Arizona is a constitutional carry state, allowing concealed carry without a permit for anyone 21 or older who can legally possess a firearm. While a permit is not required, Arizona offers an optional Concealed Weapons Permit (CWP) through the Department of Public Safety that provides additional benefits including reciprocity with other states and the ability to carry in certain restricted locations.
Find AZ CCW ClassesClasses available this weekend near you
Up to 75 days
$60
5 years
Not Required
37+ states
Allowed
Arizona is a constitutional carry state. No permit is required for concealed carry, though an optional CWP is available. Cost: $60. Valid for 5 years and honored in 37+ states.
Reviewed by Will Luker, Founder of CCW Hub. USCCA Training Counselor, USCCA Certified Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, Law Enforcement.
Last updated: 2025-01-02
Arizona is a constitutional carry state. You do not need a permit to carry a concealed firearm if you are 21 or older and legally allowed to possess a firearm. However, Arizona offers an optional Concealed Weapons Permit (CWP) for benefits like reciprocity with other states. The permit costs $60 and is valid for 5 years. Training of specified hours is required.
Permit Required?
No (Constitutional Carry)
Minimum Age
21 years old
Training Required?
Yes (varies hours)
Permit Cost
$60
Processing Time
Up to 75 days
States Honoring Permit
37+ states
Source: CCW Hub - Arizona Concealed Carry Permit Guide. Information verified as of 2025-01-02. Always verify current laws with official state sources before carrying.
This section covers Arizona firearm rules that do not fit cleanly into the other sections of this guide: ammunition, magazine capacity, waiting periods, private sales, dealer rules, body armor, antique firearms, and the historical and constitutional backdrop. If a question does not belong in Permit Basics, Concealed Carry, Open Carry, Constitutional Carry, Prohibited Places, Use of Force, Castle Doctrine, Restrictions, Reciprocity, or one of the other dedicated sections, the short answer is here.
Arizona is a permissive firearms state. Most of what appears in this catch-all is not regulated at the state level. The federal framework controls, or no rule applies at all. A.R.S. 13-3108(A) state-preempts local firearms ordinances, so the city or county next door cannot add a layer that state law does not impose.
Arizona imposes no state-level ammunition restrictions. There is no state ammunition background check, no caliber prohibition, no online-purchase rule, and no registration requirement for ammunition sales between Arizona residents. Federal law still applies:
Arizona's prohibited-possessor list at A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(7) mirrors several of the federal categories. The A.R.S. 13-3102(A)(4) offense (possessing a deadly weapon or prohibited weapon while a prohibited possessor) is the state-law parallel for prohibited persons who possess firearms, with ammunition-only conduct still falling under the federal scheme.
Arizona has no magazine capacity limit. Standard-capacity magazines (17, 20, 30, and beyond) are lawful to own, carry, transfer, and use. There is no state assault-weapon law and no feature-test for rifles. Local jurisdictions are blocked from imposing magazine caps by A.R.S. 13-3108(A), which expressly preempts local rules on "firearms or ammunition components or related accessories."
None. Arizona imposes no waiting period for any firearm purchase. The only delay you may experience is the federal NICS background check at an FFL counter, which is typically instant but can be delayed for further review under 18 U.S.C. 922(t). If NICS returns a "delay" status and the FFL has not received a final determination after three business days, federal law permits the dealer to proceed at their discretion (the "default proceed" rule), though many dealers wait longer as policy.
Arizona law does not require a background check for private firearm sales or transfers between Arizona residents who are not engaged in the business of dealing firearms. Federal law still applies:
Operational best practice (not required by Arizona statute):
An A.R.S. 13-3112 permit is a strong indicator the buyer cleared a recent background check at the time the permit was issued, but the permit is not a substitute for federal-prohibitor diligence on a current transaction.
Arizona does not impose a state-level firearm dealer license requirement. Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) in Arizona are regulated by ATF under the Gun Control Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. Chapter 44) and 27 C.F.R. Part 478. Federal rules govern the Form 4473, the bound-book A&D record, NICS background checks, and ATF compliance inspections. Arizona does not layer state-level inventory tracking, dealer-bond requirements, or state firearm-purchase permits on top of the federal scheme. Local jurisdictions are preempted from adopting any dealer-licensing layer by A.R.S. 13-3108(A).
Body armor is legal to own and possess in Arizona for non-prohibited persons. Arizona has no state-level prohibition on the purchase, sale, or wear of soft body armor or rifle plates by ordinary residents, and there is no state body-armor purchase permit, waiting period, or registration.
Two restrictions deserve mention:
Possession of body armor by an ordinary law-abiding Arizonan for personal defense, range use, or instruction is not regulated at the state level.
Federal law at 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(16) defines "antique firearm" to include firearms manufactured in or before 1898, plus certain muzzleloading replicas. Antiques are exempt from most Gun Control Act provisions (no FFL requirement to sell, no Form 4473, no NICS for purchases). Arizona follows the federal classification at A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(4), which defines "firearm" by function (a weapon designed to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive) but excludes "a firearm in permanently inoperable condition" - the same operability concept federal law uses for antiques and deactivated firearms.
An antique that functions as a firearm is still subject to Arizona's prohibited-places framework under A.R.S. 13-3102(A) if carried in a restricted location, and to A.R.S. 13-3102(A)(4) if possessed by an A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(7) prohibited possessor.
The Arizona Constitution, Art. II, Section 26, provides: "The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the State shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men." This is one of the more strongly worded state right-to-bear-arms provisions in the United States. The proviso bars private armed bodies of men; it does not narrow the individual right.
| Year | Bill | What it did |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | (Shall-issue framework) | Established Arizona's shall-issue concealed weapons permit system, codified at A.R.S. 13-3112. |
| 2010 | SB 1108 / constitutional carry | Authorized a person twenty-one years of age or older who is not a prohibited possessor under A.R.S. 13-3101 to carry a concealed firearm in Arizona without a permit. A.R.S. 13-3112 was retained as an opt-in system providing reciprocity and certain venue access. |
| 2014 | HB 2103 | Tightened A.R.S. 13-3108 preemption. The current text bars political subdivisions from enacting "any ordinance, rule or tax relating to the transportation, possession, carrying, sale, transfer, purchase, acquisition, gift, devise, storage, licensing, registration, discharge or use of firearms or ammunition or any firearm or ammunition components or related accessories." |
| 2018 | (SB 1122 / firearms storage preemption) | Extended preemption to firearm storage rules, blocking local "safe storage" mandates. |
Operators should always verify the current text of any A.R.S. provision at azleg.gov before relying on a specific subsection.
Arizona's reciprocity is governed by A.R.S. 13-3112(U), which directs the Department of Public Safety to enter agreements with other states recognizing their concealed-carry permits provided the issuing state's standards meet specified criteria. The operative list lives in Reciprocity rather than here.
To avoid duplication, OTHER does not restate content covered in sibling sections. For:
For any topic raised by a student that does not appear here or in a sibling section, the safe assumption is that Arizona does not regulate it at the state level and the federal framework controls. Confirm the latest statute against the live A.R.S. before relying on this guide.
This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult an Arizona attorney for fact-specific questions.
<!-- federal-context-block:added-2026-05-20 -->N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen (2022). Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), established the historical-tradition test for Second Amendment claims. Any state-level firearm regulation in Arizona is subject to Bruen analysis if challenged on Second Amendment grounds.
18 U.S.C. 922 framework. Federal firearm regulation sits on top of Arizona's permissive state framework for ammunition, private sales, dealer licensing, body armor, and antique firearms. Federal prohibited-person disabilities at 18 U.S.C. 922(g), federal dealer rules at 18 U.S.C. 923, and federal interstate transfer rules at 18 U.S.C. 922(a) all apply regardless of Arizona's lighter state-level treatment.
View this topic on its own page: Arizona Firearm Laws: Other Topics
Arizona is a constitutional carry (permitless carry) state. Arizona does not require a concealed carry permit for individuals who are legally allowed to possess a firearm. This is confirmed by Pennsylvania's Attorney General reciprocity document, which lists Arizona among states that "do not require a concealed carry license to carry a concealed firearm in that state."
However, Arizona still issues concealed weapons permits (CWP) through the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) for those who wish to obtain one, which provides benefits such as reciprocity with other states and the ability to carry in certain locations (such as establishments serving alcohol) where a permit is required.
The Arizona Department of Public Safety is the issuing authority for concealed weapons permits pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3112.
"The department of public safety shall issue a permit to carry a concealed weapon to a person who is qualified under this section." - A.R.S. § 13-3112(A)
Under A.R.S. § 13-3112(E), the DPS shall issue a permit to an applicant who meets all of the following conditions:
Under A.R.S. § 13-3112(N), an applicant may demonstrate competence through any of the following:
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(F):
Processing Timeline (A.R.S. § 13-3112(H)):
Priority: DPS shall prioritize applications of in-state residents when issuing permits. - A.R.S. § 13-3112(A)
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(A):
Failure to Present Permit (A.R.S. § 13-3112(C)):
Under A.R.S. § 13-3112(Q):
"This state and any political subdivision of this state shall recognize a concealed weapon, firearm or handgun permit or license that is issued by another state or a political subdivision of another state" if both:
- The permit or license is recognized as valid in the issuing state
- The permit or license holder is: (a) legally present in this state, (b) not legally prohibited from possessing a firearm in this state
Arizona has broad reciprocity, recognizing valid concealed carry permits from other states provided the above conditions are met. Arizona also has a written reciprocity agreement with Pennsylvania, among other states.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(J):
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| A.R.S. § 13-3101 | Definitions (weapons and prohibited possessors) |
| A.R.S. § 13-3102 | Misconduct involving weapons |
| A.R.S. § 13-3112 | Concealed weapons; qualification; application; permit to carry |
| A.R.S. § 4-229 | Firearms in licensed premises (liquor) |
| A.R.S. § 4-244 | Unlawful acts related to liquor |
| Title 13, Chapter 31 | Weapons and Explosives |
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(D), a law enforcement officer shall not confiscate or forfeit a weapon that is otherwise lawfully possessed by a permittee whose permit is suspended under subsection C, except that an officer may take temporary custody of a firearm during an investigatory stop of the permittee.
Arizona is a constitutional carry state. Since 2010, persons who are legally able to carry a weapon openly may also carry a concealed weapon without a CCW permit, subject to certain restrictions. However, individuals may still choose to obtain a CCW permit for several practical reasons.
Arizona is a shall-issue state, meaning the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) may not deny a CCW permit application if the applicant meets all statutory requirements.
A.R.S. § 13-3112 - Concealed Weapons Permit
Applicants must:
Applicants must provide adequate documentation of competency with a firearm. Any one of the following is acceptable:
Persons born outside the United States or one of its territories must submit a copy of proof of citizenship or alien status and provide an Alien Registration Number if available. Acceptable documents include:
View this topic on its own page: Arizona Concealed Carry Permit Basics
Arizona is a constitutional carry state. Arizona does not require a concealed carry license to carry a concealed weapon. As noted by the Pennsylvania Attorney General's office, Arizona is listed among states that "do not require a concealed carry license to carry a concealed firearm in that state."
However, Arizona still issues concealed weapons permits (CWP) through the Department of Public Safety for those who wish to obtain one, which provides benefits such as reciprocity with other states and the ability to carry in certain locations (such as establishments serving alcohol) where a permit is required.
The concealed weapons permit system operates under:
The Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) is the issuing authority for concealed weapons permits.
Contact Information:
An applicant must meet all of the following conditions:
Residency/Citizenship: Must be a resident of Arizona or a United States citizen.
Age: Must be twenty-one (21) years of age or older, or at least nineteen (19) years of age with evidence of current military service or proof of honorable discharge or general discharge under honorable conditions from the United States armed forces, armed forces reserve, or a state national guard.
Criminal History: Must not be under indictment for and must not have been convicted in any jurisdiction of a felony, unless that conviction has been expunged, set aside, or vacated, or the applicant's rights have been restored, and the applicant is not currently a prohibited possessor under state or federal law.
Mental Health: Must not suffer from mental illness and must not have been adjudicated mentally incompetent or committed to a mental institution.
Legal Presence: Must not be unlawfully present in the United States.
Firearms Competence: Must have ever demonstrated competence with a firearm and provide adequate documentation (see Training Requirements below).
An applicant must demonstrate competence with a firearm through any of the following:
"Adequate documentation" means:
Option 1 - Electronic Fingerprints via FieldPrint:
Option 2 - Physical Fingerprint Cards:
| Type | Fee |
|---|---|
| New Concealed Weapon Permit | $60.00 |
| Renewal Concealed Weapon Permit | $43.00 |
| Replacement - Damaged | $10.00 |
| Replacement - Permit Error (within 60 days of issue) | $0.00 |
| Replacement - Permit Error (after 60 days of issue) | $10.00 |
| Replacement - Lost or Stolen | $10.00 |
| Replacement - Permit Not Received (within 60 days) | $0.00 |
| Replacement - Permit Not Received (after 60 days) | $10.00 |
| Change of Address | $0.00 |
| Legal Name Change | $10.00 |
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(H):
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(A), a permit holder shall carry the permit at all times when in actual possession of a concealed weapon and is required by A.R.S. § 4-229 or § 4-244 to carry the permit (relating to carrying in establishments that serve alcohol). The permit holder must present the permit for inspection to any law enforcement officer on request when required to carry it.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(C), a permittee who is required to carry a permit (under § 4-229 or § 4-244) and fails to present it for inspection on request of a law enforcement officer is subject to a civil penalty of not more than $300. DPS shall immediately suspend the permit upon notification of the violation. However, a permittee shall not be convicted if they produce to the court a legible permit that was valid at the time of the failure to present.
Arizona recognizes a concealed weapon, firearm, or handgun permit or license issued by another state or political subdivision of another state if both:
Arizona has a written reciprocity agreement with Pennsylvania (and other states). Pennsylvania recognizes Arizona concealed carry licenses for Arizona residents who are 21 years of age or older.
Records maintained regarding applicants, permit holders, or instructors are not available to any person or entity except on an order from a state or federal court.
DPS shall maintain information comparing the number of permits requested, issued, and denied, and shall annually report this information electronically to the governor and the legislature.
<!-- federal-context-block:added-2026-05-20 -->N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen (2022). Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), eliminated "proper cause" / "good cause" discretionary CCW frameworks and required states to apply objective issuance criteria. The decision converted formerly may-issue states to shall-issue. States that were already shall-issue or permitless before Bruen experience the case primarily through its broader historical-tradition test for evaluating subsequent Second Amendment claims.
View this topic on its own page: Arizona Concealed Carry Laws
⚠️ LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While specific claims below are supported by cited source material, readers should independently verify all information by consulting the full text of the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) at azleg.gov before relying on this content. Firearm laws are subject to change.
Arizona is widely regarded as one of the most permissive states in the nation regarding open carry of firearms. Open carry is legal in Arizona without a permit for any person who is at least 18 years of age and who is legally permitted to possess a firearm.
Arizona is also a constitutional carry (permitless carry) state, meaning that since July 29, 2010 (SB 1108), both open and concealed carry are permitted without a license for eligible individuals - though concealed permitless carry requires the individual to be at least 21 years of age.
Arizona's firearm laws are primarily found in Title 13, Chapter 31 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS), covering "Weapons and Explosives."
Key definitions relevant to open carry include:
Arizona does not require a permit to openly carry a firearm. The minimum age for open carry is 18 years of age. Any person meeting this age requirement who is not a prohibited possessor may openly carry a firearm in most public places.
Source: HandgunLaw.us Arizona guide (2026) confirms: "Open Carry is legal in Arizona" and "The Minimum age for Open Carry is 18."
While open carry does not require a permit, Arizona continues to issue concealed weapons permits (CWP) through the Arizona Department of Public Safety. Per ARS § 13-3112(E), applicants must:
Even in a constitutional carry state, obtaining a CWP is advisable for reciprocity when traveling to other states and for carrying in alcohol-serving establishments (see below).
Even with Arizona's permissive open carry laws, firearms - whether carried openly or concealed - are restricted in certain locations, including:
Source: HandgunLaw.us confirms: "Places as listed in the 'Places Off Limits' above apply to those who open carry."
Arizona law draws an important distinction between permit holders and non-permit open carriers regarding establishments licensed to serve alcohol for on-premises consumption:
| Carrier Type | May Enter Alcohol-Serving Establishments? |
|---|---|
| Open carry WITHOUT a permit | No - may not enter establishments that serve alcohol for on-premises consumption |
| Open or concealed carry WITH a valid permit/license (from Arizona or any other state) | Yes - may enter, but may not consume alcohol while carrying |
This is one of the most significant practical reasons to obtain a concealed weapons permit even in a permitless carry state. The relevant statutes are ARS §§ 4-229 and 4-244.
Source: HandgunLaw.us states: "Those who Open Carry without a permit/license can't enter places that serve alcohol. Only those with a valid permit/license issued by Arizona or any other state can enter a place that serves alcohol for consumption on the premises."
Arizona has a strong state preemption law that prevents cities, towns, counties, and other local authorities from enacting firearm regulations that are more restrictive than state law. This ensures uniform open carry laws across the entire state - no municipality can ban or further restrict open carry.
Source: HandgunLaw.us confirms: "The state preempts all firearm laws in the state and local authorities can't have Laws/Ordinances against open carry."
While open carry is broadly legal on public property, private property owners retain full authority to prohibit firearms on their premises. If an owner or responsible person asks you to leave, you must comply. Failure to leave after being asked constitutes criminal trespass under Arizona law.
Source: HandgunLaw.us states: "Remember that if you enter any property and the owner/responsible person ask you to leave you must leave. Failure to leave can result in Trespass Charges."
Arizona law provides legal justification for the defensive display of a firearm. Under ARS § 13-421, a person may display a firearm defensively as a justified response to a threat of unlawful physical force or unlawful deadly physical force. This statute is particularly relevant to open carriers, as the visible presence of a holstered firearm in a threatening encounter is distinguished from brandishing or threatening.
While openly carrying a firearm is legal in Arizona:
| Carry Type | Minimum Age |
|---|---|
| Open carry of firearms (handguns and long guns) | 18 years |
| Concealed carry without a permit (permitless/constitutional carry) | 21 years |
| Concealed weapons permit (standard) | 21 years |
| Concealed weapons permit (with qualifying military service) | 19 years |
| Statute | Subject |
|---|---|
| ARS § 13-3101 | Definitions (including "prohibited possessor") |
| ARS § 13-3102 | Prohibited locations for firearms |
| ARS § 13-3108 | State preemption of local firearm regulations |
| ARS § 13-3112 | Concealed weapons permit requirements and procedures |
| ARS § 13-421 | Defensive display of a firearm |
| ARS § 4-229 | Firearms in licensed alcohol-serving premises |
| ARS § 4-244 | Unlawful acts related to liquor licensing |
View this topic on its own page: Arizona Open Carry Laws
Arizona is a constitutional carry state, meaning that individuals who are legally eligible to possess a firearm may carry a concealed weapon without obtaining a permit. Arizona enacted its constitutional carry law in 2010 (effective July 29, 2010), making it one of the earliest states to adopt permitless concealed carry.
Note: This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Always verify the current text of Arizona Revised Statutes at azleg.gov before relying on a specific subsection.
Arizona's constitutional carry provisions are found within Title 13, Chapter 31 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS), which governs "Weapons and Explosives." The key statutes include:
Under Arizona's constitutional carry framework, a person may carry a concealed weapon without a permit provided they:
Despite constitutional carry, Arizona continues to issue concealed weapons permits (CWP) through the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) under ARS § 13-3112. There are several reasons a person may still choose to obtain a permit:
To obtain a CWP, an applicant must:
Even under constitutional carry, specific rules apply when carrying in establishments licensed to serve alcohol:
Per ARS § 13-3112(Q), Arizona recognizes concealed weapon permits or licenses issued by other states or political subdivisions if:
However, per ARS § 13-3112(S), a person with a concealed weapons permit from another state may not carry concealed in Arizona if they are:
Per ARS § 13-3112(R), the Department of Public Safety enters into written reciprocity agreements with other states. Arizona has reciprocity agreements with numerous states recognizing each other's concealed carry permits. Arizona is also listed among states that do not require a concealed carry license to carry a concealed firearm, confirming its constitutional carry status.
Per ARS § 13-3108, firearms are regulated by the state, and state law preempts local regulation. This means that cities, towns, and counties in Arizona cannot enact their own laws restricting the carrying of concealed weapons beyond what state law provides.
Even under constitutional carry, Arizona law restricts carrying firearms in certain locations as outlined in ARS § 13-3102, including but not limited to:
View this topic on its own page: Arizona Constitutional Carry
Arizona law prohibits carrying firearms (open or concealed) in certain locations, regardless of whether a person possesses a CCW permit. The primary statute governing prohibited locations is A.R.S. § 13-3102 (Misconduct involving weapons).
Exceptions to the school grounds prohibition:
Note on Private Schools: Per Arizona Attorney General Opinion I16-009, Arizona CCW permittees are not prohibited from carrying a concealed handgun on private school grounds, as they are "licensed, authorized or permitted" under A.R.S. § 13-3102(C)(4). This exemption also applies under the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act.
Note on Public Schools: A.R.S. § 15-341(A)(23) requires the governing board of a public school district to prescribe and enforce policies that prohibit carrying or possessing a weapon on school grounds unless the person is a peace officer or has obtained specific authorization from the school administrator.
| Location | Classification |
|---|---|
| Polling place on election day | Class 1 misdemeanor |
| School grounds | Class 1 misdemeanor (Class 6 felony if connected to certain offenses) |
| Nuclear/hydroelectric generating station | Class 4 felony |
| Public establishment/event after request to store weapon | Class 1 misdemeanor |
| On-sale liquor premises (without CCW or where posted) | Subject to A.R.S. § 4-244 penalties |
View this topic on its own page: Prohibited Places
Arizona is a "Constitutional Carry" state (effective July 29, 2010), which significantly impacts how firearms may be carried in vehicles. The rules differ based on the person's age.
Arizona's Constitutional Carry law allows any person who is 21 years of age or older and who can legally own or purchase a firearm to carry it loaded and concealed on their person without any type of permit or license anywhere inside a vehicle.
For persons 18 to 20 years old, different rules apply under A.R.S. § 13-3102:
Under A.R.S. § 13-3102:
Firearms are generally prohibited on school grounds, but an exception exists for vehicles under A.R.S. § 13-3102:
Generally, persons traveling through Arizona may have a firearm in their vehicle, subject to the age-based rules described above. Arizona does not require firearm registration (A.R.S. § 13-3108), and state law prohibits local jurisdictions from requiring licensing or registration of firearms or ammunition.
Regardless of the vehicle carry rules, prohibited possessors under A.R.S. § 13-3101(A)(7) may not possess firearms at any time. This includes persons who:
View this topic on its own page: Vehicle Carry
Where your Arizona permit is valid
37
States honor your AZ permit
Recognition
Honors All States
Verified 2026-05-09 (uscca-map)
Verified 2026-05-09 (uscca-map)
Verified 2026-05-09 (uscca-map)
Permitless carry, age 21+; AZ residents may carry without permit in OK
Verified 2026-05-09 (uscca-map)
Do not carry on your AZ permit in these states. Laws change, always verify before traveling.
Important Reciprocity Notes
Sources
Reciprocity information last verified: May 2026. Always verify current laws before traveling with your firearm.
Arizona's use-of-force framework lives in Title 13, Chapter 4 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S. 13-401 through 13-421). Arizona is a stand-your-ground state: A.R.S. 13-405(B) and A.R.S. 13-411(B) both expressly state there is no duty to retreat before using justified deadly force in a place where the actor has a right to be and is not engaged in an unlawful act. A.R.S. 13-205(A) makes justification a non-affirmative defense: once any evidence of justification is presented, the State must disprove justification beyond a reasonable doubt.
This section summarizes the justification statutes that matter most for concealed-carry permit holders. The Castle Doctrine specifics (residential structures, occupied vehicles, presumptions) are covered in the Castle Doctrine section.
The Chapter 4 (Justification) framework, with the operative section for each rule:
Non-deadly force. Under A.R.S. 13-404(A), a person is justified in threatening or using physical force against another "when and to the extent a reasonable person would believe that physical force is immediately necessary to protect himself against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful physical force."
A.R.S. 13-404(B) lists three carve-outs where the threat or use of physical force is not justified:
Deadly force. A.R.S. 13-405(A) authorizes deadly physical force if (1) the actor would be justified under A.R.S. 13-404 in using non-deadly force, and (2) a reasonable person would believe deadly physical force is immediately necessary to protect against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly physical force.
No duty to retreat. A.R.S. 13-405(B) codifies stand-your-ground for self-defense: "A person has no duty to retreat before threatening or using deadly physical force pursuant to this section if the person is in a place where the person may legally be and is not engaged in an unlawful act."
A.R.S. 13-406 authorizes the use of physical force or deadly physical force to defend a third person whenever, under the circumstances as a reasonable person would believe them to be, the actor would be justified under A.R.S. 13-404 or 13-405 in using that level of force to protect himself against the unlawful force the actor reasonably believes threatens the third person. The reasonable-person lens is applied to the defender's perception of the third party's situation.
Premises. A.R.S. 13-407(A) lets a person in lawful possession or control of premises threaten deadly physical force, or threaten or use physical force, against another when and to the extent a reasonable person would believe it immediately necessary to prevent or terminate a criminal trespass. Under A.R.S. 13-407(B), actual use of deadly physical force in defense of premises is permitted only as also authorized under A.R.S. 13-405 (self-defense) or 13-406 (defense of others). A.R.S. 13-407(C) defines "premises" as real property and any structure adapted for human residence or lodging.
Property. A.R.S. 13-408 justifies physical force against another when and to the extent a reasonable person would believe it necessary to prevent the other's theft or criminal damage to tangible movable property in the actor's possession or control. Deadly physical force in defense of property is authorized only as further provided in A.R.S. 13-405, 13-406, and 13-411.
A.R.S. 13-411 is one of Arizona's most defender-protective statutes. Subsection A authorizes physical force or deadly physical force to prevent the commission of an enumerated list of violent felonies, including:
A.R.S. 13-411(B) confirms there is no duty to retreat before using force justified by subsection A. Subsection C creates a presumption that the actor is acting reasonably if acting to prevent what the actor reasonably believes is the imminent or actual commission of one of the listed offenses. Subsection D extends the rule to "a person's home, residence, place of business, land the person owns or leases, conveyance of any kind, or any other place in this state where a person has a right to be."
In practice A.R.S. 13-411 expands stand-your-ground beyond pure self-defense into the prevention-of-violent-felony space, with a statutory presumption that takes the reasonableness question off the table at the front end.
Arizona separately authorizes the defensive display of a firearm as a justified, lesser response. Under A.R.S. 13-421(A), defensive display is justified "when and to the extent a reasonable person would believe that physical force is immediately necessary to protect himself against the use or attempted use of unlawful physical force or deadly physical force." A.R.S. 13-421(D) defines "defensive display" to include verbally informing another person that the actor possesses or has available a firearm, and exposing or displaying a firearm in a manner a reasonable person would understand was meant to protect against unlawful force.
A.R.S. 13-421(B) disqualifies the defense for an actor who intentionally provoked the other person's use of unlawful force, or who uses a firearm in the commission of a serious offense (A.R.S. 13-706) or violent crime (A.R.S. 13-901.03). A.R.S. 13-421(C) makes clear that a person otherwise justified in the use or threatened use of physical force is not required to attempt a defensive display first. This matters operationally: Arizona does not impose a "must brandish before you shoot" tier.
A.R.S. 13-415 modifies the reasonableness analysis in A.R.S. 13-404, 13-405, and 13-406 when the defender has been a victim of prior domestic violence by the same person. The "reasonable person" benchmark is recalibrated "from the perspective of a reasonable person who has been a victim of those past acts of domestic violence" (where "domestic violence" is defined by A.R.S. 13-3601(A)). This is an evidentiary lens that helps defenders with documented prior victimization show why they perceived imminent danger sooner than a non-victim would.
A.R.S. 13-205(A) is the linchpin of Arizona's defender-friendly trial posture. Affirmative defenses generally require the defendant to prove the defense by a preponderance of the evidence. Chapter 4 justification defenses are excluded: "Justification defenses under chapter 4 of this title are not affirmative defenses." The statute then provides: "If evidence of justification pursuant to chapter 4 of this title is presented by the defendant, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act with justification."
In trial terms: once any evidence of justification is in front of the jury, the prosecution must disprove justification at the highest evidentiary standard. This is materially more protective than the preponderance standard that applies to most affirmative defenses.
A.R.S. 13-413 provides: "No person in this state shall be subject to civil liability for engaging in conduct otherwise justified pursuant to the provisions of this chapter." A successful Chapter 4 justification defense thus carries through to the civil docket as well. Arizona does not impose a separate "objectively reasonable" civil test on top of the criminal justification finding.
This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Use-of-force prosecutions turn on facts that are difficult to evaluate in advance. Consult an Arizona attorney for fact-specific questions.
<!-- federal-context-block:added-2026-05-20 -->N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen (2022) and United States v. Rahimi (2024). Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), established the historical-tradition test for Second Amendment claims. Rahimi, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), then applied Bruen to uphold the federal domestic-violence-restraining-order firearm prohibition at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), confirming that not every firearm disability fails Bruen's test. Practitioners advising on use of force or firearm-disability questions should be familiar with both cases.
View this topic on its own page: Arizona Use of Force Laws
Arizona has robust Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground protections codified in Title 13, Chapter 4 (Justification) of the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS). Arizona law imposes no duty to retreat before using force, including deadly force, in self-defense - whether inside the home, in a vehicle, or in any public place where the person has a legal right to be.
Arizona's Castle Doctrine provisions (ARS §§ 13-418 and 13-419) were enacted in 2006 as part of Laws 2006, Chapter 199, during the 47th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session. The legislation passed the Arizona Senate 29-0-1 on March 6, 2006 and was signed into law on April 24, 2006. The Stand Your Ground provisions were further strengthened in 2010 with amendments to ARS § 13-405(B) explicitly codifying the no-duty-to-retreat standard in all self-defense situations.
Under ARS § 13-205, justification defenses in Arizona are not affirmative defenses. Once a defendant presents any evidence of justification, the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act with justification. This is significantly more protective than the standard in many other states, where the defendant must prove justification by a preponderance of the evidence.
A person is justified in threatening or using physical force against another when and to the degree a reasonable person would believe that physical force is immediately necessary to protect against another's use or attempted use of unlawful physical force.
Limitations (§ 13-404(B)):
A person may use deadly physical force when:
Stand Your Ground (§ 13-405(B)): "A person has no duty to retreat before threatening or using deadly physical force pursuant to this section if the person is in a place where the person may legally be and is not engaged in an unlawful act."
A person may use physical force or deadly force to protect a third person when, under the circumstances as a reasonable person would believe them to be, such person would be justified under § 13-404 or § 13-405 in using that level of force for self-defense.
A person in lawful possession of premises may threaten or use physical force when a reasonable person would believe it immediately necessary to prevent or terminate criminal trespass. "Premises" is broadly defined to include real property and all structures - permanent or temporary, occupied or vacant. Deadly force in defense of premises requires meeting the standards of §§ 13-405 or 13-406.
A person may use physical force when necessary to prevent what a reasonable person would believe is an attempt or commission of theft or criminal damage involving tangible movable property in their possession. Deadly force for property defense alone requires meeting §§ 13-405, 13-406, or 13-411 standards.
Section A - A person is justified in threatening or using physical force or deadly physical force against another if all of the following apply:
Section B - "There is no duty to retreat before threatening or using physical force or deadly physical force" under this section.
Definitions (§ 13-418(C)):
This statute creates powerful legal presumptions favoring the defender:
These presumptions effectively mean the defender does not need to independently prove the intruder intended to cause harm - the unlawful entry itself creates the legal presumption.
Exceptions - The presumptions do NOT apply when:
Arizona is a full Stand Your Ground state. The no-duty-to-retreat principle is codified in three separate statutes:
| Statute | Context | Language |
|---|---|---|
| ARS § 13-405(B) | General self-defense (deadly force) | No duty to retreat if in a place where legally present and not engaged in unlawful act |
| ARS § 13-411(B) | Crime prevention | No duty to retreat before using force to prevent enumerated serious crimes |
| ARS § 13-418(B) | Defense of home/vehicle | No duty to retreat before using force against unlawful entry |
The Stand Your Ground protection applies anywhere in the state where a person has a legal right to be - including public streets, businesses, parks, and other locations - not just inside the home.
A person may use physical force or deadly force when and to the degree a reasonable person would believe it necessary to prevent the commission of any of the following:
Presumption of reasonableness (§ 13-411(C)): A person is presumed to be acting reasonably when using force to prevent the above crimes.
Broad applicability (§ 13-411(D)): This section applies in a person's home, residence, place of business, land they own or lease, conveyance of any kind, or any other place in this state where a person has a right to be.
Arizona specifically recognizes the justified defensive display of a firearm as a separate justification defense - a provision particularly relevant to concealed carry holders.
When justified (§ 13-421(A)): When and to the extent a reasonable person would believe that physical force is immediately necessary to protect against another's use or attempted use of unlawful physical force or deadly physical force.
What constitutes a "defensive display" (§ 13-421(D)):
Important limitations (§ 13-421(B)): This justification does not apply if the person intentionally provoked another into using force, or uses the firearm while committing a serious or violent offense.
No prerequisite (§ 13-421(C)): A person is not required to display a firearm before using justified physical force. The defensive display is an option, not a required escalation step.
"No person in this state shall be subject to civil liability for engaging in conduct otherwise justified pursuant to the provisions of this chapter."
This provision provides complete civil immunity when the use of force is determined to be legally justified under any provision of Chapter 4.
If a person who used justified force prevails in any civil action arising from that conduct, the court shall award:
The use of "shall" (mandatory, not discretionary) makes Arizona's fee-shifting provision particularly strong compared to states with permissive fee recovery.
When a defendant has experienced past acts of domestic violence (as defined in ARS § 13-3601(A)) by the victim, courts must evaluate the defendant's claim of self-defense from the perspective of a reasonable person who has been a victim of those past acts of domestic violence. This modifies the standard reasonable-person test to account for the psychological impact of prior abuse.
Justification defenses are unavailable if the person, while otherwise justified, recklessly injures or kills an innocent third person. The person may still face prosecution for the harm to the bystander even if the use of force against the aggressor was justified.
No Duty to Retreat: You are never required to retreat before using force in self-defense, provided you are in a place where you may legally be and are not engaged in unlawful activity (§§ 13-405(B), 13-411(B), 13-418(B)).
Castle Doctrine Presumptions: If someone unlawfully or forcefully enters your home or occupied vehicle, Arizona law presumes you acted reasonably in using force - the prosecution must overcome this presumption beyond a reasonable doubt (§ 13-419).
Defensive Display Option: You may legally warn, display, or place your hand on a concealed firearm as a de-escalation measure without losing justification protections (§ 13-421). This is not required before using force.
Burden on the State: Once you present any evidence of justification, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you did not act with justification (§ 13-205). You do not bear the burden of proving your defense.
Full Civil Immunity: Justified use of force provides complete civil immunity (§ 13-413), plus mandatory recovery of attorney fees, lost income, and all defense costs if you prevail in a civil suit (§ 13-420).
Broad Crime Prevention Authority: You may use force, including deadly force, to prevent serious felonies like armed robbery, kidnapping, or sexual assault - with a legal presumption of reasonableness - anywhere you have a right to be (§ 13-411).
Proportionality Required: Despite Arizona's strong self-defense protections, the force used must still be proportional to the threat. Deadly force is only justified against the use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force (§ 13-405(A)).
Verbal Provocation Is Not Enough: You cannot claim self-defense if you responded with physical force to verbal provocation alone (§ 13-404(B)(1)).
Initial Aggressor Limitation: If you provoked the confrontation, self-defense is only available if you clearly withdrew and communicated that withdrawal (§ 13-404(B)(3)).
View this topic on its own page: Arizona Castle Doctrine & Stand Your Ground Laws
Arizona does not impose a general duty to inform law enforcement officers that you are carrying a concealed weapon during routine encounters. However, there are specific, limited circumstances where a permit holder has obligations.
Note: The primary statute governing concealed carry permits in Arizona is A.R.S. § 13-3112. The full text of that statute was not available in the source material reviewed for this article. The information below is based on commonly cited provisions of that statute and should be independently verified against the current text of the law.
Under A.R.S. § 13-3112(A), a concealed carry permit holder is required to:
"The person shall carry the permit at all times when the person is in actual possession of the concealed weapon and is required by section 4-229 or 4-244 to carry the permit. If the person is in actual possession of the concealed weapon and is required by section 4-229 or 4-244 to carry the permit, the person shall present the permit for inspection to any law enforcement officer on request." - A.R.S. § 13-3112(A)
Under A.R.S. § 13-3112(C):
Under A.R.S. § 13-3112(J):
Under A.R.S. § 13-3112(D):
View this topic on its own page: Duty To Inform
Arizona is a constitutional carry state, meaning individuals 21 years of age or older (or 19+ with military service) may carry a concealed weapon without a permit. However, to obtain an official Concealed Weapons Permit (CWP) issued by the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS), applicants must demonstrate competence with a firearm through approved training.
Training requirements are established under A.R.S. § 13-3112, subsections E(6) and N.
An applicant must demonstrate competence with a firearm through any one of the following methods:
General Firearms Safety or Training Course - Completion of any firearms safety or training course or class that is available to the general public, offered by a law enforcement agency, a junior college, a college, or a private or public institution, academy, organization, or firearms training school, and that is approved by DPS or that uses instructors certified by the National Rifle Association (NRA).
Hunter Education or Safety Course - Completion of any hunter education or hunter safety course approved by the Arizona Game and Fish Department or a similar agency of another state.
NRA Firearms Safety or Training Course - Completion of any National Rifle Association firearms safety or training course.
Law Enforcement Firearms Course - Completion of any law enforcement firearms safety or training course or class offered for security guards, investigators, special deputies, or other divisions or subdivisions of law enforcement or security enforcement, and that is approved by DPS.
Military Service - Evidence of current military service or proof of honorable discharge or general discharge under honorable conditions from the United States Armed Forces.
Out-of-State Concealed Carry Permit - A valid current or expired concealed weapon, firearm, or handgun permit or license issued by another state or a political subdivision of another state that has a training or testing requirement for initial issuance.
Police Agency Firearms Course - Completion of any governmental police agency firearms training course and qualification to carry a firearm in the course of normal police duties.
Other Approved Firearms Training - Completion of any other firearms safety or training course or class conducted by a DPS-approved or NRA-certified firearms instructor.
Applicants must provide adequate documentation that they have satisfactorily completed a training program or demonstrated competence with a firearm. "Adequate documentation" is defined as:
DPS has noted (via an NRA letter posted on the DPS website) that there are restrictions regarding the use of the NRA's name, titles, and trademarks for online firearms training courses. Applicants should verify that any NRA-branded course they complete is properly authorized.
The following individuals are exempt from the initial firearms safety training requirement to obtain a CCW permit:
DPS may issue Certificates of Firearms Proficiency for purposes of implementing the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004 (LEOSA) (P.L. 108-277; 18 U.S.C. §§ 926B and 926C). Requirements include:
As of 2023, the AZPOST Board approved revised qualification courses:
View this topic on its own page: Training Requirements
The Concealed Weapons Permit Unit (CWPU) operates under:
Applicants should also review A.R.S. § 13-3101 (definitions), A.R.S. § 13-3102 (Misconduct Involving Weapons), and 18 U.S.C. § 922(d) and (g) (federal prohibited persons) for complete eligibility criteria.
Arizona does not require a concealed carry license to carry a concealed firearm in the state. However, obtaining a CCW permit provides benefits such as reciprocity with other states and exemption from the Brady Act background check requirement when purchasing firearms from a licensed dealer.
Applicants must:
Persons born outside of the United States or one of its territories must submit proof of citizenship or alien status and provide an Alien Registration Number if available. Acceptable documents include:
Non-residents of Arizona who are U.S. citizens may apply for an Arizona concealed weapons permit.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112, applicants must submit to the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS):
Apply online through the Public Services Portal at https://azdpsccw.permitium.com/entry. The portal offers options for:
Downloadable applications and instructions are available on the DPS website under the "Applications and Fees" tab.
Applications may be delivered in person to:
Arizona Department of Public Safety, Public Services Center 2222 W. Encanto Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday (excluding state and federal holidays)
Two options are available for fingerprinting:
Electronic Fingerprints - Visit a FieldPrint kiosk. After submitting the permit application online, the applicant will be required to schedule an appointment to have fingerprints taken. Once submitted, the CWPU will process the application.
Ink Fingerprint Cards - Contact a local police department, sheriff's office, or third-party fingerprint provider. Per state law, two (2) fingerprint cards must be submitted with the application. All boxes on the fingerprint card must be completed. Do NOT bend or fold fingerprint cards as it may alter prints and result in rejection.
| Type | Fee |
|---|---|
| New Concealed Weapon Permit | $60.00 |
| Renewal Concealed Weapon Permit | $43.00 |
| Replacement - Damaged | $10.00 |
| Replacement - Permit Error (within 60 days of issue) | $0.00 |
| Replacement - Permit Error (after 60 days of issue) | $10.00 |
| Replacement - Lost or Stolen | $10.00 |
| Replacement - Permit Not Received (within 60 days of issue) | $0.00 |
| Replacement - Permit Not Received (after 60 days of issue) | $10.00 |
| Change of Address | $0.00 |
| Legal Name Change | $10.00 |
A.R.S. § 13-3112 requires the Director of DPS to determine the fee that must accompany initial and renewal applications.
Applications containing errors or incomplete information will be returned to the applicant for correction.
Once the permit is received, the applicant should inspect it for any errors. If an error is found, the permit should be returned along with a completed "Profile Change Request Form" (available under the Applications and Forms tab on the DPS website).
Applicants who are denied a permit will receive a denial letter from the CWPU. Options include:
Permit holders who no longer wish to maintain a CCW permit may self-surrender:
Note: Once a permit is surrendered, it may not be reinstated. A new application would be required to obtain a new permit.
View this topic on its own page: Arizona Concealed Weapons Permit (CCW) - Application Process
The renewal of Arizona concealed carry weapon (CCW) permits is governed by A.R.S. § 13-3112, specifically subsections I, K, and L.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Permit validity | 5 years |
| Renewal fee | $43 |
| Renewal reminder sent | At least 60 days before expiration |
| Recommended submission | At least 90 days before expiration |
| Late renewal deadline | No more than 60 days after expiration |
| Fingerprints required for renewal | No |
| Background check required | Yes (A.R.S. § 41-1750) |
| Background check processing time | Within 60 days of receipt |
| Penalty for late renewal (61+ days past expiration) | Must submit new initial application ($60 fee) |
View this topic on its own page: Renewal Process
The Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) administers the Concealed Weapons Permit (CCW) program. The following fees apply, as published by the Arizona DPS:
| Type | Fee |
|---|---|
| New Concealed Weapons Permit | $60.00 |
| Renewal Concealed Weapons Permit | $43.00 |
| Replacement Card or Profile Change Request | $10.00 |
| LEOSA Certification | $20.00 |
| LEOSA Instructor Certification | No Fee |
| CCW Permit Self Surrender | No Fee |
Reference: A.R.S. § 13-3112 (Concealed weapons; qualification; application; permit to carry)
The DPS online application portal provides more granular replacement fee information:
| Replacement Reason | Fee |
|---|---|
| Damaged card | $10.00 |
| Permit error - within 60 days of issue | $0.00 |
| Permit error - after 60 days of issue | $10.00 |
| Lost or stolen card | $10.00 |
| Permit not received - within 60 days of issue | $0.00 |
| Permit not received - after 60 days of issue | $10.00 |
| Change of address | $0.00 |
| Legal name change | $10.00 |
The Arizona DPS accepts the following forms of payment:
All checks must be made payable to the Arizona Department of Public Safety.
Personal and business checks are NOT accepted.
The application fee is non-refundable. If an applicant does not qualify or is denied a CCW permit, no refund will be issued.
Due to the detailed nature of background checks, processing time can take up to 60 days, as required by state guidelines.
Under A.R.S. § 13-3108 (Firearms regulated by state; state preemption), the following financial provisions apply to political subdivisions that violate state firearm preemption:
Sources: Arizona Department of Public Safety - Concealed Weapons and Permits (azdps.gov); Arizona DPS CCW Online Application Portal (azdpsccw.permitium.com); A.R.S. § 13-3112; A.R.S. § 13-3108
View this topic on its own page: Arizona Concealed Carry Permit - Fees and Costs
Arizona law defines the following as prohibited weapons:
Important Exception: Items listed as prohibited weapons in categories (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) above do not include any firearms or devices that are possessed, manufactured, or transferred in compliance with federal law (A.R.S. § 13-3101(B)). This means NFA-regulated items (suppressors, short-barreled rifles/shotguns, machine guns) are lawful if properly registered under federal law.
Regardless of whether a person possesses a CCW permit, firearms are prohibited in the following locations (with some exceptions for peace officers):
Firearms are not allowed on school grounds, with the following exceptions:
The following persons are prohibited from possessing firearms:
Under Stage 2 fire restrictions on Arizona state lands (implemented by the Department of Forestry and Fire Management):
Lautenberg Amendment - 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9). A misdemeanor crime of domestic violence (MCDV) - any misdemeanor that has, as an element, the use or attempted use of physical force or the threatened use of a deadly weapon, committed against a current or former spouse, parent, guardian, person with a child in common, cohabitant, or similarly situated person - triggers a federal LIFETIME firearm-possession bar that is independent of state law. The Lautenberg disability applies even when the state-court conviction did not involve a firearm and even when no firearm-related penalty was imposed at sentencing. United States v. Rahimi (2024) confirmed the constitutionality of related federal § 922(g)(8) DV-restraining-order disabilities under the Bruen historical-tradition test.
View this topic on its own page: Restrictions
Arizona does not have a general statute in Title 13 (Criminal Code) that broadly prohibits carrying a firearm while intoxicated in public. Instead, Arizona regulates the intersection of firearms and alcohol primarily through Title 4 (Alcoholic Beverages), focusing on conduct at licensed alcohol-serving establishments. The key statutes are A.R.S. § 4-244(31), A.R.S. § 4-244(29), and A.R.S. § 4-229.
A.R.S. § 4-244(31) makes it unlawful:
"For any person in possession of a firearm while on the licensed premises of an on-sale retailer to consume spirituous liquor."
This is an absolute prohibition - if you are carrying a firearm on the premises of a bar, restaurant, or any establishment with an on-sale liquor license, you may not consume any alcohol, regardless of whether you hold a concealed weapons permit (CWP). The only exception is for undercover peace officers on assignment to investigate the licensed establishment.
"Spirituous liquor" is defined broadly under Arizona law to include all alcoholic beverages above 0.5% ABV, including beer, wine, and distilled spirits.
Penalty: A violation of § 4-244(31) is a Class 3 misdemeanor (A.R.S. § 4-246(C)), punishable by up to 30 days in jail (A.R.S. § 13-707) and a fine of up to $500 (A.R.S. § 13-802).
A.R.S. § 4-244(29) establishes the general rule that it is unlawful for a person to possess a firearm on the licensed premises of an on-sale retailer. However, this statute carves out critical exceptions:
Without a permit, a person carrying under Arizona's permitless (constitutional) carry provisions cannot legally carry a firearm into any establishment that serves alcohol, whether or not a "no firearms" sign is posted. This is one of the most significant practical differences between permitted and permitless carry in Arizona.
A.R.S. § 4-229 allows a person with a valid concealed weapons permit (issued under A.R.S. § 13-3112) to carry a concealed handgun on the premises of an on-sale retailer, unless the licensee has posted a compliant prohibition sign.
The prohibition sign must meet all of the following specifications:
The Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control provides compliant signs to licensees at no cost.
A person charged with violating a posted sign may raise an affirmative defense if:
Even when a sign is posted, an armed person may briefly enter the premises for the specific purpose of:
Penalty: A violation of § 4-229(B) (carrying past a properly posted sign) is a Class 3 misdemeanor (A.R.S. § 4-246(C)), carrying the same penalties as § 4-244(31) - up to 30 days in jail and a $500 fine.
Licensees (bar/restaurant owners) also have obligations under § 4-244(30):
Notably, Arizona's criminal code (A.R.S. § 13-3102, Misconduct Involving Weapons) does not contain a provision specifically prohibiting the carrying or possession of a firearm while intoxicated in general public settings (i.e., outside of licensed alcohol-serving premises). This means:
Arizona has strong state preemption of local firearms regulation:
"A political subdivision of this state shall not enact any ordinance, rule or tax relating to the transportation, possession, carrying, sale or use of firearms or ammunition."
This means cities and counties cannot impose additional restrictions on carrying firearms while intoxicated beyond what state law provides. In 2013, the Arizona Attorney General addressed this in Opinion I13-010, analyzing whether Tucson Ordinance 11080 - which authorized law enforcement to request blood or breath tests from persons who negligently discharged a firearm - was preempted by § 13-3108. The AG opinion confirmed the Legislature's intent to maintain uniform firearms regulation statewide.
While Arizona lacks a general intoxication-firearms statute, federal law imposes additional restrictions:
SB 1012 (prefiled December 9, 2025, for the 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session) proposes amendments to A.R.S. § 4-229 regarding concealed weapons notice and posting requirements at alcohol-serving establishments. As of April 2026, the bill's full text and current status should be verified at the Arizona Legislature website (azleg.gov).
| Situation | Legal? | Statute | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCW permit holder carrying concealed in bar (no sign posted, not drinking) | Yes | § 4-229(A) | - |
| CCW permit holder carrying concealed in bar (sign posted) | No | § 4-229(B) | Class 3 misdemeanor |
| Permitless carrier entering bar with firearm | No | § 4-244(29) | Class 3 misdemeanor |
| Any person with firearm consuming alcohol on licensed premises | No | § 4-244(31) | Class 3 misdemeanor |
| Carrying firearm while intoxicated in general public (not on licensed premises) | Not specifically prohibited | No applicable statute | - |
Note: Class 3 misdemeanor penalties include up to 30 days in jail (A.R.S. § 13-707) and a fine of up to $500 (A.R.S. § 13-802). Additional surcharges may apply.
This summary reflects Arizona law as of April 2026. Statutes referenced: A.R.S. §§ 4-229, 4-244(30)-(31), 4-246(C), 13-707, 13-802, 13-3102, 13-3108. This content is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified Arizona attorney for guidance on specific situations.
View this topic on its own page: Under Influence
Arizona does not impose a general statutory requirement on firearm owners or concealed carry permit holders to store firearms in any particular manner in their homes or vehicles. The state addresses firearm storage only in specific, narrow contexts - public establishments requesting weapon removal, government buildings, university campuses, and during declared emergencies. The relevant statutes are outlined below.
If the operator of a public establishment or sponsor of a public event requests that a person carrying a deadly weapon remove it, the operator or sponsor must provide temporary and secure storage for the weapon. Key provisions:
Arizona law permits a person to lawfully transport or store a firearm on a university campus provided both conditions are met:
The Arizona Board of Regents or a university may require that vehicles transporting or storing firearms be parked in designated alternative parking areas as described in ARS § 12-781. Possession or use of personal safety devices (e.g., pepper spray) is not prohibited.
Arizona law explicitly prohibits government officials from imposing additional restrictions on firearm storage during declared emergencies:
"Pursuant to the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article II, Section 26, Constitution of Arizona, and notwithstanding any other law, the emergency powers of the governor, the adjutant general or any other official or person do not allow the imposition of additional restrictions on the lawful possession, transfer, sale, transportation, carrying, storage, display or use of firearms or ammunition or firearms or ammunition components." - ARS § 26-303(L)
The governor and adjutant general may order the reasonable movement of ammunition stores out of the path of dangerous conditions (ARS § 26-303(M)(1)), but cannot mandate broader firearm storage restrictions.
ARS § 13-3109 addresses the transfer or furnishing of firearms to minors. While Arizona does not mandate locked storage in the home, gun owners should be aware that providing unsupervised access to firearms by minors may trigger liability under this statute. Concealed carry permit holders who live with minors should consult the current text of ARS § 13-3109 for specific obligations.
Arizona probation and juvenile court officers authorized to carry firearms are subject to specific storage rules under the Code of Judicial Administration:
These requirements apply only to judicial branch officers, not to the general public or concealed carry permit holders.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 923(d) and 27 CFR §§ 478.73, 478.104, Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) in Arizona must certify that secure gun storage or safety devices will be available at any location where firearms are sold to non-licensees. These devices must be compatible with the firearms offered for sale. Failure to comply may result in license revocation. This requirement applies to dealers, not individual gun owners or concealed carry permit holders.
The ATF also publishes Safety and Security for Firearm Owners (ATF P 5300.22), which provides voluntary recommendations for safe firearms handling and storage to protect against theft, loss, or misuse.
| Context | Storage Requirement | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| General home storage | None - no state mandate | - |
| Public establishments requesting weapon removal | Operator must provide temporary secure storage | ARS § 13-3102.01 |
| University campuses | Locked vehicle/compartment, not visible | ARS § 12-781 |
| During declared emergencies | Cannot be restricted by government | ARS § 26-303(L) |
| Minors' access | Restrictions on furnishing to minors | ARS § 13-3109 |
| Judicial officers (probation/court) | Locked, designated storage required | ACJA § 6-113(Q) |
| Federal Firearms Licensees | Secure storage devices must be available for sale | 18 U.S.C. § 923(d) |
Although Arizona does not mandate specific storage for concealed carry permit holders, responsible storage is strongly recommended:
This section reflects Arizona law as of April 2026. Firearm laws are subject to change through legislation and court decisions. Consult current Arizona Revised Statutes and an attorney for legal advice specific to your situation.
View this topic on its own page: Storage
Arizona's "Constitutional Carry" law (effective July 29, 2010) allows any person who is 21 years of age or older and who can legally own or purchase a firearm to carry it loaded and concealed on their person without any type of permit or license anywhere inside a vehicle.
Under A.R.S. § 13-3102(A)(2), it is unlawful for a person under 21 years of age to carry a deadly weapon (except a pocket knife) concealed on their person or within their immediate control in or on a means of transportation.
However, A.R.S. § 13-3102(B)(3) provides exceptions for persons aged 18-20. A firearm is not considered unlawfully concealed if it is carried in:
Persons aged 18-20 may also openly carry a loaded firearm on their person while inside a vehicle, provided the firearm or holster is visible.
Note: This does not permit an 18-20 year old to conceal an unholstered firearm underneath a seat.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3102(A)(12) and (I)(1), possessing a deadly weapon on school grounds is generally prohibited. However, an exception applies:
Under A.R.S. § 13-3102(A)(1)(b), a person carrying a concealed deadly weapon commits misconduct involving weapons if, when contacted by a law enforcement officer, they fail to accurately answer the officer when asked whether they are carrying a concealed deadly weapon. During a stop, the law enforcement officer may take temporary custody of the firearm for the duration of the contact for officer safety purposes.
Under A.R.S. § 13-3108, political subdivisions of Arizona are prohibited from enacting any ordinance, rule, or tax relating to the transportation, possession, carrying, sale, transfer, purchase, acquisition, gift, devise, storage, licensing, registration, discharge, or use of firearms or ammunition. Any local rule that is inconsistent with or more restrictive than state law is null and void.
Political subdivisions also cannot require the licensing or registration of firearms or ammunition.
Firearm carry (open or concealed) is generally prohibited in the following locations, which may affect transport decisions:
Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), the following categories of persons are prohibited from shipping, transporting, possessing, or receiving any firearm or ammunition in interstate or foreign commerce:
View this topic on its own page: Transport
Arizona has one of the strongest state preemption laws in the country regarding firearms regulation. Under A.R.S. § 13-3108, titled "Firearms Regulated by State; State Preemption; Injunction; Civil Penalty; Cause of Action; Violation; Classification; Definition," the Arizona Legislature has broadly prohibited political subdivisions (cities, towns, counties) from enacting local firearm regulations that differ from or exceed state law.
A political subdivision of Arizona shall not enact any ordinance, rule, or tax relating to the:
This prohibition is deliberately broad - the statute uses the word "relating to," which courts have interpreted expansively to cover even indirect regulations of firearms.
Political subdivisions shall not:
A political subdivision shall not enact any rule or ordinance that:
Critically, any local rule or ordinance that is inconsistent with or more restrictive than state law - whether enacted before or after July 29, 2010 - is null and void.
The state, any agency or political subdivision, and any law enforcement agency shall not facilitate the destruction of a firearm or purchase/acquire a firearm for destruction purposes, except as authorized by A.R.S. §§ 13-3105 or 17-240.
The preemption law includes narrow exceptions allowing political subdivisions to regulate in the following areas:
Arizona's preemption law includes robust enforcement provisions:
The term "political subdivision" includes a political subdivision acting in any capacity - whether under police power, in a proprietary capacity, or otherwise. This prevents local governments from circumventing preemption by claiming they are acting as property owners rather than regulators.
The Arizona Legislature has made its preemptive intent explicit. When amending § 13-3108(A) in 2000, the Legislature included the following statement of intent:
"It is the intent of the legislature to clarify existing law relating to the state's preemption of firearms regulation in this state. Firearms regulation is of statewide concern. Therefore, the legislature intends to limit the ability of any political subdivision in this state to regulate firearms and ammunition."
In Opinion I13-010 (R13-012) (September 25, 2013), Arizona Attorney General Thomas C. Horne concluded that A.R.S. § 13-3108 preempted two City of Tucson ordinances:
The Attorney General also found that both ordinances were preempted under field preemption principles, concluding that the Legislature's comprehensive statutory scheme - using broad terms like "relating to" and applying to political subdivisions acting "in any capacity" - demonstrated a clear preemptive policy over the entire field of firearms regulation.
The opinion cited longstanding Arizona precedent that firearm possession and regulation "presents dangers to the public and the police which have 'no reference either to time or place' and which render it a 'matter of state-wide concern.'" - Clayton v. State, 38 Ariz. 135, 148-49 (1931).
In May 2025, the Arizona Legislature passed SB 1705, which would have strengthened preemption enforcement by allowing civil penalties of up to $5,000 against local officials who knowingly pass firearm restrictions in violation of state law. Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed the bill, stating it was unnecessary and would "undermine local control." The existing enforcement mechanisms in § 13-3108(H)-(K) remain in effect.
Separately, A.R.S. § 13-3107 makes it a class 6 felony to discharge a firearm with criminal negligence within the limits of any municipality. Exceptions include:
A "properly supervised range" includes ranges operated by NRA-affiliated clubs, nationally recognized shooting organizations, public/private schools, or ranges approved by federal, state, or local agencies.
The Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management imposes fire-related restrictions that may affect firearm use on state lands:
For current fire restriction status, visit dffm.az.gov/fire-restrictions or WildlandFire.az.gov.
For the full text of Arizona's firearms statutes, visit the Arizona Legislature website at azleg.gov. For personalized legal guidance, consult a qualified Arizona firearms attorney.
View this topic on its own page: Preemption
Arizona has not enacted a red-flag law. No Arizona statute authorizes courts to issue an "extreme risk protection order" (ERPO), a "gun violence restraining order" (GVRO), or a similarly named civil order whose purpose is to temporarily strip a person of firearms based on a finding of risk to self or others. Petitioning frameworks of that kind exist in other states; Arizona is not one of them. The only Arizona civil order that produces a firearm-disability effect is an order of protection issued under Arizona's domestic-violence and related civil-procedure statutes (A.R.S. 13-3601 et seq.), which interacts with federal 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) rather than with a state ERPO regime.
Arizona's firearm-possession disabilities are codified in A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(7), the "prohibited possessor" definition. The seven categories in A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(7) include a person found to constitute a danger to self or others, or to have a persistent, acute, or grave disability, by court order under A.R.S. 36-540, and whose right to possess a firearm has not been restored under A.R.S. 13-925. This is a mental-health-commitment-based disability, not an ERPO. It does not allow a family member, law-enforcement officer, or other petitioner to seek a stand-alone firearm-removal order outside of the civil commitment, criminal conviction, or protective-order frameworks already on the books.
Arizona also recognizes that a person under any order of protection issued under A.R.S. 13-3602 (domestic violence) or A.R.S. 12-1809 (injunction against harassment) may, depending on the order's specific terms and on whether the federal 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) prohibitor attaches, be barred from possessing a firearm during the order's effective period. That federal disability is independent of any Arizona-state ERPO scheme.
Because Arizona has not enacted an ERPO statute, the procedural elements that distinguish red-flag regimes elsewhere are absent in Arizona:
Because there is no ERPO statute, Arizona has no parallel state criminal penalty for violating an ERPO. Violation of an order of protection issued under A.R.S. 13-3602 is its own offense under A.R.S. 13-2810 (interfering with judicial proceedings) and A.R.S. 13-2810-adjacent provisions; that is a protective-order penalty, not a red-flag penalty. A person found to possess a firearm while subject to a qualifying domestic-violence restraining order can face federal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8); that, again, is a federal disability rather than a state ERPO consequence.
Arizona's legislature has considered red-flag proposals in recent sessions, but no such bill has been enacted. The state's policy posture has been to address risk-based disarmament through (a) civil commitment under Title 36, (b) protective orders under Title 13 Chapter 36, and (c) prohibited-possessor classifications under A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(7), rather than through a free-standing ERPO statute. Operators tracking pending legislation should consult the Arizona Legislature's bill tracker at azleg.gov for any active red-flag or ERPO bill in the current session.
This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult an Arizona attorney for fact-specific questions about protective orders, civil commitment, or firearm-disability restoration. Always verify current statutes at azleg.gov.
<!-- federal-context-block:added-2026-05-20 -->United States v. Rahimi (2024). In United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federal firearm prohibition at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) for persons subject to a qualifying domestic-violence restraining order, holding the federal disability survives the historical-tradition test of N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). Rahimi is the controlling SCOTUS authority on the constitutionality of federal firearm disabilities tied to domestic-violence findings; it bears on any state-level red-flag / ERPO analysis to the extent those frameworks borrow federal § 922(g)(8) prohibitor mechanics.
View this topic on its own page: Red Flag
Arizona's "prohibited weapons" statute, A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8), names the same hardware federal law treats as NFA items: short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, suppressors, machine guns, certain incendiary and gas devices, bombs, grenades, and improvised explosive devices. The state then carves out a complete federal-compliance exemption at A.R.S. 13-3101(B): when those items are "possessed, manufactured or transferred in compliance with federal law," they are not "prohibited weapons" under Arizona law. The practical result is that Arizona is one of the most permissive NFA jurisdictions: the federal NFA process governs and Arizona piggybacks on it without adding a separate state registration or permit layer.
Possession or manufacture of a "prohibited weapon" outside the federal-compliance exemption is criminalized by A.R.S. 13-3102(A)(3).
A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(a) defines "prohibited weapon" to include the following items:
A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(b) excludes from the "prohibited weapon" definition any state-law-compliant fireworks, propellant-actuated devices and industrial tools manufactured for their intended purposes, and devices commercially manufactured primarily for illumination.
The single most important provision for NFA owners is A.R.S. 13-3101(B): "The items set forth in subsection A, paragraph 8, subdivision (a), items (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of this section do not include any firearms or devices that are possessed, manufactured or transferred in compliance with federal law."
The items the exemption covers are exactly the federally regulated NFA categories most concealed-carry holders ask about:
What "in compliance with federal law" means in practice: registration on the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record under 26 U.S.C. Chapter 53 (the NFA), payment of any applicable making or transfer tax, completion of the appropriate ATF form (Form 1 for making, Form 4 for transfer, Form 5 for tax-free government and estate transfers, Form 5320.20 for interstate transportation of certain items), and compliance with the Gun Control Act's restrictions on prohibited possessors at 18 U.S.C. 922(g).
Note that items (v), (vi), (vii), and (viii) of A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(a) - Molotov-type devices, chemical gas devices, improvised explosive devices, and IED parts kits - are not covered by the federal-compliance exemption. Possession of those items remains criminal under Arizona law regardless of any federal registration.
| Item | Arizona treatment | Federal requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Suppressor | Lawful if federally registered (A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(a)(ii) + (B)) | Form 4 (transfer) or Form 1 (build); registration on NFRTR |
| Short-barreled rifle (SBR) | Lawful if federally registered (A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(a)(iv) + (B)) | Form 1 or Form 4; registration on NFRTR |
| Short-barreled shotgun (SBS) | Lawful if federally registered (A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(a)(iv) + (B)) | Form 1 or Form 4; registration on NFRTR |
| Any Other Weapon (AOW) | Generally lawful; A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(a) does not categorically reach AOWs, and federal-compliance exemption applies to the extent it does | Form 4 (transfer, $5 tax under current statute) or Form 1 |
| Machine gun (pre-1986 registered) | Lawful if federally registered and transferable to civilian (A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(a)(iii) + (B)) | NFRTR registration; civilian transfers limited to pre-May 19, 1986 registered machine guns under 18 U.S.C. 922(o) |
| Destructive device | Lawful if federally registered (A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(a)(i) + (B)) | NFA destructive-device registration |
| Molotov-type device | Not lawful under Arizona law regardless of federal status | (A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(a)(v); not within B's exemption) |
| Improvised explosive device | Not lawful under Arizona law regardless of federal status | (A.R.S. 13-3101(A)(8)(a)(vii); not within B's exemption) |
Manufacturing, possessing, transporting, selling, or transferring a prohibited weapon outside the federal-compliance exemption is misconduct involving weapons under A.R.S. 13-3102(A)(3). Under the classification ladder at A.R.S. 13-3102(M), an A.R.S. 13-3102(A)(3) violation is a class 4 felony in the default ladder, with elevated treatment when the conduct is tied to certain enumerated offenses or to gang, criminal-syndicate, or racketeering activity (see A.R.S. 13-3102(A)(9), (15), and (16)).
A federally registered NFA item carried or stored outside the federal-compliance envelope (for example, a registered SBR transferred to a non-licensed buyer without the required Form 4 approval) loses the A.R.S. 13-3101(B) exemption and exposes both transferor and transferee to A.R.S. 13-3102(A)(3) liability in addition to the federal NFA violation.
A.R.S. 13-3108(A) blocks Arizona cities and counties from enacting "any ordinance, rule or tax relating to the transportation, possession, carrying, sale, transfer, purchase, acquisition, gift, devise, storage, licensing, registration, discharge or use of firearms or ammunition or any firearm or ammunition components or related accessories." Localities cannot add a permit requirement, a registration requirement, or a ban on NFA items beyond what state law provides. The narrow exceptions in subsections B through G of A.R.S. 13-3108 cover government-property rules, noise regulation, and the like, none of which displace the A.R.S. 13-3101(B) exemption for federally compliant NFA items.
This summary is informational and is not legal advice. NFA enforcement turns on facts and on the ATF's interpretation of federal forms; consult an Arizona attorney and your federal NFA paperwork before relying on the rules above.
<!-- federal-context-block:added-2026-05-20 -->Bump stocks - Garland v. Cargill (2024). In Garland v. Cargill, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the federal regulation classifying bump stocks as machineguns under the National Firearms Act. As a matter of FEDERAL law, bump stocks are no longer NFA-regulated. State law may still independently restrict bump stocks; consult your state's RESTRICTIONS section for any state-level bump-stock prohibition.
P.L. 119-21 NFA tax (2026). Effective January 1, 2026, P.L. 119-21 (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed July 4, 2025) reduced the federal NFA making and transfer tax to $0 for silencers, SBRs, SBSs, and AOWs. Machine guns and destructive devices retain the $200 tax. The federal registration requirements (Form 1 / Form 4, fingerprints, photographs, CLEO notice) remain unchanged.
View this topic on its own page: Nfa Items
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3112, applicants must meet the following requirements:
Persons born outside of the United States or one of its territories must send a copy of proof of citizenship or alien status and provide an Alien Registration Number, if available. Acceptable documents include:
Arizona Department of Public Safety - Concealed Weapons Permit Unit
View this topic on its own page: Resources
No. Arizona is a constitutional carry (permitless carry) state. Arizona does not require a concealed carry license to carry a concealed firearm within the state. However, Arizona still issues concealed weapons permits (CWP) through the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) for those who wish to obtain one, which can be beneficial for reciprocity with other states and for carrying in establishments that serve alcohol.
Reference: A.R.S. § 13-3112
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(E), the Arizona DPS shall issue a permit to an applicant who meets all of the following conditions:
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(N), an applicant may demonstrate competence through any of the following:
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(E)(6), "adequate documentation" means:
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(H), the DPS shall complete all required qualification checks within 60 days after receiving the application and shall issue a permit within 15 working days after completing the qualification checks if the applicant meets all conditions.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(H), if a permit is denied, DPS shall notify the applicant in writing within 15 working days after completing all required qualification checks and shall state the reasons for the denial. The applicant then has 20 days to submit additional documentation. DPS must reconsider its decision and inform the applicant within 20 days of the result. If still denied, the applicant may request a hearing pursuant to Title 41, Chapter 6, Article 10.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(I), a permit is valid for five (5) years upon issuance. A permit held by a member of the U.S. armed forces (including Arizona National Guard or reserves) who is on federal active duty and deployed overseas shall be extended until 90 days after the end of the overseas deployment.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(K), a permit is renewable every five years. At least 60 days before the expiration date, DPS shall send a renewal reminder notice and renewal application form to the permit holder. A criminal history records check will be conducted within 60 days after receipt of the renewal application. Additional fingerprints are not required for renewal.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(A), you must carry the permit at all times when you are in actual possession of the concealed weapon and are required by A.R.S. § 4-229 or § 4-244 to carry the permit (i.e., when carrying in establishments that serve alcohol). You must present the permit for inspection to any law enforcement officer on request in those circumstances.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(C), a permittee who is required to carry a permit (under § 4-229 or § 4-244) and fails to present it for inspection upon request of a law enforcement officer is subject to a civil penalty of not more than $300. DPS shall immediately suspend the permit upon notification of the violation. However, a permittee shall not be convicted if they produce to the court a legible permit that was valid at the time of the failure to present.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(D), a law enforcement officer shall not confiscate or forfeit a weapon that is otherwise lawfully possessed by a permittee whose permit is suspended for failure to present, except that an officer may take temporary custody of a firearm during an investigatory stop.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(B), the permit of a person who is arrested or indicted for an offense that would make the person unqualified (under A.R.S. § 13-3101(A)(7) or § 13-3112) shall be immediately suspended and seized. If the person is convicted, the permit shall be revoked. The permit shall be restored upon presentation of documentation from the court if the permittee is found not guilty or the charges are dismissed, or upon documentation from the county attorney that charges were dropped or dismissed.
Yes. Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(Q), Arizona shall recognize a concealed weapon, firearm, or handgun permit or license issued by another state or political subdivision if both:
Yes. Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(A), the DPS shall prioritize applications of in-state residents when issuing a permit to carry a concealed weapon.
Yes. The Arizona Department of Public Safety maintains a license status lookup tool at https://webapps.azdps.gov/public_inq/sgrd/ShowLicenseStatus.action. You can search by name or license number. Note that the status could indicate "Issued" when the license is actually expired - always check the expiration date.
According to the DPS Licensing Unit:
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(F), the application must be completed on a form prescribed by DPS. The applicant must:
Note: The application form shall not require the applicant to disclose the type of firearm for which a permit is sought.
Per A.R.S. § 13-3112(J), DPS maintains a computerized permit record system accessible to criminal justice agencies for confirming permit status. This information and other records regarding applicants, permit holders, or instructors shall not be available to any other person or entity except on an order from a state or federal court. A criminal justice agency shall not use the system to conduct inquiries unless it has reasonable suspicion to believe the person is carrying a concealed weapon and the person is subject to a lawful criminal investigation, arrest, detention, or investigatory stop.
Key prohibited locations under Arizona law include (referencing A.R.S. § 13-3102 and related statutes in Title 13, Chapter 31):
Note: Specific prohibited locations are detailed in A.R.S. § 13-3102. Permit holders should review the full text of this statute for comprehensive information.
<!-- federal-context-block:added-2026-05-20 -->Lautenberg Amendment - 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9). A misdemeanor crime of domestic violence (MCDV) - any misdemeanor that has, as an element, the use or attempted use of physical force or the threatened use of a deadly weapon, committed against a current or former spouse, parent, guardian, person with a child in common, cohabitant, or similarly situated person - triggers a federal lifetime firearm-possession bar that is independent of state law. The federal bar applies even when the state-court conviction did not involve a firearm and even when no firearm-related penalty was imposed at sentencing. The 2024 U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Rahimi reaffirmed that federal firearm disabilities tied to domestic-violence findings remain constitutional under the Second Amendment.
View this topic on its own page: Arizona Concealed Carry - Frequently Asked Questions
Browse local instructors offering state-approved training in your area. Book online, complete your training, and get one step closer to your concealed carry permit.