status, being under 21, a firearms related court order or injunction, release on bond or personal recognizance pending trial, appeal, or sentencing for a felony, an outstanding arrest warrant, or a firearm forfeiture order under RCW 9.41.098(1)(e) within one year before applying.
Training is not on that list. That version of RCW 9.41.070(1) sets out the complete set of grounds for refusing a license, and no training or shooting qualification is among them. That changes in 2027, and only in 2027.
RCW 9.41.050(1)(b) requires a licensee to have the CPL "in his or her immediate possession at all times that he or she is required by this section to have a concealed pistol license" and to display it on demand to any police officer, or to any other person when required by law. A violation is a class 1 civil infraction under chapter 7.80 RCW, not a crime.
RCW 9.41.050(2)(a) says a person "shall not carry or place a loaded pistol in any vehicle" unless the person has a CPL and one of three conditions holds:
A violation is a misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.050(2)(b)). "Loaded" is defined at RCW 9.41.010(31) and reaches a cartridge in the chamber, in a clip locked in place, in a revolver's cylinder, in a tube or magazine inserted in the action, or a ball in the barrel of a capped or primed muzzle loader.
Unloaded pistols have a separate rule that binds licensees and everyone else alike. Under RCW 9.41.050(3)(a), a person at least 18 in possession of an unloaded pistol may not leave it in a vehicle unless it is locked within the vehicle and concealed from view from outside. That is also a misdemeanor.
RCW 9.41.060 lifts RCW 9.41.050 entirely for a listed set of people and situations. Four of the ten:
The remaining exemptions are mostly occupational: qualifying law enforcement and corrections personnel, armed forces on duty, authorized federal officers, the firearms trade, and officers retired for service or physical disability (subsection (10)). Subsection (5) is not: it covers regularly enrolled members of any organization duly authorized to purchase or receive pistols from the United States or from this state.
RCW 9.41.040 grades unlawful possession in two degrees. First degree, a class B felony, covers owning, accessing, having in custody, control, or possession, or receiving any firearm after a conviction or an insanity finding for any serious offense, and also covers an untraceable or undetectable firearm while the person is subject to an order described in RCW 9.41.040(2)(a)(ii). Second degree, a class C felony, covers the rest: other felony convictions, listed domestic violence offenses, qualifying protection and no contact orders, involuntary commitment for a mental disorder, incompetency dismissals, being under 18, and pretrial release on a serious offense. Each firearm is a separate offense. Possession after filing a voluntary waiver of firearm rights under RCW 9.41.350 is a class 4 civil infraction (RCW 9.41.040(7)).
There is no licensed path for anyone aged 18 to 20. A CPL requires 21, and RCW 9.41.240(2) confines a person at least 18 but under 21 to possessing a pistol in the person's abode, at the person's fixed place of business, or on real property under his or her control, unless an exception under RCW 9.41.042, 9.41.050, or 9.41.060 applies.
RCW 9.41.050 reaches concealed carry. Open carry of a pistol by a person who may lawfully possess it is not licensed in Washington. But how you carry is regulated regardless.
RCW 9.41.270(1), in the version in force until May 1, 2027, makes it unlawful to "carry, exhibit, display, or draw" a firearm or other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm "in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons." Either branch is enough: intent to intimidate, or circumstances that warrant alarm. A violation is a gross misdemeanor, and on conviction the person "shall lose his or her concealed pistol license, if any" (RCW 9.41.270(2)). Subsection (3) takes five things outside the rule, among them acts in your own abode or fixed place of business and acting to protect yourself or another "against the use of presently threatened unlawful force."
Two statutes ban open carry specifically, and both are written against open carry only. RCW 9.41.305 covers the west state capitol campus grounds and buildings, legislative offices and hearings, and municipal governing body meeting buildings and locations; a violation is a misdemeanor under subsection (4)(a), and a gross misdemeanor on a second or subsequent violation under subsection (4)(b). RCW 9.41.305(5) says nothing in that section applies to lawful concealed carry by a person who has a valid CPL. RCW 9.41.300(2) covers permitted demonstrations, and the area within 250 feet of one after an officer directs you to leave. RCW 9.41.300(2)(e) says "Nothing in this subsection applies to the lawful concealed carry of a firearm by a person who has a valid concealed pistol license."
RCW 9.41.300(1) makes it unlawful to enter certain places while knowingly possessing or having under your control a weapon. Its eight categories cover restricted access areas of jails and law enforcement facilities, court proceeding areas, restricted access areas of inpatient public mental health facilities, the portion of an establishment the state liquor and cannabis board classifies as off limits to persons under 21, restricted access areas of a commercial service airport, and the premises of libraries, accredited zoos or aquariums, and transit stations. A violation of subsection (1) or (2) is a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.300(16)).
A CPL matters for four of those eight and does nothing about the other four. RCW 9.41.300(14) says the library, zoo or aquarium, and transit categories do not apply to a person licensed under RCW 9.41.070. RCW 9.41.300(9) lets a licensee into a jail or law enforcement facility if, on entering, the licensee directly and promptly proceeds to the administrator or the administrator's designee and obtains written permission or checks the firearm, then reclaims it on leaving and departs immediately.
The four the license does not touch are court areas, inpatient mental health areas, airport restricted areas, and the bar. On the last one there is no license exception at all: no subsection of RCW 9.41.300 exempts a license holder from the portion classified as off limits to persons under 21, and RCW 9.41.300(11) lifts it only for the proprietor of the premises and employees while engaged in their employment. RCW 9.41.300(7) separately lifts that category for law enforcement personnel, for security personnel while engaged in official duties, and for a person engaged in military activities sponsored by the federal or state governments while engaged in official duties.
Local governments have little room to add to this. RCW 9.41.290 states that Washington "fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation." One authorized local restriction reaches licensees: RCW 9.41.300(3)(b) lets a municipality restrict firearms in a stadium or convention center it operates, but not as to "Any pistol in the possession of a person licensed under RCW 9.41.070 or exempt from the licensing requirement by RCW 9.41.060."
RCW 9.41.280(1) makes it unlawful to knowingly carry onto, or possess on, public or private elementary or secondary school premises, school provided transportation, and facilities while used exclusively by schools or for official school board meetings, any firearm or listed dangerous weapon. A first violation is a misdemeanor; second and subsequent violations are a gross misdemeanor. A conviction on the firearm branch, subsection (1)(a), revokes a CPL for three years and bars applying for one for three years.
A CPL does not lift the school ban. RCW 9.41.280(3)(e) is narrow: a licensee, or a person exempt under RCW 9.41.060, in possession of a pistol is outside subsection (1) only while picking up or dropping off a student, or while attending official school board meetings held off district owned or leased property. Two vehicle exceptions cover a nonstudent at least 18 on legitimate business at the school: (3)(f) for a firearm secured in an attended vehicle or concealed from view in a locked unattended one, and (3)(g) for an unloaded firearm secured in a vehicle. Read RCW 9.41.280(6) before assuming the pickup exception reaches further: except for (3)(b), (c), (f), and (h), "firearms are not permitted in a public or private school building," and (3)(e) is not on that list.
Child care premises and voting facilities have their own statutes: RCW 9.41.282, a gross misdemeanor, and RCW 9.41.284, a misdemeanor that becomes a gross misdemeanor on a second violation. A conviction on the firearm branch of either revokes a CPL for three years and bars applying for three years. Each carries its own license exception. RCW 9.41.282(3)(b) covers a CPL holder, or a person exempt under RCW 9.41.060, in possession of a pistol while picking up or dropping off a child, and RCW 9.41.284(4) leaves concealed carry by a RCW 9.41.070 licensee outside the ban at voting centers, student engagement hubs, and county elections offices, though not at a ballot counting center.
18 U.S.C. 922(q)(2)(A) makes it unlawful to knowingly possess a firearm affecting interstate commerce at a place the individual knows or has reasonable cause to believe is a school zone. Subparagraph (B)(ii) exempts a person licensed by the state in which the school zone sits, where that state's law requires law enforcement to verify the person is qualified before issuing. RCW 9.41.070(2)(a) directs the Washington issuing authority to run those checks, so on its own terms that exemption reads on a Washington CPL holder inside Washington. It does nothing about RCW 9.41.280.
The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act operates independently of a CPL. 18 U.S.C. 926B lets a qualified law enforcement officer carrying the agency photographic identification carry concealed notwithstanding state law, and 18 U.S.C. 926C does the same for a qualified retired officer who separated in good standing and has met the annual firearms qualification standard. Both carve back: subsection (b) of each preserves state laws letting private property owners restrict concealed firearms, and state laws that "prohibit or restrict the possession of firearms on any State or local government property, installation, building, base, or park."
Under RCW 9.41.075(1), in the version in force until May 1, 2027, a law enforcement agency revokes a CPL immediately on discovery that the licensee was ineligible under RCW 9.41.070 when applying or renewing, on a conviction, insanity finding, or commitment making the person ineligible under RCW 9.41.040, on "conviction of the licensee for a third violation of this chapter within five calendar years," on a firearm forfeiture order under RCW 9.41.098(1)(d), or on receipt of an order to surrender and prohibit weapons or a non-ex-parte extreme risk protection order. Forfeiture revocations run one year, then two, then five. Separately, RCW 9.41.070(12) makes a person who knowingly makes a false statement about citizenship or identity on an application guilty of false swearing under RCW 9A.72.040, a gross misdemeanor, revokes that person's license, and makes the person permanently ineligible for another one, and the convictions described above under RCW 9.41.270, 9.41.280, 9.41.282, and 9.41.284 carry their own losses.
A superseding version of RCW 9.41.070 takes effect May 1, 2027. Until that date it is not law and the framework above is unchanged.
It adds a denial ground at subsection (1)(h) for an applicant who "has failed to produce a certificate of completion from a certified concealed carry firearms safety training program within the last five years ... or proof that the applicant is exempt from the training requirement." Its subsection (5)(a) requires that program to include "live-fire shooting exercises on a firing range ... including a minimum of 50 rounds of ammunition firing training at a firing range under the supervision of an instructor." RCW 43.43.575, which directs certification of those programs, also first takes effect May 1, 2027.
| Conduct | Statute | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying a pistol concealed without a CPL | RCW 9.41.050(1)(a) with RCW 9.41.810 | Misdemeanor |
| CPL not in immediate possession, or not shown on demand | RCW 9.41.050(1)(b) | Class 1 civil infraction |
| Loaded pistol in a vehicle outside the licensed conditions | RCW 9.41.050(2) | Misdemeanor |
| Unloaded pistol left in a vehicle unlocked or in view | RCW 9.41.050(3) | Misdemeanor |
| Weapon carried or displayed so as to intimidate or warrant alarm | RCW 9.41.270(2) | Gross misdemeanor, plus loss of the CPL |
| Weapon in a place listed in RCW 9.41.300(1); open carry at a permitted demonstration | RCW 9.41.300(16) | Gross misdemeanor |
| Open carry on capitol grounds or at a municipal meeting, first violation | RCW 9.41.305(4)(a) | Misdemeanor |
| Open carry on capitol grounds or at a municipal meeting, second and subsequent | RCW 9.41.305(4)(b) | Gross misdemeanor |
| Firearm on school premises, first violation | RCW 9.41.280(2)(a) | Misdemeanor |
| Firearm on school premises, second and subsequent | RCW 9.41.280(2)(b) | Gross misdemeanor |
| Unlawful possession of a firearm, first degree | RCW 9.41.040(1)(b) | Class B felony |
| Unlawful possession of a firearm, second degree | RCW 9.41.040(2)(b) | Class C felony |
| Possession after a voluntary waiver of firearm rights | RCW 9.41.040(7)(b) | Class 4 civil infraction |
An out-of-state license buys very little here. RCW 9.41.073(1) recognizes one only while the holder is not a Washington resident, and only on the three conditions that section sets.
Then read the current text of any section above at app.leg.wa.gov and check the effective date line at the top of it. Several chapter 9.41 sections show the version in force and a 2027 replacement on one page.
View this topic on its own page: Washington Concealed Carry Laws
Washington does not have a statute that bans the open carrying of a pistol. A person who is at least 21 years old and may legally possess a firearm can generally open carry a handgun in public without a license. This is different from concealed carry, which requires a Concealed Pistol License (CPL) under RCW 9.41.070. There is no statute that affirmatively grants an "open carry permit," and none is needed, but several statutes restrict how and where a firearm may be openly carried.
No Washington statute prohibits openly carrying a firearm by a person eligible to possess one. The right to bear arms is protected by Article I, section 24 of the Washington Constitution, which the firearms preemption statute (RCW 9.41.290) and the prohibited-places statute (RCW 9.41.300) both reference.
Open carry is only available to a person who is not disqualified from possessing firearms. Washington's unlawful-possession statute, RCW 9.41.040, makes it a crime for certain people (such as those with qualifying felony convictions or certain protection orders) to possess any firearm, openly or concealed. Open carry does not create an exception to that prohibition. RCW 9.41.050(4) makes the same point: nothing in the carry statute permits possession of firearms that are illegal to possess under state or federal law.
Age also limits open carry. Under RCW 9.41.240(2), a person who is at least 18 but under 21 may possess a pistol only in the person's place of abode, at the person's fixed place of business, or on real property under the person's control, unless an exception in RCW 9.41.042, 9.41.050, or 9.41.060 applies (such as lawful outdoor recreation or carrying the pistol unloaded in a closed opaque case). None of those exceptions covers ordinary open carry in public, so in practice a person must be at least 21 to open carry a pistol in public in Washington.
The line between lawful open carry and unlawful unlicensed concealed carry matters. Under RCW 9.41.050(1)(a), except in a person's place of abode or fixed place of business, a person may not carry a pistol concealed on his or her person without a CPL. If a holstered handgun is openly visible, no license is required. Once it is concealed (for example, under a jacket or in a bag carried on the person), a CPL is required.
Two vehicle rules also distinguish the two:
A person without a CPL may transport a pistol in a vehicle only if it is unloaded. The CPL itself is issued by the chief of police of a municipality or the sheriff of a county on a shall-issue basis under RCW 9.41.070, requires the applicant to be at least 21 years old, and is valid for five years. The current version of RCW 9.41.070 (effective until May 1, 2027) does not require an applicant to complete a firearms safety training course, so training is not currently a condition for a Washington CPL. A training requirement was added by the 2025 Legislature (2025 c 370) and takes effect May 1, 2027. After that date, applicants will need proof of a certified concealed carry firearms safety training course under RCW 9.41.070 and RCW 43.43.575. Until then, the listed conditions are eligibility to possess firearms, the minimum age, fingerprinting, and the background check.
The main statute that limits how a firearm may be openly carried is RCW 9.41.270. It is unlawful to carry, exhibit, display, or draw any firearm or other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons. A violation is a gross misdemeanor, and a person convicted of it loses any concealed pistol license. Open carry by itself, without more, does not violate this statute, but the manner of carry can.
RCW 9.41.270(3) lists exceptions. The statute does not apply to acts committed in a person's place of abode or fixed place of business, to a person acting to protect himself, herself, or another against presently threatened unlawful force, to peace officers performing their duties, to a person making or assisting a lawful felony arrest, or to a person engaged in government-sponsored military activities.
Two statutes single out open carry. Both exempt a person lawfully carrying concealed under a valid CPL.
State capitol grounds and local government meeting buildings (RCW 9.41.305). It is unlawful to knowingly open carry a firearm or other weapon at the west state capitol campus grounds, buildings on the state capitol grounds, any state legislative office, or any location of a public state legislative hearing or meeting during the hearing or meeting. The ban also covers city, town, county, or other municipal buildings used in connection with meetings of the governing body, and any location of a public meeting or hearing of that governing body during the meeting. A first violation is a misdemeanor; a second or subsequent violation is a gross misdemeanor. Law enforcement and on-duty military are exempt, and the section does not apply to lawful concealed carry under a valid CPL.
Permitted demonstrations (RCW 9.41.300(2)). It is unlawful to knowingly open carry a firearm or other weapon while knowingly at a permitted demonstration, whether the weapon is carried on the person or in a vehicle. It is also unlawful to knowingly open carry within 250 feet of the perimeter of a permitted demonstration after a law enforcement officer advises the person of the demonstration and directs the person to leave until unarmed, though that 250-foot rule does not apply on private property the person owns or leases. A "permitted demonstration" includes a gathering for which a government permit was issued, or a gathering of 15 or more people assembled for a single event at a public place that the local chief executive, sheriff, or chief of police has declared permitted. A violation is a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.300(16)). Lawful concealed carry by a CPL holder is exempt under RCW 9.41.300(2)(e).
Beyond the open-carry-specific rules above, RCW 9.41.300(1) bars any firearm (open or concealed) from a list of places, including the restricted access areas of jails and law enforcement facilities, areas of any building used in connection with court proceedings, restricted access areas of certain public mental health facilities, the area of an establishment that the liquor and cannabis board has classified as off-limits to people under 21 (the bar area of a tavern), and the restricted access areas of a commercial service airport beyond the security screening checkpoint. The 2024 amendments added the premises of a public library, the premises of an accredited zoo or aquarium, and the premises of a transit station or transit facility. A violation of RCW 9.41.300(1) is a gross misdemeanor.
A CPL changes the analysis for some of these locations. Under RCW 9.41.300(14), the library, zoo or aquarium, and transit restrictions do not apply to a person licensed to carry a concealed firearm under RCW 9.41.070. The current statute does not list public parks or playgrounds among the places where firearms are barred under RCW 9.41.300.
Open carry is also limited by federal law in certain places. Carrying a concealed dangerous weapon or explosive into the sterile (secured) area of an airport or onto an aircraft is a federal crime under 49 U.S.C. 46505, separate from Washington's airport restriction in RCW 9.41.300(1)(e). Federal facilities and other federally controlled property carry their own prohibitions regardless of state open-carry rules.
Washington fully occupies the field of firearms regulation. Under RCW 9.41.290, the state preempts the entire field of firearms regulation, including possession, carrying, and transportation. Cities, towns, and counties may enact only firearms ordinances specifically authorized by state law, such as those allowed by RCW 9.41.300 (for example, restricting discharge of firearms, or restricting possession in a municipally operated stadium or convention center). Local ordinances that are more restrictive than state law are preempted. This means open-carry rules are largely uniform statewide, with the place-based exceptions written into RCW 9.41.300 and RCW 9.41.305 rather than left to local choice.
RCW 9.41.060 lists people and activities exempt from the carry restrictions of RCW 9.41.050, including law enforcement officers, members of the armed forces and national guard on duty, licensed firearms dealers in the ordinary course of business, members of target-shooting and collector clubs going to or from organized activities, people engaged in lawful outdoor recreation such as hunting, fishing, camping, hiking, or horseback riding, and anyone carrying a pistol unloaded in a closed opaque case or secure wrapper.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.040 | Unlawful possession of firearms (who may not possess) |
| RCW 9.41.050 | Carrying firearms; concealed-carry license requirement; vehicle rules |
| RCW 9.41.060 | Exceptions to the carry restrictions |
| RCW 9.41.070 | Concealed Pistol License (shall-issue, 21+, 5-year term) |
| RCW 9.41.240 | Pistol possession by persons 18 to 20 (limited to home, business, or own property) |
| RCW 9.41.270 | Carrying or displaying a weapon to intimidate or that warrants alarm (gross misdemeanor) |
| RCW 9.41.290 | State preemption of firearms regulation |
| RCW 9.41.300 | Weapons prohibited in certain places; open carry at permitted demonstrations |
| RCW 9.41.305 | Open carry prohibited on state capitol grounds and municipal meeting buildings |
| 49 U.S.C. 46505 | Federal prohibition on weapons in airport sterile areas and aircraft |
View this topic on its own page: Open Carry in Washington
Washington attaches training to buying a gun, not to carrying one. Today you can get a concealed pistol license (CPL) without taking a class, but a dealer cannot hand you a firearm unless you show a safety course completed within the last five years or proof of an exemption. On May 1, 2027 that changes again: the license itself picks up a live-fire training prerequisite. Three rules: an absence of any training condition on the license, a purchase requirement in force since January 1, 2024, and a license requirement that starts on May 1, 2027.
The CPL statute is RCW 9.41.070. The version in force right now is the one the code reviser heads "(Effective until May 1, 2027.)", and its subsection (1) sets out the grounds on which an application can be refused. It directs that the chief of police of a municipality or the sheriff of a county "shall within thirty days after the filing of an application of any person, issue a license," and then says the applicant's "constitutional right to bear arms shall not be denied, unless" one of seven things is true. Those seven are:
There is no course, no range qualification, and no certificate anywhere in that list. The current section uses the word "training" exactly once, in subsection (9)(a)(i), where three dollars of the ten dollar late renewal penalty funds first the printing and distribution of the firearms pamphlet and then the support of volunteer instructors in the Department of Fish and Wildlife basic firearms safety training program. That is a spending clause. The program it names appears nowhere in the subsection (1) grounds for refusing an application.
The Attorney General's office says as much. The reciprocity list it publishes under RCW 9.41.073(2), last updated 07/10/2026 by its own stamp, states a reason beside each jurisdiction Washington does not recognize. The Delaware row begins: "Washington does not mandate the training required by Delaware for reciprocity." The Minnesota, Nebraska, and South Carolina rows give that same reason, and the New Mexico row gives it in different words, as the training New Mexico requires before it will recognize a Washington license. Five of the forty rows the list marks as not recognized rest in part on training.
What an applicant does get is reading material. RCW 9.41.070(9)(a)(i) provides that the firearms pamphlet "shall be given to each applicant for a license," and RCW 9.41.310 directs the Department of Fish and Wildlife to publish a pamphlet on firearms safety and the legal limits of the use of firearms and to supply it to the Department of Licensing for distribution. The current edition, "Firearms Safety, Suicide Awareness, The Law, and You," carries a publication date of September 1, 2025, so read it as a snapshot of that date rather than a live statement of the law.
Out-of-state licensees get no training test either. Under RCW 9.41.073(1), a person licensed in a state that recognizes Washington licenses may carry concealed here if that state does not license people under twenty-one and requires mandatory fingerprint-based background checks of criminal and mental health history. Training is not one of the conditions, and the recognition runs only while the license holder is not a Washington resident.
The purchase side is where Washington puts its training mandate today. RCW 9.41.1132, in the half headed "(Effective until May 1, 2027.)", opens by requiring a person applying for the purchase or transfer of a firearm to provide "proof of completion of a recognized firearms safety training program within the last five years". It applies to any firearm, not just handguns, and it has nothing to do with carrying. Its current text comes from 2023 c 161 s 2, and the act's own effective-date note, printed with RCW 9.41.090, reads: "This act takes effect January 1, 2024."
The requirement bites at delivery. RCW 9.41.090(1)(a) bars a dealer from delivering a firearm to the purchaser until "[t]he purchaser provides proof of completion of a recognized firearm safety training program within the last five years that complies with the requirements in RCW 9.41.1132, or proof that the purchaser is exempt from the training requirement." Private sales do not escape it: under RCW 9.41.113(2) and (3) a transaction where neither party is a licensed dealer must be completed through one, and the dealer must then comply with everything that would apply to a sale from its own inventory. RCW 9.41.113(4) takes whole categories of transfer outside that section, so they need not be completed through a dealer and the RCW 9.41.090(1)(a) delivery condition does not reach them. Those categories include a bona fide gift or loan between the immediate family members that subsection lists, the sale or transfer of an antique firearm, the specified temporary transfers, transfers involving a law enforcement or corrections agency, or an officer or service member acting within the course and scope of employment or official duties, and a federally licensed gunsmith receiving a firearm solely for service or repair. Knowingly violating RCW 9.41.113 is a gross misdemeanor, a subsequent knowing violation is a class C felony, and each gun sold or transferred without the required background check is a separate offense (RCW 9.41.115). Separately from training, RCW 9.41.092 bars delivery until all required background checks are back and ten business days have elapsed since the dealer requested the check.
RCW 9.41.1132(1) requires that the program, at a minimum, include instruction on:
Subsection (3) permits the course to include stories from individuals with lived experience in the topics listed in subsection (1)(a) through (g), or an understanding of the legal and social impacts of discharging a firearm. There is no live-fire component in the current text and no stated hour count.
RCW 9.41.1132(2) limits sponsorship to four categories: "a federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency, a college or university, a nationally recognized organization that customarily offers firearms training, or a firearms training school with instructors certified by a nationally recognized organization that customarily offers firearms training." The same subsection sets the paperwork: "The proof of training shall be in the form of a certification that states under the penalty of perjury that the training included the minimum requirements."
Note what the current text does not say. It names no state approval or certification of the program itself. The statute that directs the Washington State Patrol to certify training programs, RCW 43.43.575, is headed "(Effective May 1, 2027.)" and has no earlier version. Under today's text a program qualifies by its content and its sponsor, and the certification signed under penalty of perjury is the proof a dealer relies on.
RCW 9.41.1132(4) exempts two groups of people, certain officers and certain service members, and the terms matter:
The military exemption is not a status exemption. It carries its own five-year training condition, so a service member who cannot point to qualifying service training within that window is in the same position as any other buyer. Tribal police officers, licensed armed private investigators, and licensed armed security guards are not on the current list. They are added by the version of the statute that takes effect May 1, 2027, discussed below.
Everything in this part is enacted law that is not yet in force. It comes from 2025 c 370 (E2SHB 1163), and that act's effective-date note, printed with RCW 9.41.090, reads: "Except for section 6 of this act, this act takes effect May 1, 2027." Nothing described in this part is a requirement today.
The superseding version of RCW 9.41.070 adds an eighth disqualifier at subsection (1)(h): an applicant is disqualified who "[h]as failed to produce a certificate of completion from a certified concealed carry firearms safety training program within the last five years, as provided under subsection (5) of this section and RCW 43.43.575, or proof that the applicant is exempt from the training requirement."
Subsection (5)(a) of that version defines the course. The training "must be from a concealed carry firearms safety training program certified under RCW 43.43.575 that includes live-fire shooting exercises on a firing range that include a demonstration by the applicant of the safe handling of, and shooting proficiency with, firearms, including a minimum of 50 rounds of ammunition firing training at a firing range under the supervision of an instructor." Subsection (5)(b) exempts applicants who can demonstrate they are exempt under RCW 9.41.1132(5), which is the expanded exemption list in the 2027 version of that statute.
RCW 43.43.575, also effective May 1, 2027, is the machinery. It directs the Washington State Patrol to "establish a program to provide certifications for firearms safety training programs that meet the requirements of RCW 9.41.070 and 9.41.1132," to require certified programs to apply for recertification every five years, and to develop the form and manner of the documentation applicants use to prove completion or to prove an exemption.
The State Patrol's firearms background division page carries this framework under a heading that reads "New Training Requirement" followed by the line "Not required until May 2027". The same page says work has begun on the systems and processes and that the agency is "on target for an early 2027 implementation" of the training certification and the permit to purchase application user interfaces.
One open question worth raising with your issuing agency rather than guessing at: how renewals will be handled. Subsection (1)(h) sits in the list of grounds that disqualify an application, and subsection (2)(c) of the same 2027 version applies the eligibility screening "whether the applicant is applying for a new concealed pistol license or to renew a concealed pistol license."
RCW 9.41.121, headed "(Effective May 1, 2027.)" with no earlier version, creates a permit to purchase and requires the application to include "[a] certificate of completion of a certified firearms safety training program within the last five years, or proof that the applicant is exempt from the training requirement, as provided in RCW 9.41.1132."
The 2027 version of RCW 9.41.1132 adds a ninth topic at subsection (1)(i): "Live-fire shooting exercises on a firing range that include a demonstration by the applicant of the safe handling of, and shooting proficiency with, firearms." Two details separate it from the CPL rule. It states no round count, while the CPL provision at RCW 9.41.070(5)(a) sets a floor of 50 rounds. And on renewal of a permit to purchase, subsection (2) allows the live-fire component to have been completed within the last 10 years rather than five. That version also widens the sponsor list to include tribal law enforcement agencies and requires the certificate to be in the form the State Patrol develops under RCW 43.43.575.
RCW 36.28A.090 sets up Washington's process for the federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act certification, 18 U.S.C. 926B and 926C. A retired officer satisfies the federal certification requirement by holding a firearms qualification certificate that uses the model certificate developed by the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, in which a law enforcement agency, or an individual or entity certified to provide firearms training, acknowledges that the bearer "has been found qualified or otherwise found to meet the standards established by the criminal justice training commission for firearms qualification for the basic law enforcement training academy in the state." The certificate is valid for one year from the date of that determination and must state the date. The retired officer pays the cost, and nothing in the statute requires a local agency to complete the certificate.
View this topic on its own page: Washington Firearms Training Requirements
You apply for a Washington concealed pistol license (CPL) at a local law enforcement agency, not at a state office. RCW 9.41.070 directs the chief of police of a municipality or the sheriff of a county to issue the license within thirty days after the filing of an application, or up to sixty days in the two cases set out below, unless one of a closed list of disqualifiers applies. The license runs five years from the date of issue.
Washington has no permit to purchase today. RCW 9.41.121 is printed in chapter 9.41, but its only version takes effect May 1, 2027, and the fingerprint fee in RCW 9.41.071 carries the same date. Neither is a step in a CPL application filed now.
RCW 9.41.070(13) gives three filing paths. If you live in a municipality, you may apply to that municipality or to the county you live in. If you live in an unincorporated area, you apply to the county. If you are a nonresident, you may apply anywhere in the state. The issuing authority "shall not refuse to accept completed applications for concealed pistol licenses during regular business hours" (RCW 9.41.070(1)).
The Attorney General's firearms FAQ says you must apply in person at a local law enforcement office, and the Department of Licensing tells applicants to expect an appointment and to bring a completed but unsigned form. Those are agency instructions. RCW 9.41.070 does not itself require personal appearance. What it requires is that an original application carry a complete set of fingerprints (RCW 9.41.070(4)), and the fee schedule at RCW 9.41.070(5)(b) pays four dollars to the agency taking them.
The Department of Licensing states on its own page that it does not issue or renew any firearms license. It keeps the central firearms records database, gives agencies forms and database access, and sends CPL renewal notices. Applications, renewals, replacements, fees, and denials go to the police department or sheriff's office.
RCW 9.41.070(4) says the license application shall bear:
The application also asks about eligibility under RCW 9.41.040 and federal law, place of birth, and United States citizenship. An applicant who is not a citizen must give country of citizenship, a United States issued alien number or admission number, and the basis for claiming exemption from federal prohibitions on firearm possession by noncitizens. The same subsection says "The applicant shall not be required to produce a birth certificate or other evidence of citizenship." A noncitizen must also, if applicable, meet the requirements of RCW 9.41.173 and produce proof of compliance at application. That statute is the separate noncitizen firearm license, which a nonimmigrant noncitizen obtains from the sheriff of the county of residence for hunting and sport shooting.
Signing the form waives confidentiality. RCW 9.41.070(4) makes a signed CPL application a written request that the health care authority, mental health institutions, and other health care facilities "release information relevant to the applicant's eligibility for a concealed pistol license to an inquiring court or law enforcement agency." RCW 9.41.097(1) puts the matching duty on those bodies. A photograph may be required and printed on the face of the license.
Agency document lists run past the statute. DOL's firearms page instructs applicants to present a driver's license or state ID showing the current address, says passports and military IDs are not accepted in place of a state-issued ID, and asks permanent residents for a Permanent Resident Card. RCW 9.41.070(4) asks for a license or ID number only "if used for identification," and RCW 9.41.070(11) bars a political subdivision from modifying the requirements of the chapter or asking an applicant "to voluntarily submit any information not required by this section." Ask the agency taking your application which of its requests it treats as mandatory.
An application for an original license includes a complete set of fingerprints forwarded to the Washington State Patrol (RCW 9.41.070(4)).
Under RCW 9.41.070(2)(a) the issuing authority runs a check through the national instant criminal background check system, the Washington state patrol electronic database, the health care authority electronic database, and other agencies or resources as appropriate, to determine whether you are ineligible under RCW 9.41.040 or 9.41.045 or prohibited under federal law. Subsection (2)(b) adds that the issuing authority "shall deny a permit to anyone who is found to be prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal or state law." Under subsection (2)(c) both duties apply whether you are applying new or renewing.
An original license gets one more layer. RCW 9.41.070(2)(d): "A background check for an original license must be conducted through the Washington state patrol criminal identification section and shall include a national check from the federal bureau of investigation through the submission of fingerprints." Results return to the issuing authority, and you may request and receive a copy from it. To correct a record, contact the Washington State Patrol for a Washington record and the FBI for records from other jurisdictions. The WSP SAFE system is the separate dealer transfer check under RCW 43.43.580.
RCW 9.41.070(1) sets two clocks:
Either condition alone moves you to the sixty-day track. DOL's page states the first trigger only, as a sixty-day wait for applicants holding an out-of-state license or ID. The residency trigger sits beside it in the statute.
A temporary emergency license may be issued for good cause pending review under subsection (1). It does not exempt the holder from any records check requirement, and temporary emergency licenses "shall be easily distinguishable from regular licenses" (RCW 9.41.070(10)).
On issuance the original goes to the licensee, the duplicate goes to the director of licensing within seven days, and the triplicate is preserved for six years by the issuing authority. DOL keeps copies or records of CPL applications, which may not be disclosed except as RCW 42.56.240(4) allows (RCW 9.41.129).
RCW 9.41.070 fixes the fees. No other state or local branch or unit of government may impose additional charges for issuance (RCW 9.41.070(5)), and no other branch or unit of government may impose additional charges for renewal (RCW 9.41.070(6)).
| Item | Fee | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Original five-year license | Thirty-six dollars, plus FBI charges passed on to the applicant | RCW 9.41.070(5) |
| Renewal | Thirty-two dollars | RCW 9.41.070(6) |
| Late renewal penalty | Ten dollars added to the renewal fee | RCW 9.41.070(9)(a) |
| Replacement of a lost or damaged license | Ten dollars to the issuing authority | RCW 9.41.070(7) |
Payment is by cash, check, or money order at the applicant's option, and the issuing authority may allow more methods (RCW 9.41.070(8)). DOL directs applicants to the issuing agency to confirm required fees and accepted payment methods. The federal charge is not the agency's to set: RCW 9.41.070(5) fixes the fee at "thirty-six dollars plus additional charges imposed by the federal bureau of investigation that are passed on to the applicant," and names no figure for the federal part.
RCW 9.41.070(1) frames the grounds as an exception to a right: "The applicant's constitutional right to bear arms shall not be denied, unless" the applicant
That last ground is narrower than it looks. RCW 9.41.098(1)(e) covers forfeiture from a person who is in a place where a concealed pistol license is required and who is under the influence of a drug or intoxicating liquor. DOL's page compresses it to any forfeiture order in the last twelve months.
A foreign conviction can disqualify. AGO 2014 No. 6 concludes that a person convicted in a foreign country of a crime comparable to a serious offense or any other felony under Washington law is prohibited from possessing a firearm in Washington and is therefore ineligible for a CPL, and that the issuing authority is prohibited from issuing in that case. Comparability is decided case by case. Separately, no person convicted of a felony may have the privilege to carry a concealed pistol restored unless granted relief from disabilities by the attorney general under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 925(c), or RCW 9.41.040(3) or (4) applies.
The current statute gives you no written denial notice and no administrative reconsideration step. The remedy is judicial. RCW 9.41.0975(2) allows an application to a court of competent jurisdiction for a writ of mandamus directing an issuing agency to issue a license "wrongfully refused," or directing that erroneous information behind a wrongful refusal be corrected. File in the county where you applied or in Thurston county, at your discretion. The court "shall provide an expedited hearing," and a person granted the writ "shall be awarded reasonable attorneys' fees and costs." RCW 9.41.0975(1) immunizes a good-faith failure to issue a license to an eligible person, and the writ is the relief the statute provides.
You may renew within ninety days before or after the expiration date (RCW 9.41.070(9)(a)). A license renewed that way takes effect on the expiration date of the prior license. Renewing after expiration adds the ten dollar late penalty to the thirty-two dollar renewal fee. The fingerprint-based FBI check is an original-license step. RCW 9.41.070(2)(d) attaches the national fingerprint check to a background check "for an original license," and subsection (4) forwards the set taken on an original application to the Washington State Patrol. The database and NICS checks in subsection (2)(a) run on renewals too. DOL states that a CPL more than ninety days past expiration cannot be renewed and requires an application for an original license, which matches the statutory window.
Two statements about renewal notices disagree, and the statute governs. RCW 9.41.070(9)(b) says that for licenses expiring on or after August 1, 2018, DOL "shall mail a renewal notice approximately ninety days before the license expiration date," to the address on the application or to a new address you have reported to DOL, and may email it instead if you gave an email address at application. The notice must state the expiration date, the renewal fee, the late penalty, and how to renew. DOL's own web page says notices go out sixty days before expiration. Track your expiration date yourself.
Service members get two provisions. Under RCW 9.41.070(14), a member of the armed forces, including the national guard and reserves, who could not renew because of assignment, reassignment, or deployment for out-of-state military service may renew within ninety days after returning to Washington. Give the issuing authority, no later than ninety days after discharge or the order back to this state, a copy of the original order designating the period of out-of-state service and, if appropriate, the discharge or later order back. That renewal takes effect on the prior expiration date and carries no late penalty. RCW 9.41.070(15) separately requires issuing agencies to run a mail renewal process for those same service members and permits an online one, but a license renewed under that subsection "is valid for a period of one year."
A lost or damaged license is replaced for ten dollars paid to the issuing authority (RCW 9.41.070(7)).
Washington law does not require you to update the address on your CPL when you move, and DOL says so directly. DOL describes the voluntary route as the original application process without fingerprinting: complete an application marked for a replacement license and submit it with the replacement fee. DOL also tells licensees who no longer live in the jurisdiction that processed the license to contact the agency in the new one. Nothing in RCW 9.41.070 imposes a duty to report a change of address. The section's address provisions run the other way: subsection (4) puts a residential address on the application, and subsection (9)(b) mails the renewal notice to the licensee at the address listed on the application, or to a new address if the licensee has notified the department of licensing of the change.
RCW 9.41.075(1) requires a law enforcement agency to revoke the license immediately upon any of the following:
Forfeiture-based revocation is graduated under RCW 9.41.075(3): one year on the first forfeiture, two years on the second, five years on the third or later, with no reapplication until the revocation period ends.
RCW 9.41.075(2) adds a divestment step for a person who was ineligible, was issued a license anyway, and cannot lawfully possess a pistol without one: lawfully transfer ownership of any pistol acquired while holding the license, within 14 days of revocation, with evidence to the agency within 15 days. The agency notifies DOL in writing, and DOL records the revocation (RCW 9.41.075(4)).
Two other paths reach the same place. Under RCW 9.41.047(2), when a court reports a disqualifying conviction, insanity finding, commitment, or one of the incompetency-to-stand-trial dismissals listed in RCW 9.41.047(1)(a), one of which additionally requires a court finding that the person has a history of one or more violent acts, DOL checks whether the person holds a CPL and, if so, "shall immediately notify the license-issuing authority which, upon receipt of such notification, shall immediately revoke the license." A court ordering a party to surrender weapons under RCW 9.41.800(6) also orders surrender of "any concealed pistol license issued under RCW 9.41.070" to the local law enforcement agency.
One rule cuts the other way. RCW 9.41.098(1)(a) makes it an absolute defense to forfeiture of a concealed pistol that the person held a valid Washington CPL within the preceding two years and has not become ineligible in the interim. Before the firearm is returned, the person must pay the past due renewal fee and the current renewal fee.
| Conduct | Grade | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Knowingly making a false statement about citizenship or identity on a CPL application | False swearing, a gross misdemeanor: up to 364 days in county jail, a fine of up to $5,000, or both. The license is revoked and the person is permanently ineligible for a CPL | RCW 9.41.070(12); RCW 9A.72.040; RCW 9A.20.021(2) |
| Carrying a pistol concealed without a license, outside your place of abode or fixed place of business | Misdemeanor under the chapter default in RCW 9.41.810. Chapter 9.41 RCW prescribes no punishment for this offense, so RCW 9.92.030 supplies it: up to ninety days in county jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both | RCW 9.41.050(1)(a); RCW 9.41.810; RCW 9.92.030 |
| Not having your license in immediate possession, or not displaying it on demand to a police officer | Class 1 civil infraction under chapter 7.80 RCW. RCW 7.80.120(1)(a) sets the maximum and default at $250, not counting statutory assessments | RCW 9.41.050(1)(b); RCW 7.80.120(1)(a) |
2025 c 370 rewrites RCW 9.41.070 effective May 1, 2027, adding a certified concealed carry training requirement with live-fire instruction, a written denial notice with a reconsideration step, and a link to the new permit to purchase in RCW 9.41.121. None of it is in force, and none of it applies to an application filed today. The Washington State Patrol marks its training certification program "Not required until May 2027."
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.070 | Concealed pistol license: filing, contents, background check, clocks, fees, renewal, replacement |
| RCW 9.41.075 | Concealed pistol license revocation |
| RCW 9.41.0975 | Official immunity and writ of mandamus for a wrongful refusal |
| RCW 9.41.097 | Release of eligibility information by health care bodies |
| RCW 9.41.047 | Court notification of disqualifying events and immediate revocation |
| RCW 9.41.050 | Carrying: license requirement and immediate possession |
| RCW 9.41.098 | Forfeiture of firearms |
| RCW 9.41.129 | Department of Licensing recordkeeping |
| RCW 9.41.173 | Noncitizen firearm license |
| RCW 9.41.800 | Surrender of weapons and of the concealed pistol license by court order |
| RCW 9.41.810 | Chapter 9.41 penalty default |
| RCW 9.92.030 | Punishment of a misdemeanor when no punishment is prescribed |
| RCW 7.80.120 | Monetary penalty for a class 1 civil infraction |
| RCW 9A.72.040 | False swearing |
| RCW 9A.20.021 | Maximum sentences, gross misdemeanor |
View this topic on its own page: Washington Concealed Pistol License: The Application Process
Washington puts its concealed pistol license (CPL) prices in the statute itself, so the base amounts are the same in every city and county. Under RCW 9.41.070 an original five year license is $36 plus the FBI fingerprint charges passed on to the applicant, a renewal is $32, a replacement is $10, and renewing after the license has already expired adds a $10 penalty. You pay the issuing authority, which is the chief of police of your municipality or the sheriff of your county. No training course is a condition of the license today, so there is no state mandated class to buy before you apply.
Keep two cost tracks separate. The CPL is a carry license, not a purchase permit, and the charges a Washington dealer collects when you buy or receive a firearm are a different set of costs that the license fee does not cover.
| Charge | Amount | Set by |
|---|---|---|
| Original five year license | $36.00 plus FBI charges passed through | RCW 9.41.070(5) |
| Renewal | $32.00 | RCW 9.41.070(6) |
| Late renewal penalty, added to the renewal fee | $10.00 | RCW 9.41.070(9)(a) |
| Replacement of a lost or damaged license | $10.00 | RCW 9.41.070(7) |
The original, renewal, and replacement fees are each called nonrefundable in the statute, and the original fee is due when you file the application. The license runs five years from the date of issue. Payment is by cash, check, or money order at your option under RCW 9.41.070(8), and the issuing authority may allow additional methods if it chooses to. The statute does not name any, so ask before you go. The Department of Licensing keeps the records but does not issue or renew the license, and its firearms page tells applicants to check the required fees and accepted payment methods with the local law enforcement agency.
An original application has to include a complete set of fingerprints, forwarded to the Washington State Patrol (RCW 9.41.070(4)). The background check for an original license runs through the State Patrol criminal identification section and includes a national FBI check made by submitting those prints (RCW 9.41.070(2)(d)).
RCW 9.41.070(5) names one charge that rides on the license fee: the federal bureau of investigation charges passed on to the applicant. The subsection sets the original fee at "thirty-six dollars plus additional charges imposed by the federal bureau of investigation that are passed on to the applicant," and then says "No other state or local branch or unit of government may impose any additional charges on the applicant for the issuance of the license." RCW 9.41.070(6) carries a parallel bar for renewals, worded slightly more broadly without the state or local limit: no other branch or unit of government may impose additional charges on the applicant for the renewal of the license. So chapter 9.41 RCW puts the license price at $36 plus whatever the FBI currently charges for the print submission. RCW 9.41.070 does not fix a dollar figure for that federal charge, so the amount is whatever the federal bureau of investigation is charging when you apply.
Fingerprint taking is already funded inside the fee: RCW 9.41.070(5)(b) sends $4.00 of the $36.00 to the agency that takes the prints. Separately, RCW 43.43.760 caps at five dollars what any law enforcement agency may charge "for the purpose of taking fingerprint impressions or searching its files of identification for noncriminal purposes." The two provisions are not cross-referenced, and neither says which one governs a fingerprint charge taken for a concealed pistol license application. Ask the agency what it charges and why before you pay it.
The State Patrol has fee authorities of its own outside chapter 9.41 RCW, and two of them bear on the fingerprints and record check an original application requires. RCW 43.43.742 lets the State Patrol charge fees for submission of fingerprints taken by local agencies for a license application, covering as nearly as practicable its direct and indirect costs of processing the submission. RCW 43.43.760(4) requires it to charge fees for processing noncriminal justice system requests for criminal history record information under that section on the same cost recovery basis. Neither names an amount, and neither says how it fits the bar in RCW 9.41.070(5).
Under RCW 9.41.070(9)(b) the Department of Licensing mails or emails a renewal notice roughly 90 days before expiration, and the notice must state the renewal fee amount and the late penalty. The Department's own web page currently tells licensees these notices go out 60 days before expiration, and RCW 9.41.070(9)(b) is the requirement that binds the Department.
Members of the armed forces, the national guard, and the reserves who cannot renew on time because of an out of state assignment, reassignment, or deployment may renew within 90 days after returning to Washington. RCW 9.41.070(14) says a person renewing on that basis pays only the renewal fee and is not charged the late penalty, provided the required copies of the original assignment order, and of any discharge or later order sending the person back to Washington, reach the issuing authority no later than 90 days after that discharge or order. RCW 9.41.070(15) requires issuing agencies to offer a mail renewal process for those same licensees, and a license renewed through it is valid for one year rather than five.
RCW 9.41.070 itemizes the distribution of each amount it sets.
| Recipient | Original fee | Renewal fee |
|---|---|---|
| State general fund | $15.00 | $15.00 |
| Agency taking the fingerprints | $4.00 | none |
| Issuing authority, to enforce chapter 9.41 RCW | $14.00 | $14.00 |
| Firearms range account in the general fund | $2.16 | $2.16 |
| Concealed pistol license renewal notification account, RCW 43.79.540 | $0.84 | $0.84 |
The $10.00 late penalty is split by RCW 9.41.070(9)(a) into $3.00 for the limited fish and wildlife account, spent first on printing and distributing the pamphlet on the legal limits of the use of firearms, firearms safety, and the preemptive nature of state law that every license applicant receives, and then on supporting volunteer instructors in the Department of Fish and Wildlife basic firearms safety training program, and $7.00 to the issuing authority for enforcing chapter 9.41 RCW. The $10.00 replacement fee goes entirely to the issuing authority.
Buying or receiving a firearm in Washington carries its own charges, and holding a CPL does not waive any of them.
A transfer a dealer runs through the State Patrol system carries a state background check fee. RCW 9.41.1135(2) requires a dealer to charge the purchaser or transferee "a background check fee in an amount determined by the Washington state patrol" and to remit the proceeds monthly, and RCW 43.43.580(4)(a) requires that the amount be "reasonably calculated to cover the direct and indirect costs" of running the program, with collections deposited in the state firearms background check system account created in RCW 43.43.590. There is no longer a statutory ceiling on it: the earlier cap of eighteen dollars was struck from RCW 43.43.580 by 2026 c 100 s 1, effective June 11, 2026. The State Patrol publishes the current amount, and its firearms background division page announces a background check fee of $33 effective July 1, 2026. Confirm it with the State Patrol, since the figure is now set administratively rather than by statute. The fee does not apply to a pawnbroker's receipt or redemption of a pawned firearm (RCW 43.43.580(4)(b)), and RCW 9.41.1135(3) exempts transfers to licensed dealers and antique firearms.
On a private party sale where neither side is a licensed dealer, and where no exception in RCW 9.41.113(4) applies, the parties must complete the transfer through a licensed dealer (RCW 9.41.113(3)). RCW 9.41.113(3)(e) lets that dealer "charge a fee that reflects the fair market value of the administrative costs and efforts incurred by the licensed dealer for facilitating the sale or transfer." The statute sets no amount and no cap, so the figure is the dealer's to set.
Training is a purchase requirement, not a carry requirement. RCW 9.41.1132(1) requires a person applying for the purchase or transfer of a firearm to show proof of completing a recognized firearms safety training program within the last five years covering eight listed topics, and RCW 9.41.1132(2) limits who may sponsor that training to a federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency, a college or university, a nationally recognized organization that customarily offers firearms training, or a firearms training school with instructors certified by such an organization. RCW 9.41.090(1)(a) makes the dealer's delivery depend on that proof or on proof of an exemption. The exemptions in RCW 9.41.1132(4) cover the peace officer categories defined in RCW 10.93.020, most of them only where arrest powers and carrying a firearm are a normal part of the officer's duties, plus active duty, national guard, and reserve members who completed qualifying firearms proficiency or familiarization training as part of their service in the last five years. Course pricing is set by the private and institutional providers who run these classes, not by the statute.
Finally, RCW 9.41.092 bars a licensed dealer from delivering a firearm until the required background check results are known and ten business days have passed since the dealer requested the check. That is a delay rather than a charge.
Nothing in this group is a cost you can be charged today, and none of it changes the CPL fee schedule above.
A nonimmigrant noncitizen residing in Washington who wants to carry or possess a firearm for hunting and sport shooting applies to the county sheriff for a noncitizen firearm license good for two years. RCW 9.41.173(5) sets that fee at fifty dollars "plus additional charges imposed by the Washington state patrol and the federal bureau of investigation that are passed on to the applicant," bars any other state or local charge for issuance, and leaves the fee with the sheriff. This matters to CPL applicants because RCW 9.41.070(4) requires an applicant who is not a United States citizen to meet the additional requirements of RCW 9.41.173 where applicable and to produce proof of compliance at application.
For anyone going into the business, RCW 9.41.110(16)(c) sets the dealer's license fee at one hundred twenty-five dollars for pistols, the same for firearms other than pistols, and the same for ammunition, with the remaining licenses available at no further fee to a dealer who already holds one. Those fees go to the state general fund.
| Conduct | Grade | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying a pistol concealed on your person without a license, away from your abode or fixed place of business | Misdemeanor under the chapter's general penalty, punishable under RCW 9.92.030 by a fine of up to $1,000, up to 90 days in county jail, or both | RCW 9.41.050(1)(a), RCW 9.41.810 |
| Failing to carry the license and display it when required | Class 1 civil infraction under chapter 7.80 RCW, with a $250 maximum and default under RCW 7.80.120(1)(a), not counting statutory assessments | RCW 9.41.050(1)(b) |
| Carrying or placing a loaded pistol in a vehicle without a CPL, or without meeting the placement conditions the subsection lists | Misdemeanor, same RCW 9.92.030 maximum | RCW 9.41.050(2) |
| Leaving an unloaded pistol in a vehicle unlocked or in view, by a person at least eighteen | Misdemeanor, same RCW 9.92.030 maximum | RCW 9.41.050(3) |
RCW 9.41.810 makes any violation of chapter 9.41 RCW a misdemeanor except where a provision says otherwise, which is what supplies the grade for carrying without a license, and RCW 9.92.030 supplies the punishment for a misdemeanor that no statute in force punishes by its own terms. A person who knowingly makes a false statement about citizenship or identity on a CPL application is guilty of false swearing under RCW 9A.72.040, a gross misdemeanor under RCW 9A.72.040(2) punishable by up to 364 days in county jail, a fine of up to $5,000, or both (RCW 9A.20.021(2)), and RCW 9.41.070(12) adds revocation of the license and permanent ineligibility for another one.
| Statute | What it fixes |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.070(5) | Original license fee, the FBI pass through, the bar on other government charges, and the distribution of the original fee |
| RCW 9.41.070(6) | Renewal fee, its distribution, and the bar on other charges for renewal |
| RCW 9.41.070(7) | Replacement license fee |
| RCW 9.41.070(8) | Payment methods |
| RCW 9.41.070(9) | Renewal window, late penalty, distribution of the penalty, renewal notice |
| RCW 9.41.070(14) | Military renewal without the late penalty |
| RCW 9.41.070(15) | Mail renewal process for military members serving out of state, and the one year validity of a license renewed that way |
| RCW 43.43.742 | State Patrol fee for processing fingerprints submitted for a license application |
| RCW 43.43.760 | Cap on law enforcement fingerprint charges for noncriminal purposes, and the State Patrol's own cost recovery fee |
| RCW 9.41.1135 | Dealer's duty to charge and remit the state background check fee |
| RCW 43.43.580 | How the State Patrol sets that fee and where it is deposited |
| RCW 9.41.113 | Dealer's fair market value fee on a transfer it facilitates |
| RCW 9.41.1132 | Firearms safety training required to buy or receive a firearm |
| RCW 9.41.092 | Ten business day dealer delivery period |
| RCW 9.41.173 | Noncitizen firearm license fee |
| RCW 9.41.110 | Dealer's license fees |
| RCW 9.92.030 | Fine for a misdemeanor with no punishment fixed by statute |
| RCW 7.80.120 | Monetary penalty for a class 1 civil infraction |
| RCW 9A.20.021 | Maximum fine for a gross misdemeanor |
Before you write a check, call the police department or sheriff's office you will apply to and ask for its current total, since the statute names the $36.00 but not the charges added to it.
View this topic on its own page: Fees and Costs for a Washington Concealed Pistol License
Outside your own place of abode or fixed place of business, Washington requires a Concealed Pistol License (CPL) to carry a pistol concealed on your person, and a CPL is required to carry a loaded pistol in a vehicle. The license, its application, fees, and renewal are all governed by RCW 9.41.070. Washington is a shall-issue state: the chief of police of a municipality or the sheriff of a county must issue or renew the license unless the applicant is disqualified under the statute (RCW 9.41.070(1)).
Note on timing: RCW 9.41.070 currently runs in two versions. The text described below as current is the version effective until May 1, 2027. A second version takes effect May 1, 2027 and adds a live-fire training requirement and a data-reporting duty. The statute also carries a notice that a further 2026 amendment (House Bill 2632) is scheduled to change this section. Confirm the operative text before relying on a specific subsection number, because the subsection numbering shifts between the two versions.
A Washington CPL is valid for five years from the date of issue (RCW 9.41.070(1)).
For CPLs that expire on or after August 1, 2018, the Department of Licensing (DOL) mails a renewal notice approximately 90 days before the license expiration date to the address listed on the application, or sends it to the email address the licensee provided at the time of application (RCW 9.41.070(9)(b)).
The notice must contain:
The statute does not excuse a late renewal because a notice was not received. Keep your address current with the issuing authority and DOL.
Applications, including renewals, are filed based on residency (RCW 9.41.070(13)):
The issuing authority cannot refuse to accept completed applications during regular business hours (RCW 9.41.070(1)). Specific procedures such as walk-in service, appointments, or online renewal are set by each local agency. Contact your issuing agency for its process.
To renew, the applicant must continue to qualify under RCW 9.41.070 and must not fall into any disqualifier. Under RCW 9.41.070(1), the license must be issued unless the applicant:
The issuing authority runs a background check through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, the Washington State Patrol database, the Health Care Authority database, and other resources, and these checks apply to both new and renewal applications (RCW 9.41.070(2)). A full fingerprint-based FBI check is required for an original license; the statute ties that fingerprint submission to the original application, so a renewal generally does not require a new set of fingerprints (RCW 9.41.070(2), (4)).
Non-citizen applicants must meet the additional requirements of RCW 9.41.173 and provide proof of compliance at application (RCW 9.41.070(4)).
No training is required to obtain or renew a Washington CPL under the current version of the statute. That changes on May 1, 2027 (see below).
Under the version of RCW 9.41.070 that takes effect May 1, 2027 (enacted by 2025 c 370, Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1163), an applicant for issuance of a CPL, including a renewal, must complete a concealed carry firearms safety training program certified under RCW 43.43.575. The training must include (RCW 9.41.070(5)(a)):
An applicant who cannot produce a certificate of completion within the last five years, or proof of an exemption, is disqualified (RCW 9.41.070(1)(h), effective May 1, 2027). Applicants who can demonstrate they are exempt under RCW 9.41.1132(5) do not have to complete the training (RCW 9.41.070(5)(b)).
In the post-2027 version, an applicant who presents a valid permit to purchase firearms issued under RCW 9.41.121 is exempt from the fingerprint requirement on a CPL application (RCW 9.41.070(2)(d), (4)).
Beginning not later than one year after May 1, 2027, and annually thereafter, issuing authorities must submit aggregate license application data to the Washington State Patrol firearms background check program for statewide analysis. Not later than 18 months after May 1, 2027, the program reports to the legislature on application, issuance, and denial numbers, anonymized demographic data, the disqualifiers cited in denials, appeals, and revocations (RCW 9.41.070(14), effective May 1, 2027).
All fees are nonrefundable and are set by statute. No other state or local unit of government may impose additional charges for issuing or renewing the license (RCW 9.41.070).
| Service | Statutory Fee |
|---|---|
| Original CPL (five-year) | $36 plus FBI fingerprint charges passed on to the applicant (RCW 9.41.070(5)) |
| Renewal (on time) | $32 (RCW 9.41.070(6)) |
| Late renewal (after expiration, within the 90-day window) | $32 renewal fee plus a $10 late penalty (RCW 9.41.070(9)(a)) |
| Replacement (lost or damaged) | $10 (RCW 9.41.070(7)) |
Because the original fee adds the federal fingerprint processing charge on top of the $36 base, the total an applicant pays for an original license is commonly higher than $36; the exact total depends on the FBI charge passed through by the agency.
The $32 renewal fee is distributed as follows:
The $10 late penalty is distributed as follows:
Payment must be accepted by cash, check, or money order at the applicant's option. The issuing authority may allow additional payment methods at its option (RCW 9.41.070(8)).
The issuing authority must act within 30 days after the application is filed. If the applicant does not have a valid permanent Washington driver's license or Washington state identification card, or has not been a resident for the previous 90 consecutive days, the issuing authority has up to 60 days (RCW 9.41.070(1)).
A member of the armed forces, including the National Guard and reserves, who cannot renew on time because of an out-of-state assignment, reassignment, or deployment may renew within 90 days after returning to Washington, if the person provides the issuing authority, no later than 90 days after the date of discharge or of the order back to this state (RCW 9.41.070(14)):
A license renewed under this provision takes effect on the expiration date of the prior license, and the licensee pays only the standard renewal fee with no late penalty (RCW 9.41.070(14)).
By October 1, 2019, agencies that issue CPLs were required to develop and implement a mail-application renewal procedure, and may develop an online process, for a service member who cannot renew in person because of out-of-state military service. The applicant must provide a copy of the original deployment or assignment order, apply within the 90-day-before or 90-day-after window, and pay the renewal fee plus any applicable late penalty. A license renewed through this process takes effect on the expiration date of the prior license and is valid for one year (RCW 9.41.070(15)).
The chief of police or county sheriff may issue a temporary emergency license for good cause while a full review is pending. A temporary emergency license does not exempt the holder from any records-check requirement and must be easily distinguishable from a regular license (RCW 9.41.070(10)).
A person who is subject to a court order or injunction regarding firearms under chapter 7.105 RCW is disqualified from holding or renewing a CPL (RCW 9.41.070(1)(d)). Chapter 7.105 RCW is Washington's consolidated civil protection order chapter, which covers domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, antiharassment, vulnerable adult, and extreme risk protection orders.
An extreme risk protection order specifically requires the respondent to surrender all firearms and any concealed pistol license issued under RCW 9.41.070, and bars the respondent from possessing or obtaining a firearm or a CPL while the order is in effect (the surrender requirements are set out in RCW 7.105.340 and are referenced in the temporary order statute, RCW 7.105.330).
A person who becomes subject to a qualifying order cannot renew a CPL and may have an existing license surrendered or revoked. Violating a firearms-surrender provision can carry criminal consequences. Consult the specific order and chapter 7.105 RCW for the exact terms.
A person who knowingly makes a false statement regarding citizenship or identity on a CPL application is guilty of false swearing under RCW 9A.72.040. In addition to any other penalty, that person's CPL is revoked and the person is permanently ineligible for a CPL (RCW 9.41.070(12)).
A lost or damaged license may be replaced for a $10 fee paid to the issuing authority (RCW 9.41.070(7)).
A political subdivision of the state cannot modify the requirements of RCW 9.41.070 or chapter 9.41 RCW, and cannot ask an applicant to voluntarily submit information not required by the statute (RCW 9.41.070(11)). This is reinforced by Washington's general firearms preemption statute, RCW 9.41.290.
Washington has conditional statutory reciprocity under RCW 9.41.073. A person who holds a valid concealed pistol license or permit from another state may carry a concealed pistol in Washington without a Washington CPL, but only when all of the following are met:
The Washington Attorney General is required by law to publish and maintain the official, current list of states that qualify for reciprocity. As of the mid-2025 list, roughly ten states qualified, including Idaho (enhanced permit only), Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana (enhanced permit only), North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Utah, several with permit-type restrictions. The list changes as other states amend their laws, so verify the current list at atg.wa.gov before relying on it.
Because reciprocity is limited to nonresidents, a Washington resident cannot carry concealed on an out-of-state permit, even one from a qualifying state. A person who moves to Washington and keeps a former home-state permit must obtain a Washington CPL; carrying concealed without one is unlawful (RCW 9.41.050).
A nonresident whose home-state permit does not qualify cannot carry concealed in Washington on that permit alone. That person may instead apply for a Washington nonresident CPL under RCW 9.41.070, which a nonresident may file for anywhere in the state.
Retired or separated law enforcement officers carry under the federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, codified at 18 U.S.C. 926C, which is separate from the Washington CPL. LEOSA requires an annual firearms qualification that meets the active-duty standard of the agency or state. In Washington, qualification and credentialing for retired officers are handled administratively through the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission rather than under RCW 9.41.070. Qualification fees and equipment requirements are set by that agency, so confirm current amounts and requirements directly with it.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.070 | CPL application, fees, renewal, eligibility, military exception, preemption |
| RCW 9.41.073 | Reciprocity, recognition of out-of-state concealed pistol licenses |
| RCW 9.41.040 | Unlawful possession of firearms (disqualifying conditions) |
| RCW 9.41.045 | Possession of firearms by persons under community custody |
| RCW 9.41.050 | Carrying a pistol (license required for concealed carry and loaded vehicle carry) |
| RCW 9.41.121 | Permit to purchase (fingerprint exemption, effective May 1, 2027) |
| RCW 9.41.173 | Additional requirements for non-citizen applicants |
| RCW 9.41.1132 | Concealed carry training exemptions (effective May 1, 2027) |
| RCW 9.41.290 | State preemption of firearms regulation |
| RCW 43.43.575 | Certified concealed carry firearms safety training program (effective May 1, 2027) |
| RCW 43.79.540 | Concealed pistol license renewal notification account |
| RCW 7.105.340 | Extreme risk protection order, surrender of firearms and CPL |
| RCW 9A.72.040 | False swearing (penalty for a false CPL application) |
| 18 U.S.C. 926C | LEOSA, retired law enforcement officers |
| 2025 c 370 (ESHB 1163) | Training requirement and reporting duty added to RCW 9.41.070 (effective May 1, 2027) |
View this topic on its own page: Washington Concealed Pistol License (CPL) Renewal
Holding a valid Washington Concealed Pistol License (CPL) lets you carry a concealed pistol in most public places, but a CPL does not override the locations where state and federal law make firearm possession a crime. Some of these restrictions apply to everyone, including CPL holders. Others have a specific carve-out for CPL holders. Read each location carefully, because the exemptions are not uniform.
The main Washington statutes are RCW 9.41.300 (weapons prohibited in certain places), RCW 9.41.305 (open carry on capitol grounds and municipal meeting buildings), RCW 9.41.280 (schools), and RCW 9.41.282 (child care centers). State preemption is governed by RCW 9.41.290.
Under RCW 9.41.300(1), it is unlawful to enter the following places when you knowingly possess or knowingly have under your control a weapon. "Weapon" here means any firearm, an explosive as defined in RCW 70.74.010, or an instrument or weapon listed in RCW 9.41.250 (RCW 9.41.300(17)).
A violation of RCW 9.41.300(1) is a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.300(16)).
The exemptions are not the same for every location, so this is where the most common mistakes happen:
The bar-area prohibition (item 4) does not apply to the proprietor of the premises or employees while engaged in their employment (RCW 9.41.300(11)). The zoo and aquarium prohibition (item 7) does not apply to employees of a zoo, aquarium, or animal sanctuary while engaged in their employment if the weapon is owned by the facility and kept to protect employees, animals, or the public (RCW 9.41.300(12)).
It is unlawful to knowingly open carry a firearm or other weapon while knowingly at a permitted demonstration, whether you carry it on your person or in a vehicle (RCW 9.41.300(2)(a)). It is also unlawful to open carry within 250 feet of the perimeter of a permitted demonstration after a law enforcement officer advises you of the demonstration and directs you to leave until you no longer possess the weapon, except on private property you own or lease (RCW 9.41.300(2)(b)). A "permitted demonstration" is a permitted gathering, or a gathering of 15 or more people assembled for a single event at a public place that a local executive, sheriff, or chief of police has declared permitted (RCW 9.41.300(2)(d)).
This subsection does not apply to the lawful concealed carry of a firearm by a person who has a valid CPL (RCW 9.41.300(2)(e)). A violation of RCW 9.41.300(2) is a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.300(16)).
Subsection (1) does not apply to a person engaged in military activities sponsored by the federal or state governments while on official duties, to law enforcement personnel, or to security personnel while on official duties, with a narrow exception that the court-proceedings restriction in (1)(b) still applies to a law enforcement officer or corrections officer present at a courthouse as a party to certain protection order or domestic violence actions (RCW 9.41.300(7) and (8)). Color guards and honor guards affiliated with the U.S. military, the Washington National Guard, or the state Department of Veterans Affairs are exempt from the library, zoo, and transit restrictions for burial or interment ceremonies (RCW 9.41.300(13)).
The perimeter of any location covered by RCW 9.41.300(1) must be posted at reasonable intervals to alert the public that possession of firearms is restricted (RCW 9.41.300(6)). Courthouses must designate and mark restricted areas and provide a locked box or a designated official for weapon storage during a visit (RCW 9.41.300(1)(b)).
It is unlawful to knowingly open carry a firearm or other weapon at:
Law enforcement and military personnel acting in their official capacity are exempt (RCW 9.41.305(3)). Nothing in this section applies to the lawful concealed carry of a firearm by a person who has a valid CPL (RCW 9.41.305(5)). A first violation is a misdemeanor, and second and subsequent violations are gross misdemeanors (RCW 9.41.305(4)). Municipalities must post notice signs at the locations described in (1)(b) (RCW 9.41.305(6)).
It is unlawful to knowingly carry onto or possess on public or private elementary or secondary school premises, school-provided transportation, areas of facilities while being used exclusively by schools, or areas used for official school board meetings, any firearm or other listed dangerous weapon (RCW 9.41.280(1)). A first violation is a misdemeanor, and second and subsequent violations are gross misdemeanors (RCW 9.41.280(2)(a) and (b)). A conviction for the firearm offense results in revocation of any CPL for three years, and the person cannot apply for a CPL during that period (RCW 9.41.280(2)(c)).
A CPL holder, or a person exempt from the licensing requirement under RCW 9.41.060, is allowed only while picking up or dropping off a student, or attending an official school board meeting held off school-owned or leased property (RCW 9.41.280(3)(e)). A CPL does not authorize general carry inside a school building. The statute also exempts, among others, a nonstudent at least 18 years old whose firearm is secured within an attended vehicle or concealed from view within a locked unattended vehicle while conducting legitimate business at the school (RCW 9.41.280(3)(f)), and law enforcement officers (RCW 9.41.280(3)(h)). Schools must post "GUN-FREE ZONE" signs (RCW 9.41.280(7)).
It is unlawful to carry onto or possess on licensed child care center premises, center-provided transportation, or areas used exclusively by a center, any firearm or other listed dangerous weapon (RCW 9.41.282(1)). A violation is a gross misdemeanor, and a firearm conviction triggers a three-year CPL revocation (RCW 9.41.282(2)). The prohibition does not apply to family day care provider homes, or to a CPL holder (or a person exempt under RCW 9.41.060) while picking up or dropping off a child (RCW 9.41.282(3)). Centers must post "GUN-FREE ZONE" signs (RCW 9.41.282(4)).
Cities, towns, counties, and other municipalities may restrict the possession of firearms in any stadium or convention center they operate, but those restrictions cannot apply to a pistol in the possession of a person licensed under RCW 9.41.070 or exempt from the licensing requirement under RCW 9.41.060, or to a firearms showing, demonstration, or lecture (RCW 9.41.300(3)(b)). A CPL holder generally may carry a concealed pistol in a publicly operated stadium or convention center despite a local possession restriction.
Private property owners and businesses may prohibit firearms on their premises and ask you to leave. Refusing to leave after being asked can expose you to a trespass charge under Washington's criminal trespass laws. A CPL does not override a private owner's decision to bar firearms.
Washington State Ferries are operated by the state Department of Transportation under state rules. Ferry terminals can fall within the transit station and transit facility category in RCW 9.41.300(1)(h), from which CPL holders are exempt under RCW 9.41.300(14). Open display of weapons and unlawfully possessed firearms are not allowed. Lawful concealed carry by a CPL holder is generally permitted. Check current Washington State Ferries rules before you travel, because vessel and terminal policies can change.
Federal law applies on top of Washington law and a Washington CPL does not exempt you from it:
Washington fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation. Cities, towns, counties, and other municipalities may enact only firearms laws that are specifically authorized by state law, such as the local-authority provisions in RCW 9.41.300, and that are consistent with chapter 9.41 RCW. Local laws that are inconsistent with, more restrictive than, or that exceed state law are preempted and void (RCW 9.41.290). Because of preemption, the prohibited places in this section come from state statute, not from a patchwork of city ordinances, except where the legislature has expressly given local governments authority (for example, discharge restrictions and stadium or convention center possession rules under RCW 9.41.300(3)).
Legislation has been introduced in recent sessions to add more prohibited places, such as parks and playgrounds, certain state and local public buildings, and county fairgrounds, sometimes with a CPL carve-out. As of the statute text current here, those locations are not in RCW 9.41.300, and none of these proposals should be treated as law unless and until enacted and effective. Confirm the current statute and any new session laws before relying on this.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.300 | Weapons prohibited in certain places, exceptions, penalty |
| RCW 9.41.305 | Open carry prohibited on capitol grounds and municipal meeting buildings |
| RCW 9.41.280 | Possessing dangerous weapons on school facilities |
| RCW 9.41.282 | Possessing dangerous weapons on child care premises |
| RCW 9.41.290 | State preemption |
| RCW 9.41.070 | Concealed pistol license |
| RCW 9.41.060 | Exceptions to the license requirement |
| 18 U.S.C. 930 | Firearms in federal facilities |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(q) | Gun-Free School Zones Act |
| 49 U.S.C. 46505 | Carrying a weapon on an aircraft |
This information is for general reference only and is not legal advice. Verify the current statutes and consult a Washington attorney for your specific situation.
View this topic on its own page: Where You Cannot Carry a Firearm in Washington
Washington requires a license to carry a pistol concealed and to keep a loaded pistol in a vehicle. It is not a permitless concealed-carry state. Open carry of a pistol by a person who may lawfully possess one is generally allowed without a license, but loaded long guns in vehicles are restricted by separate law. This section explains how the rules apply when you transport a firearm by car.
Under RCW 9.41.050(2)(a), a person may not carry or place a loaded pistol in any vehicle unless the person has a Concealed Pistol License (CPL) and one of the following is true:
A violation of RCW 9.41.050(2) is a misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.050(2)(b)).
Separately, RCW 9.41.050(1)(a) prohibits carrying a pistol concealed on your person, except in your place of abode or fixed place of business, without a CPL. A CPL holder must keep the license in immediate possession and display it on demand; failure to do so is a class 1 civil infraction (RCW 9.41.050(1)(b)).
The CPL requirement applies to pistols. RCW 9.41.010(36) defines a "pistol" as "any firearm with a barrel less than 16 inches in length, or [that] is designed to be held and fired by the use of a single hand." Rifles and shotguns are not pistols and are not subject to the CPL requirement, though other vehicle rules apply (see "Long Guns in Vehicles" below).
RCW 9.41.010(30) provides that a firearm is "loaded" when:
If you do not hold a CPL, the practical way to transport a pistol in a vehicle is to keep it unloaded and cased. RCW 9.41.060(9) exempts "any person while carrying a pistol unloaded and in a closed opaque case or secure wrapper" from the restrictions in RCW 9.41.050. This is the primary lawful method for moving a pistol by car without a license.
Other exceptions in RCW 9.41.060 that can apply to travel include:
Loaded pistol (CPL holders): If a CPL holder leaves a loaded pistol in the vehicle while away from it, the pistol must be locked within the vehicle and concealed from view from outside the vehicle (RCW 9.41.050(2)(a)(iii)).
Unloaded pistol: A person at least 18 years of age who has an unloaded pistol may not leave it in a vehicle unless the unloaded pistol is locked within the vehicle and concealed from view from outside the vehicle (RCW 9.41.050(3)(a)). A violation is a misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.050(3)(b)).
For reference, RCW 9.41.010(39) defines "secure gun storage" as a locked box, gun safe, or other secure locked storage space designed to prevent unauthorized use or discharge of a firearm, and the act of keeping an unloaded firearm stored by such means.
Rifles and shotguns do not require a CPL, but they are not free of vehicle rules. Under RCW 77.15.460, it is unlawful to possess a loaded rifle or shotgun in a motor vehicle or on an off-road vehicle (a long gun is "loaded" for this purpose when there is a shell or cartridge in the chamber, or a muzzle loader is loaded and capped or primed). It is also unlawful to discharge a firearm from a moving motor vehicle. These offenses are misdemeanors (RCW 77.15.460(3)). Limited exceptions apply, such as on-duty law enforcement.
No Washington statute broadly prohibits the open carry of a firearm by a person who may lawfully possess one, and the CPL requirement reaches only pistols carried concealed. Two limits matter:
Even with a CPL, you cannot carry a weapon into the places listed in RCW 9.41.300(1)(a) through (e), which include:
The 2024 Legislature (2024 c 285) added three more locations to RCW 9.41.300(1): libraries (RCW 9.41.300(1)(f)), accredited zoos and aquariums (RCW 9.41.300(1)(g)), and transit stations and transit facilities (RCW 9.41.300(1)(h)). These three additions do not apply to a person licensed to carry a concealed firearm under RCW 9.41.070 (RCW 9.41.300(14)). A valid CPL holder may therefore lawfully carry a concealed pistol in a library, in an accredited zoo or aquarium, and at a transit station or transit facility. A person without a CPL remains barred from carrying a weapon in those three places.
A violation of RCW 9.41.300(1) or (2) is a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.300(16)). Separately, RCW 9.41.280 prohibits possessing dangerous weapons, including firearms, on public and private school grounds, but the statute's exceptions are the vehicle-carry rules for schools. A CPL holder, or a person exempt from the licensing requirement under RCW 9.41.060, may possess a pistol while picking up or dropping off a student (RCW 9.41.280(3)(e)). A nonstudent at least 18 years of age who is legally in possession of a firearm may keep it secured within an attended vehicle, or concealed from view within a locked unattended vehicle, while conducting legitimate business at the school (RCW 9.41.280(3)(f)), and a nonstudent at least 18 may keep an unloaded firearm secured in a vehicle while conducting legitimate business at the school (RCW 9.41.280(3)(g)). RCW 9.41.305 prohibits the open carry of weapons on the west side of the state capitol campus and in municipal buildings during certain public meetings. The airport parking lots, drives, and walkways outside the screening checkpoint are not part of the secured area (RCW 9.41.300(1)(e)), so transporting a firearm to long-term parking is generally treated like ordinary vehicle carry up to the checkpoint.
Federal law applies independently at airports and on aircraft. Carrying or attempting to carry a weapon onto an aircraft, or into a sterile area, is a federal crime under 49 U.S.C. 46505, separate from any state offense.
Employers, both public and private, may set workplace rules barring firearms on the job or on company property, and Washington courts have upheld that authority (Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, 116 Wn.2d 794 (1991); Pacific Northwest Shooting Park Ass'n v. City of Sequim, 158 Wn.2d 342 (2006); Chan v. City of Seattle, 164 Wn. App. 549 (2011)).
RCW 9.41.290 provides that the state "fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation," including possession, transfer, and transportation of firearms. Cities, towns, and counties may enact only firearm laws specifically authorized by state law (such as RCW 9.41.300) and consistent with state law. Local ordinances that are more restrictive than or exceed state law are preempted. Local governments may still regulate the discharge of firearms in areas where there is a reasonable likelihood that people, animals, or property could be harmed (RCW 9.41.300(3)).
Washington has conditional statutory reciprocity. Under RCW 9.41.073, a person who holds a valid concealed pistol license or permit from another state may carry a concealed pistol in Washington without a Washington CPL if all of these conditions are met:
Recognition under RCW 9.41.073 applies only while the holder is not a Washington resident, and the holder must carry in compliance with Washington law (RCW 9.41.073(1)(b)). Once a person becomes a Washington resident, out-of-state recognition no longer applies and a Washington CPL is required to carry concealed.
The Washington Attorney General is required by law to publish, and maintains, the official current list of qualifying states. As of mid-2025 the list included roughly ten states, for example Idaho (enhanced permit only), Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana (enhanced permit only), North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Utah. The list changes as states amend their laws, so confirm the current list at atg.wa.gov before relying on it. A nonresident from a state that does not qualify can still apply for a nonresident Washington CPL under RCW 9.41.070.
The federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act lets qualified retired or separated officers carry concealed nationwide, including in vehicles (18 U.S.C. 926C; active-duty and other qualified officers are covered by 18 U.S.C. 926B). A qualified retired officer must carry the photographic identification required by the federal statute along with proof of annual firearms qualification. Washington documents eligibility through the Criminal Justice Training Commission, and RCW 36.28A.090 directs the development of that firearms qualification. Separately, RCW 9.41.060(10) gives Washington officers who retired for service or physical disability the same carry privilege as a CPL holder, provided they hold the required documentation from their former agency and are not otherwise disqualified.
These restrictions apply regardless of whether the firearm is in a vehicle:
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.010 | Definitions (pistol (36), loaded (30), secure gun storage (39), large-capacity magazine (25)) |
| RCW 9.41.050 | Carrying firearms; CPL required; loaded and unloaded pistols in vehicles |
| RCW 9.41.060 | Exceptions, including unloaded pistol in a closed opaque case or secure wrapper |
| RCW 9.41.070 | Concealed pistol license; application; fee; renewal |
| RCW 9.41.073 | Concealed pistol license; reciprocity |
| RCW 9.41.270 | Carrying or displaying a weapon to intimidate or alarm |
| RCW 9.41.280 | Dangerous weapons on school facilities |
| RCW 9.41.290 | State preemption of local firearms regulation |
| RCW 9.41.300 | Weapons prohibited in certain places |
| RCW 9.41.305 | Open carry prohibited at the capitol and municipal buildings |
| RCW 9.41.370 | Large-capacity magazines; restrictions |
| RCW 9.41.390 | Assault weapons; restrictions |
| RCW 77.15.460 | Loaded rifle or shotgun in a vehicle |
| RCW 36.28A.090 | Washington LEOSA firearms qualification |
| 18 U.S.C. 926B / 926C | Federal LEOSA (active and retired officers) |
| 49 U.S.C. 46505 | Carrying a weapon onto an aircraft (federal) |
View this topic on its own page: Carrying Firearms in Vehicles in Washington
Washington regulates how firearms, including pistols, are carried and transported in vehicles and in public places. The core rules are in Chapter 9.41 RCW (Firearms and Dangerous Weapons). A separate fish and wildlife statute, RCW 77.15.460, governs loaded rifles and shotguns in vehicles. Washington is not a permitless concealed carry state: a Concealed Pistol License (CPL) issued under RCW 9.41.070 is required to carry a pistol concealed and to carry a loaded pistol in a vehicle. Open carry of a pistol is generally lawful without a license for a person who may legally possess it, subject to the location limits below.
Under RCW 9.41.010:
A person may not carry or place a loaded pistol in a vehicle unless that person has a CPL and one of the following is true (RCW 9.41.050(2)(a)):
A CPL holder may carry the pistol loaded and concealed on the person or in the vehicle throughout the state, subject to the prohibited places below. A licensee must keep the CPL in immediate possession at all times a license is required and must display it on demand to any police officer (RCW 9.41.050(1)(b)).
It is unlawful to carry a pistol concealed on the person without a CPL, except in the person's place of abode or fixed place of business (RCW 9.41.050(1)(a)). Two vehicle rules apply to people without a CPL:
A person without a CPL may lawfully transport a pistol under the exceptions in RCW 9.41.060, which include:
RCW 9.41.060 also exempts on-duty law enforcement and military members, licensed dealers in the ordinary course of business, members of target-shooting and collector clubs going to or from their activities, and certain retired officers.
No license is required to possess or transport a rifle or shotgun. The main vehicle limit is RCW 77.15.460:
RCW 9.41.190 makes it unlawful to own, transport, or possess any machine gun, bump-fire stock, undetectable firearm, short-barreled shotgun, or short-barreled rifle, with limited exceptions. A violation is a class C felony. Two points matter for transport:
Federal NFA transfer tax was changed by Pub. L. 119-21. The making and transfer tax is $200 for a machinegun or destructive device and $0 for other NFA items, effective for calendar quarters beginning more than 90 days after July 4, 2025, with the first qualifying quarter starting January 1, 2026. The change in federal tax does not change Washington's separate state ban on machine guns and short-barreled shotguns.
A person under 18 is generally barred from possessing a firearm, but RCW 9.41.042 lists exceptions. A minor may possess a firearm when:
The travel exception is narrower than the possession exceptions. A minor may travel with an unloaded firearm only to or from the activities in RCW 9.41.042(1) through (5): safety courses, range practice, organized competitions or performances, licensed hunting or trapping, and supervised or certified use in areas where discharge is permitted (RCW 9.41.042(6)). Travel to or from the real property and residence exceptions is not covered, so a minor may not transport a firearm to a relative's property or to the minor's home in reliance on those exceptions.
Even with a CPL, a firearm may not be taken into the places listed in RCW 9.41.300(1), which affects where you can stop while transporting a firearm:
Important CPL exemptions:
Penalty: violating RCW 9.41.300(1) is a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.300(16)). The statute does not escalate this to a felony for repeat offenses. Premises covered by subsection (1) must be posted at reasonable intervals.
It is unlawful to knowingly open carry a firearm at a permitted demonstration, or within 250 feet after an officer directs you to leave, including carrying it in a vehicle at the demonstration (RCW 9.41.300(2)). This subsection does not apply to lawful concealed carry by a valid CPL holder (RCW 9.41.300(2)(e)).
School premises are governed by RCW 9.41.280, not RCW 9.41.300. It is unlawful to knowingly carry onto or possess a firearm on public or private elementary or secondary school premises, on school-provided transportation, or in facility areas being used exclusively by a school. A first violation is a misdemeanor and a second or subsequent violation is a gross misdemeanor; a conviction under subsection (1)(a) results in revocation of any CPL for three years (RCW 9.41.280(2)). A person in possession of a pistol who holds a CPL issued under RCW 9.41.070, or who is exempt from the licensing requirement under RCW 9.41.060, may possess the pistol while picking up or dropping off a student, and while attending official school board meetings held off school district-owned or leased property (RCW 9.41.280(3)(e)). A separate vehicle exception allows a nonstudent at least 18 years old who is conducting legitimate business at the school to keep a firearm secured within an attended vehicle, or concealed from view within a locked unattended vehicle (RCW 9.41.280(3)(f) and (g)).
Under federal law, the Gun-Free School Zones Act (18 U.S.C. 922(q)) restricts firearms within 1,000 feet of a school, but exempts a person licensed by the state to carry. A Washington CPL holder is within that exemption, though the separate state prohibition on school property still applies.
Licensed child care centers have their own statute, RCW 9.41.282, with rules parallel to the school rules. It is unlawful to carry onto or possess a firearm on licensed child care center premises, on child care center-provided transportation, or in facility areas being used exclusively by a child care center. A violation is a gross misdemeanor, and a conviction involving a firearm results in revocation of any CPL for three years (RCW 9.41.282(2)). A CPL holder, or a person exempt from licensing under RCW 9.41.060, may possess a pistol while picking up or dropping off a child at the center, and a person at least 18 years old conducting legitimate business at the center may keep a firearm secured within an attended vehicle or concealed from view within a locked unattended vehicle (RCW 9.41.282(3)). Family day care provider homes are not covered by this prohibition.
RCW 9.41.284 prohibits knowingly carrying or possessing firearms in ballot counting centers, voting centers, student engagement hubs, and county elections and voter registration offices. A CPL holder may carry a concealed pistol in a voting center, student engagement hub, or elections and voter registration office, but no firearm, whether concealed or openly carried, may be possessed in a ballot counting center (RCW 9.41.284(4)). Separately, RCW 70.108.150 makes it unlawful for anyone except law enforcement officers to carry, transport, or possess any firearm while on the site of an outdoor music festival, and it contains no CPL exception.
Washington State Ferries are operated as part of the state highway system. A CPL holder may carry consistent with state law, and a person without a CPL should keep a pistol unloaded and in a closed opaque case or secure wrapper (RCW 9.41.060(9)). Federally controlled security zones at terminals may impose additional limits.
RCW 9.41.300(1)(h) restricts firearms at transit stations and transit facilities, but the statute expressly excludes transit vehicles from that definition, so buses and rail cars are not covered by this prohibition. A CPL holder is in any event exempt from the transit station and facility restriction (RCW 9.41.300(14)). Individual transit agencies may post their own rules, so check posted signage.
Amtrak sets its own firearms policy under federal authority. Firearms must be unloaded, in a locked hard-sided container, and declared in advance; Amtrak does not allow firearms in carry-on baggage. This applies to Amtrak Cascades service in Washington.
Carrying a concealed dangerous weapon that would be accessible in flight, or placing a loaded firearm on an aircraft in air transportation, is a federal crime under 49 U.S.C. 46505. Firearms flown commercially must be unloaded, in a locked hard-sided case, and declared to the airline as checked baggage. Washington also makes the TSA-screened restricted areas of a commercial service airport off-limits under RCW 9.41.300(1)(e).
Washington has no statute that requires employers to let employees store firearms in personal vehicles on company property:
Washington has no statutory "duty to inform" that requires a CPL holder to volunteer that they are armed during a traffic stop. However, a licensee must carry the CPL and display it on demand to a police officer (RCW 9.41.050(1)(b)), and CPL status may be visible to officers when a driver's license is queried. Answer truthfully if asked.
Under 18 U.S.C. 926A, a person may transport a firearm through any state, including Washington, if:
FOPA is generally treated by courts as a defense rather than absolute immunity, so a traveler may still face arrest and have to raise it. It does not override state assault weapon or large capacity magazine bans, and lengthy stops can take a trip outside its protection.
Washington has a conditional out-of-state reciprocity statute, RCW 9.41.073. A person who holds a valid concealed pistol license or permit from another state may carry a concealed pistol in Washington without a Washington CPL, but only if all of these conditions are met: the issuing state recognizes and gives effect to Washington concealed pistol licenses; the issuing state does not issue concealed pistol licenses or permits to persons under 21; and the issuing state requires mandatory fingerprint-based background checks of criminal and mental health history for all applicants. The person must be 21 or older, must not be a Washington resident, and must carry the out-of-state license along with government-issued photo identification while carrying in Washington.
The Washington Attorney General is required to publish, and keep current, the official list of states whose licenses qualify. As of the mid-2025 update that list included roughly ten states, such as Idaho (enhanced permit only), Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana (enhanced permit only), North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Utah. The list changes as other states amend their laws, so always confirm the current list at atg.wa.gov before relying on a home-state permit. If your state is not on the list, your out-of-state permit is not recognized in Washington.
Practical points for visitors:
Under chapter 7.105 RCW, a Washington court may issue an extreme risk protection order requiring a person to surrender firearms and any concealed pistol license. A person subject to such an order is prohibited from possessing or transporting firearms for the duration of the order, and violating the order is a criminal offense.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.010 | Definitions (firearm, pistol, loaded) |
| RCW 9.41.040 / 9.41.042 | Unlawful possession; minor possession exceptions |
| RCW 9.41.050 | Carrying firearms; loaded pistol in a vehicle |
| RCW 9.41.060 | Exceptions to carrying restrictions (unloaded cased pistol, outdoor recreation) |
| RCW 9.41.070 | Concealed pistol license (resident and nonresident) |
| RCW 9.41.073 | Conditional out-of-state license reciprocity |
| RCW 9.41.190 | Machine guns, short-barreled shotguns, SBR (class C felony) |
| RCW 9.41.280 | Weapons on school facilities |
| RCW 9.41.282 | Weapons on licensed child care center premises |
| RCW 9.41.284 | Weapons at voting and ballot counting facilities |
| RCW 9.41.290 | State preemption |
| RCW 9.41.300 | Weapons prohibited in certain places (gross misdemeanor) |
| RCW 9.41.326 / 9.41.327 | Untraceable firearms; unfinished frames or receivers |
| RCW 9.41.370 | Large capacity magazine restrictions |
| RCW 9.41.390 | Assault weapon restrictions |
| RCW 70.108.150 | Firearms prohibited at outdoor music festivals |
| RCW 77.15.460 | Loaded rifle or shotgun in a vehicle (misdemeanor) |
| Chapter 7.105 RCW | Extreme risk protection orders |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(q) | Federal Gun-Free School Zones Act |
| 18 U.S.C. 926A | Federal interstate transportation protection (FOPA) |
| 49 U.S.C. 46505 | Carrying a weapon on an aircraft |
View this topic on its own page: Washington State Transportation Laws for Concealed Carry
Washington does not impose a blanket rule that every firearm be stored in a specific way at all times. Instead, the law creates criminal liability for unsafe storage when a prohibited person gains access, defines what "secure gun storage" means, requires firearms dealers to offer storage devices and post warnings, requires owners to report a lost or stolen firearm, and sets rules for keeping pistols in vehicles. This section explains the storage obligations a CPL holder needs to know, with each rule tied to the Washington statute that creates it.
RCW 9.41.010 defines the term that runs through Washington's storage statutes. Under RCW 9.41.010(39), "secure gun storage" means:
A trigger lock or similar device designed to prevent unauthorized use or discharge of the firearm is treated as an acceptable alternative in the statutes that reference secure storage. The storage standards in this area were established by Initiative Measure No. 1639, approved by voters on November 6, 2018, and effective July 1, 2019.
RCW 9.41.360 does not order you to store a firearm in any particular place. Subsection (6) says plainly: "Nothing in this section mandates how or where a firearm must be stored." What it does is create a crime called community endangerment due to unsafe storage of a firearm. A person who stores or leaves a firearm in a location where the person knows, or reasonably should know, that a prohibited person may gain access to it can be charged if a prohibited person actually obtains access and possession and a harmful outcome follows.
Community endangerment due to unsafe storage in the first degree applies when a prohibited person obtains access and possession of the firearm and causes personal injury or death with it. It is a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW (maximum 5 years imprisonment and/or a $10,000 fine).
Community endangerment due to unsafe storage in the second degree applies when a prohibited person obtains access and possession of the firearm and:
It is a gross misdemeanor punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW (maximum 364 days imprisonment and/or a $5,000 fine).
Under RCW 9.41.360(3), subsection (1) does not apply if:
Using a locked box, gun safe, or trigger lock is therefore a complete defense to this offense.
For purposes of this section, RCW 9.41.360(5) defines "prohibited person" as a person who is prohibited from possessing a firearm under state or federal law. If a death or serious injury occurs, RCW 9.41.360(4) allows the prosecuting attorney to decline to prosecute even where technically sufficient evidence exists, in situations where prosecution would serve no public purpose or would defeat the purpose of the law.
This section was enacted by Initiative Measure No. 1639 (2019 c 3 s 5) and took effect July 1, 2019.
RCW 9.41.050 governs how a pistol may be kept in a vehicle, and the rule turns on whether the pistol is loaded.
Under RCW 9.41.050(2)(a), a person shall not carry or place a loaded pistol in any vehicle unless the person has a license to carry a concealed pistol and:
A violation is a misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.050(2)(b)).
Under RCW 9.41.050(3)(a), a person at least 18 years of age who is in possession of an unloaded pistol shall not leave the unloaded pistol in a vehicle unless it is locked within the vehicle and concealed from view from outside the vehicle. A violation is a misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.050(3)(b)).
In short, a loaded pistol left in a car requires a CPL plus locking it inside and out of view, and even an unloaded pistol left in a car must be locked inside and concealed from view.
RCW 9.41.368, enacted in 2024 (2024 c 286 s 1), requires an owner or other person lawfully in possession of a firearm who suffers its loss or theft to report the facts and circumstances to the local law enforcement agency where the loss or theft occurred within 24 hours after first discovering it, unless the delay is for good cause shown. The report must include, to the extent known:
A person who fails to report commits a civil infraction subject to a monetary penalty of up to $1,000. If multiple firearms are lost or stolen in a single event, only a single penalty applies (RCW 9.41.368(3)).
RCW 9.41.365 places three duties on every registered firearms dealer:
When selling or transferring any firearm, offer to sell or give the purchaser or transferee a secure gun storage device, or a trigger lock or similar device designed to prevent the unauthorized use or discharge of the firearm.
Conspicuously post, in a prominent location, a warning sign provided by the Department of Licensing, in block letters at least one inch in height:
WARNING: YOU MAY FACE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IF YOU STORE OR LEAVE AN UNSECURED FIREARM WHERE A PERSON WHO IS PROHIBITED FROM POSSESSING FIREARMS CAN AND DOES OBTAIN POSSESSION.
Upon the sale or transfer of a firearm, deliver a written warning to the purchaser or transferee, in block letters not less than one-fourth inch in height, with the same WARNING text.
A dealer who violates RCW 9.41.365 commits a class 1 civil infraction under chapter 7.80 RCW and may be fined up to $250.
Separately, under RCW 9.41.368(4), the local licensing authority that issues a firearm dealer's license must provide signage, to be posted at each point of sale in block letters not less than one inch in height, stating:
FAILURE TO KEEP FIREARMS IN SECURE GUN STORAGE, OR SECURED WITH A TRIGGER LOCK OR SIMILAR DEVICE THAT IS DESIGNED TO PREVENT THE UNAUTHORIZED USE OR DISCHARGE OF THE FIREARM MAY SUBJECT YOU TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES. FAILURE TO REPORT THE LOSS OR THEFT OF A FIREARM MAY SUBJECT YOU TO A CIVIL PENALTY UP TO $1,000.
A person under 21 may not purchase a pistol or semiautomatic assault rifle, and except as otherwise provided, no one may sell or transfer a semiautomatic assault rifle to a person under 21 (RCW 9.41.240(1)). A person at least 18 but less than 21 may possess a semiautomatic assault rifle only in a place of abode, at a fixed place of business, on real property under the person's control, or, under RCW 9.41.240(3)(d), for the specific purpose of moving to a new place of abode, traveling between the place of abode and real property under the person's control, or selling or transferring the firearm in accordance with this chapter. In each of those transit situations the semiautomatic assault rifle must be unloaded and either in secure gun storage or secured with a trigger lock or similar device designed to prevent the unauthorized use or discharge of the firearm. This provision was added by Initiative 1639 (2019 c 3 s 13).
Washington gives a person who wants to limit their own access to firearms two related tools.
Under RCW 9.41.350, a person may file a voluntary waiver of firearm rights with the clerk of the court in any Washington county. Once the form is accepted, the person's possession or control of a firearm is unlawful under RCW 9.41.040(7), and the waiver is entered into the national instant criminal background check system. The person may file a revocation no sooner than seven calendar days after filing the waiver. This is a self-directed means of reducing access during a period of crisis, and the records are exempt from public disclosure.
Under RCW 9.41.380, the Legislature encourages an expansion of safe storage to better prevent suicide by veterans, military members, and their families. That statute also provides that a dealer who allows a person to temporarily store a firearm on the dealer's premises in a locked locker, box, or container not accessible to the dealer does not, by doing so, create a special relationship for civil liability purposes.
Washington has, in recent sessions, considered bills that would impose affirmative secure-storage requirements for firearms kept in residences and vehicles. As of this writing, no such mandatory secure-storage requirement has been enacted into the firearms chapter (chapter 9.41 RCW). The storage obligations currently in force are the ones described above. Because gun storage law in Washington has changed repeatedly, confirm the current status of any pending bill before relying on it.
View this topic on its own page: Firearm Storage Requirements in Washington
Washington's self-defense law is built from a small set of statutes in Chapter 9A.16 RCW, read together with decades of case law from the Washington Supreme Court. Washington has no statute that uses the labels "stand your ground" or "castle doctrine." Instead, the right to use force, including deadly force, comes from RCW 9A.16.020 and RCW 9A.16.050, and the absence of a duty to retreat comes from court decisions interpreting those statutes. Concealed pistol license holders should understand both the statutory text and the way courts apply it.
RCW 9A.16.020 lists the situations in which "the use, attempt, or offer to use force upon or toward the person of another is not unlawful." The provisions most relevant to a private citizen are:
The statute also covers force used by public officers, by a person arresting someone who has committed a felony, and by common carriers expelling unruly passengers (RCW 9A.16.020(1), (2), (5)).
The recurring limit in RCW 9A.16.020(3) is that the force used must be "not more than is necessary." Washington defines "necessary" in RCW 9A.16.010(1): no reasonably effective alternative to the use of force appeared to exist, and the amount of force used was reasonable to effect the lawful purpose intended.
A person is not justified in using force against another based on the discovery of, knowledge about, or potential disclosure of the victim's actual or perceived gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation. This includes situations involving an unwanted nonforcible advance or a prior romantic or sexual relationship (RCW 9A.16.025).
When force results in death, the controlling statute for a private citizen is RCW 9A.16.050, "Homicide - By other person - When justifiable." Homicide is justifiable when committed either:
Two points follow from the text. First, deadly force in self-defense requires a reasonable belief in imminent danger of a felony or of great personal injury, not merely a fear of any unlawful contact. Second, "Deadly force" is defined in RCW 9A.16.010(2) as the intentional application of force through the use of firearms or any other means reasonably likely to cause death or serious physical injury.
Washington courts judge a self-defense claim from the standpoint of a reasonably prudent person knowing all that the defendant knew at the time. The standard combines an objective measure of reasonableness with the subjective facts and circumstances as they appeared to the person using force. If the response is found reasonable, charges may not be pursued; where the facts are disputed, the question of reasonableness goes to a jury.
Distinct from justifiable homicide, RCW 9A.16.030 makes a homicide excusable "when committed by accident or misfortune in doing any lawful act by lawful means, without criminal negligence, or without any unlawful intent." This is the current statutory text. Earlier versions of the statute used a "without ordinary caution" phrasing that the legislature has since replaced.
Washington imposes no duty to retreat before using lawful force in self-defense, but this rule comes from court decisions rather than from any statute. The Washington Supreme Court has held that there is no duty to retreat when a person is assaulted in a place where he or she has a right to be (State v. Studd, 1999; State v. Reynaldo Redmond, 2003). A person who is not the aggressor and who is somewhere they may lawfully be is not required to flee before standing their ground.
There is an important limit. The absence of a duty to retreat does not relax the requirement that the force used be reasonable and necessary. Whether less drastic alternatives were available is part of the totality of the circumstances a jury may weigh in deciding whether the response was reasonable.
Do not treat this as a statutory "stand your ground" law. Washington has no RCW section by that name. The protection exists only as case law construing RCW 9A.16.020 and RCW 9A.16.050.
The right to use force extends to defending another person. RCW 9A.16.020(3) authorizes force used "by another lawfully aiding" a person about to be injured, and RCW 9A.16.050(1) authorizes justifiable homicide in defense of family members and of "any other person in his or her presence or company." The same conditions apply: a reasonable ground to apprehend a felony or great personal injury, and imminent danger.
RCW 9A.16.020(3) permits reasonable, non-deadly force to prevent a malicious trespass or other malicious interference with real or personal property lawfully in a person's possession, when the force is not more than is necessary. Washington law does not authorize deadly force to protect property alone. Deadly force becomes lawful only when the situation also satisfies RCW 9A.16.050, meaning a reasonable belief in imminent danger of a felony or of death or great personal injury to a person, or the actual resistance of an attempt to commit a felony upon or in a dwelling.
Washington has no statute labeled a "castle doctrine," and there is no statutory presumption of reasonableness for force used against an intruder. What Washington provides is the dwelling clause of RCW 9A.16.050(2): homicide is justifiable in the actual resistance of an attempt to commit a felony "upon or in a dwelling, or other place of abode" in which the person is present. Combined with the no-duty-to-retreat case law, this gives strong protection to a person defending their home, but the person must still reasonably believe that force, including deadly force, is necessary to resist a felony or to prevent death or great personal injury. Reasonableness and necessity still control.
RCW 9A.16.110 provides that no person shall be placed in legal jeopardy for protecting, by any reasonable means necessary, themselves, their family, or their property, or for coming to the aid of another who is in imminent danger of or the victim of a violent crime as defined in RCW 9.94A.030.
If a person charged with such a crime is found not guilty by reason of self-defense, the state must reimburse the defendant for all reasonable costs, including lost time, legal fees, and other defense expenses. To award those costs, the trier of fact must find that the self-defense claim was sustained by a preponderance of the evidence (RCW 9A.16.110(2)). This is not an independent cause of action, and a judge may deny or reduce the award if the defendant was engaged in criminal conduct substantially related to the events (RCW 9A.16.110(3)).
Even when a use of force is ultimately found justified, a concealed carry holder should expect the following:
A separate body of law governs use of force by peace officers. It does not set the standard for a private citizen's self-defense, but concealed carry holders may encounter it during or after an incident. RCW 9A.16.040 sets a "good faith" justifiable-homicide standard for peace officers and public officers. Chapter 10.120 RCW, enacted by E2SHB 1310 (Laws of 2021) and later amended, sets a civil "reasonable care" standard: an officer may use physical force only in the circumstances listed in RCW 10.120.020(1), and may use deadly force only when necessary to protect against an immediate threat of serious physical injury or death (RCW 10.120.020(2)). Chapter 10.116 RCW separately bans chokeholds and neck restraints by officers (RCW 10.116.020) and restricts certain tactics.
The Washington Legislature has expressly stated that the peace-officer standard does not narrow a private citizen's rights. The note following RCW 9A.16.040 recognizes that "private citizens' permissible use of deadly force under the authority of RCW 9.01.200, 9A.16.020, or 9A.16.050 is not restricted and remains broader than the limitations imposed on peace officers."
| Term | Statutory definition |
|---|---|
| Necessary | No reasonably effective alternative to the use of force appeared to exist, and the amount of force used was reasonable to effect the lawful purpose intended (RCW 9A.16.010(1)). |
| Deadly force | The intentional application of force through the use of firearms or any other means reasonably likely to cause death or serious physical injury (RCW 9A.16.010(2)). |
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| RCW 9A.16.010 | Definitions ("necessary," "deadly force") |
| RCW 9A.16.020 | Use of force - When lawful |
| RCW 9A.16.025 | Use of force - When unjustified - Victim identity |
| RCW 9A.16.030 | Homicide - When excusable |
| RCW 9A.16.040 | Justifiable homicide or deadly force by peace officer - Good faith standard |
| RCW 9A.16.050 | Homicide - By other person - When justifiable |
| RCW 9A.16.110 | Defending against violent crime - Reimbursement |
| RCW 9.94A.030 | Definition of "violent crime" (cross-referenced by RCW 9A.16.110) |
| RCW 10.120.020 | Permissible uses of force by peace officers (civil standard) |
| RCW 10.116.020 | Prohibited tactics - Chokeholds and neck restraints (peace officers) |
This summary is general information, not legal advice. Self-defense outcomes turn on specific facts, and case law continues to shape how these statutes are applied. Consult a Washington attorney for advice about your situation.
View this topic on its own page: Use of Force and Self-Defense in Washington State
Washington does not have a statutory "castle doctrine" and does not have a statutory "stand your ground" law. There is no RCW section by either name. Self-defense in Washington is governed by the general use-of-force statutes in Chapter 9A.16 RCW, as interpreted by Washington courts. The "no duty to retreat" rule that people associate with stand-your-ground laws exists in Washington, but it comes from case law, not from a statute.
This section explains the actual legal framework so you can understand it accurately rather than relying on labels that do not apply in Washington.
Washington's self-defense rules live in two main statutes:
The definition of "deadly force" is set out separately in RCW 9A.16.010(2): the intentional application of force through the use of firearms or any other means reasonably likely to cause death or serious physical injury.
RCW 9A.16.020 lists the situations in which the use, attempt, or offer to use force toward another person is not unlawful. The provision most relevant to private self-defense is subsection (3):
Whenever used by a party about to be injured, or by another lawfully aiding him or her, in preventing or attempting to prevent an offense against his or her person, or a malicious trespass, or other malicious interference with real or personal property lawfully in his or her possession, in case the force is not more than is necessary.
The key limit in that text is "in case the force is not more than is necessary." Washington law ties the amount of force to what is necessary, and RCW 9A.16.010(1) defines "necessary" to mean that no reasonably effective alternative to the use of force appeared to exist and that the amount of force used was reasonable to effect the lawful purpose intended.
Other subsections of RCW 9A.16.020 cover force by public officers, citizen arrest after a felony, reasonable detention of a trespasser, force by a common carrier expelling a passenger, and force used to restrain a person who is mentally ill, mentally incompetent, or mentally disabled from committing a dangerous act. Those are situational and are not the general self-defense rule for a permit holder.
When deadly force results in death, the controlling statute for a private citizen is RCW 9A.16.050. It states that homicide is justifiable when committed either:
Subsection (2) is the closest thing Washington has to a "castle" provision. It allows justifiable use of deadly force to actually resist an attempt to commit a felony upon the person, or upon or in a dwelling or other place of abode in which the person is. It is narrower than a true castle-doctrine statute: it is tied to resisting an attempted felony, and the general standard of necessity and reasonableness still applies. There is no statutory presumption of reasonableness for force used inside the home, and no statutory civil or criminal immunity of the kind found in true castle-doctrine states.
Separately, RCW 9A.16.030 provides that a homicide is excusable when committed by accident or misfortune in doing a lawful act by lawful means, without criminal negligence and without unlawful intent. This is distinct from justifiable self-defense and applies to accidents, not deliberate defensive force.
Washington recognizes that a person who is assaulted in a place where he or she has a right to be, and who is not the aggressor, has no duty to retreat before using lawful force in self-defense. This rule is established by the Washington Supreme Court, not by any RCW section.
Because this rule comes from court decisions interpreting RCW 9A.16.020 and RCW 9A.16.050, it can be refined by future cases. Do not expect to find a statute titled "stand your ground" in Washington, because none exists. The protection is real but is grounded in case law applying the general use-of-force statutes.
Whether force is justified in Washington turns on reasonableness and necessity judged from the standpoint of a reasonably prudent person in the same situation. Washington jury instructions evaluate the defender's actions based on the conditions as they reasonably appeared at the time, not on hindsight. The practical points for a permit holder:
RCW 9A.16.110 provides that no person in Washington shall be placed in legal jeopardy for protecting, by any reasonable means necessary, himself or herself, his or her family, or his or her real or personal property, or for coming to the aid of another who is in imminent danger of, or the victim of, a violent crime as defined in RCW 9.94A.030. If a person charged with one of the listed crimes is found not guilty by reason of self-defense, the statute directs the state to reimburse reasonable costs of the defense, including lost time and legal fees, once the trier of fact finds the self-defense claim was sustained by a preponderance of the evidence. The court may reduce or deny the award if the defendant was engaged in criminal conduct substantially related to the events. This is a reimbursement mechanism, not a grant of pretrial immunity from prosecution.
RCW 9A.16.025 provides that a person is not justified in using force against another based on the discovery of, knowledge about, or potential disclosure of the victim's actual or perceived gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation. This forecloses a so-called "panic" defense.
View this topic on its own page: Castle Doctrine and Self-Defense Law in Washington
Washington has no statutory duty to inform. A concealed pistol license (CPL) holder is not required to proactively tell a law enforcement officer that they are carrying a concealed pistol during a traffic stop or other contact. Nothing in Chapter 9.41 RCW (Firearms and Dangerous Weapons) imposes an affirmative duty to announce that you are armed.
What Washington law does require is narrower: if you are carrying under a CPL, you must keep the license on you and show it to an officer when asked. The license requirement itself comes from RCW 9.41.050, which makes a CPL necessary to carry a concealed pistol in the first place.
RCW 9.41.050 governs the carrying of firearms in Washington. Two parts of it matter for police contact:
So the obligation is reactive, not proactive. You do not have to volunteer that you are armed, but if an officer demands to see your CPL while you are carrying concealed, you must produce it. The penalty for failing to have or display the license is a civil infraction, not a criminal charge.
RCW 9.41.070, which sets out CPL issuance requirements, application procedures, and the conditions of the license, contains no duty-to-inform language either. No section of Chapter 9.41 RCW requires a permit holder to disclose their armed status to law enforcement.
RCW 9.41.060 lists who is exempt from RCW 9.41.050 entirely. The provisions on carrying concealed do not apply to, among others:
These exemptions go to whether a CPL is needed at all, not to any duty to inform.
Washington has a separate "duty to warn" that applies to mental health professionals, not to people carrying firearms. RCW 71.05.120(3) preserves a mental health provider's duty to warn or to take reasonable precautions to protect a reasonably identifiable victim when a patient has communicated an actual threat of physical violence. That duty is discharged by reasonable efforts to communicate the threat to the victim and to law enforcement. This is a clinician's obligation under the mental health code. It has nothing to do with a CPL holder's interaction with police.
This analysis rests on the text of Washington's firearms statutes. RCW 9.41.050 and RCW 9.41.070 set out the carry and licensing rules, and neither imposes a duty to inform. The conclusion that Washington has no duty-to-inform law is supported by the absence of any such provision anywhere in Chapter 9.41 RCW. Always confirm current law, since the firearms chapter has been amended frequently in recent sessions.
View this topic on its own page: Duty to Inform Law Enforcement in Washington
Washington does not have a standalone criminal statute that makes it a crime to carry a concealed pistol while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The simple act of carrying concealed while intoxicated is not, by itself, a separate offense. Washington instead addresses the intersection of firearms and intoxication through a firearm forfeiture provision, the concealed pistol license (CPL) rules, several general criminal statutes, and federal law. The practical risk is real: a person carrying concealed while under the influence can lose the firearm by court order and can be disqualified from holding a CPL.
The most directly applicable Washington statute is RCW 9.41.098, the firearm forfeiture statute. Under RCW 9.41.098(1)(e), the superior courts and the courts of limited jurisdiction may order forfeiture of a firearm proven to be:
"In the possession of a person who is in any place in which a concealed pistol license is required, and who is under the influence of any drug or under the influence of intoxicating liquor, as defined in chapter 46.61 RCW."
Several points matter here:
A court may order the firearm destroyed or otherwise disposed of after a forfeiture order (RCW 9.41.098(2)). The owner may seek return of the firearm only on the limited grounds in RCW 9.41.098(3), such as a showing that there was no probable cause to believe a violation occurred, that the firearm was stolen, or that the owner neither knew of nor consented to the act that led to forfeiture. A law enforcement officer may confiscate a firearm found in the possession of a person under these circumstances (RCW 9.41.098(4)).
Carrying concealed while intoxicated is therefore not a crime in itself under state law, but it exposes the carrier to permanent loss of the firearm by court order.
A forfeiture under RCW 9.41.098(1)(e) carries a licensing consequence. Under RCW 9.41.070, the concealed pistol license statute, an applicant is disqualified from obtaining a CPL if the applicant has been ordered to forfeit a firearm under RCW 9.41.098(1)(e) within one year before filing the application. Washington's separate revocation statute, RCW 9.41.075, requires a law enforcement agency to revoke an existing CPL when the licensee is ordered to forfeit a firearm, with graduated revocation of one year for a first forfeiture, two years for a second, and five years for a third or later forfeiture (RCW 9.41.075(1)(d) and (3)). That revocation trigger cross-references RCW 9.41.098(1)(d), the forfeiture prong for a firearm possessed when a person commits or is arrested for a felony or a crime in which a firearm was used or displayed, which is a different prong than the under-the-influence forfeiture at RCW 9.41.098(1)(e). The consequence that attaches squarely to an under-the-influence forfeiture is the one-year bar on obtaining a CPL under RCW 9.41.070.
Washington has no firearm-specific intoxication crime, but general criminal statutes can apply to an impaired person who handles or uses a firearm.
Reckless endangerment (RCW 9A.36.050). A person is guilty of reckless endangerment when he or she recklessly engages in conduct, not amounting to a drive-by shooting, that "creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another person." Reckless endangerment is a gross misdemeanor. Handling a firearm while significantly impaired could support a reckless endangerment charge depending on the conduct.
Intoxication and mental state (RCW 9A.16.090). Washington law treats voluntary intoxication as no excuse for a crime, but allows intoxication to be considered when proving a required mental state:
"No act committed by a person while in a state of voluntary intoxication shall be deemed less criminal by reason of his or her condition, but whenever the actual existence of any particular mental state is a necessary element to constitute a particular species or degree of crime, the fact of his or her intoxication may be taken into consideration in determining such mental state."
This is directly relevant to any use-of-force incident. Intoxication does not by itself excuse criminal conduct, and it can cut against a person trying to show the reasonable belief that a lawful self-defense claim requires.
Prohibited places (RCW 9.41.300). Washington restricts weapons in certain locations. RCW 9.41.300 makes it unlawful to knowingly possess or control a weapon in the restricted access areas of jails and law enforcement facilities, the areas of buildings used in connection with court proceedings, restricted areas of airports, and similar locations. The statute also bars carrying in that part of an establishment classified by the state liquor and cannabis board as off-limits to persons under 21, which covers the bar area of a tavern. These restrictions are not framed as "under the influence" rules, but they overlap heavily with places where alcohol is served, and they create separate exposure for an impaired carrier.
Washington fully preempts the field of firearms regulation. RCW 9.41.290 states that the state "fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation within the boundaries of the state," and that cities, towns, and counties "may enact only those laws and ordinances relating to firearms that are specifically authorized by state law, as in RCW 9.41.300, and are consistent with this chapter." Local laws that are inconsistent with, more restrictive than, or that exceed state law are preempted.
A 1984 attorney general opinion (AGO 1984 No. 27) discussed whether a city or county could make it an offense to possess a firearm while intoxicated. That opinion interpreted the 1983 version of the preemption statute and concluded that the question would not turn on preemption but on the state constitutional right to bear arms. The preemption statute was substantially strengthened in 1985 (1985 c 428), after that opinion, to occupy the entire field and to permit only specifically authorized local ordinances. Under the current statute, a local criminal ordinance regulating firearm possession while intoxicated would likely be preempted unless specifically authorized by state law. Anyone relying on the older opinion should treat it as dated on the preemption point. The safer assumption is that the controlling rules on carrying concealed while under the influence are the state forfeiture statute and the general criminal statutes described above, not a patchwork of local ordinances.
Unlawful drug users (18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3)). Federal law makes it unlawful for any person "who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance" to possess firearms or ammunition. This is a status-based prohibition on possession, separate from any question of being intoxicated at a given moment. The Washington State Patrol applies this to, among others, a person convicted of using or possessing a controlled substance within the past year, a person with multiple recent arrests for controlled substance use or possession, or a person shown by a recent drug test to use a controlled substance unlawfully.
LEOSA (18 U.S.C. 926B and 926C). Qualified active and retired law enforcement officers who carry under the federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act must meet the statute's conditions, which include that the officer "is not under the influence of alcohol or another intoxicating or hallucinatory drug or substance." LEOSA is a federal authority for qualifying officers, not a state exemption, and it does not protect an officer who is impaired.
Washington has legalized recreational cannabis, but firearm consequences remain because of federal law.
This overview is general information, not legal advice. Statutes and their subsection numbering change. Verify the current text of any cited statute and consult a Washington attorney for advice on a specific situation.
View this topic on its own page: Carrying a Firearm Under the Influence in Washington
Washington regulates which firearms and accessories a person may make, sell, buy, and possess, who is barred from possessing firearms at all, and how lawful transfers must be processed. These rules apply on top of the licensing rules for carrying a concealed pistol. The definitions that drive most of these restrictions are set out in RCW 9.41.010, and the criminal prohibitions and penalties are spread across Chapter 9.41 RCW.
Washington enacted its assault weapon law through House Bill 1240 (2023 c 162). The operative ban is RCW 9.41.390, and it took effect immediately on April 25, 2023.
RCW 9.41.390(1) makes it unlawful to manufacture, import, distribute, sell, or offer for sale any assault weapon, except for the narrow situations listed in the statute. The law does not ban simple possession. A person who lawfully owned an assault weapon before the effective date may keep it.
Limited exceptions in RCW 9.41.390(2) include sales to the United States or Washington armed forces or to law enforcement agencies, certain dealer transactions involving out-of-state buyers, the out-of-state sale of a licensed dealer's existing stock acquired before January 1, 2023 (only during the 90 days after April 25, 2023), and receipt of an assault weapon by operation of law on the death of the former lawful owner.
A violation of RCW 9.41.390 is a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.390(4)). A violation is also treated as an unfair or deceptive act under the Consumer Protection Act, Chapter 19.86 RCW (RCW 9.41.395).
Under RCW 9.41.010(2)(a), "assault weapon" includes:
RCW 9.41.010(2)(c) excludes from the definition: antique firearms, any firearm made permanently inoperable, and any firearm that is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action.
A "large capacity magazine" is an ammunition feeding device that can accept more than 10 rounds, plus any conversion kit, part, or combination of parts from which such a device can be assembled if held by the same person (RCW 9.41.010(25)). The definition carves out certain fixed tubular .22 rimfire devices and tubular magazines that are part of certain lever action firearms.
RCW 9.41.370(1) makes it unlawful to manufacture, import, distribute, sell, or offer for sale any large capacity magazine, except for the limited military and law enforcement supply situations in RCW 9.41.370(2). As with the assault weapon law, this is a supply-side restriction. RCW 9.41.370 does not by its terms criminalize simple possession of a magazine a person already owns. A person who violates RCW 9.41.370 is guilty of a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.370(3)).
The large capacity magazine restriction was challenged in court. The Washington Supreme Court upheld the law, and the restriction remains in effect statewide. Anyone planning a purchase should treat over-10-round magazines as unavailable for retail sale inside Washington.
RCW 9.41.190(1) makes it unlawful to manufacture, own, buy, sell, loan, furnish, transport, or possess any machine gun, bump-fire stock, undetectable firearm, short-barreled shotgun, or short-barreled rifle, or any part designed solely for use in those weapons. It is also unlawful to assemble or repair any of them. A violation is a class C felony (RCW 9.41.190(5)).
There is an important distinction for short-barreled rifles. RCW 9.41.190(2) provides that owning, buying, selling, transporting, or possessing a short-barreled rifle is not unlawful if the person is in compliance with applicable federal law. In practice that means a short-barreled rifle registered under the National Firearms Act and possessed in compliance with federal requirements is allowed under state law. Machine guns and short-barreled shotguns do not get the same general exception. State law continues to bar them except for narrow licensed-manufacturer and pre-July 1, 1994 affirmative-defense situations described in RCW 9.41.190(3) and (4).
A "short-barreled rifle" is a rifle with a barrel under 16 inches, or any weapon made from a rifle with an overall length under 26 inches. A "short-barreled shotgun" is a shotgun with a barrel under 18 inches, or any weapon made from a shotgun with an overall length under 26 inches (RCW 9.41.010).
Items that are illegally held are declared contraband and are subject to seizure (RCW 9.41.220).
For the federal items that remain lawful in Washington when federally compliant, such as a short-barreled rifle, the federal transfer and making tax under the National Firearms Act applies. Under Public Law 119-21, the tax is $200 for a machine gun or destructive device and $0 for other National Firearms Act items, effective for calendar quarters beginning more than 90 days after July 4, 2025, with the first qualifying quarter starting January 1, 2026. The federal change does not lift Washington's separate state ban on machine guns and short-barreled shotguns.
RCW 9.41.040 lists who may not possess a firearm in Washington and grades the offense:
These state prohibitions exist alongside the federal prohibited-person categories in 18 U.S.C. 922(g), which include felons, persons subject to certain domestic violence restraining orders, persons convicted of misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence, and others. A person who is barred federally is barred regardless of state status. Note that being under indictment is addressed by 18 U.S.C. 922(n), not 922(g).
A person prohibited under RCW 9.41.040 may petition a superior court to restore the right to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.041, subject to several limits.
A state court order restores only the state right to possess a firearm. It does not by itself remove any separate federal disability, and it is not a license. Restoration of state rights does not guarantee that a concealed pistol license will be issued.
RCW 9.41.047 governs firearm prohibitions tied to mental health commitments and certain criminal findings. At the time a person is committed for treatment under RCW 71.05.240, RCW 71.05.320, RCW 71.34.740, RCW 71.34.750, or Chapter 10.77 RCW, or is found not guilty by reason of insanity, the court must order surrender of firearms and any concealed pistol license and must notify the person that possession is unlawful until the right is restored.
A person prohibited on these grounds may, on discharge, petition the superior court for restoration under RCW 9.41.047(3). The petitioner generally must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that court-ordered treatment is complete, that the underlying condition has been successfully managed, that the person no longer presents a substantial danger, that symptoms are not reasonably likely to recur, and that no extreme risk protection order is in effect. A person found not guilty by reason of insanity faces additional waiting and eligibility requirements.
Washington requires a background check for nearly all firearm sales and transfers, including private sales, gun show sales, and online sales (RCW 9.41.113(1)). When neither party is a licensed dealer, the parties must process the transfer through a licensed dealer, who runs the background check as if selling from inventory (RCW 9.41.113(3)).
RCW 9.41.113(4) lists exceptions, including bona fide gifts or loans between certain immediate family members, transfers of antique firearms, short-term transfers to prevent imminent harm, transfers to prevent suicide, certain transfers at an authorized shooting range or organized competition, and certain transfers by operation of law on the death of an owner.
A knowing violation of RCW 9.41.113 is a gross misdemeanor, and a repeat violation is a class C felony (RCW 9.41.115). Each firearm transferred without the required check is a separate offense.
House Bill 1143 (2023 c 161), effective January 1, 2024, added requirements that a dealer must satisfy before delivering any firearm to a purchaser. Under RCW 9.41.090(1), a dealer may not deliver a firearm until:
RCW 9.41.092 sets a waiting period: the dealer may not deliver the firearm until 10 business days have elapsed from the date the dealer requested the background check.
Washington allows family, household members, and law enforcement to seek an extreme risk protection order against a person who poses a significant danger of harming themselves or others with a firearm. These orders are now part of the unified civil protection order statute, Chapter 7.105 RCW (for example, the temporary extreme risk protection order provisions in RCW 7.105.330). An extreme risk protection order can require the person to surrender firearms and prohibits the person from possessing or buying firearms while the order is in effect.
RCW 9.41.350 lets a person voluntarily waive their own firearm rights by filing a form with the clerk of the court. Once accepted, the waiver is entered into the national background check system, and possession or purchase of a firearm becomes unlawful for that person under RCW 9.41.040(7). The person may file a revocation no sooner than seven calendar days after filing the waiver. Records of a voluntary waiver are confidential and may not be used against the person in a legal proceeding.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.010 | Definitions (assault weapon, large capacity magazine, short-barreled rifle and shotgun) |
| RCW 9.41.040 | Unlawful possession of firearms and offense grades |
| RCW 9.41.041 | Restoration of the right to possess a firearm |
| RCW 9.41.047 | Mental health prohibitions and restoration |
| RCW 9.41.090 | Dealer delivery requirements (safety training, eligibility) |
| RCW 9.41.092 | 10 business day waiting period |
| RCW 9.41.1132 | Firearm safety training program standards |
| RCW 9.41.113 | Universal background check for sales and transfers |
| RCW 9.41.115 | Penalty for background check violations |
| RCW 9.41.190 | Machine guns, bump-fire stocks, short-barreled weapons (class C felony) |
| RCW 9.41.220 | Unlawful firearms declared contraband |
| RCW 9.41.350 | Voluntary waiver of firearm rights |
| RCW 9.41.370 | Large capacity magazine restriction (gross misdemeanor) |
| RCW 9.41.390 | Assault weapon manufacture, import, distribution, and sale ban (gross misdemeanor) |
| RCW 9.41.395 | Assault weapon Consumer Protection Act provision |
| Chapter 7.105 RCW | Extreme risk protection orders |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(g) | Federal prohibited persons |
| Public Law 119-21 | Federal National Firearms Act tax change |
This page explains the law in general terms and is not legal advice. Firearm restrictions change frequently in Washington and several provisions are subject to ongoing litigation. Confirm the current statute text and consult a Washington attorney before acting.
View this topic on its own page: Washington Weapon and Firearm Restrictions
Washington regulates several categories of National Firearms Act (NFA) items more strictly than federal law. The controlling state statute is RCW 9.41.190 (Unlawful firearms - Exceptions), which flatly bans machine guns, bump-fire stocks, short-barreled shotguns, undetectable firearms, and certain untraceable firearms, while allowing short-barreled rifles only when the owner is in compliance with federal law. Federal NFA rules under 26 U.S.C. Chapter 53 and 27 CFR Part 479 still apply on top of state law. Where state law bans an item outright, federal registration does not make it lawful to possess in Washington.
This page covers the firearms commonly described as NFA or "Title II" items. Before relying on it, confirm the current statute text, because RCW 9.41.190 and the definitions in RCW 9.41.010 carry noted 2026 amendments (see the Pending Changes section below).
Under RCW 9.41.190(1), it is unlawful for any person to manufacture, own, buy, sell, loan, furnish, transport, or have in possession or under control any of the following:
The same statute also makes it unlawful to manufacture, own, buy, sell, transport, or possess any part designed and intended solely and exclusively for use in one of these items or for converting a weapon into one (RCW 9.41.190(1)(b)), and to assemble or repair any such item (RCW 9.41.190(1)(c)).
Separately, RCW 9.41.190(1)(d) makes it unlawful to manufacture, cause to be manufactured, assemble, or cause to be assembled an untraceable firearm with the intent to sell it. An "untraceable firearm" is one manufactured after July 1, 2019, that is not an antique and cannot be traced by a serial number affixed under federal law (RCW 9.41.010(52)).
Penalty: Any violation of RCW 9.41.190 is a class C felony (RCW 9.41.190(5)).
Items in these categories that are illegally held or possessed are declared contraband and must be seized by any peace officer or member of the armed forces of the United States or of Washington wherever and whenever found (RCW 9.41.220). (Note: this is RCW 9.41.220, the correct contraband section.)
Short-barreled rifles are treated differently from short-barreled shotguns. A short-barreled rifle is a rifle with one or more barrels less than 16 inches in length, or any weapon made from a rifle by modification with an overall length of less than 26 inches (RCW 9.41.010(44)).
RCW 9.41.190(2) provides that it is not unlawful for a person to manufacture, own, buy, sell, loan, furnish, transport, assemble, repair, or possess a short-barreled rifle, or any part designed solely for a short-barreled rifle, "if the person is in compliance with applicable federal law."
In practice this means a short-barreled rifle is lawful in Washington only if the owner has completed the federal NFA process: ATF Form 1 (making) or Form 4 (transfer), the tax payment, the background check, and chief law enforcement officer notification. A short-barreled rifle that is not federally registered is unlawful under RCW 9.41.190(1).
Peace officers and military (RCW 9.41.190(3)(a)): The prohibition does not apply to a peace officer in the discharge of official duty or traveling to or from official duty, or to an officer or member of the armed forces of the United States or of Washington in the discharge of, or traveling to or from, official duty.
Licensed manufacturers (RCW 9.41.190(3)(b)): The prohibition does not apply to a person (or an employee who has undergone fingerprinting and a background check) who is exempt from or licensed under federal law and engaged in producing, manufacturing, repairing, or testing machine guns, bump-fire stocks, short-barreled shotguns, or short-barreled rifles for use or purchase by the U.S. armed forces, for federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement agencies, or for exportation in compliance with federal law.
Grandfathered machine guns and short-barreled shotguns (RCW 9.41.190(4)): It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under this section that the machine gun or short-barreled shotgun was acquired prior to July 1, 1994, and is possessed in compliance with federal law. This affirmative defense applies only to machine guns and short-barreled shotguns. It does not extend to bump-fire stocks or undetectable firearms.
Suppressors are regulated as NFA items under federal law (defined at 26 U.S.C. 5845(a)) but are not listed among the items prohibited by RCW 9.41.190. A Washington resident may lawfully possess a suppressor if it is properly registered under the federal NFA.
One state-law caveat: a sound suppressor or silencer is one of the listed features in Washington's "assault weapon" definition. A semiautomatic, center-fire rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has a sound suppressor or silencer (or a threaded barrel designed to attach one), and a semiautomatic pistol with a threaded barrel capable of accepting a silencer, fall within the assault weapon definition at RCW 9.41.010(2)(a) and are therefore subject to the manufacture, import, distribution, and sale ban in RCW 9.41.390 (discussed below). This applies to the rifle or pistol configured with those features, not to a stand-alone suppressor.
Destructive devices (explosives, incendiaries, poison-gas devices, and firearms with a bore diameter over one-half inch) and "any other weapons" (AOW) are not separately listed in RCW 9.41.190. They are governed by federal NFA rules under 26 U.S.C. Chapter 53 and 27 CFR Part 479. Other Washington statutes outside chapter 9.41 RCW, including those covering explosives, may apply to specific destructive devices. Confirm the applicable provisions before acquiring or transporting such an item.
Under RCW 9.41.225, it is unlawful, in the commission or furtherance of a felony other than a violation of RCW 9.41.190 itself, to discharge a machine gun, to menace or threaten another person with a machine gun, or to do the same with a firearm containing a bump-fire stock. A violation is punished as a class A felony under chapter 9A.20 RCW (RCW 9.41.225(3)). (Note: this offense is RCW 9.41.225, not 9.41.193.)
The federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) administers the NFA. For NFA items that are lawful in Washington (most commonly a federally registered short-barreled rifle, or a suppressor), the standard federal steps apply:
NFA tax change: Under Public Law 119-21, the federal making and transfer tax is $200 for a machine gun or destructive device and $0 for all other NFA firearms (including short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and suppressors). This change applies to calendar quarters beginning more than 90 days after July 4, 2025, with the first qualifying quarter starting January 1, 2026. ATF general web pages may still display the older $200 figure for all items; the statutory change is the controlling authority.
Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) notification (per Washington Attorney General guidance): Each responsible person must notify the CLEO with jurisdiction where the person is located of a proposed making or acquisition. If you live within city limits, send the NFA form to your city police department. If you live outside city limits, send it to your county sheriff's office. Do not send NFA forms to the Washington Attorney General's Office; that office will return them to you for submission to the correct agency.
Interstate transport of registered NFA weapons: A non-licensee generally must obtain ATF approval before transporting a machine gun, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or destructive device across state lines, consistent with 18 U.S.C. 922(a)(4). ATF Form 5320.20 is used to request that approval.
Assault weapons (RCW 9.41.390): Washington prohibits manufacturing, importing, distributing, selling, or offering for sale any defined assault weapon. The ban took effect April 25, 2023 (2023 c 162, enacting Substitute House Bill 1240). It is a prospective sale-and-supply ban: existing lawful owners may keep assault weapons they already own, and the statute carries narrow exceptions for sales to the military or law enforcement, transfers to nonresidents through a licensed dealer, and receipt by operation of law on the death of the prior owner (RCW 9.41.390(2)). A violation is a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.390(4)), and the conduct is also an unfair or deceptive act under the Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW (RCW 9.41.395).
Large capacity magazines (RCW 9.41.370): Washington prohibits manufacturing, importing, distributing, selling, or offering for sale any magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds (a "large capacity magazine" as defined in RCW 9.41.010(25)). This is a ban on supply and sale, not on simple possession. A violation is a gross misdemeanor punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW (RCW 9.41.370(3)). Facilitating the online sale, distribution, or transfer of a large capacity magazine is separately an unfair or deceptive act under the Consumer Protection Act (RCW 9.41.375). The magazine restriction has been the subject of ongoing litigation (including Gator's Custom Guns v. Ferguson); confirm its current enforcement status before relying on it.
The displayed text of RCW 9.41.190 and of the definitions in RCW 9.41.010 carry noted 2026 amendments on the official RCW site (referencing 2025-26 session laws 2320-S.SL and 2632.SL). Because subsection numbering and item definitions can shift when these amendments take effect, verify the current statute text on app.leg.wa.gov before acting on any specific subsection cite in this guide.
| Item | Federal status | Washington status |
|---|---|---|
| Machine guns | Restricted (registered; new civilian transfers closed after 1986) | Banned under RCW 9.41.190; affirmative defense if acquired before July 1, 1994, and federally compliant |
| Short-barreled rifles | NFA registration required | Lawful if in compliance with federal law (RCW 9.41.190(2)) |
| Short-barreled shotguns | NFA registration required | Banned under RCW 9.41.190; affirmative defense if acquired before July 1, 1994, and federally compliant |
| Suppressors / silencers | NFA registration required | Lawful with federal NFA registration; no separate state ban (but counts as an assault-weapon feature) |
| Bump-fire stocks | Restricted under federal rule | Banned under RCW 9.41.190 (no affirmative defense) |
| Undetectable firearms | Prohibited federally | Banned under RCW 9.41.190 |
| Destructive devices | NFA registration required | No separate listing in RCW 9.41.190; federal NFA and other state statutes may apply |
| Any other weapons (AOW) | NFA registration required | No separate listing in RCW 9.41.190; federal NFA applies |
View this topic on its own page: NFA Items in Washington State
Washington's "red flag" law lets a court temporarily restrict a person's access to firearms through an Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO). The framework began with Initiative 1491 in 2016 (formerly chapter 7.94 RCW) and was recodified into the unified civil protection order statute, chapter 7.105 RCW, effective July 1, 2022 (2021 c 215). An ERPO is a civil order. It does not require a criminal charge or conviction, and it is separate from criminal no-contact orders.
An ERPO is available when a respondent poses a significant danger of causing personal injury to self or others by having in the respondent's custody or control, purchasing, possessing, accessing, receiving, or attempting to purchase or receive, a firearm (RCW 7.105.100(1)(e); RCW 7.105.225(1)(e)). Unlike other protection orders, an ERPO addresses firearm access only. It does not order the respondent to stay away from, or stop contacting, a specific person. For that kind of personal protection, a separate protection order (such as a domestic violence protection order) must be sought.
Under RCW 7.105.100(1)(e), a petition for an extreme risk protection order may be filed by:
The petition must allege that the respondent poses a significant danger as described above, and must identify the information the petitioner can provide about the respondent's firearms, including the number, types, and locations of any firearms the petitioner believes are in the respondent's current ownership, possession, custody, access, or control (RCW 7.105.100(1)(e)).
Upon issuing an ERPO, including a temporary order, the court orders the respondent to surrender all firearms in the respondent's custody, control, or possession, and any concealed pistol license (CPL) issued under RCW 9.41.070, to the local law enforcement agency. For orders other than ex parte temporary orders, the court also directs law enforcement to revoke any CPL issued to the respondent (RCW 7.105.340(1)).
While the order is in effect, the respondent may not have in the respondent's custody or control, access, possess, purchase, receive, or attempt to purchase or receive, a firearm or a concealed pistol license (RCW 7.105.330(3)(g)). The respondent also cannot obtain a new CPL during that period.
The petition is filed under penalty of perjury and must state the specific facts and circumstances for which relief is sought (RCW 7.105.105(3)). It must allege that the respondent poses a significant danger of personal injury through firearm access and identify the respondent's known firearms (RCW 7.105.100(1)(e)). A petitioner may file on their own or with an attorney.
If the court finds reasonable cause to believe the respondent poses a significant danger of causing personal injury to self or others in the near future through firearm access, it shall issue a temporary extreme risk protection order (RCW 7.105.330(2)). A temporary ERPO:
If the court declines to issue a temporary ERPO, it must state the particular reasons for the denial (RCW 7.105.330(6)).
A full hearing is held before the temporary order expires. At an ERPO hearing the court may examine the petitioner, respondent, and witnesses under oath, or consider their sworn declarations, and shall ensure a reasonable search of criminal history and civil protection order records (RCW 7.105.215(1)). In deciding whether grounds exist, the court may consider any relevant evidence, including recent acts or threats of violence, a pattern of acts or threats within the past 12 months, violation of a prior protection order, unlawful or reckless use or display of a firearm, abuse of controlled substances or alcohol, and recent acquisition of firearms (RCW 7.105.215(3)).
The court shall issue a full ERPO if it finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the respondent poses a significant danger of causing personal injury to self or others through firearm access (RCW 7.105.225(1)(e)). A full ERPO has a duration of one year (RCW 7.105.330(3)(g); RCW 7.105.340(6)).
There is no cost to file for an ERPO. Courts may not charge a petitioner service-of-process fees, and no filing fee applies to protection order petitions under chapter 7.105 RCW other than antiharassment petitions (RCW 7.105.105(9)).
When an ERPO is issued, the law enforcement officer serving it shall request that the respondent immediately surrender all firearms in the respondent's custody, control, or possession, and any CPL, and may conduct any search permitted by law. The timing of surrender works as follows (RCW 7.105.340(2)):
At surrender, the officer issues a receipt identifying all surrendered firearms and provides a copy to the respondent. Within 72 hours after service of the order, the serving officer files the original receipt with the court (RCW 7.105.340(3)).
Upon issuance of a one-year ERPO, the court sets a compliance review hearing and requires the respondent to appear not later than three judicial days from issuance to show that all firearms and any CPL have been surrendered. The hearing may be waived only on a satisfactory showing, supported by the record, that the respondent has timely and completely surrendered (RCW 7.105.340(6)).
If the petitioner or a law enforcement officer swears that the respondent failed to surrender all firearms, the court determines whether probable cause exists; if it does, the court shall issue a search warrant describing the firearms and authorizing their seizure (RCW 7.105.340(4); see also RCW 9.41.801(4)). Courts also develop procedures to verify timely and complete compliance with surrender orders, including review of Department of Licensing and Washington State Patrol firearm records (RCW 9.41.801(6)).
The renewal rules are set by RCW 7.105.410:
Termination is governed by RCW 7.105.505, not the renewal statute:
Penalties tied directly to an ERPO are set by RCW 7.105.460:
Two related consequences also apply. First, failing to comply with the surrender requirements can result in an arrest warrant and contempt proceedings under chapter 7.21 RCW (RCW 7.105.340(7)). Second, a prior violation of an order to surrender and prohibit weapons or of an extreme risk protection order is a predicate that makes any later firearm possession the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree, a class C felony (RCW 9.41.040(2)(a)(i)(F); RCW 9.41.040(2)(b)).
An ERPO has direct consequences for CPL holders:
An ERPO is not the only chapter 7.105 order that can result in firearm surrender and CPL revocation. Under RCW 9.41.800, a court entering a protection order, restraining order, or no-contact order shall, upon a showing by a preponderance of the evidence that a party used, displayed, or threatened to use a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a felony, or is ineligible to possess firearms under RCW 9.41.040, require surrender of all firearms and any CPL, prohibit future possession, and (other than for unheard ex parte orders) direct revocation of the CPL.
| Order Type | Abbreviation | Firearm Surrender |
|---|---|---|
| Extreme Risk Protection Order | ERPO | Mandatory; this is the order's primary purpose |
| Domestic Violence Protection Order | DVPO | Required on the showing in RCW 9.41.800 |
| Sexual Assault Protection Order | SAPO | Required on the showing in RCW 9.41.800 |
| Stalking Protection Order | SPO | Required on the showing in RCW 9.41.800 |
| Antiharassment Protection Order | AHPO | Required on the showing in RCW 9.41.800 |
| Vulnerable Adult Protection Order | VAPO | Required on the showing in RCW 9.41.800 |
Note that violating the restraint provisions of a domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, or vulnerable adult protection order is a separate gross misdemeanor (a class C felony in the circumstances described in RCW 7.105.450(4) and (5)). ERPO-specific penalties are governed by RCW 7.105.460, described above.
To help courts ensure compliance with an order to surrender and prohibit weapons or an extreme risk protection order, the Department of Licensing makes the following information available to prosecuting attorneys' offices, city attorneys' offices, public defender agency staff, probation services personnel, and court judicial officers and staff (RCW 9.41.815):
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| RCW 7.105.100 | Types of petitions; who may petition for an ERPO |
| RCW 7.105.105 | Filing provisions; no filing fee for ERPO petitions |
| RCW 7.105.215 | ERPO hearings; evidence the court may consider |
| RCW 7.105.225 | Standard for granting (or denying) a protection order |
| RCW 7.105.330 | Temporary extreme risk protection orders |
| RCW 7.105.340 | Surrender of firearms under an ERPO; compliance |
| RCW 7.105.410 | Renewal of extreme risk protection orders |
| RCW 7.105.460 | Enforcement and penalties for ERPO violations and false petitions |
| RCW 7.105.505 | Termination of extreme risk protection orders |
| RCW 9.41.040 | Unlawful possession of a firearm |
| RCW 9.41.800 | Surrender of weapons or licenses; future possession |
| RCW 9.41.801 | Surrender of weapons or licenses; ensuring compliance |
| RCW 9.41.815 | Information sharing for compliance |
View this topic on its own page: Washington Red Flag Law: Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPO)
Washington maintains one of the broadest firearms preemption statutes in the country, codified at RCW 9.41.290. The statute limits the ability of cities, counties, towns, and other municipalities to enact their own firearms regulations and establishes the state legislature as the controlling authority over nearly all aspects of firearms law. The result for a Concealed Pistol License (CPL) holder is that the rules for carrying are set at the state level and are the same statewide, except where the legislature has specifically authorized local action.
RCW 9.41.290 (State preemption) provides:
The state of Washington hereby fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation within the boundaries of the state, including the registration, licensing, possession, purchase, sale, acquisition, transfer, discharge, and transportation of firearms, or any other element relating to firearms or parts thereof, including ammunition and reloader components. Cities, towns, and counties or other municipalities may enact only those laws and ordinances relating to firearms that are specifically authorized by state law, as in RCW 9.41.300, and are consistent with this chapter. Such local ordinances shall have the same penalty as provided for by state law. Local laws and ordinances that are inconsistent with, more restrictive than, or exceed the requirements of state law shall not be enacted and are preempted and repealed, regardless of the nature of the code, charter, or home rule status of such city, town, county, or municipality.
Source: 1994 sp.s. c 7 s 428; 1985 c 428 s 1; 1983 c 232 s 12.
Washington's preemption framework operates against two state constitutional provisions:
RCW 9.41.290 uses its field-preemption language to override municipal home rule authority over firearms. Where the state has spoken, local police power over firearms ceases.
The preemption is both express and broad:
Under RCW 9.41.110, every city, town, and political subdivision is barred from creating its own purchase-permit scheme. The statute provides that, except as otherwise provided in chapter 9.41 RCW, every city, town, and political subdivision "is prohibited from requiring the purchaser to secure a permit to purchase or from requiring the dealer to secure an individual permit for each sale." A local government cannot layer its own purchase-permit on top of state law.
Despite the broad preemption, RCW 9.41.300 authorizes a few specific areas of local firearms regulation. These are the exceptions, and they are read narrowly.
Cities, towns, counties, and other municipalities may restrict the discharge of firearms in any portion of their jurisdiction "where there is a reasonable likelihood that humans, domestic animals, or property will be jeopardized." Such ordinances may not abridge the Article I, section 24 right to bear arms in defense of self or others. Most cities have ordinances of this kind, and they are valid because state law authorizes them.
A city, town, county, or other municipality may restrict the possession of firearms in any stadium or convention center it operates, with two carve-outs. The restriction does not apply to:
In other words, a CPL holder's concealed pistol is protected even where a municipality otherwise restricts firearms in its stadium or convention center.
Cities, towns, and counties may restrict the areas in which firearms may be sold, but a firearms business may not be treated more restrictively than other businesses in the same zone, and any required cessation period may not be shorter than for other businesses (RCW 9.41.300(4)(a)). They may also restrict the location of a firearms business to not less than 500 feet from primary or secondary school grounds where the business has a storefront, regular business hours, and visible signage advertising firearms for sale, with grandfathering for existing businesses (RCW 9.41.300(4)(b)).
Local governments retain authority over the manner in which firearms forfeited to them are disposed of.
Violations of local ordinances adopted under RCW 9.41.300(3) must carry the same penalty as provided by state law (RCW 9.41.300(5)).
Because preemption pushes the place-restriction decision up to the state, the controlling list of off-limits locations is in state law, not local ordinance. Under RCW 9.41.300(1), it is unlawful to knowingly possess or knowingly have under your control a weapon (including a firearm) in:
The libraries, zoos and aquariums, and transit locations in (f), (g), and (h) were added by the legislature in 2024 (2024 c 285 s 1). Any person who violates RCW 9.41.300(1) is guilty of a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.300(16)).
The exemptions are not uniform across the list, so read them carefully:
Separate from the place list, RCW 9.41.300(2) makes it unlawful to knowingly open carry a firearm or other weapon at a permitted demonstration, or within 250 feet of the perimeter of a permitted demonstration after a law enforcement officer has advised the person and directed them to leave. This does not apply on private property owned or leased by the person, and it does not apply to the lawful concealed carry of a firearm by a person who holds a valid CPL (RCW 9.41.300(2)(e)). A violation is a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.300(16)).
Several firearms place restrictions sit outside RCW 9.41.300 in their own statutes, and they too are state law rather than local ordinance:
RCW 9.41.305, first enacted in 2021 (2021 c 261 s 2) and amended in 2022 and 2023 (2022 c 106 s 2; 2023 c 470 s 3006), prohibits the open carry of a firearm or other weapon (as defined in RCW 9.41.300(1)(b)) at:
Key points for carriers:
Seattle enacted an ordinance imposing a tax on each firearm and on rounds of ammunition sold within the city, dedicating the revenue to gun violence research and prevention. The Washington Supreme Court held that RCW 9.41.290 preempts the local regulation of firearms but does not preempt taxation, and that the ordinance was a valid revenue measure authorized by Seattle's taxing authority under RCW 35.22.280(32). The decision drew a careful line: a municipality may tax firearms sales even though it may not regulate firearms.
The Washington Supreme Court held that RCW 9.41.290 does not preempt internal employment rules limiting on-duty possession of firearms by public employees. The preemption statute targets regulatory firearms laws and ordinances directed at the general public, not a government employer's workplace rules for its own employees.
The Washington Supreme Court held that a city acting in a proprietary capacity, as the owner leasing its convention center for a gun show, may impose conditions on firearms sales through a use permit. The conditions related to private use of the city's property and were not laws of general application to the public.
The Washington Court of Appeals struck down Seattle's ban on firearms in public parks as preempted by RCW 9.41.290. Seattle was acting as a general regulator of the public, not as an employer or proprietary property owner, and RCW 9.41.300 does not list parks among the places where local governments may restrict firearms.
The Court of Appeals upheld a Seattle ordinance prohibiting the discharge of firearms within city limits as authorized by the discharge exception now found in RCW 9.41.300(3)(a). The court's broad reading of the older "Notwithstanding RCW 9.41.290" language prompted the 1994 legislature to tighten the statute and narrow local authority.
The Washington Attorney General has opined that RCW 9.41.290 preempts a city from enacting a general ban on possession of firearms on city property or in city-owned facilities, reasoning that the legislature carefully enumerated the specific places where possession is prohibited and did not authorize a general municipal ban (AGO 2008 No. 8).
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.290 | State preemption of firearms regulation |
| RCW 9.41.300 | Weapons prohibited in certain places; local laws and ordinances; exceptions; penalty |
| RCW 9.41.300(1) | State-level prohibited places (jails, courts, mental health, bars, airport, libraries, zoos/aquariums, transit) |
| RCW 9.41.300(2) | Open carry prohibited at permitted demonstrations |
| RCW 9.41.300(3) | Authorized local discharge and stadium/convention center restrictions |
| RCW 9.41.305 | Open carry prohibited on state capitol grounds and at municipal governing body meetings |
| RCW 9.41.070 | Concealed Pistol License (application, issuance, renewal) |
| RCW 9.41.060 | Exceptions to the license requirement |
| RCW 9.41.098 | Forfeiture of firearms; disposition |
| RCW 9.41.110 | Dealer licenses; local purchase permits prohibited |
| RCW 9.41.280 | Possessing dangerous weapons on school facilities |
| RCW 9.41.282 | Possessing dangerous weapons on child care premises |
| RCW 9.41.284 | Possessing dangerous weapons at voting facilities |
| RCW 35.22.280(32) | First-class city taxing authority (basis for firearms tax in Watson) |
| Wash. Const. Art. XI, Sec. 11 | Home rule; local police power |
| Wash. Const. Art. I, Sec. 24 | Right to bear arms |
View this topic on its own page: Washington State Preemption of Firearms Laws
Washington recognizes only a short list of other states' concealed pistol licenses, and the test turns on the issuing state's law rather than on your own record. Under RCW 9.41.073, an out-of-state license lets you carry concealed in Washington only if the state that issued it recognizes Washington licenses in return, does not license anyone under 21, and requires fingerprint-based background checks of criminal and mental health history for every applicant. Miss one condition and the license does nothing here.
The attorney general keeps the roster. On the version of that roster last updated on July 10, 2026, ten states qualified. Check the current version at atg.wa.gov before you travel.
RCW 9.41.073(1)(a) authorizes "a person licensed to carry a pistol in a state the laws of which recognize and give effect in that state to a concealed pistol license issued under the laws of the state of Washington" to carry a concealed pistol in Washington if two further conditions hold:
Those two conditions and the mutual recognition in the quoted text are all about the other state. The statute asks what the issuing state requires of everyone, not whether you personally were fingerprinted or how old you are.
Two limits sit in RCW 9.41.073(1)(b). Recognition "applies to a license holder from another state only while the license holder is not a resident of this state," and the holder "must carry the handgun in compliance with the laws of this state." Once you become a Washington resident, the out-of-state license stops working and you need a Washington concealed pistol license.
RCW 9.41.073(2) gives the attorney general the job of publishing the roster: the attorney general "shall periodically publish a list of states" that recognize a Washington license and "meet the requirements of subsection (1)(a)(i) and (ii) of this section." The attorney general's office says the statute "confers no discretion on the Attorney General or any other Washington entity to ignore or waive any of its requirements."
RCW 9.41.073(1)(a)(i) states its age condition about the licensing state as a whole. The attorney general's July 10, 2026 list does not recognize every permit a listed state issues. It names permit types rather than states alone, and for Montana, South Dakota and Utah it names a class it will not recognize because of the age of the people that class is issued to.
| State (list of July 10, 2026) | Qualification stated on the list |
|---|---|
| Idaho | Enhanced Permit only |
| Kansas | Standard License only |
| Louisiana | No qualification stated |
| Michigan | No qualification on the recognized table. The list's second table adds that Michigan does not recognize nonresident concealed pistol licenses issued by Washington |
| Montana | Enhanced Permit only. Temporarily restricted enhanced permits issued to 18 to 20 year olds are not recognized |
| North Carolina | No qualification stated |
| North Dakota | Class 1 permits only |
| Ohio | No qualification stated |
| South Dakota | Unrestricted Enhanced Permit and Gold permits only. Restricted Enhanced Permits issued to 18 to 20 year olds and Regular Concealed Carry permits are not recognized |
| Utah | Utah Provisional Concealed Firearm Permit is not recognized, because that permit is issued to people under 21 |
Carrying the wrong class of permit from a listed state leaves you exactly where a holder from an unlisted state stands.
The same document carries a second table covering the other 49 states and the District of Columbia, with a stated reason for each. Forty of those 50 entries are marked as having no reciprocity with Washington. Grouping the reasons the attorney general gave on July 10, 2026:
Several entries appear in more than one group. Vermont is the one remaining entry, and the reason given there is that Vermont does not have a concealed weapons law and does not issue licenses.
Recognition under RCW 9.41.073 answers one question: whether you may carry concealed at all. It does not import your home state's carry rules, and it does not reach every Washington exemption.
Carrying a concealed pistol without a license Washington accepts is a misdemeanor. RCW 9.41.050(1)(a) prohibits it outside your place of abode or fixed place of business, and RCW 9.41.810 makes any violation of chapter 9.41 RCW a misdemeanor unless the chapter says otherwise. Your realistic options:
No training course is a condition of a Washington concealed pistol license today. RCW 9.41.070(1) provides that the applicant's constitutional right to bear arms "shall not be denied" unless one of seven listed grounds applies, and every one of them is a disqualifier rather than a training or testing condition. A live-fire training condition is scheduled to join that list on May 1, 2027 under an amended RCW 9.41.070 and RCW 43.43.575. It is not in effect now.
Washington law does not govern what happens to your license once you leave. RCW 9.41.073 speaks only to carrying in Washington. Where you are going decides, so read that state's rules on recognition, locations, and any duty to inform before you cross the line.
The attorney general's page adds that "some states may recognize a Washington concealed pistol license, even though Washington doesn't recognize theirs." Recognition is not always symmetrical even among the ten, as the Michigan row above shows.
Washington's own training gap shows up in the reasons other states give. Five of the entries on that same list say Washington does not mandate the training the other state requires for reciprocity. Whether the live-fire requirement scheduled for May 1, 2027 changes any of those positions is not something the current list addresses.
The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act runs independently of state reciprocity. 18 U.S.C. 926B lets a qualified law enforcement officer carrying the photographic identification issued by the employing agency carry a concealed firearm notwithstanding state law, and 18 U.S.C. 926C does the same for a qualified retired officer carrying the identification described in its subsection (d). Both sections expressly leave in place state laws that let private property owners restrict concealed firearms and state laws restricting firearms on state or local government property, installations, buildings, bases, and parks.
Washington's implementation for retirees is RCW 36.28A.090, which exists "to establish a process for issuing firearms certificates to residents of Washington who are otherwise qualified retired law enforcement officers" under the federal act. The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs develops the model certificate. A law enforcement agency or a certified firearms training provider must acknowledge that the bearer met the criminal justice training commission's firearms qualification standard for the basic law enforcement training academy, and the certificate is valid for one year from the date of that determination. RCW 36.28A.090(6) adds that nothing in the section requires a local agency to complete the certificate. A certificate alone is not the whole package, because 18 U.S.C. 926C(d) also requires photographic identification from the agency the officer separated from.
Separately, RCW 9.41.060(1)(a) lists law enforcement officers of this state or another state among the people RCW 9.41.050 does not apply to, and RCW 9.41.060(10) covers officers retired for service or physical disability, but not those retired because of mental or stress-related disabilities, and only where the officer holds documentation signed by the chief law enforcement officer of the Washington agency he or she retired from and has no conviction or insanity acquittal that would make him or her ineligible for a concealed pistol license.
18 U.S.C. 926A protects transporting a firearm for a lawful purpose between two places where you may lawfully possess and carry it, provided the firearm is unloaded and neither it nor the ammunition is readily or directly accessible from the passenger compartment. In a vehicle without a separate compartment, they must be in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console. That covers passage through a state, not carrying there.
| Citation | What it does |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.073 | Conditions for recognizing an out-of-state license, nonresident limit, attorney general's publication duty |
| RCW 9.41.050 | License required to carry concealed, immediate possession duty, loaded pistol in a vehicle |
| RCW 9.41.060 | Exceptions to RCW 9.41.050, including unloaded in a closed opaque case |
| RCW 9.41.070 | Washington concealed pistol license, nonresident application, term, fee, disqualifiers |
| RCW 9.41.280, RCW 9.41.282, RCW 9.41.284 | Place bans whose concealed pistol exemption is keyed to RCW 9.41.070 |
| RCW 9.41.300 | Weapons prohibited in certain places, and the exemption limited to RCW 9.41.070 licensees |
| RCW 9.41.810 | Residual misdemeanor penalty for chapter 9.41 RCW |
| RCW 36.28A.090 | Firearms qualification certificates for qualified retired officers |
| 18 U.S.C. 926A | Interstate transportation of firearms |
| 18 U.S.C. 926B and 926C | Federal carry authority for qualified active and retired officers |
Every state-by-state entry above comes from the attorney general's reciprocity list as it read on July 10, 2026, the update date that page prints. It is revised as other states answer the annual survey the attorney general's office sends out, so confirm your state and your permit class at atg.wa.gov before carrying in Washington. This guide is informational and is not legal advice.
View this topic on its own page: Reciprocity
This section points you to the agencies, courts, and statutes that matter most for concealed carry in Washington. Washington requires a Concealed Pistol License (CPL) under RCW 9.41.070 to carry a pistol concealed and to carry a loaded pistol in a vehicle. The CPL is issued on a shall-issue basis by your local chief of police or county sheriff, not by a state agency. Use the contacts below to apply, to handle protection-order or rights-restoration matters, and to find the primary law for any claim you want to verify.
The Attorney General's office publishes general information on Washington firearms law, including concealed pistol licenses, out-of-state reciprocity, and recent legislative changes.
Note on self-defense: the Attorney General's office does not set a civilian "use of force standard" by statute number you can cite for self-defense. Civilian use of force in Washington is governed by RCW 9A.16.020 (use of force, when lawful) and RCW 9A.16.050 (homicide by another person, when justifiable), as interpreted by the courts. RCW 10.120.020 (permissible uses of force) applies to peace officers, not to private citizens, so do not rely on it for personal self-defense. Washington has no statutory stand-your-ground law and no statutory castle doctrine. Washington case law establishes that a person who is where they may lawfully be and is not the aggressor has no duty to retreat (State v. Studd; State v. Reynaldo Redmond).
The Department of Licensing (DOL) is the central record-keeper for firearms licenses that local law enforcement issues and approves. DOL maintains the statewide database; it does not itself issue your CPL. Its site covers concealed pistol licenses, alien firearm licenses, dealer licenses, fees, and forms.
Administers firearms qualifications used for the federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA) by qualified retired officers in Washington.
Provides resources on secure firearm storage, suicide prevention, and community safety.
Federal information on firearms regulation, federal firearms licenses, and federal prohibited persons.
Concealed pistol license applications are processed by local law enforcement, not by a central state office. Contact the agency for where you live.
Example, City of Bellevue:
Example, Snohomish County:
Washington has conditional statutory reciprocity under RCW 9.41.073. A person who holds a valid concealed pistol license or permit issued by another state may carry a concealed pistol in Washington without a Washington CPL only if all of these are met:
The Attorney General is required by law to publish the official list of states that qualify and updates it as other states change their laws. As of the mid-2025 update the list included roughly ten states, such as Idaho (Enhanced Permit only), Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana (Enhanced Permit only), North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Utah, several with permit-type limits. The list changes, so always verify the current list before you travel.
If you hold a permit from a state that is not on the Attorney General's list, that permit does not let you carry concealed in Washington. A nonresident from a non-qualifying state who wants to carry concealed in Washington can still obtain a Washington nonresident CPL under RCW 9.41.070. Apply through a Washington local law enforcement agency.
Court forms for protection orders, firearm surrender, and rights restoration.
Protection orders under chapter 7.105 RCW can require a respondent to surrender firearms and any concealed pistol license, and can prohibit possession while the order is in effect:
Violating the terms of a protection order, including possessing firearms after a surrender order, can lead to arrest and penalties. For most protection orders other than antiharassment and extreme risk orders, a knowing violation is a gross misdemeanor under RCW 7.105.450.
An ERPO lets family or household members, or law enforcement, petition a court to temporarily prohibit a person who poses a significant danger from having firearms.
A unit within the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office focused on firearm surrender enforcement in domestic violence cases.
For personal legal advice on firearms law, rights restoration, or related matters.
A person who has lost the right to possess firearms may petition for restoration under Washington law:
Important considerations:
| Statute | Topic |
|---|---|
| RCW 9.41.070 | Concealed pistol license: application, fee, renewal (including nonresident CPL) |
| RCW 9.41.073 | Reciprocity: recognition of out-of-state concealed pistol licenses and permits |
| RCW 9.41.040 | Unlawful possession of firearms (the prohibition) |
| RCW 9.41.041 | Restoration of the right to possess a firearm |
| RCW 9.41.047 | Possession rights after insanity acquittal or involuntary commitment |
| RCW 9.41.350 | Voluntary waiver of firearm rights |
| RCW 9.41.360 | Unsafe storage of a firearm |
| RCW 9.41.365 | Firearm security and storage, requirements for dealers |
| RCW 9A.16.020 | Use of force, when lawful (civilian self-defense) |
| RCW 9A.16.050 | Homicide by another person, when justifiable |
| RCW 7.105.310 | Protection order relief (firearm and CPL surrender) |
| RCW 7.105.340 | Temporary extreme risk protection order, surrender |
| RCW 7.105.450 | Enforcement and penalties for protection order violations |
| 18 U.S.C. 926B | LEOSA, qualified active law enforcement officers |
| 18 U.S.C. 926C | LEOSA, qualified retired law enforcement officers |
View this topic on its own page: Additional Resources
This page answers common questions about Washington's concealed pistol license (CPL), where you can and cannot carry, firearm purchases, and related state and federal law. It is general information, not legal advice. Washington's firearms laws are in Chapter 9.41 RCW. For guidance on your specific situation, consult an attorney.
Do I need a license to carry a concealed pistol in Washington?
Yes. Under RCW 9.41.050, you may not carry a pistol concealed on your person without a concealed pistol license, except in your place of abode or fixed place of business. Washington is not a permitless (constitutional) carry state for concealed pistol carry. A CPL is also required to carry or place a loaded pistol in a vehicle (RCW 9.41.050(2)).
How do I apply for a Washington concealed pistol license?
Apply through the chief of police of the municipality where you live, or the sheriff of your county if you live in an unincorporated area. The process is governed by RCW 9.41.070. The application requires a complete set of fingerprints, and the issuing authority runs a background check through the national instant criminal background check system and state databases.
Is Washington a shall-issue state?
Yes. Under RCW 9.41.070(1), the issuing authority shall issue the license within 30 days of the application unless the applicant is disqualified. If you do not have a valid permanent Washington driver's license or state identification card, or have not been a Washington resident for the previous 90 consecutive days, the issuing authority has up to 60 days.
Who is eligible for a CPL?
You must be at least 21 years old and not disqualified. Disqualifiers under RCW 9.41.070 include being ineligible to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040 or 9.41.045 or under federal law, having a revoked CPL, being subject to certain protective or no-contact orders, being free on bond or personal recognizance pending trial for a felony, and having an outstanding felony or misdemeanor arrest warrant.
How long is a CPL valid, and what does it cost?
A CPL is valid for five years from the date of issue. Under RCW 9.41.070, the nonrefundable fee for an original five-year license is $36 plus FBI charges passed on to the applicant. The renewal fee is $32, and the replacement fee for a lost or damaged license is $10.
Does Washington require firearms training to get a CPL right now?
Not yet. The current version of RCW 9.41.070 does not require completion of a firearms training program to obtain a CPL. A live-fire training requirement for CPL applicants, added by 2025 legislation, is scheduled to take effect May 1, 2027 under RCW 9.41.070(5) and RCW 43.43.575. Confirm the current requirement with your local issuing authority before applying.
Can a nonresident get a Washington CPL?
Yes. Under RCW 9.41.070(11), a nonresident may apply for a Washington CPL anywhere in the state.
Can I carry concealed without a CPL while engaged in outdoor recreation?
RCW 9.41.060 lists exceptions to the licensing requirement in RCW 9.41.050. These include any person engaging in a lawful outdoor recreational activity such as hunting, fishing, camping, hiking, or horseback riding, when, considering all the circumstances, it is reasonable to conclude the person is participating in those activities or traveling to or from a legitimate outdoor recreation area (RCW 9.41.060(8)). A separate exception applies to anyone carrying a pistol unloaded and in a closed opaque case or secure wrapper (RCW 9.41.060(9)).
Does a CPL cover rifles and shotguns?
The CPL applies to pistols. Open carry of a long gun is not licensed in the same way, but all firearms remain subject to the prohibited-place rules and other provisions of Chapter 9.41 RCW.
Does Washington recognize concealed carry permits from other states?
Yes, conditionally. Under RCW 9.41.073, Washington gives effect to a valid concealed pistol license or permit from another state, but only if that state qualifies under the statute. The other state must recognize and give effect to Washington concealed pistol licenses, must not issue licenses or permits to persons under 21, and must require a mandatory fingerprint-based background check covering criminal and mental health history. When a state meets all of these requirements, a person who is 21 or older may carry a concealed pistol in Washington on that state's license, as long as the person carries the out-of-state license along with government-issued photo identification and carries in accordance with Washington law. The Washington Attorney General publishes the official, current list of qualifying states at atg.wa.gov.
Which states does Washington recognize?
As of the Attorney General's update of July 25, 2025, the qualifying states were Idaho (Enhanced Permit only), Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana (Enhanced Permit only), North Carolina, North Dakota (Class 1 permits only), Ohio, South Dakota (with permit-type limits), and Utah (excluding the Provisional permit). This list changes as other states amend their laws, so always verify the current Attorney General list at atg.wa.gov before relying on it.
I am moving to Washington and want to keep carrying concealed. What do I do?
If your home state is on the Attorney General's qualifying list, your out-of-state license is recognized while you remain a nonresident, subject to the conditions in RCW 9.41.073. Once you establish Washington residency, plan to apply for a Washington CPL through your local chief of police or county sheriff under RCW 9.41.070. If your state does not qualify, you will need a Washington CPL to carry concealed.
I am visiting Washington. Can I carry?
If your permit was issued by a state on the Attorney General's qualifying list and you are 21 or older, you may carry a concealed pistol under RCW 9.41.073 while carrying that license and government-issued photo identification, following Washington law. If your state does not qualify, your out-of-state permit will not authorize concealed carry here. Open carry of a pistol by a person who may lawfully possess one is generally allowed, subject to the prohibited places below and the rules on demonstrations. You may also apply for a nonresident Washington CPL under RCW 9.41.070(11) if you are eligible.
What is Washington's law on open carry?
Open carry of a pistol is generally lawful in public for a person who may lawfully possess the firearm, and no license is required to openly carry a pistol. The prohibited locations below still apply, and RCW 9.41.300(2) makes it unlawful to knowingly open carry a firearm at a permitted demonstration, or within 250 feet of one after a law enforcement officer directs you to leave. A person lawfully carrying concealed under a valid CPL is exempt from the demonstration restriction (RCW 9.41.300(2)(e)).
Where am I prohibited from carrying a firearm even with a CPL?
Under RCW 9.41.300(1), it is unlawful to knowingly possess a weapon in:
A person with a valid CPL is exempt from the library, zoo or aquarium, and transit prohibitions under RCW 9.41.300(14). Violating RCW 9.41.300(1) is a gross misdemeanor (RCW 9.41.300(16)). Note that public parks and playgrounds are not listed in RCW 9.41.300.
Are firearms allowed on school grounds?
Generally no. Possession of dangerous weapons, including firearms, on school facilities is restricted under RCW 9.41.280, with limited statutory exceptions. This is a separate statute from RCW 9.41.300.
Can I carry a firearm at work?
Washington law does not generally prohibit carrying firearms at most private workplaces, but private employers may set policies prohibiting firearms on their premises. Public employers and certain regulated facilities have specific restrictions. Check your employer's policy and applicable law.
Can a city or county pass its own gun laws?
Mostly no. Under RCW 9.41.290, Washington fully occupies and preempts the field of firearms regulation. Cities, towns, and counties may enact only firearms laws specifically authorized by state law, such as the limited authority in RCW 9.41.300, and those local laws must be consistent with state law. Local laws that are more restrictive than state law are preempted.
Does Washington have a stand-your-ground or castle doctrine statute?
Washington has no statutory stand-your-ground law and no statutory castle doctrine. The lawful use of force is governed by RCW 9A.16.020, and justifiable homicide by RCW 9A.16.050, as interpreted by the courts.
Do I have a duty to retreat?
Washington case law holds that a person who is where they have a right to be and is not the aggressor has no duty to retreat before using lawful force in self-defense (for example, State v. Studd and State v. Reynaldo Redmond). The force used must be no more than is necessary under the circumstances (RCW 9A.16.020(3)).
How does the background check process work?
Under RCW 9.41.113, all firearm sales or transfers in Washington are subject to a background check unless specifically exempted, including private sales and sales at gun shows or online. Where neither party is a licensed dealer, the transfer must be processed through a licensed dealer. The Washington State Patrol firearms background check program runs checks through the national instant criminal background check system and state databases.
Is there a waiting period to buy a firearm?
Yes. Under RCW 9.41.092, a licensed dealer may not deliver a firearm until the required background checks are complete and at least 10 business days have elapsed from the date the dealer requested the background check. This 10-business-day waiting period was enacted in 2023 (chapter 161, Laws of 2023).
Do I need safety training to buy a firearm?
Yes. Under RCW 9.41.090, a dealer may not deliver a firearm unless the purchaser provides proof of completion of a recognized firearm safety training program within the last five years that meets RCW 9.41.1132, or proof of an exemption. A separate permit-to-purchase requirement under RCW 9.41.121 is scheduled to take effect May 1, 2027.
What are common reasons a transfer is denied?
Federal prohibitions under 18 U.S.C. 922(g) include a conviction for a crime punishable by more than one year, being a fugitive from justice, being an unlawful user of or addicted to a controlled substance, being adjudicated as a mental defective or committed to a mental institution, being an unlawful alien, being dishonorably discharged, having renounced U.S. citizenship, being subject to a qualifying protective order, and a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence conviction. A person under indictment is restricted from receiving a firearm under a separate provision, 18 U.S.C. 922(n), not 922(g). State prohibitions under RCW 9.41.040 add further disqualifying offenses.
Can the Washington State Patrol pre-check my eligibility before I try to buy?
No. Eligibility is determined through an actual transfer at a licensed dealer. You can review RCW 9.41.040 (state law) and 18 U.S.C. 922(g) (federal law) to self-assess.
How do I restore my right to possess firearms?
Restoration of firearm rights is governed by RCW 9.41.041. The process depends on the disqualifying event and generally requires a petition to the appropriate court. A person who is federally prohibited (for example, after an involuntary mental health commitment under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(4)) may remain federally prohibited even if state rights are restored. Consult an attorney about your specific situation.
Can a minor possess a firearm?
Unlawful possession of a firearm is addressed in RCW 9.41.040. RCW 9.41.042 lists the limited circumstances in which a person under 18 may possess a firearm, such as while taking a hunter or firearms safety course, target shooting at an authorized range, organized competition, hunting or trapping under a valid license, on real property controlled by a parent or guardian with permission, or at the person's residence with parental permission for lawful self-defense.
What about adults between 18 and 21?
Under RCW 9.41.240, a person under 21 may not purchase a pistol or a semiautomatic assault rifle, and no person may sell or transfer a semiautomatic assault rifle to a person under 21. A person 18 to 20 years old may possess a pistol only in their abode, fixed place of business, or on real property under their control, unless an exception in RCW 9.41.042, 9.41.050, or 9.41.060 applies. These age rules were enacted by Initiative 1639 (2019).
What does Washington's assault weapons law do?
Under RCW 9.41.390, no person may manufacture, import, distribute, sell, or offer for sale an assault weapon, with limited exceptions. The law took effect April 25, 2023 (chapter 162, Laws of 2023). It does not prohibit continued possession of an assault weapon lawfully owned before that date.
Can I keep an assault weapon I owned before the law took effect?
Yes. The law limits the prospective sale and transfer of assault weapons while allowing existing legal owners to keep what they already own. Transfers are restricted to the narrow circumstances in RCW 9.41.390(2).
What is the penalty for violating the assault weapons law?
A violation of RCW 9.41.390 is a gross misdemeanor.
Do I have to comply while the law is being challenged in court?
Yes. Unless a court issues an order blocking enforcement, the law remains in effect.
What does the large capacity magazine law do?
Under RCW 9.41.370, no person may manufacture, import, distribute, sell, or offer for sale a large capacity magazine (one capable of holding more than 10 rounds), with limited exceptions. The law was enacted in 2022 (chapter 104, Laws of 2022).
Can I keep magazines I already own?
The statute restricts manufacture, importation, distribution, and sale. It does not by its terms prohibit simple possession of magazines you already own.
What is the penalty?
A violation of RCW 9.41.370 is a gross misdemeanor punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.
Is the magazine law still enforceable?
The law has been the subject of litigation, including Gator's Custom Guns v. Ferguson. Unless and until a court issues an order blocking enforcement, the restriction remains in effect. Check current court status before relying on any change.
Does Washington have a secure storage law?
Yes. RCW 9.41.360 makes it the crime of community endangerment due to unsafe storage of a firearm when a prohibited person gains access to an unsecured firearm and causes injury or, in the second degree, gains access in other defined circumstances. The law does not authorize warrantless inspection of your home.
Does buying a semiautomatic assault rifle require training?
Yes. Initiative 1639 requires proof of completion of a recognized firearms safety training program for the purchase of a semiautomatic assault rifle, consistent with the training standards in RCW 9.41.1132, in addition to the enhanced background check and waiting period.
Are NFA items legal in Washington?
Washington law in RCW 9.41.190 makes it a class C felony to manufacture, own, buy, sell, transport, or possess a machine gun, bump-fire stock, undetectable firearm, short-barreled shotgun, or short-barreled rifle, with exceptions. However, RCW 9.41.190(2) provides that a short-barreled rifle is lawful if the person is in compliance with applicable federal law (National Firearms Act registration). Short-barreled shotguns and machine guns remain prohibited under state law except in the narrow circumstances the statute allows.
What is the federal NFA transfer tax?
The federal NFA tax is set by federal law. Under Public Law 119-21, the making or transfer tax is $200 for a machine gun or destructive device and $0 for other NFA items, effective for calendar quarters beginning more than 90 days after July 4, 2025 (the first qualifying quarter is January 1, 2026). ATF general pages may still display the older $200 figure. The federal registration requirement under the NFA still applies, and state-law prohibitions in RCW 9.41.190 apply independently of federal tax treatment.
Can I carry a firearm into an airport secured area or onto an aircraft?
No. Beyond Washington's airport restriction in RCW 9.41.300(1)(e), carrying a concealed or unlawful weapon on or attempting to board an aircraft is a federal crime under 49 U.S.C. 46505. Possessing a firearm in a secured area of an airport can also lead to federal and TSA enforcement.
Where can I read Washington's firearms laws?
Washington's firearms statutes are in Chapter 9.41 RCW, available through the Washington State Legislature at app.leg.wa.gov/RCW (use cite=9.41 for the chapter, or cite=9.41.070 for a specific section).
Where do I find federal firearms law?
Federal firearms law is primarily in Title 18, Chapter 44 of the United States Code. For the National Firearms Act and federal compliance, contact the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| Chapter 9.41 RCW | Washington firearms law (general) |
| RCW 9.41.040 | Unlawful possession of firearms (first degree class B felony, second degree class C felony) |
| RCW 9.41.041 | Restoration of firearm rights |
| RCW 9.41.042 | Permissible firearm possession by persons under 18 |
| RCW 9.41.050 | Carrying firearms (concealed and in vehicles) |
| RCW 9.41.060 | Exceptions to the carrying restrictions |
| RCW 9.41.070 | Concealed pistol license |
| RCW 9.41.073 | Reciprocity for out-of-state concealed pistol licenses and permits |
| RCW 9.41.090 | Dealer deliveries and safety training requirement |
| RCW 9.41.092 | 10-business-day waiting period |
| RCW 9.41.113 | Universal background checks |
| RCW 9.41.121 | Permit to purchase (effective May 1, 2027) |
| RCW 9.41.190 | Machine guns, short-barreled firearms, and other unlawful firearms |
| RCW 9.41.240 | Age restrictions on pistols and semiautomatic assault rifles |
| RCW 9.41.280 | Dangerous weapons on school facilities |
| RCW 9.41.290 | State preemption |
| RCW 9.41.300 | Weapons prohibited in certain places |
| RCW 9.41.360 | Unsafe storage of a firearm |
| RCW 9.41.370 | Large capacity magazines |
| RCW 9.41.390 | Assault weapons |
| RCW 9.41.1132 | Firearm safety training program standards |
| RCW 9A.16.020 | Use of force when lawful |
| RCW 9A.16.050 | Justifiable homicide |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(g) | Federal firearm possession prohibitions |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(n) | Federal restriction on persons under indictment |
| 49 U.S.C. 46505 | Carrying a weapon on or onto an aircraft |
This information is compiled from the Revised Code of Washington (Chapter 9.41 RCW) and federal law. Laws change. Always verify the current statute before relying on this information, and consult an attorney for advice on your situation.
View this topic on its own page: Washington Concealed Carry: Frequently Asked Questions
This section covers Washington firearm rules that do not fit cleanly into the other parts of this guide: private sales and the universal background check (RCW 9.41.113), the dealer-delivery process and the ten-business-day waiting period (RCW 9.41.090, RCW 9.41.092), the buyer training requirement (RCW 9.41.090, RCW 9.41.1132), the future permit-to-purchase requirement (RCW 9.41.121, effective May 1, 2027), juvenile possession (RCW 9.41.040, RCW 9.41.042), domestic-violence prohibitors, ammunition and magazine rules, antique and curio categories, the hunting-regulation overlay, tribal-land jurisdiction, the self-defense reimbursement statute (RCW 9A.16.110), and the federal framework that sits underneath all of it.
Washington is a heavily regulated firearms state. Most of what lands in this catch-all is regulated at the state level, often more strictly than the federal floor. Where another section of this guide owns the operative text (for example PROHIBITED_PLACES for RCW 9.41.300, or NFA_ITEMS for the state machine-gun and short-barreled-shotgun rules), this section cross-references that section rather than duplicating it.
Washington requires a background check on nearly all firearm transfers, including private sales between residents. Initiative 594 (approved November 2014, codified at RCW 9.41.113) routed private transfers through a licensed dealer who runs the federal NICS check and applies state requirements.
Operative rule (RCW 9.41.113): all firearm sales or transfers, in whole or part in this state, are subject to background checks unless specifically exempted. Where neither party is a licensed dealer, the parties must complete the transfer through a licensed dealer, who conducts the background check and meets all federal and state recordkeeping requirements. The dealer may charge a fee reflecting the fair market value of its administrative costs.
Exceptions in RCW 9.41.113(4) include:
Penalty: a knowing violation of RCW 9.41.113 is a gross misdemeanor for the first offense and a class C felony for a second or subsequent knowing violation. A separate offense is charged for each firearm sold or transferred without complying with the background-check requirement. These penalties are set out in RCW 9.41.115, not in RCW 9.41.113 itself.
Federal overlay on top of the state rule:
Effective January 1, 2024, Washington requires proof of firearm safety training before a dealer may deliver a firearm. The requirement comes from House Bill 1143 (2023 c 161) and is enforced through RCW 9.41.090, with the program standards set out in RCW 9.41.1132. The training requirement is separate from the Concealed Pistol License; it gates every dealer firearm purchase, not just concealed carry.
Operative rule (RCW 9.41.090(1)(a)): a dealer may not deliver a firearm until the purchaser provides proof of completion of a recognized firearm safety training program within the last five years that complies with RCW 9.41.1132, or proof of exemption.
Under the version of RCW 9.41.1132 in effect now (until May 1, 2027), the training must, at a minimum, cover:
The training must be sponsored by a federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency, a college or university, a nationally recognized organization that customarily offers firearms training, or a firearms training school whose instructors are certified by such an organization. The current statute does not set a minimum number of hours and does not require a live-fire component (a live-fire requirement is added in the version of RCW 9.41.1132 that takes effect May 1, 2027). Proof of training is a certification made under penalty of perjury.
Exemptions (RCW 9.41.1132(4)) cover Washington general, limited, and specially commissioned peace officers and federal peace officers who carry a firearm as a normal part of their duties, and active members of the armed forces, national guard, or reserves who completed qualifying firearms training within the last five years. There is no general exemption for CPL holders. Confirm exemption status with the dealer at the point of sale.
The waiting period lives in RCW 9.41.092, not in RCW 9.41.090. Except as otherwise provided in the chapter, a licensed dealer may not deliver any firearm to a purchaser or transferee until (1) all required background checks are complete and the purchaser is not prohibited and has no voluntary waiver of firearm rights in effect, and (2) ten business days have elapsed from the date the dealer requested the background check.
Practical effects:
Washington enacted a permit-to-purchase requirement in 2025 (House Bill 1163, 2025 c 370). It is not yet in effect. The permit-to-purchase system, codified at RCW 9.41.121, takes effect May 1, 2027. As of that date, a dealer may not deliver a firearm until the purchaser produces a valid permit to purchase issued by the Washington State Patrol firearms background check program. The permit application requires fingerprints, a certificate of completion of a certified firearms safety training program (the post-2027 version of RCW 9.41.1132 adds a live-fire component), and an application fee. Until May 1, 2027, the training-plus-waiting-period framework above governs; do not assume a purchase permit is required before that date.
Under RCW 9.41.040(2)(a)(v), a person under 18 may not possess a firearm except as provided in RCW 9.41.042. Unlawful possession of a firearm by a juvenile is generally unlawful possession in the second degree, a class C felony.
RCW 9.41.042 lists the situations in which a person under 18 may possess a firearm, including:
Of these, only the travel exception requires the firearm to be unloaded by its terms.
Separately, a person under 21 may not purchase a pistol or a semiautomatic assault rifle, and a person 18 to 20 may possess a pistol or semiautomatic assault rifle only in limited places and circumstances (RCW 9.41.240). The age-21 rule for semiautomatic assault rifles came from Initiative 1639 (2018).
Federal overlay: 18 U.S.C. 922(x) bars the transfer of a handgun or handgun ammunition to a person under 18 except in narrow enumerated cases.
Washington layers state and federal prohibitors on domestic-violence convictions and protection orders.
The U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Rahimi (2024) upheld 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) against a Second Amendment challenge, so the federal protection-order prohibitor remains good law after Bruen.
Washington imposes no permit, registration, or background-check requirement on the purchase of ordinary ammunition. Federal 18 U.S.C. 922(d) still prohibits selling ammunition to a prohibited person.
Magazine-capacity restriction (RCW 9.41.370): no person may manufacture, import, distribute, sell, or offer for sale any "large capacity magazine," defined in RCW 9.41.010 as an ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds. The ban targets the commercial chain, not mere continued possession of a magazine already owned. A violation is a gross misdemeanor. The statute took effect July 1, 2022 (2022 c 104).
Litigation status: the Washington Supreme Court upheld the magazine ban in State v. Gator's Custom Guns (decided May 8, 2025), in a 7-2 decision holding that magazines over 10 rounds are not protected "arms." The gun shop petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for review; confirm the current status of that petition before relying on the ban being final. See RESTRICTIONS for the full magazine framework.
Federal 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(16) defines an antique firearm as one manufactured in or before 1898, plus certain muzzleloaders and replicas. Washington follows the federal antique definition for most purposes. As a result, antique firearms typically:
Curios and relics are ordinary firearms for state and most federal purposes. The collector (C&R) designation primarily affects how a licensed collector acquires and transfers firearms, not state carry or possession rules. RCW 9.41.113(4)(i) exempts a sale of a curio or relic to a licensed collector from the universal background check.
NFA items (suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, machine guns, destructive devices, and any other weapons) are covered in detail in NFA_ITEMS. The short version for Washington:
State preemption (RCW 9.41.290) prevents local jurisdictions from adding their own NFA-specific restrictions.
RCW 9A.16.110 provides that when a person charged with a violent crime is found not guilty by reason of self-defense, the state reimburses the defendant for reasonable costs, including legal fees, loss of time, and other defense expenses. The trier of fact must find that the self-defense claim was sustained by a preponderance of the evidence, and the judge then sets the award. The provision is unusual nationally and reflects a deliberate Washington policy choice. See USE_OF_FORCE for the full self-defense framework.
Washington does not have a pretrial criminal-immunity statute on the Florida model. Self-defense is an affirmative defense raised at trial, not a basis for early dismissal. A criminal acquittal does not automatically bar a related civil suit.
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife regulates hunting under RCW Title 77. Firearms used in hunting are subject to species-specific equipment rules that are independent of RCW Title 9.41. Key points:
Tribal nations in Washington may regulate firearms within their reservation boundaries. State firearms law generally applies to non-Indian persons on fee-patent land within a reservation, while tribal law governs tribal members and certain on-reservation conduct. The interplay is fact-specific. A person carrying through a reservation should:
Federal firearms law sets a floor that no state can fall below, and Washington consistently legislates above that floor (universal background check, ten-business-day wait, magazine cap, assault-weapon manufacture-and-sale ban, buyer training). On substantive carry, possession, and transfer rules, Washington's stricter framework governs in-state conduct.
Two federal statutes come up often:
If the OTHER section ever discusses secured-area airport or aircraft carry, the controlling federal statute is 49 U.S.C. 46505 (carrying a weapon or explosive aboard aircraft), not the general firearm provisions of 18 U.S.C. 924.
This catch-all reflects Washington law as of June 2026. Magazine-ban and assault-weapon-ban litigation, and the rollout of the 2027 permit-to-purchase system, continue to evolve. Confirm current status before relying on any provision affected by pending appellate review or pending rulemaking.
View this topic on its own page: Washington Firearm Laws: Other Topics
Browse local instructors offering state-approved training in your area. Book online, complete your training, and get one step closer to your concealed carry permit.