Reviewed by Will Luker, Founder of CCW Hub. USCCA Training Counselor, USCCA Certified Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, Law Enforcement.
Concealed Handgun Licenses in Oregon are issued by the county sheriff's office. Applicants apply through the sheriff of the county in which they reside (or, for Washington State residents, through certain Oregon county sheriffs). The CHL is valid throughout the entire state of Oregon.
Governing Statute: ORS 166.291 et seq.
To qualify for an Oregon CHL, an applicant must meet all of the following requirements:
An applicant is not eligible if any of the following apply:
Oregon does NOT recognize any other state's concealed handgun license or permit. An Oregon CHL carries no force outside of Oregon unless recognized by another state. Applicants should check reciprocity agreements before traveling to other states.
Fees are set by the sheriff's office and are non-refundable (they cover the cost of the background check). Typical fee schedules (as listed by Jackson County and Columbia County):
| Application Type | Fee |
|---|---|
| New Application | $115.00 |
| Renewal | $75.00 |
| Transfer (from another Oregon county) | $30.00 (unless expired/soon to expire) |
| Transfer with Renewal | $90.00 |
| Change of Address | $15.00 |
| Name Change | $15.00 |
| Duplicate/Replacement Card | $15.00 |
Note: Some counties may charge a bank convenience fee (e.g., 2% for card payments). Fees may vary slightly by county.
When applying for a CHL, applicants must provide:
Oregon is generally an open carry state. Oregon allows for the unlicensed carrying of handguns openly while still requiring a permit for concealed carry. Oregon law explicitly distinguishes between open and concealed carry. Since Oregon does not allow permitless concealed carry, it is not considered a "constitutional carry" state.
Oregon law states:
"Firearms carried openly in belt holsters are not concealed within the meaning of this section."
This means that a person who openly carries a firearm in a belt holster is not subject to the concealed carry restrictions under ORS 166.250. No concealed handgun license (CHL) is required for open carry in a belt holster.
It is a crime to:
These prohibitions do not apply to firearms carried openly in belt holsters.
Certain categories of persons are exempt from the unlawful possession provisions of ORS 166.250, including but not limited to:
These exemptions apply broadly to both open and concealed carry situations as defined in the statute.
Understanding what constitutes a "loaded" firearm is critical because local ordinances under ORS 166.173 specifically regulate loaded firearms in public places. Under ORS 166.360, a firearm is considered loaded when there is an unexpended cartridge or shell in the chamber or in a clip or magazine that is attached to the firearm. Carrying an unloaded firearm openly may not be subject to the same local restrictions.
Cities and counties may adopt ordinances to regulate, restrict, or prohibit the possession of loaded firearms in public places as defined in ORS 161.015.
However, such local ordinances do not apply to:
Practical Impact: Several Oregon cities and at least one county have enacted ordinances restricting the open carry of loaded firearms in public places. Known jurisdictions with such restrictions include:
CHL holders are exempt from all of these local restrictions under ORS 166.173(2)(c). This creates a practical incentive for persons who wish to open carry loaded firearms in these jurisdictions to obtain a concealed handgun license, even if they intend to carry openly.
The authority to regulate firearms is generally preempted by the state:
"Except as expressly authorized by state statute, the authority to regulate in any matter whatsoever the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition, is vested solely in the Legislative Assembly."
ORS 166.173 is one of the express statutory authorizations that allows local governments to regulate loaded firearms in public places, creating a narrow exception to the general state preemption. Local jurisdictions cannot regulate the open carry of unloaded firearms, as that authority is not granted by ORS 166.173.
Even where open carry is otherwise permitted, firearms (whether open or concealed) are restricted in certain locations:
ORS 166.262 limits the authority of peace officers to arrest for ORS 166.250 or 166.370 violations under certain circumstances, and also identifies the Capitol building and major airport terminals as locations with enhanced restrictions.
The same categories of persons prohibited from possessing firearms under ORS 166.250(1)(c) and ORS 166.270 are also prohibited from open carry, including:
Regardless of whether carried openly or concealed, it is unlawful to possess machine guns, certain short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and firearms silencers except as authorized under federal law.
Persons subject to firearm prohibitions related to mental health may petition for relief under ORS 166.273. ORS 166.274 provides a process for relief from the prohibition against possessing or purchasing a firearm, including applicable fees. These relief provisions apply equally to open and concealed carry rights.
Under ORS 166.250(1)(b), it is unlawful to possess a handgun that is concealed and readily accessible within a vehicle without a CHL. A handgun is considered readily accessible if it is within the passenger compartment (ORS 166.250(4)(a)).
Exceptions exist for vehicles without storage outside the passenger compartment, where the handgun may be stored in a closed and locked glove compartment, center console, or other container (ORS 166.250(4)(b)). For motorcycles, ATVs, and snowmobiles, a handgun in a locked container or equipped with a trigger lock is not considered readily accessible (ORS 166.250(4)(c)).
Note on open carry in vehicles: Oregon courts have addressed the question of open carry in automobiles. A handgun carried openly (e.g., in a visible belt holster on the person) within a vehicle may be treated differently than a handgun placed on the seat or dashboard. The Oregon Court of Appeals has issued rulings on open carry in automobiles — persons relying on open carry in vehicles should be aware that placement and visibility matter for determining whether the firearm is "concealed" under the statute.
Oregon courts and the Attorney General have addressed several open carry issues:
These rulings shape the practical application of Oregon's open carry laws beyond the statutory text.
Regardless of carry method, Oregon law separately prohibits the unlawful possession of armor-piercing ammunition. This restriction applies to both openly and concealed carried firearms.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Open carry legal statewide? | Yes, generally permitted for persons legally allowed to possess firearms |
| Permit required for open carry? | No state permit required |
| Minimum age | 18 years old to possess a firearm (ORS 166.250(1)(c)(A)); exceptions for minors with parental consent for non-handguns |
| Local restrictions possible? | Yes — cities and counties may restrict loaded firearms in public places under ORS 166.173 |
| Jurisdictions with restrictions | Portland, Beaverton, Tigard, Oregon City, Salem, Independence, Multnomah County |
| CHL holders exempt from local restrictions? | Yes — ORS 166.173(2)(c) |
| Unloaded open carry restricted locally? | No — ORS 166.173 only authorizes regulation of loaded firearms |
| State preemption | Yes — ORS 166.170 preempts local regulation except as expressly authorized (e.g., ORS 166.173) |
| Key statute | ORS 166.250(3) — firearms in belt holsters are not concealed |
| Relief from prohibitions | Available under ORS 166.273 (mental health) and ORS 166.274 (general) |
Oregon law restricts the carrying of firearms, including by concealed handgun license (CHL) holders, in several categories of locations. The primary statutes governing prohibited locations are ORS 166.360–166.380 and related provisions as amended by SB 554 (2021, Chapter 146).
A "public building" is defined under ORS 166.360(9) to include:
Possession of a loaded or unloaded firearm or any other dangerous weapon in a public building is a Class C felony under ORS 166.370(1)(a).
Under ORS 166.370(1)(b), within the Capitol (as defined in ORS 166.360(1)), the CHL affirmative defense does not provide a complete defense. If a CHL holder possesses a firearm in the Capitol, upon conviction the offense is reduced to a Class A misdemeanor (punishable by up to 364 days' imprisonment, $6,250 fine, or both) rather than a Class C felony.
The passenger terminal of a commercial service airport with over one million passenger boardings per year (i.e., Portland International Airport) is a prohibited public building. (ORS 166.360(9)(b), added by SB 554, 2021)
Under SB 554 (2021), entities that own, occupy, or control certain public buildings may adopt an ordinance, rule, or policy limiting or precluding the CHL affirmative defense for possession of firearms in those buildings.
While governed primarily by federal law (18 U.S.C. § 930), the following are prohibited locations:
The prohibition on firearms in public buildings (ORS 166.370(1)(a)) does not apply to:
Historically, CHL holders had an affirmative defense to the crime of possessing a firearm in a public building. SB 554 (2021) modified this by:
| Location | Offense Level (General) | Offense Level (CHL Holder, where applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| Public building (general) | Class C felony | Affirmative defense available (unless policy adopted) |
| Capitol building | Class C felony | Class A misdemeanor |
| Airport passenger terminal (>1M boardings) | Class C felony | Class A misdemeanor |
| School grounds (with adopted policy) | Class C felony | Class A misdemeanor |
| Building with adopted policy under ORS 166.377(3) | Class C felony | Class A misdemeanor |
| Court facility | Class C felony | No CHL exception |
Under ORS 166.250(1)(b), a person commits the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm if the person knowingly possesses a handgun that is concealed and readily accessible to the person within any vehicle.
This is a Class A misdemeanor (ORS 166.250(5)).
ORS 166.250(4) defines when a handgun is "readily accessible":
(a) General rule: A handgun is readily accessible if it is within the passenger compartment of the vehicle.
(b) Vehicles without external storage: If a vehicle (other than a motorcycle, ATV, or snowmobile) has no storage location outside the passenger compartment, a handgun is not readily accessible if:
(c) Motorcycles, ATVs, and snowmobiles: A handgun is not readily accessible if:
ORS 166.250(3): Firearms carried openly in belt holsters are not concealed within the meaning of this section. This applies to carrying in vehicles as well.
Persons holding a valid Oregon Concealed Handgun License (CHL) issued under ORS 166.291 and 166.292 are exempt from the prohibition on carrying a concealed handgun in a vehicle (ORS 166.260(1)(i)).
Important: Oregon generally does not recognize concealed handgun licenses from other states. If you want to carry a concealed handgun in Oregon, you will need an Oregon CHL.
The following persons are also exempt from the vehicle carry restrictions under ORS 166.250:
ORS 166.250(2)(b): Any U.S. citizen over 18 who resides in or is temporarily in Oregon (and is not a prohibited person) may own, possess, or keep a handgun at their place of residence or place of business without a permit. "Residence" includes a recreational vessel or recreational vehicle while used as residential quarters.
Portland City Code 14A.60.010 makes it unlawful to knowingly possess or carry a loaded firearm (or a firearm with a loaded magazine/clip) in or upon a public place, including while in a vehicle in a public place.
Exceptions to the Portland ordinance include:
Enhanced penalty: When the offense involves carrying a loaded firearm containing ammunition with gunpowder propellant in a vehicle (including a transit vehicle), the court must impose a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 days.
ORS 821.240 makes it an offense to operate a snowmobile or ATV with a firearm unless the firearm is unloaded.
"Unloaded" means (ORS 821.240(3)):
Exemptions from the ATV/snowmobile firearm restriction (ORS 821.240(2)):
Violation is a Class B traffic violation.
ORS 166.173 authorizes cities and counties to adopt ordinances regulating possession of loaded firearms in public places (which can include vehicles in public places). However, such ordinances do not apply to:
| Situation | Legal? |
|---|---|
| Concealed handgun in vehicle with Oregon CHL | ✅ Yes |
| Concealed handgun in vehicle without CHL | ❌ No (Class A misdemeanor) |
| Handgun in locked container (vehicle with no external storage), key removed, no CHL | ✅ Yes (not "readily accessible") |
| Firearm openly carried in belt holster in vehicle | ✅ Yes (not "concealed") |
| Loaded firearm in vehicle in Portland without CHL | ❌ No (city ordinance violation) |
| Loaded firearm on ATV/snowmobile without CHL | ❌ No (Class B traffic violation) |
| Out-of-state CHL only (no Oregon CHL) | ❌ Generally not recognized |
Oregon does not recognize any other state's concealed handgun license or permit.
This is a critical point for anyone traveling to Oregon with an out-of-state concealed carry permit. Regardless of what state issued your permit, it carries no legal authority in Oregon.
Oregon's concealed handgun licensing is governed by ORS 166.250 through ORS 166.292. The state operates on a Shall Issue system, with licenses issued by county sheriffs.
While Oregon does not honor other states' permits, it does offer a limited path for certain non-residents:
| Type | Fee |
|---|---|
| New Applicant | $115.00 |
| Renewal | $75.00 |
| Transfer | $30.00 |
| Transfer with Renewal | $90.00 |
| Change of Address/Name | $15.00 |
| Replacement/Duplicate Card | $15.00 |
Per ORS 166.291(5)(a), statutory fees include:
Oregon's use of force laws are codified primarily in ORS Chapter 161 (General Provisions — Justification), sections 161.190 through 161.275. Oregon does not have a statutory "Stand Your Ground" law, but the Oregon Supreme Court has held that there is no duty to retreat before using force in self-defense in public. (State v. Sandoval, 342 Ore. 506, 513-514 (2007); State v. Lang, 215 Ore. App. 15, 18 (2007)).
In any prosecution for an offense, justification as defined in ORS 161.195 to 161.275 is a defense.
Conduct that would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable and not criminal when:
Conduct that would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable and not criminal when:
A person is justified in using physical force upon another person for self-defense or to defend a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force. The person may use a degree of force which the person reasonably believes to be necessary for the purpose.
Oregon does not impose a legal duty to retreat before using force in self-defense. The Oregon Supreme Court confirmed in State v. Sandoval (2007): "The legislature did not intend to require a person to retreat before using deadly force against the imminent use of deadly physical force by another."
A person is NOT justified in using physical force upon another person if:
A person is NOT justified in using deadly physical force upon another person unless the person reasonably believes that the other person is:
Note: Oregon allows deadly force to be used if someone is committing or attempting to commit a burglary in a dwelling, and for second degree burglary the dwelling does not need to be occupied (ORS 161.219).
A person in lawful possession or control of premises is justified in using physical force upon another person when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes it necessary to prevent or terminate what the person reasonably believes to be the commission or attempted commission of a criminal trespass by the other person in or upon the premises.
A person may use deadly physical force in defense of premises only:
Definition of "Premises":
A person is justified in using physical force, other than deadly physical force, upon another person when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes it to be necessary to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission by the other person of theft or criminal mischief of property.
Important: Deadly force is generally not justified solely to protect property. Only non-deadly force may be used to prevent theft or criminal mischief.
The use of physical force upon another person that would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable under the following circumstances:
A person may not use physical force to resist an arrest by a peace officer who is known or reasonably appears to be a peace officer, whether the arrest is lawful or unlawful.
A private person acting on their own account is justified in using physical force upon another person when and to the extent reasonably believed necessary to:
Deadly force in a citizen's arrest is justified only when the person reasonably believes it necessary for self-defense or to defend a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of deadly physical force.
A person directed by a peace officer to assist in making an arrest or preventing an escape is justified in using physical force when and to the extent reasonably believed necessary to carry out the officer's direction.
Deadly force may be used only when:
The commission of acts that would otherwise constitute an offense (other than murder) is not criminal if the actor was coerced by the use or threatened use of unlawful physical force of such nature or degree to overcome earnest resistance. Duress is not a defense for one who intentionally or recklessly places oneself in a situation where duress is probable.
The use of force must be based on a reasonable belief that force is necessary. Courts consider:
The level of force used must be proportional to the threat faced:
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| ORS 161.190 | Justification as a defense |
| ORS 161.195 | "Justification" described |
| ORS 161.200 | Choice of evils |
| ORS 161.205 | Use of physical force generally |
| ORS 161.209 | Use of physical force in defense of a person |
| ORS 161.215 | Limitations on use of physical force in defense of a person |
| ORS 161.219 | Limitations on use of deadly physical force in defense of a person |
| ORS 161.225 | Use of physical force in defense of premises |
| ORS 161.229 | Use of physical force in defense of property |
| ORS 161.249 | Use of physical force by private person assisting an arrest |
| ORS 161.255 | Use of physical force by private person making citizen's arrest |
| ORS 161.260 | Use of physical force in resisting arrest prohibited |
| ORS 161.270 | Duress |
Oregon is not a Stand Your Ground state by statute, but achieves a similar result through case law. The Oregon Supreme Court has established that there is no duty to retreat before using force in self-defense, whether at home or in any place where a person is lawfully present.
The landmark case State v. Sandoval, 342 Ore. 506, 513-514 (2007) held:
"The legislature did not intend to require a person to retreat before using deadly force against the imminent use of deadly physical force by another."
This principle was reinforced in State v. Lang, 215 Ore. App. 15, 18 (2007). Oregon is one of eight states where stand-your-ground principles exist through judicial decision or jury instructions rather than statute. The other seven are California, Colorado, Illinois, New Mexico, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.
Because Oregon's no-duty-to-retreat rule was established by case law rather than legislation, it was not enacted as part of the nationwide wave of statutory stand-your-ground laws that began with Florida in 2005. Instead, the Oregon Supreme Court interpreted the existing self-defense statutes in ORS Chapter 161 as containing no retreat requirement.
Oregon's self-defense laws are part of a broader statutory justification framework in ORS Chapter 161. Under this framework, conduct that would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable and not criminal when it falls within the recognized defenses of person, premises, or property. The burden is on the state to disprove a justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt once it is raised.
A person is justified in using physical force upon another person for self-defense or to defend a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force. The person may use a degree of force which they reasonably believe to be necessary for the purpose.
Key elements of this standard:
The right to use physical force in self-defense is not available when:
Deadly physical force may only be used when a person reasonably believes the other person is:
Note that these are limitations on the broader self-defense right — ORS 161.219 narrows the circumstances in which the heightened response of deadly force is permitted, not the general right to use proportional physical force under ORS 161.209.
Oregon follows the Castle Doctrine, which provides specific protections for persons defending their home or premises:
Oregon law addresses the use of physical force in defense of property separately from defense of premises:
| Principle | Oregon Rule |
|---|---|
| Duty to retreat (in public) | No — established by case law (Sandoval, 2007) |
| Duty to retreat (at home) | No — Castle Doctrine applies |
| Deadly force against home intruders | Permitted against burglary in a dwelling (ORS 161.219) |
| Deadly force against violent felonies | Permitted when felony involves use/threat of physical force (ORS 161.219) |
| Proportional force required | Yes — force must be reasonable and proportional to the threat |
| Initial aggressor exception | Force not justified unless aggressor withdraws and communicates intent |
| Combat by agreement | Self-defense not available for consensual fights (ORS 161.215) |
| Deadly force to protect property only | Not permitted — deadly force requires threat to persons, not just property |
| Civil immunity for justified force | No specific statute — Oregon is not among the 22 states with statutory civil immunity |
| Case | Citation | Holding |
|---|---|---|
| State v. Sandoval | 342 Ore. 506 (2007) | No duty to retreat before using deadly force in self-defense |
| State v. Lang | 215 Ore. App. 15 (2007) | Reinforced no-duty-to-retreat principle |
| State v. Lockwood | 43 Or App 639 (1979) | Upheld defense of property considering prior confrontations |
Note: This information is current as of April 2026. Oregon's self-defense framework is primarily defined by ORS Chapter 161 (§§ 161.195–161.235) and interpreted through case law. Oregon has not enacted statutory stand-your-ground legislation, and the no-duty-to-retreat rule rests on judicial interpretation that could theoretically be revisited. Always consult current statutes and qualified legal counsel for the most up-to-date guidance.
Oregon does not have a statute that requires concealed handgun license (CHL) holders to proactively inform law enforcement officers that they are carrying a concealed firearm during a traffic stop or other law enforcement contact.
A comprehensive review of Oregon's firearms statutes — primarily found in ORS Chapter 166 (Offenses Against Public Order; Firearms and Other Weapons), including the concealed handgun license provisions at ORS 166.291 through 166.295 and related enforcement provisions — reveals no requirement that a CHL holder must voluntarily disclose their carry status to a law enforcement officer. The ATF's published compilation of Oregon State Laws and Published Ordinances likewise lists no duty-to-inform provision among Oregon's firearms statutes.
ORS 166.380 is the closest Oregon comes to any license-presentation requirement, and it is limited to public buildings:
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, a peace officer may examine a firearm possessed by anyone on the person while in or on a public building to determine whether the firearm is a loaded firearm.
(2) A person who is licensed under ORS 166.291 and 166.292 to carry a concealed handgun may present a valid concealed handgun license to the peace officer instead of providing the firearm to the peace officer for examination.
Key distinctions:
ORS 166.262 provides that a peace officer may not arrest or charge a person for violating ORS 166.250(1)(a) or (b) (unlawful possession of firearms) or ORS 166.370(1)(a) (possession in public buildings) if the person has a valid CHL in their immediate possession, except when the person is carrying:
Recent legislative change: ORS 166.262 was amended by 2025 c.594 §5, which updated the list of locations where CHL arrest protection does not apply, adding buildings with policies under ORS 166.377(3) and clarifying the school grounds exception.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Duty to Inform | No — Oregon has no statutory requirement to proactively inform law enforcement of concealed carry status |
| Must Present License if Asked | Only in public buildings under ORS 166.380 — CHL holder may present license in lieu of firearm examination |
| Arrest Protection | ORS 166.262 — peace officers may not arrest CHL holders for carrying offenses if CHL is in immediate possession (exceptions: Capitol, PDX airport terminal, certain policy-restricted buildings, school grounds) |
| Penalty for Failure to Inform | N/A — no duty-to-inform statute exists |
| Recent Changes | 2025 c.594 §5 amended ORS 166.262, updating CHL arrest-protection exceptions |
| Recommended Practice | Voluntarily informing officers is generally recommended for safety |
Training requirements for Oregon's Concealed Handgun License are established under ORS 166.291, which requires applicants to "demonstrate competency with a handgun" through approved training methods.
Under ORS 166.291, an applicant may demonstrate competency with a handgun by completing any one of the following:
Hunter Education or Hunter Safety Course
National Rifle Association (NRA) Firearms Safety or Training Course
Firearms Safety or Training Course Available to the General Public
Law Enforcement Firearms Safety or Training Course
Evidence of Equivalent Experience with a Handgun
Prior or Current Oregon CHL
Multiple Oregon county sheriff's offices recognize the Oregon State Sheriff's Association (OSSA) online course as an approved course that satisfies the Oregon educational requirement for handgun safety training. This course is available at oregonchl.org.
Pursuant to ORS 166.295(1)(a), a concealed handgun license is renewable by repeating the procedures set out in ORS 166.291 and ORS 166.292.
An Oregon CHL is valid for 4 years from the date of issuance, unless otherwise revoked or denied.
Fees are set by individual county sheriff's offices but are consistent across the sources reviewed:
| Service | Fee |
|---|---|
| Renewal | $75.00 |
| Transfer | $30.00 |
| Transfer with Renewal | $90.00 |
| Address Change | $15.00 |
| Name Change | $15.00 |
| Duplicate/Replacement Card | $15.00 |
Note: Fees are non-refundable. Some counties charge an additional convenience fee (e.g., 2-3%) for credit/debit card payments. Payment methods accepted vary by county but generally include cash, check, and credit/debit cards.
Per ORS 166.292, the sheriff has 45 days to process a renewal application. Some counties may process applications sooner depending on workload.
An otherwise expired concealed handgun license continues to be valid for up to 45 days after the licensee applies for renewal, provided that:
The renewal process varies slightly by county:
If you applied for renewal before your license expired and have proof of the renewal application (receipt), your expired CHL remains valid for up to 45 days while the renewal is being processed. Columbia County advises carrying the receipt along with your current CHL until the new license arrives in the mail.
If your CHL has expired and you did not apply for renewal before the expiration date, you cannot legally carry concealed. You must apply for renewal and receive your new card before you are legally permitted to carry concealed again.
Active members of the armed forces of the United States, the National Guard of the United States, or the Oregon National Guard may submit a renewal application online (per Columbia County guidance via Permitium).
A CHL can be denied on renewal or revoked for any of the reasons that would cause denial of an initial application, including:
Per ORS 166.293(5), if a renewal application is denied or a license is revoked, the applicant will be notified by certified letter and has 30 days from the date of receipt to appeal the decision through Circuit Court.
Per ORS 166.295(C)(2), licensees are required to report any change of address, and the sheriff shall issue a new license as a duplicate for the change of address. The license expires on the same date as the original. Failure to report a change of address may result in revocation. The fee for address or name changes is $15.00.
Oregon concealed handgun license fees are set at the county level by each Sheriff's Office, pursuant to ORS 166.291 and ORS 166.292. While fees are generally consistent across counties, minor variations may exist. The following fee schedules are based on information from multiple Oregon county Sheriff's Offices.
The following fees are consistent across Jackson County, Columbia County, and other Oregon counties:
| Fee Type | Amount |
|---|---|
| New Application | $115.00 |
| Renewal | $75.00 |
| Transfer (from another Oregon county) | $30.00 |
| Transfer with Renewal | $90.00 |
| Change of Address | $15.00 |
| Change of Name | $15.00 |
| Duplicate/Replacement Card | $15.00 |
Sources: Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Columbia County Sheriff's Office
It is unlawful to possess the following unless registered as required under federal law:
Unlawful possession of a machine gun, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or firearms silencer is a Class B felony (ORS 166.272(2)). However, a peace officer may not arrest or charge a person if the person has documentation showing the item is registered as required under federal law (ORS 166.272(3)). Federal registration (NFA compliance) is an affirmative defense (ORS 166.272(4)).
Under Oregon law, it is a crime to:
Exceptions to the concealed carry prohibition:
The following individuals are prohibited from possessing a firearm in Oregon (ORS 166.250, 166.270):
Exception for certain felons (ORS 166.270(4)): The prohibition does not apply to a person who:
The Oregon State Police Firearms Instant Check System (FICS) applies the following federal disqualifiers:
A person under the age of 18 may possess a firearm only if all of the following conditions are met:
A person barred from possessing a firearm due to mental health determinations may petition the Psychiatric Security Review Board for relief if:
The board shall grant relief if the petitioner demonstrates they will not be likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety and that granting relief would not be contrary to the public interest (ORS 166.273(5)). A person may file a petition no more than once every two years (ORS 166.273(9)).
Gun dealers must post a prominent notice stating: "The purchaser of a firearm has an obligation to store firearms in a safe manner and to prevent unsupervised access to a firearm by a minor. If a minor or unauthorized person obtains access to a firearm and the owner failed to store the firearm in a safe manner, the owner may be in violation of the law."
A person who delivers or transfers a firearm to a minor must directly supervise the minor's use. Failure to supervise constitutes negligence per se in a civil action for damages caused by the minor's use of the firearm (ORS 166.480(2)(a)).
Oregon does not have a specific statute that explicitly prohibits carrying a concealed firearm while under the influence of alcohol or intoxicants. Unlike many other states that establish BAC thresholds or standalone intoxication offenses for armed persons, Oregon's concealed handgun license (CHL) statutes (ORS 166.291–166.295) and the general firearms statutes in ORS Chapter 166 contain no dedicated provision criminalizing the possession or carry of a firearm while intoxicated.
A thorough review of ORS Chapter 166 (Offenses Against Public Order; Firearms and Other Weapons) confirms that no provision directly addresses carrying a firearm while intoxicated. Oregon does not establish:
This places Oregon among a minority of states that do not specifically regulate the combination of firearms and intoxication through dedicated statutory language.
While Oregon lacks a carrying-under-the-influence statute, its general criminal culpability framework addresses intoxication directly. ORS 161.125 provides:
"(1) The use of drugs or controlled substances, dependence on drugs or controlled substances or voluntary intoxication shall not, as such, constitute a defense to a criminal charge, but in any prosecution for an offense, evidence that the defendant used drugs or controlled substances, or was dependent on drugs or controlled substances, or was intoxicated may be offered by the defendant whenever it is relevant to negative an element of the crime charged."
"(2) When recklessness establishes an element of the offense, if the defendant, due to the use of drugs or controlled substances, dependence on drugs or controlled substances or voluntary intoxication, is unaware of a risk of which the defendant would have been aware had the defendant been not intoxicated, not using drugs or controlled substances, or not dependent on drugs or controlled substances, such unawareness is immaterial."
This second provision is particularly significant for armed individuals: if a person handles a firearm recklessly while intoxicated, the fact that intoxication prevented them from perceiving the risk does not negate the recklessness element. The law treats them as if they were sober for purposes of evaluating recklessness.
The legal standard for recklessness, which underpins many charges that could arise from intoxicated firearm handling, is defined in ORS 161.085(9):
"'Recklessly,' when used with respect to a result or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense, means that a person is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists. The risk must be of such nature and degree that disregard thereof constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation."
Under ORS 161.125(2), a person's voluntary intoxication cannot shield them from this standard — if a sober person would have been aware of the risk, the intoxicated person is held to the same measure.
Although there is no specific carrying-under-the-influence law, a person who uses or handles a firearm while intoxicated could face charges under other Oregon statutes if their conduct meets the relevant elements:
Carrying while intoxicated is not itself a listed ground for CHL revocation under ORS 166.293. However, criminal conduct committed while intoxicated can lead to CHL consequences through multiple pathways:
If intoxicated conduct with a firearm results in a conviction for an offense described in ORS 166.255(1)(b) or (c) (including misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence or stalking), the court is required to:
Oregon's Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants (DUII) laws (ORS 813.010) apply to operating vehicles and are not directly related to firearm carry. However:
Regardless of Oregon state law, federal law prohibits firearm possession by any person who is an "unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance." Key points:
While Oregon does not prohibit carrying while intoxicated, CHL holders should be aware of location-based restrictions that may overlap with alcohol consumption:
Although Oregon does not have a specific prohibition on carrying a firearm while under the influence, CHL holders should exercise extreme caution:
Note: The absence of a specific Oregon statute on carrying while intoxicated was confirmed through review of ORS Chapter 166 (firearms statutes), ORS Chapter 161 (general criminal liability provisions), ORS Chapter 471 (liquor regulations), and the Oregon State Police FICS disqualification categories. No provision directly criminalizing the carry of a firearm while intoxicated was identified in the 2025 edition of the Oregon Revised Statutes or in 2021 session legislation.
Oregon enacted comprehensive firearm storage requirements through Senate Bill 554 (2021), codified as ORS 166.390–166.403, known as the Cindy Yuille and Steve Forsyth Act (ORS 166.390). These provisions establish mandatory storage requirements, reporting obligations for lost or stolen firearms, and transfer security requirements.
An owner or possessor of a firearm must, at all times that the firearm is not carried by or under the control of the owner, possessor, or authorized person, secure the firearm by one of the following methods:
(ORS 166.395(1)(a))
A firearm is not considered secured if:
The storage requirement does not apply when:
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Authorized person | A person authorized by the owner or possessor to temporarily carry or control the firearm while in the presence of the owner or possessor |
| Container | A box, case, chest, locker, safe, or similar receptacle (including within a vehicle: a glove compartment, enclosed trunk, or center console) equipped with a tamper-resistant lock |
| Control | The owner/possessor is close enough to prevent an unauthorized person from obtaining the firearm; OR the owner/possessor is in their own residence, alone or with authorized non-minor co-residents, and the residence is secure |
| Gun room | An area within a building enclosed by walls, floor, and ceiling (including a closet) with all entrances secured by a tamper-resistant lock, kept locked when unoccupied, used for firearm storage or firearm-related activities |
| Trigger or cable lock | A device installed in a firearm designed to prevent operation without first deactivating the device; or a device incorporated into the firearm's design to prevent operation by unauthorized persons |
| Minor | A person under 18 years of age |
| Firearm | As defined in ORS 166.210, except it does not include a firearm rendered permanently inoperable |
| Violation | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to secure a firearm | Class C violation | Up to $500 fine |
| Failure to secure a firearm when a minor obtains the unsecured firearm and the owner knew or should have known a minor could gain unauthorized access | Class A violation | Up to $2,000 fine |
If a firearm obtained as a result of a storage violation is used to injure a person or property within two years of the violation, the violation constitutes per se negligence in a civil action. The presumption of negligence may not be overcome by showing the owner acted reasonably.
Exceptions to civil liability (ORS 166.395(4)):
When transferring a firearm that requires a criminal background check under ORS 166.435, the transferor must transfer the firearm:
| Violation | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to secure firearm during transfer | Class C violation | Up to $500 fine |
A person who owns, possesses, or controls a firearm must report the loss or theft to a law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction where the loss or theft occurred:
| Violation | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to report loss/theft | Class B violation | Up to $1,000 fine |
| Knowingly providing false information in a report | Crime of initiating a false report under ORS 162.375 | Criminal penalties |
Within 24 hours of receiving a report, a law enforcement agency must create a record in the Law Enforcement Data System or another electronic database as determined by the Department of State Police.
A person who delivers or otherwise transfers a firearm to a minor must directly supervise the minor's use of the firearm.
SB 554 requires gun dealers to post in a prominent location a notice, in block letters not less than one inch in height, stating:
"The purchaser of a firearm has an obligation to store firearms in a safe manner and to prevent unsupervised access to a firearm by a minor. If a minor or unauthorized person obtains access to a firearm and the owner failed to store the firearm in a safe manner, the owner may be in violation of the law."
Portland has an additional local ordinance that makes it an offense to fail to prevent access to a firearm by a minor when the person knew or reasonably should have known a minor could gain access:
| Violation | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|
| Minor gains access to firearm on premises | Up to 10 days incarceration and $500 fine |
| Minor gains access and carries firearm off premises | Up to 20 days incarceration and $750 fine |
| Minor carries firearm to a school or school event | Up to 30 days incarceration and $2,500 fine |
Defenses under Portland Code:
Authorized Department of Corrections staff may possess a personal handgun in their vehicle parked in a department parking lot if:
SB 554 (Chapter 146, Oregon Laws 2021) took effect on the 91st day following adjournment sine die of the 2021 Regular Session.
Under ORS 166.250(1)(b), it is unlawful to possess a handgun that is concealed and readily accessible to the person within any vehicle, unless an exception applies.
ORS 166.250(3): Firearms carried openly in belt holsters are not considered concealed within the meaning of the statute.
Persons licensed under ORS 166.291 and 166.292 to carry a concealed handgun are exempt from the prohibition on carrying concealed firearms, including in vehicles (ORS 166.260(1)(i)).
Under ORS 166.262, a peace officer may not arrest or charge a person for violating ORS 166.250(1)(a) or (b) if the person has in their immediate possession a valid concealed handgun license, unless the person possesses a firearm:
The following persons are not affected by the concealed carry prohibition per ORS 166.260:
Note: The exceptions in ORS 166.260(1)(d) through (i) constitute affirmative defenses to a charge of violating ORS 166.250, per ORS 166.260(4) — meaning the burden is on the person to prove the exception applies. The exceptions in ORS 166.260(3) (shooting club members and licensed hunters/fishermen) are stated as exemptions ("ORS 166.250 does not apply to or affect") rather than being explicitly designated as affirmative defenses by the statute.
ORS 166.250(2)(b): Any U.S. citizen over 18 years of age who resides in or is temporarily sojourning in Oregon (and is not in a prohibited class) may own, possess, or keep a handgun at their place of residence or place of business without a permit. "Residence" includes a recreational vessel or recreational vehicle while used as residential quarters.
ORS 166.170 vests the authority to regulate the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation, or use of firearms solely in the Legislative Assembly. Counties, cities, and other municipal entities may not enact ordinances to regulate these matters except as expressly authorized by state statute. Contrary ordinances are void.
Despite state preemption, ORS 166.173 allows cities and counties to adopt ordinances regulating the possession of loaded firearms in public places. However, these ordinances do not apply to:
The City of Portland has a local ordinance making it unlawful to knowingly possess or carry a loaded firearm (or a firearm with a loaded magazine/clip) in a public place, including in a vehicle. Exceptions include:
Penalty: Up to six months imprisonment and a $500 fine. A mandatory minimum 30-day sentence applies when the offense involves carrying a loaded firearm containing ammunition with gunpowder propellant in a vehicle, including a transit vehicle.
Under ORS 166.256(6) and ORS 166.259(6), a person who is otherwise prohibited from possessing firearms may transport a firearm without prosecution if:
Under the federal Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act (18 USC §926C), qualified retired law enforcement officers may carry a concealed firearm across state lines, including in Oregon. Requirements include:
ORS 166.630 prohibits discharging a weapon on or across a highway, ocean shore recreation area, or public utility facility.
ORS 166.638 prohibits discharging a weapon across airport operational surfaces.
Oregon has a broad state preemption statute that reserves firearms regulation authority to the state legislature:
ORS 166.170(1): "Except as expressly authorized by state statute, the authority to regulate in any matter whatsoever the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition, is vested solely in the Legislative Assembly."
ORS 166.170(2): "Except as expressly authorized by state statute, no county, city or other municipal corporation or district may enact civil or criminal ordinances, including but not limited to zoning ordinances, to regulate, restrict or prohibit the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition. Ordinances that are contrary to this subsection are void."
This statute was enacted in 1995 (1995 Special Session, Chapter 1, §1).
Despite the broad preemption, Oregon law carves out several specific areas where local governments retain regulatory authority:
The City of Portland has enacted certain firearms-related ordinances that it considers to fall within the authorized exceptions to state preemption, including:
Portland's policy explicitly acknowledges that these regulations "clearly fall outside" the state preemption statute because they involve discharge regulation and loaded firearm possession in public places — both of which are expressly authorized by state statute. Portland also asserts that state law does not prohibit municipalities from enacting curfew, loss reporting, or child access laws.
Note: The scope and enforceability of some local ordinances, particularly those beyond discharge and loaded possession regulations, may be subject to legal challenge under the preemption statute.
Oregon's Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) law, commonly referred to as the "red flag" law, was enacted in 2017 (Senate Bill 719) and took effect on January 1, 2018. The following criminal penalties are associated with violations of or abuse of the ERPO process:
(Source: Oregon Secretary of State Advisory Report 2023-26)
(Source: Oregon Secretary of State Advisory Report 2023-26; Oregon Judicial Department ERPO Packet)
The ERPO petition form packet from the Oregon Judicial Department also includes the following warning:
"Filing a Petition for harassment purposes or based on false statements may lead to criminal charges against a Petitioner."
While not penalties themselves, failure to comply with these requirements constitutes a violation of the ERPO and triggers the criminal penalties described above:
Under Oregon law, it is a crime to knowingly possess a machine gun, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or firearms silencer unless the item is properly registered under federal law (i.e., the National Firearms Act).
Crime Classification: Unlawful possession of a machine gun, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or firearms silencer is a Class B felony (punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment and/or up to $250,000 fine per ORS 161.605(2) and 161.625(1)(c)).
Law Enforcement Protection: A peace officer may not arrest or charge a person for violating ORS 166.272(1) if the person has in their immediate possession documentation showing the NFA item is registered as required under federal law.
Affirmative Defense: It is an affirmative defense to a charge under ORS 166.272(1) that the machine gun, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or firearms silencer was registered as required under federal law.
Oregon enacted the "Community Safety Firearms Act" (2025 c.594), which prohibits rapid fire activators:
Oregon prohibits the manufacture, importation, possession, use, purchase, sale, or transfer of large-capacity magazines, defined as:
Exceptions include:
If a defendant uses or threatens use of a firearm during commission of a felony:
Oregon law permits possession of machine guns, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and silencers/suppressors only when properly registered under the National Firearms Act (26 U.S.C. Chapter 53). Owners should maintain registration documentation on their person when in possession of NFA items.
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| ORS 166.210 | Definitions (including machine gun, short-barreled firearms) |
| ORS 166.272 | Unlawful possession of machine guns, short-barreled firearms, silencers |
| ORS 166.350 | Armor-piercing ammunition |
| ORS 166.352 | Rapid fire activators (2025) |
| ORS 166.355 | Large-capacity magazines |
| ORS 166.382 | Destructive devices |
| ORS 161.610 | Enhanced penalties for firearm use in felonies |
| 26 U.S.C. Ch. 53 | National Firearms Act (federal registration) |
Concealed Handgun Licenses in Oregon are issued at the county level by the sheriff's office. Contact your county sheriff's office for specific eligibility requirements, application procedures, and fees. See ORS 166.291 for residency definitions.
Oregon CHL requirements are established under ORS 166.291. Contact your county sheriff's office for the complete list of qualification requirements and application procedures. Oregon Revised Statutes require CHL holders to keep their current physical address on file at all times with the issuer of the CHL.
Based on Lane County's CHL program, common application types include:
Contact your county sheriff's office for the full list of available application types and specific requirements.
Oregon recognizes concealed weapon permits and pistol/firearms permits as acceptable forms of identification for certain state services (e.g., ordering vital records from Oregon Health Authority). A concealed weapon permit with photo is listed as one of the acceptable identification documents, and a pistol or firearms permit is also recognized.
Under ORS 192.374, a public body may not disclose records or information that identifies a person as a current or former holder of, or applicant for, a concealed handgun license, except in limited circumstances such as criminal justice purposes, court orders, written consent of the holder/applicant, or other specific exceptions outlined in the statute.
Oregon CHL holders should verify concealed carry reciprocity agreements with other states before traveling. Reciprocity agreements can change; check with the destination state's attorney general or law enforcement agency for current information.
Under Oregon Law (ORS 166.250 and ORS 166.291–166.295), if you wish to carry a handgun concealed upon your person, or concealed and readily accessible within a vehicle, you must have a concealed handgun license (CHL). A CHL allows you to carry a loaded or unloaded handgun concealed upon your person or concealed within your control in a car or other means of transportation. The CHL applies only to handguns as defined in ORS 166.210(4) — a firearm designed to be held and fired with one hand.
Unless a firearm is partially visible, it is considered concealed under Oregon law. There is no specific statutory definition of "concealment" in ORS Chapter 166, but case law and sheriff's office guidance consistently hold that if the firearm is not readily visible to ordinary observation, it is concealed. This includes carrying inside a bag, purse, pocket, waistband, or jacket — as well as within a vehicle's glove compartment, center console, or under a seat.
CHLs are issued by the county sheriff's office of the applicant's county of residence and are valid throughout the entire state of Oregon (ORS 166.291(1)).
Oregon CHLs are valid for 4 years from the date of issuance, unless otherwise revoked or denied (ORS 166.292(4)).
No. Oregon does not recognize any other state's concealed handgun license or permit. There are no active reciprocity agreements. Your Oregon CHL carries no legal force outside of Oregon unless the destination state independently recognizes Oregon licenses. Before traveling to another state with a concealed handgun, you must verify that state's current reciprocity rules.
Yes. Oregon is generally an open-carry state. Adults who are not otherwise prohibited from possessing firearms may openly carry a loaded or unloaded firearm in most public places without a CHL. However, individual cities and counties may regulate the open carry of loaded firearms in public places under ORS 166.173. Notable examples include Portland, Salem, Beaverton, Tigard, and Oregon City, which have enacted local ordinances restricting loaded open carry. CHL holders are exempt from these local restrictions under ORS 166.173(2)(c).
ORS 166.170 establishes that the State of Oregon has preemption over most firearms regulation — meaning local governments generally cannot enact firearms laws that are more restrictive than state law. However, there are specific exceptions under ORS 166.173 that allow cities and counties to:
To be eligible for an Oregon CHL under ORS 166.291(1), you must meet the following minimum qualifications:
Under ORS 166.291(1)(p), you must demonstrate competency with a handgun by one of the following methods:
Note: The Oregon State Sheriff's Association offers an approved online course. Many county sheriffs also maintain lists of locally approved instructors and courses. The course certificate must be current — some counties require completion within the past year, though this varies.
Fees vary by county, as each sheriff's office sets its own fee schedule within statutory limits. Common fee ranges include:
| Application Type | Typical Range |
|---|---|
| New Applicant | $50–$115 |
| Renewal | $50–$75 |
| Transfer (from another county) | $30–$50 |
| Transfer with Renewal | $75–$90 |
| Change of Address and/or Name | $15 |
| Replacement/Duplicate Card | $15 |
Example: Columbia County charges $115 for new applicants and $75 for renewals. Multnomah County and other larger counties may have different fee structures. Contact your county sheriff's office for exact current fees.
Applications are submitted through your county sheriff's office. Many counties now use an online application system (such as Permitium). Gather all required documentation before starting the application:
The process generally involves:
By statute (ORS 166.292(1)), the sheriff's office has 45 days to process both new applications and renewals once all required documentation has been received, including fingerprints (for new and transfer applications) and a photograph. Most counties process applications in 2–4 weeks, but processing times vary. The sheriff must issue the license or provide a written denial within the 45-day period.
Yes. New applicants and transfer applicants are required to be fingerprinted regardless of whether fingerprints are already on file with the Oregon State Police. Fingerprints are submitted for both state (OSP) and federal (FBI) background checks. Renewals do not require new fingerprints.
No. Oregon does not require a CHL applicant to register their handgun or to qualify with a specific firearm. Do not bring your firearm to the sheriff's office.
Even with a valid CHL, there are locations where carrying a concealed handgun is prohibited or restricted:
State prohibited locations under ORS 166.370:
Locations with conditional restrictions: 4. Public buildings — Under ORS 166.370(3)(g), CHL holders are generally exempt from the prohibition on carrying firearms in public buildings. However, the Oregon Court of Appeals has held that certain entities (such as the Oregon University System) may impose restrictions. Federal buildings remain prohibited regardless of CHL status. 5. Schools (K–12) — Under ORS 166.370(1), possessing a firearm in or on school grounds is generally prohibited. CHL holders have a statutory exemption under ORS 166.370(3)(g), but individual school districts may have policies that affect this. 6. Private property — Property owners and businesses may prohibit firearms on their premises. While violating a no-firearms policy on private property is not a criminal offense per se (Oregon has no specific criminal trespass-with-firearm statute), you must leave if asked, and refusal may constitute criminal trespass under ORS 164.245. 7. Indian reservations — Tribal law governs; your CHL may not be recognized. 8. National parks — Carrying is generally permitted under federal law, but firearms are prohibited inside federal buildings and visitor centers within the parks.
Note: Oregon law regarding firearms in public buildings and schools has been the subject of ongoing litigation. Always verify current law before carrying in sensitive locations.
Pursuant to ORS 166.295(1)(a), a CHL is renewable by repeating the procedures set out in ORS 166.291 and 166.292. You are not required to be fingerprinted again or to provide character references again for a renewal. You are also not required to retake a handgun safety course for renewal.
An otherwise expired CHL continues to be valid for up to 45 days after the licensee applies for renewal if:
Tip: Apply for renewal approximately 30–45 days before your expiration date. Applying too early (more than 45 days before expiration) may result in losing time on your current permit, as the new 4-year period starts from the date of issuance.
No. You must have a valid concealed handgun license to carry concealed. Carrying concealed with an expired CHL is a violation of ORS 166.250 and may be charged as a Class A misdemeanor. You must apply to renew your CHL and receive your new card before you are legally permitted to carry concealed again — unless you are within the 45-day grace period described above.
Under ORS 166.293, the sheriff shall revoke a CHL if the licensee:
The sheriff must provide written notice of the revocation, including the reason. The revocation takes effect upon the licensee's receipt of the notice.
Yes. Under ORS 166.293(4), if your CHL application is denied or your existing CHL is revoked, you may petition the circuit court in the county where the application was made or the license was issued. The court will conduct a de novo review (fresh hearing). If the court finds that you meet the statutory qualifications, it will order the sheriff to issue or restore the license. The petition must be filed within a reasonable time, and you may wish to consult an attorney experienced in firearms law.
ORS 166.295(2) requires that the licensee report a change of address to the sheriff. The sheriff shall issue a new license as a duplicate reflecting the new address. The license expires on the same date as the original. Failure to report an address change may result in revocation of your license under ORS 166.293. The cost is typically $15. You must update your address with the Oregon DMV prior to updating your CHL.
If you move to another county, you must apply for a CHL transfer with the new county's sheriff's office. They will notify the previous county that you are no longer a CHL holder there. You will need to:
Your existing CHL remains valid until the transfer is processed or it expires, whichever comes first.
If you move out of state and do not transfer your license to another Oregon county, you must notify your issuing county's sheriff's office. Your Oregon CHL does not automatically transfer to any other state. Some states may recognize your Oregon CHL independently, but you must verify this before carrying in another state.
Yes. Bring a marriage license or court documentation as proof of your name change. The cost is typically $15. You should also update your name with the Oregon DMV.
Report the loss to your county sheriff's office and apply for a replacement. The cost is typically $15. You should not carry concealed without your physical CHL card in your possession.
Oregon law does not require you to proactively inform a law enforcement officer that you are carrying a concealed handgun during a traffic stop. However, many CHL instructors and law enforcement agencies recommend the following best practices:
If you are carrying concealed without your CHL on your person, this is a serious offense under ORS 166.250 and can result in arrest, seizure of the firearm, and revocation of your license. Always carry your CHL with you when carrying concealed.
Possibly. Under ORS 166.291(8), the county sheriff may waive the residency requirement for a resident of a contiguous state (Washington, Idaho, Nevada, or California) who has a compelling business interest or other legitimate demonstrated need. Key points:
Yes. If you are an active member of the Armed Forces of the United States, the National Guard of the United States, or the Oregon National Guard, you may submit a renewal application through your county's online application system. Under ORS 166.295, provisions exist to accommodate military personnel who may be stationed outside of Oregon. Contact your issuing county's sheriff's office for specific procedures related to military deployment renewals.
Measure 114 was approved by Oregon voters in November 2022 and would have established a permit-to-purchase requirement for all firearms and banned magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The measure faced immediate legal challenges and was largely enjoined by courts. As of early 2026, key provisions of Measure 114 — including the permit-to-purchase system and the large-capacity magazine ban — remain subject to ongoing litigation and have not been fully implemented. The CHL process under ORS 166.291–166.295 continues to operate independently of Measure 114. Check the Oregon Judicial Department website or consult legal counsel for the most current status of this litigation.
A CHL (Concealed Handgun License) under ORS 166.291 authorizes you to carry a concealed handgun. It does not replace or substitute for any separate purchase requirements. Oregon requires a background check (through a licensed dealer) for all firearm transfers under ORS 166.435–166.441. If Measure 114's permit-to-purchase provisions take effect, that would be an additional, separate requirement from the CHL.
Carrying a concealed handgun without a valid CHL is a violation of ORS 166.250 and is classified as a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to 364 days in jail and a fine of up to $6,250. A second or subsequent offense may carry enhanced penalties. Additionally, the firearm may be seized and subject to forfeiture proceedings.
ORS 166.260 lists persons who are exempt from the prohibition on carrying concealed handguns without a CHL, including:
Browse local instructors offering state-approved training in your area. Book online, complete your training, and get one step closer to your concealed carry permit.