Georgia has no Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO), Risk Protection Order (RPO), or "red flag" statute. Unlike approximately 22 other states, the District...
Reviewed by Will Luker, Founder of CCW Hub. USCCA Training Counselor, USCCA Certified Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, Law Enforcement.
Georgia has no Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO), Risk Protection Order (RPO), or "red flag" statute. Unlike approximately 22 other states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, Georgia provides no civil court mechanism for temporarily prohibiting firearm possession or compelling firearm surrender based on a finding that a person poses a risk to themselves or others. There is no GA statute that lets a family member, a co-worker, or a law enforcement officer petition a court to remove firearms from someone in crisis short of an underlying criminal charge or a full mental health commitment.
The Giffords Law Center, Everytown for Gun Safety, the University of Michigan Firearm Injury Prevention Center, and the USCCA all confirm Georgia's status as a non-adopting state. The Georgia Law Review's January 2025 student comment by Robbie Ottley, titled Georgia Red Flag Laws, surveys the gap and argues for adoption. Bills have been filed in the General Assembly. None has reached the Governor's desk.
If you are a Georgia carrier or instructor, the practical takeaway is short. The familiar prohibitors at O.C.G.A. § 16-11-129(b) (eligibility for the WCL) and the federal prohibitors at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) still apply, but no state-court order can be entered against you under a "risk" or "red flag" theory. There is no ERPO record to clear, no ERPO surrender to comply with, and no ERPO violation to defend.
In states that have adopted them, ERPOs (also called Risk Protection Orders, Firearms Restraining Orders, Gun Violence Restraining Orders, or Lethal Violence Protective Orders depending on the state) share a common structure:
The federal Bipartisan Safer Communities Act of 2022 (Pub. L. 117-159) included grant funding to encourage states to enact or implement ERPO laws. Georgia has not used those grants to enact a state ERPO. Rep. Lucy McBath (D-GA-6) sponsored the federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2022 (H.R. 2377) to create a parallel federal mechanism. That bill cleared the House Judiciary Committee but did not become law.
Bills proposing a Georgia red flag statute have been filed in recent sessions. The most recent is HB 453, the "Georgia Red Flag Protective Order Act," introduced February 13, 2025 in the 2025-2026 Regular Session. As tracked by BillTrack50, HB 453 would have added a new Part 3A to Article 4, Chapter 11 of Title 16 of the Official Code of Georgia, creating a petition-based risk protection order procedure modeled on other states' ERPOs. Under the bill's text, a family or household member or law enforcement officer could petition the superior court; the court could issue a temporary ex parte order pending hearing and, on clear and convincing evidence, a final order of up to 12 months requiring surrender of firearms and ammunition. HB 453 died in committee on April 2, 2026 without a floor vote.
For practical purposes, GA carriers should treat the issue as settled for the current cycle. No GA ERPO statute exists, and the most recent attempt to enact one is dead. Watch for re-introduction in future sessions, but do not plan around speculative legislation.
Because Georgia has no red flag statute:
The Georgia Law Review comment by Ottley summarizes the gap this way: "While measures such as red-flag laws offer clear policy solutions to mitigate gun violence, Georgia has responded to the gun violence crisis by broadening the availability of guns in the state." Whatever one's policy view, the description of current law is accurate. Constitutional carry was enacted in 2022 (SB 319); no red flag mechanism was added alongside it.
Several existing Georgia procedures can produce firearm-removal effects in narrow circumstances. None of them is a red flag law, and a CCW instructor should not describe them as substitutes. They are listed here so students understand the actual landscape.
O.C.G.A. Title 37, Chapter 3 governs involuntary mental health treatment in Georgia. A peace officer or designated medical professional can initiate an emergency mental health evaluation. A probate court can order extended inpatient commitment after a hearing. If a person is involuntarily committed to a mental institution, federal law (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4)) prohibits them from receiving or possessing firearms, and the commitment is NICS-reportable. This is not a tailored firearm-removal tool. It is a clinical commitment proceeding that has a collateral federal firearm consequence.
O.C.G.A. § 19-13-1 et seq. governs Family Violence Protective Orders. A court may issue a TPO when family-violence is shown. A TPO with the right findings, between qualifying intimate partners, may trigger federal § 922(g)(8). Some TPOs explicitly require firearm surrender as a condition; others leave firearm possession unaddressed at the state level and rely on federal enforcement.
In any pending criminal case, a Georgia judge may impose bond conditions, including a no-firearms condition. This is routine in domestic-violence and stalking cases. It is a court order in an existing case, not a red flag petition.
Independent of any state mechanism, the federal prohibitors at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) attach automatically based on certain records. The two most likely to come up in a "red flag-adjacent" conversation are § 922(g)(4) (adjudicated mentally defective or committed to a mental institution) and § 922(g)(9) (the Lautenberg amendment, misdemeanor crime of domestic violence). For the full prohibitor list, see RESTRICTIONS.
Georgia has no red flag, ERPO, or risk protection order statute. No state-court petition lets a family member, co-worker, or officer remove firearms from a person on a "risk" theory. Existing firearm prohibitors (state WCL eligibility under § 16-11-129(b), federal prohibitors under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)) operate normally, and adjacent mechanisms (Title 37 commitment, family-violence TPO, bond conditions) continue to apply in their own narrower domains.
<!-- federal-context-block:added-2026-05-20 -->United States v. Rahimi (2024). In United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federal firearm prohibition at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) for persons subject to a qualifying domestic-violence restraining order, holding the federal disability survives the historical-tradition test of N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). Rahimi is the controlling SCOTUS authority on the constitutionality of federal firearm disabilities tied to domestic-violence findings; it bears on any state-level red-flag / ERPO analysis to the extent those frameworks borrow federal § 922(g)(8) prohibitor mechanics.
This page covers one part of our Georgia concealed carry guide.
Read the complete Georgia guideBrowse local instructors offering state-approved training in your area. Book online, complete your training, and get one step closer to your concealed carry permit.