North Dakota does not have an "Extreme Risk Protection Order" (ERPO) or "Red Flag" statute that allows a court to order temporary removal of firearms...
Reviewed by Will Luker, Founder of CCW Hub. USCCA Training Counselor, USCCA Certified Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, Law Enforcement.
North Dakota does not have an "Extreme Risk Protection Order" (ERPO) or "Red Flag" statute that allows a court to order temporary removal of firearms from a person based solely on a finding that the person poses a risk to themselves or others. As of 2026, ND remains one of the minority of states without ERPO legislation.
However, several existing statutory and federal mechanisms can result in temporary or permanent firearms restrictions for at-risk individuals.
The North Dakota Legislative Assembly has considered and rejected ERPO-style bills in recent sessions. The state's policy posture is to rely on existing mental health civil commitment, domestic-violence protection orders, and federal prohibited-person law rather than a dedicated ERPO regime.
This means that in North Dakota:
North Dakota's civil-commitment statute, N.D.C.C. Chapter 25-03.1, allows for involuntary commitment of a person who is mentally ill and poses a danger to themselves or others.
Process:
Firearms consequences:
A person subject to an involuntary outpatient treatment order may, depending on the specifics, be a prohibited person under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(4). The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (2022) expanded NICS reporting of mental health adjudications.
A domestic-violence protection order in North Dakota under N.D.C.C. Chapter 14-07.1 can result in a firearms prohibition through both state and federal law.
Process:
Firearms consequences:
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) in United States v. Rahimi, 144 S. Ct. 1889 (2024).
ND also has disorderly conduct restraining orders under N.D.C.C. 12.1-31.2-01 for non-domestic-violence situations involving threats or harassment. These orders can include firearms-related conditions but do not automatically trigger the federal 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) prohibition unless they meet the specific federal criteria (cohabitant/intimate partner relationship, opportunity to participate, finding of credible threat).
Following an arrest, a North Dakota court may impose conditions of release that prohibit firearm possession, particularly in cases involving:
These conditions are enforceable during the pendency of the criminal case. Violation can result in revocation of release and additional charges.
Even without an ERPO, the existing federal prohibited-person framework under 18 U.S.C. 922(g) imposes firearm restrictions based on:
Each category triggers a federal prohibition without requiring a separate state proceeding.
When a person becomes a prohibited person in North Dakota, the firearms must be disposed of in a manner that does not result in continued possession by the prohibited person. Typical options:
A prohibited person who retains constructive possession (e.g., the firearms remain in the prohibited person's home) commits a continuing 18 U.S.C. 922(g) violation.
Under the NICS Improvement Amendments Act (P.L. 110-180) and the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (2022), ND reports qualifying mental health adjudications and certain other disqualifying records to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. This affects:
A person whose firearms rights have been removed may seek restoration through:
Restoration of state rights does not automatically restore federal rights.
ND legislative records show recurring ERPO proposals that have not advanced. Stakeholders interested in ERPO-style legislation should monitor:
| Statute / Source | Subject |
|---|---|
| N.D.C.C. 12.1-31.2-01 | Disorderly conduct restraining order |
| N.D.C.C. 14-07.1 | Domestic violence protection orders |
| N.D.C.C. 25-03.1 | Mental health civil commitment |
| N.D.C.C. 62.1-02-01 | Prohibited persons under state law |
| 18 U.S.C. 922(g) | Federal prohibited persons |
| United States v. Rahimi, 144 S. Ct. 1889 (2024) | Constitutional validity of 922(g)(8) |
| P.L. 110-180 (NICS Improvement Amendments Act) | NICS reporting framework |
| P.L. 117-159 (Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, 2022) | NICS enhancement and federal prohibited-person expansion |
This is general information, not legal advice. Mental-health, protection-order, and federal-prohibited-person law is complex and fact-specific. Consult counsel for any specific situation.
This page covers one part of our North Dakota concealed carry guide.
Read the complete North Dakota guideBrowse local instructors offering state-approved training in your area. Book online, complete your training, and get one step closer to your concealed carry permit.