Georgia codifies a robust right to use force in self-defense, including deadly force. O.C.G.A. § 16-3-21 authorizes deadly force when you reasonably...
Reviewed by Will Luker, Founder of CCW Hub. USCCA Training Counselor, USCCA Certified Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, Law Enforcement.
Georgia codifies a robust right to use force in self-defense, including deadly force. O.C.G.A. § 16-3-21 authorizes deadly force when you reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent death, great bodily injury, or a forcible felony. O.C.G.A. § 16-3-23.1 abolishes any duty to retreat (Stand Your Ground), and O.C.G.A. § 16-3-23 gives expanded protection for force used to defend your habitation, which O.C.G.A. § 16-3-24.1 defines to include your dwelling, your motor vehicle, and your place of business. If your use of force is justified under any of these provisions, O.C.G.A. § 16-3-24.2 makes you immune from criminal prosecution unless the weapon you used was one you were not lawfully entitled to carry or possess.
Justification is the framework. O.C.G.A. § 16-3-20 provides that conduct which is justified is a complete defense to prosecution for any crime based on that conduct. The Article 2 justification sections (§§ 16-3-20 through 16-3-28) work together. You read § 16-3-21 to know what defense of self or others permits, § 16-3-23 with the § 16-3-24.1 definition to know what defense of habitation permits, § 16-3-24 to know what defense of other property permits, § 16-3-23.1 to know you do not have to retreat, and § 16-3-24.2 to know that when force is justified you are immune from criminal prosecution (civil exposure is a separate question governed by general Georgia tort law).
What constitutional carry, concealed carry, and open carry did not change is the use-of-force standard. The statutes in this section apply to lawful weapons carriers and to anyone else lawfully using force, with one consequence built into § 16-3-24.2: if you were not legally entitled to carry the weapon you used to apply deadly force, immunity does not protect you.
The core self-defense rule is in § 16-3-21(a):
"A person is justified in threatening or using force against another when and to the extent that he or she reasonably believes that such threat or force is necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person against such other's imminent use of unlawful force."
Two thresholds matter:
"Reasonable" is both subjective and objective. You must actually have held the belief, and the belief must be one a reasonable person in your position would have held. Juries are the ones who decide reasonableness if a case goes to trial. Even with statutory presumptions and immunity available, the charging decision rests with the prosecutor and the verdict rests with the jury.
You lose the justification defense if you fall into any of three categories under § 16-3-21(b):
For the aggressor and mutual-combat categories, you can recover the right to self-defense, but only by withdrawing from the encounter and effectively communicating your intent to withdraw. If the other person then continues or threatens to continue using unlawful force, you regain justification. This is statutory, not common law. The exact mechanics of "effective communication" are fact-specific. Verbal disengagement coupled with physical retreat is the safest pattern. Continuing to argue while edging toward the door is not withdrawal.
§ 16-3-21(c) voids any state agency rule, regulation, or policy, and any county or municipal ordinance, that conflicts with the self-defense standard. Your right to use justified force in self-defense is not subject to local restriction.
In a murder or manslaughter prosecution where you raise self-defense, § 16-3-21(d) permits you to offer:
This is Georgia's statutory pathway for battered-spouse and similar evidence. The use-of-force standard does not change. What changes is what evidence the jury hears when assessing whether your belief was reasonable.
§ 16-3-23 governs force used to prevent or terminate an unlawful entry into or attack upon a habitation. Non-deadly force is justified to the extent reasonably believed necessary. Deadly force has a structured three-prong test. You are justified in using deadly force when:
The second prong is Georgia's functional Castle Doctrine. When a non-household intruder unlawfully and forcibly enters the habitation and you know it, deadly force is statutorily authorized without the additional showing of imminent personal violence required under § 16-3-21.
The expansive reach of Georgia's Castle Doctrine comes from the statutory definition. § 16-3-24.1 provides:
"As used in Code Sections 16-3-23 and 16-3-24, the term 'habitation' means any dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business..."
That single sentence extends defense-of-habitation protection beyond your home. Your occupied motor vehicle is a habitation for purposes of § 16-3-23. Your place of business is a habitation for purposes of § 16-3-23. The same three-prong deadly-force test applies in all three settings.
For a full treatment of the Castle Doctrine, including its interaction with vehicle and workplace facts, see the separate Castle Doctrine section.
Stand Your Ground is codified at § 16-3-23.1:
"A person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-21, relating to the use of force in defense of self or others, Code Section 16-3-23, relating to the use of force in defense of a habitation, or Code Section 16-3-24, relating to the use of force in defense of property other than a habitation, has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and use force as provided in said Code sections, including deadly force."
The statute was added by 2006 Ga. Laws 599, § 1, effective July 1, 2006. It applies wherever you are lawfully present. You do not have to retreat from a public sidewalk, a parking lot, a friend's living room, or any other place you are lawfully there before using justified force.
Stand Your Ground does not change the other elements of justification. You still need a reasonable belief of imminent unlawful force, and deadly force still requires the heightened § 16-3-21 or § 16-3-23 showing. The statute removes one requirement that some other states impose: the duty to attempt safe retreat before using force.
When you defend real property that is not a habitation or you defend personal property, § 16-3-24 governs:
The takeaway: you cannot use deadly force only to stop someone from taking your wallet or trespassing on raw land. If the trespass or interference rises to a forcible felony, the deadly-force gate opens. Otherwise the response must be non-deadly. Personal property is defined by § 16-3-24.1 as personal property other than a motor vehicle. A motor vehicle is treated as a habitation under § 16-3-23, not as personal property under § 16-3-24.
§ 16-3-24.2 provides:
"A person who uses threats or force in accordance with Code Section 16-3-20, 16-3-21, 16-3-23, 16-3-23.1, 16-3-24, or 17-4-20 shall be immune from criminal prosecution therefor unless in the use of deadly force, such person utilizes a weapon the carrying or possession of which is unlawful by such person under Part 2 of Article 4 of Chapter 11 of this title."
Two features matter for instructors and students:
The 2024 General Assembly amended § 16-3-24.2 (2024 Ga. Laws 545, § 1, eff. 5/2/2024). The unlawful-weapon carve-out as quoted above reflects the current 2024 statutory text. Earlier versions used slightly different cross-references.
Georgia courts treat § 16-3-24.2 as conferring true immunity, not just an affirmative defense. The defendant may file a pretrial motion for immunity and the trial court holds a hearing. If the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the force was justified, the prosecution ends. The remedy is structural, not just a jury instruction.
The 2024 text of § 16-3-24.2 grants immunity "from criminal prosecution" only. The statute does not grant blanket civil immunity. Civil exposure is governed by general Georgia tort law and by the doctrines around justification as a defense to civil claims; a defender immune from criminal prosecution may still face a civil suit by an injured party or the estate of a deceased intruder. Justification can be raised as a defense to those civil claims, but the statute itself does not foreclose the suit. Insurance, legal-defense fees, and reputational cost can attach to a civil action even where the defender ultimately prevails on justification.
§ 16-3-24.2 includes § 17-4-20 in its immunity list. § 17-4-20 governs use of force by law enforcement during arrests, so officers acting within it are themselves covered. The statute does not create an express carve-out against civilian defenders who use force on someone who turns out to be a peace officer. That risk is litigated under § 16-3-21 reasonableness.
When evaluating a use-of-force scenario in Georgia, walk the questions in order:
Justification under Georgia law is a defense to Georgia criminal charges. It does not by itself answer federal questions. If your use of force exposes facts that show you were a prohibited possessor under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (felony conviction, domestic-violence misdemeanor, drug user, adjudicated mental defective, illegal alien, dishonorable discharge, renunciation of citizenship, or subject to a qualifying restraining order), federal firearm charges can follow even if your underlying use of force was justified for the assault question. § 16-3-24.2 immunity at the state level does not bind federal prosecutors.
| Statute | Coverage |
|---|---|
| O.C.G.A. § 16-3-20 | General justification: justified conduct is a defense to prosecution |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-3-21(a) | Self-defense or defense of others; deadly force standard |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-3-21(b) | Aggressor doctrine, provocation, felony-flight bar; withdrawal exception |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-3-21(c) | Local rules void if in conflict with self-defense standard |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-3-21(d) | Family-violence and child-abuse evidence in murder or manslaughter cases |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-3-23 | Defense of habitation; three-prong deadly-force test |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-3-23.1 | No duty to retreat (Stand Your Ground) |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-3-24 | Defense of property other than habitation; deadly force only against forcible felony |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-3-24.1 | Definitions: "habitation" includes dwelling, motor vehicle, place of business |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-3-24.2 | Immunity from criminal prosecution only (no civil immunity); unlawful-weapon carve-out |
| 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) | Federal prohibited-possessor categories; not displaced by state immunity |
N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen (2022) and United States v. Rahimi (2024). Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), established the historical-tradition test for Second Amendment claims. Rahimi, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), then applied Bruen to uphold the federal domestic-violence-restraining-order firearm prohibition at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), confirming that not every firearm disability fails Bruen's test. Practitioners advising on use of force or firearm-disability questions should be familiar with both cases.
This page covers one part of our Georgia concealed carry guide.
Read the complete Georgia guideBrowse local instructors offering state-approved training in your area. Book online, complete your training, and get one step closer to your concealed carry permit.